从西南印度洋中脊轴部形态及其两侧沉降速率变化探讨热点与洋中脊相互作用

王昊, 谭平川, 阮爱国

王昊,谭平川,阮爱国. 2023. 从西南印度洋中脊轴部形态及其两侧沉降速率变化探讨热点与洋中脊相互作用. 地震学报,45(3):455−470. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220186
引用本文: 王昊,谭平川,阮爱国. 2023. 从西南印度洋中脊轴部形态及其两侧沉降速率变化探讨热点与洋中脊相互作用. 地震学报,45(3):455−470. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220186
Wang H,Tan P C,Ruan A G. 2023. Discussion on the interaction between hot spots and mid-ocean ridge from the axial morphology and the variation of subsidence rate on both sides of the Southwest Indian Ridge. Acta Seismologica Sinica45(3):455−470. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220186
Citation: Wang H,Tan P C,Ruan A G. 2023. Discussion on the interaction between hot spots and mid-ocean ridge from the axial morphology and the variation of subsidence rate on both sides of the Southwest Indian Ridge. Acta Seismologica Sinica45(3):455−470. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220186

从西南印度洋中脊轴部形态及其两侧沉降速率变化探讨热点与洋中脊相互作用

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(42076047,42006072)、自然资源部第二海洋研究所所基金(HYGG2001)和浙江省钱江人才D基金(QJD2002033)共同资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王昊,在读硕士研究生,主要从事海洋地质研究,e-mail:2412859450@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    阮爱国,博士,研究员,主要从事海洋地球物理与深部构造研究,e-mail:ruanag@163.com

  • 中图分类号: P736

Discussion on the interaction between hot spots and mid-ocean ridge from the axial morphology and the variation of subsidence rate on both sides of the Southwest Indian Ridge

  • 摘要: 基于高精度地形数据,将西南印度洋中脊(11.88°E—66.75°E)分为6个区域,按不同区域分析洋脊轴部形态及其两侧基底沉降曲线的变化,由此探讨西南印度洋中脊的岩浆活动及其受热点影响的机制。结果显示:① 对于整个西南印度洋中脊,轴部隆起占13.38%,轴部裂谷占82.8%,平坦过渡形占3.82%,其中19°E,36°E,41.2°E,43.7°E,50.4°E和64.5°E等处为较集中的洋脊轴部隆起;② 埃里克辛普森—英多姆转换断层之间的区域(39.4°E—45.77°E)显示出异常浅的轴部裂谷和异常小且南北不对称的基底沉降速率,这表明埃里克辛普森—英多姆转换断层之间的区域是热点对洋中脊影响较为明显的区域,南侧较北侧异常小的基底沉降速率表明热点与洋中脊的相互作用主要表现为热点岩浆从洋中脊南部向上流动到岩石圈底部,然后与岩石圈发生相互作用。
    Abstract: Based on high resolution seafloor bathymetry map, we divided the Southwest Indian Ridg (SWIR) (11.88°E—66.75°E) into six regions. In each region, we estimate the variation of the axial morphology, and the basement subsidence curve over the flanks of the spreading ridge, which can be used to indicate the spreading process of the SWIR and how it was affected by the hot spot. The result shows that: ① For the entire SWIR, axial uplift accounts for 13.38%, axial rift accounts for 82.8%, and flat transitional shape accounts for 3.82%, the areas at 19°E, 36°E, 41.2°E, 43.7°E, 50.4°E, 64.5°E have focus magmatic ridge representing axial ridge uplift; ② The area between the Eric Simpson-Indomed transition faults (39.4°E—45.77°E) shows axial valley with anomalous shallow bathymetry and asymmetrical anomalous low basement subsidence rates between north and south. Therefore, we believe that the area between the Eric Simpson-Indomed transition faults has been significantly affected by the hot spots. Compared with the subsidence rate north of the spreading ridge, the anomalous low subsidence rate in the south indicates that the interaction between the hot spots and the ridge is characterized by the hot spots flowing upward from the south of the SWIR to the bottom of the lithosphere, and then interact with the lithosphere.
  • 图  11   SWIR沉降速率随与马里昂热点(a)及克洛泽热点(b)距离的变化图

    Figure  11.   Diagram of sedimentation rate variation with distance from Marion hot spot (a) and Corzet hot spot (b)

    图  1   西南印度洋地形图及分区

    SWIR:西南印度洋中脊;SEIR:东南印度洋中脊;CIR:中印度洋中脊;BTJ:布维三连点;RTJ:罗得里格斯三连点;SH:沙卡;DT:迪图瓦;AB:安德鲁贝恩;M:马里昂;PE:爱德华王子;ES:埃里克辛普森;DII:发现Ⅱ号;IN:英多姆;GA:加列尼;AII:亚特兰提斯Ⅱ号;MEL:梅尔。下同

