王广福1, 于桂生1, 周公威2. 1984: 最小相位地震仪及其相频特性的确定. 地震学报, 6(1): 98-110.
引用本文: 王广福1, 于桂生1, 周公威2. 1984: 最小相位地震仪及其相频特性的确定. 地震学报, 6(1): 98-110.
WANG GUANGFUup, YU GUISHENGup, ZHOU GONGWEIup2. 1984: MINIMUM-PHASE SEISMOGRAPHS AND THE DETERMINATION OF THEIR PHASE RESPONSES. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 6(1): 98-110.
Citation: WANG GUANGFUup, YU GUISHENGup, ZHOU GONGWEIup2. 1984: MINIMUM-PHASE SEISMOGRAPHS AND THE DETERMINATION OF THEIR PHASE RESPONSES. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 6(1): 98-110.

最小相位地震仪及其相频特性的确定

MINIMUM-PHASE SEISMOGRAPHS AND THE DETERMINATION OF THEIR PHASE RESPONSES

  • 摘要: 本文根据最小相位系统判据,对目前我国地震台站普遍使用的几种类型地震仪做了分析指出,这些仪器都是最小相位系统;最小相位系统的相频特性可由其幅频特性计算出来.作者按照地震台站观测规范规定,标定了 DD-1型、DK-1型和基式地震仪的幅频特性.然后,用希尔伯特(Hilbert)变换由实测幅频特性计算了它们的相频特性.并把计算结果与用相位特性测试仪器实测的结果做了比较:对于 DD-1型地震仪,在从0.0125秒到12.5秒的周期范围内,最大误差小于5;对于 DK-1地震仪,在从0.05秒到100秒的周期内,最大误差小于5;对于基式地震仪,在从0.01秒到100秒的周期范围内,最大误差小于1.5.这种方法可以解决台站仪器相频特性的标定问题.标定精度比快速傅里叶变换(FFT)方法和用近似解析表达式计算方法要高.应用这种方法的关键是能对被测系统幅频特性曲线高频段和低频段的斜率做出正确的判断.这种方法的误差取决于幅频特性曲线的标定精度.用插值方法计算,计算的尾差和截断误差可以不必考虑.

     

    Abstract: On the basis of minimum-phase criteria analysis has been made for some kinds of seismographs which are now in common use at Chinese seismological stations. The result shows that such seismographs are minimum-phase systems. The phase responses may be calculated from their amplitude responses.According to The Operating Code for eismological Observation promulgated by State Seismological Bureau the amplitude desponse of the type DD-1, DK-1, and SK seismographs have been calibrated and their phase responses were calculated from these amplitude responses by the Hilbert transformation. The calculated phase responses were compared with that measured by a phasometer. The maximum error was found to be less than 5 for type DD-1 and DK-1 seismographs in the period range from 0.0125 s to 12.5 s and 0.05 s to 100 s, respectively. For type SK seismograph in the period range of 0.01s to 100s the maximum error is less than 1.5.This technique may be used to calibrate the seismograph phase response at the permanent stations. It is more accurate than the FFT method and the analytical method by means of approximate expression of a transfer function.The key to the use of this technique lies in the correct judgement of the slopes of the higher and lower frequency parts of the amplitude response curve. The error depends on the calibration accuracy of the amplitude response. By interpolation the tail and the truncation error may be neglected.

     

/

返回文章
返回