    Figure  1.   Topographic map of Southwest Indian Ocean

    SWIR:Southwest Indian Ridge;SEIR:Southeast Indian Ridge;CIR:Central Indian Ridge;BTJ:Bouvet Triple Junction;RTJ:Rodriguez Triple Junction;SH:Shaka;DT:Du Toit;AB:Andrew Bain;M:Marion;PE:Prince Edward;ES:Eric Simpson;DII:Discovery Ⅱ ;IN:Indomed;GA:Gallieni;AII:Atlantis Ⅱ ;MEL:Melville. The same below

    图  2   SWIR沿轴水深、地幔布格重力异常MBA和玄武岩Na8含量变化图(修改自Sauter,Cannat,2010

    图中纵向灰色实线为转换断层位置。(a) 沿轴水深;(b) 沿轴MBA变化(Georgen et al,2001);(c) 玄武岩Na8含量变化

    Figure  2.   Variation of the depth,MBA,Na8 composition of basalts along the SWIR axis(modified after Sauter,Cannat,2010

    The vertical gray solid line indicates the location of transform faults. (a) Depth;(b) Mantle Bouguer anomaly (Georgen et al,2001); (c) Na8 composition of basalts

    图  3   西南印度洋中脊玄武岩同位素比值变化图(修改自孙国洪等,2021

    Figure  3.   Variations in isotopic ratios of MORBs along SWIR (modified after Sun et al,2021

    图  4   沿西南印度洋中脊的水深拟合图

    红色实线为最佳高斯拟合线;灰色条带为转换断层发育位置;红色条带为热点投影到洋中脊的位置;ABCDEF为洋脊研究分区

    Figure  4.   Fitting diagram of seafloor depth along SWIR

    The solid red line is the best Gaussian fitting line;the gray stripes indicate the location of transition faults;the red stripe is the location where the plume is projected onto the mid-ocean ridge; ABCDEF are the segmented study areas

    图  5   沿西南印度洋中脊采样以及扩张方向示意图

    (a) 水深地形图;(b) 磁异常分布图,磁异常数据来源于全球2′分辨率磁力网格数据EMAG2 (Maus et al,2009

    Figure  5.   Schematic diagram of sampling along SWIR and its spreading direction

    (a) Topographic map;(b) The magnetic anomalies map,and the magnetic anomaly data are from EMAG2 (Maus et al,2009

    图  6   西南印度洋中脊轴部形态示意图

    (a) 富岩浆段洋中脊轴部隆起形态;(b) 富岩浆段至贫岩浆段的过渡形态;(c) 贫岩浆段洋中脊轴部凹陷形态

    Figure  6.   Schematic diagram of axial morphology of mid-ocean ridge

    (a) Axial rise characterized by rich magmatic supply;(b) A transitional type between the axis rise and valley; (c) Axial valley marked by poor magmatic supply

    图  7   沉降曲线示意图

    Figure  7.   Schematic diagram of basement subsidence curves

    图  8   SWIR轴部地形图(灰色和红色条带意义同图4

    Figure  8.   SWIR axial morphology (The meaning of gray and red stripes are the same as in fig.4)

    图  9   轴部裂谷深度随与马里昂热点(a)及克洛泽热点(b)距离的变化图

    Figure  9.   Diagram of axial rift depth variation with distance from Marion hot spot (a) and Corzet hot spot (b)

    图  10   SWIR沉降速率图

    图(a)中红色实线为各研究区域内沉降速率的拟合线,品红色虚线为SWIR沉降速率平均值,蓝色阴影为全球沉降速率均值范围(Stein,Stein,1992Crosby,McKenzie,2009);图(b)中蓝色和黑针线分别为洋中脊北侧沉降速率减去南侧所得的正值与负值,灰色及红色条带与图4同。顶部红色区域显示洋脊轴部隆起所占比例(a) 沉降速率沿轴变化图;(b) 洋脊两侧沉降速率差值沿轴变化图

    Figure  10.   SWIR sedimentation rate diagram

    In fig.(a),the solid red line is the best fit line of the subsidence rate along the SWIR, the red dotted line shows an average SWIR subsidence rate,while the horizontal blue stripes represent the global subsidence rate (Stein, Stein,1992Crosby,McKenzie,2009);In fig.(b),the black and blue lines indicate the values of difference between the northern and southern subsidence rate. The vertical gray and red stripes indicate the same meaning as in fig.4. The red areas at top represent the percentage of the axial rise for each region. (a) Subsidence rate variation along SWIR;(b) Axial variation of the difference between northern and southern subsidence rate

    图  12   轴部裂谷深度与沉降速率散点图

    Figure  12.   Scatter plot of axial valley depth versus subsidence rate

    图  13   热点与洋中脊相互作用示意图

    Figure  13.   Diagram of interaction between hot spot and mid-ocean ridge

    表  1   SWIR各研究区域的扩张轴部深度及沉降速率均值表

    Table  1   Axial valley depth and subsidence rate of each area in SWIR

    各研究分区轴部裂谷深度/km沉降速率/(km·Ma−1/2
    A−1.090.393
    B−0.480.244
    C−0.370.129
    D−0.950.407
    E−1.400.420
    F−1.140.414
    SWIR−1.000.368
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 胡昊. 2020. 用OBS远震接收函数方法研究西南印度洋中脊深部结构及洋脊-热点相互作用[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学: 94–99.

    Hu H. 2020. Using OBS Teleseismic Receiver Function to Study the Deep Structure of the Southwest Indian Ridge and Interaction of the Ridge-Hotspot System[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University: 94–99 (in Chinese).

    李三忠,索艳慧,余珊,赵淑娟,戴黎明,曹花花,张臻,刘为勇,张国堙. 2015. 西南印度洋构造地貌与构造过程[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,39(1):15–29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2015.01.002

    Li S Z,Suo Y H,Yu S,Zhao S J,Dai L M,Cao H H,Zhang Z,Liu W Y,Zhang G Y. 2015. Morphotectonics and tectonic processes of the southwest Indian Ocean[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia,39(1):15–29 (in Chinese).

    刘持恒,李江海,张华添,刘仲兰,范庆凯. 2018. 西南印度洋岩浆补给特征研究:来自洋壳厚度的证据[J]. 地球物理学报,61(7):2859–2870.

    Liu C H,Li J H,Zhang H T,Liu Z L,Fan Q K. 2018. Magma supply of the southwest Indian Ocean:Evidence from crustal thickness anomalies[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,61(7):2859–2870 (in Chinese).

    孙国洪,田丽艳,李小虎,张汉羽,陈凌轩,刘红玲. 2021. 西南印度洋中脊岩石地球化学特征及其岩浆作用研究[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,41(5):126–138.

    Sun G H,Tian L Y,Li X H,Zhang H Y,Chen L X,Liu H L. 2021. A review of studies on the magmatism at Southwest Indian Ridge from petrological and geochemical perspectives[J]. Marine Geology &Quaternary Geology,41(5):126–138 (in Chinese).

    余星,迪克·亨利,李小虎,初凤友,董彦辉,胡航. 2020. 西南印度洋中脊地质构造特征及其地球动力学意义[J]. 地球物理学报,63(10):3585–3603.

    Yu X,Dick H,Li X H,Chu F Y,Dong Y H,Hu H. 2020. The geotectonic features of the Southwest Indian Ridge and its geodynamic implications[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,63(10):3585–3603 (in Chinese).

    Albers M,Christensen U R. 2001. Channeling of plume flow beneath mid-ocean ridges[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett,187(1/2):207–220.

    Anderson M O,Chadwick Jr W W,Hannington M D,Merle S G,Resing J A,Baker E T,Butterfield D A,Walker S L,Augustin N. 2017. Geological interpretation of volcanism and segmentation of the Mariana back-arc spreading center between 12.7°N and 18.3°N[J]. Geochem,Geophys,Geosyst,18(6):2240–2274.

    Baines A G,Cheadle M J,Dick H J B,Scheirer A H,John B E,Kusznir N J,Matsumoto T. 2007. Evolution of the Southwest Indian Ridge from 55°45′E to 62°E:Changes in plate-boundary geometry since 26 Ma[J]. Geochem,Geophys,Geosyst,8(6):Q06022.

    Buck W R,Lavier L L,Poliakov A N B. 2005. Modes of faulting at mid-ocean ridges[J]. Nature,434(7034):719–723. doi: 10.1038/nature03358

    Cannat M,Rommevaux-Jestin C,Sauter D,Deplus C,Mendel V. 1999. Formation of the axial relief at the very slow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (49° to 69°E)[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,104(B10):22825–22843. doi: 10.1029/1999JB900195

    Chen Y S,Morgan W J. 1990a. A nonlinear rheology model for mid-ocean ridge axis topography[J]. J Geophys Res,95(B11):17583–17604. doi: 10.1029/JB095iB11p17583

    Chen Y S,Morgan W J. 1990b. Rift valley/no rift valley transition at mid-ocean ridges[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,95(B11):17571–17581. doi: 10.1029/JB095iB11p17571

    Crosby A G,McKenzie D. 2009. An analysis of young ocean depth,gravity and global residual topography[J]. Geophys J Int,178(3):1198–1219. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04224.x

    Dick H J B,Lin J,Schouten H. 2003. An ultraslow-spreading class of ocean ridge[J]. Nature,426(6965):405–412. doi: 10.1038/nature02128

    Dutkiewicz A,Müller R D,Wang X,O’Callaghan S,Cannon J,Wright N M. 2017. Predicting sediment thickness on vanished ocean crust since 200 Ma[J]. Geochem,Geophys,Geosyst,18(12):4586–4603.

    Font L,Murton B J,Roberts S,Tindle A G. 2007. Variations in melt productivity and melting conditions along SWIR (70°E–49°E):Evidence from olivine-hosted and plagioclase-hosted melt inclusions[J]. J Petrol,48(8):1471–1494. doi: 10.1093/petrology/egm026

    Gautheron C,Moreira M,Gerin C,Tassan-Got L,Bezos A,Humler E. 2015. Constraints on the DUPAL anomaly from helium isotope systematics in the Southwest Indian mid-ocean ridge basalts[J]. Chem Geol,417:163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.10.005

    Georgen J E,Lin J,Dick H J B. 2001. Evidence from gravity anomalies for interactions of the Marion and Bouvet hotspots with the Southwest Indian Ridge:Effects of transform offsets[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett,187(3/4):283–300.

    Georgen J E. 2014. Interaction of a mantle plume and a segmented mid-ocean ridge:Results from numerical modeling[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett,392:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2014.01.035

    Hirth G,Kohlstedt D L. 1996. Water in the oceanic upper mantle:Implications for rheology,melt extraction and the evolution of the lithosphere[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett,144(1/2):93–108.

    Ito G,Shen Y,Hirth G,Wolfe C J. 1999. Mantle flow,melting,and dehydration of the Iceland mantle plume[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett,165(1):81–96. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00216-7

    Jian H C,Singh S C,Chen Y J,Li J B. 2017a. Evidence of an axial magma chamber beneath the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge[J]. Geology,45(2):143–146. doi: 10.1130/G38356.1

    Jian H C,Chen Y J,Singh S C,Li J B,Zhao M H,Ruan A G,Qiu X L. 2017b. Seismic structure and magmatic construction of crust at the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge at 50°28′E[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,122(1):18–42. doi: 10.1002/2016JB013377

    Li J B,Jian H C,Chen Y J,Singh S C,Ruan A G,Qiu X L,Zhao M H,Wang X G,Niu X W,Ni J Y,Zhang J Z. 2015. Seismic observation of an extremely magmatic accretion at the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge[J]. Geophys Res Lett,42(8):2656–2663. doi: 10.1002/2014GL062521

    Lin J,Parmentier E M. 1989. Mechanisms of lithospheric extension at mid-ocean ridges[J]. Geophys J Int,96(1):1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1989.tb05246.x

    Lin J,Purdy G M,Schouten H,Sempere J C,Zervas C. 1990. Evidence from gravity data for focused magmatic accretion along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge[J]. Nature,344(6267):627–632. doi: 10.1038/344627a0

    Marks K M,Stock J M. 1994. Variations in ridge morphology and depth-age relationships on the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,99(B1):531–541. doi: 10.1029/93JB02760

    Maus S,Barckhausen U,Berkenbosch H,Bournas N,Brozena J,Childers V,Dostaler F,Fairhead J D,Finn C,von Frese R R B,Gaina C,Golynsky S,Kucks R,Lühr H,Milligan P,Mogren S,Müller R D,Olesen O,Pilkington M,Saltus R,Schreckenberger B,Thébault E,Caratori Tontini F. 2009. EMAG2:A 2–arc min resolution Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid compiled from satellite,airborne,and marine magnetic measurements[J]. Geochem,Geophys,Geosyst,10(8):Q08005.

    McDougall I A N,Verwoerd W,Chevallier L U C. 2001. K-Ar geochronology of Marion Island,Southern Ocean[J]. Geol Mag,138(1):1–17. doi: 10.1017/S0016756801005039

    McKenzie D P. 1967. Some remarks on heat flow and gravity anomalies[J]. J Geophys Res,72(24):6261–6273. doi: 10.1029/JZ072i024p06261

    Mendel V, Sauter D, Rommevaux-Jestin C, Patriat P, Lefebvre F, Parson L M. 2003. Magmato-tectonic cyclicity at the ultra-slow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge: Evidence from variations of axial volcanic ridge morphology and abyssal hills pattern[J]. Geochem, Geophys, Geosyst, 4(5): 9102.

    Meyzen C M, Ludden J N, Humler E, Luais B, Toplis M J, Mével C, Storey M. 2005. New insights into the origin and distribution of the DUPAL isotope anomaly in the Indian Ocean mantle from MORB of the Southwest Indian Ridge[J]. Geochem, Geophys, Geosyst, 6(11): Q11K11.

    Minshull T A,Muller M R,White R S. 2006. Crustal structure of the Southwest Indian Ridge at 66°E:Seismic constraints[J]. Geophys J Int,166(1):135–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03001.x

    Muller M R,Robinson C J,Minshull T A,White R S,Bickle M J. 1997. Thin crust beneath ocean drilling program borehole 735B at the Southwest Indian Ridge?[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett,148(1/2):93–107.

    Muller M R,Minshull T A,White R S. 2000. Crustal structure of the Southwest Indian Ridge at the Atlantis II fracture zone[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,105(B11):25809–25828. doi: 10.1029/2000JB900262

    Niu X W,Ruan A G,Li J B,Minshull T A,Sauter D,Wu Z L,Qiu X L,Zhao M H,Chen Y J,Singh S. 2015. Along-axis variation in crustal thickness at the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (50°E) from a wide-angle seismic experiment[J]. Geochem,Geophys,Geosyst,16(2):468–485.

    Parson B,Sclater J G. 1997. An analysis of the variation of ocean floor bathymetry and heat flow with age[J]. J Geophys Res,82(5):803–827.

    Patriat P,Sloan H,Sauter D. 2008. From slow to ultraslow:A previously undetected event at the Southwest Indian Ridge at ca. 24 Ma[J]. Geology,36(3):207–210. doi: 10.1130/G24270A.1

    Ruan A G,Hu H,Li J B,Niu X W,Wei X D,Zhang J,Wang A X. 2017. Crustal structure and mantle transition zone thickness beneath a hydrothermal vent at the ultra-slow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (49°39′E):A supplementary study based on passive seismic receiver functions[J]. Mar Geophys Res,38(1):39–46.

    Sauter D,Patriat P,Rommevaux-Jestin C,Cannat M,Briais A,Gallieni Shipboard Scientific Party. 2001. The Southwest Indian Ridge between 49°15′E and 57°E:Focused accretion and magma redistribution[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett,192(3):303–317. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00455-1

    Sauter D, Carton H, Mendel V, Munschy M, Rommevaux-Jestin C, Schott J J, Whitechurch H. 2004. Ridge segmentation and the magnetic structure of the Southwest Indian Ridge (at 50°30′E, 55°30′E and 66°20′E): Implications for magmatic processes at ultraslow-spreading centers[J]. Geochem, Geophys, Geosyst, 5(5): Q05K08.

    Sauter D,Cannat M,Meyzen C,Bezos A,Patriat P,Humler E,Debayle E. 2009. Propagation of a melting anomaly along the ultraslow Southwest Indian Ridge between 46°E and 52°20′E:Interaction with the Crozet hotspot?[J]. Geophys J Int,179(2):687–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04308.x

    Sauter D, Cannat M. 2010. The ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian ridge[G]//Diversity of Hydrothermal Systems on Slow Spreading Ocean Ridges. Washington: American Geophysical Union: 153–173.

    Sauter D,Cannat M,Rouméjon S,Andreani M,Birot D,Bronner A,Brunelli D,Carlut J,Delacour A,Guyader V,MacLeod C J,Manatschal G,Mendel V,Ménez B,Pasini V,Ruellan E,Searle R. 2013. Continuous exhumation of mantle-derived rocks at the Southwest Indian Ridge for 1 1 million years[J]. Nat Geosci,6(4):314–320. doi: 10.1038/ngeo1771

    Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego. 2023. Index of /pub/archive/srtm15/V1[EB/OL]. [2022-08-23]. https://topex.ucsd.edu/pub/archive/srtm15/V1/

    Seton M, Müller R D, Zahirovic S, Williams S, Wright N M, Cannon J, Whittaker J M, Matthews K J, McGirr R. 2020. A global data set of present-day oceanic crustal age and seafloor spreading parameters[J]. Geochem, Geophys, Geosyst, 21(10): e2020GC009214.

    Sloan H,Sauter D,Goff J A,Cannat M. 2012. Abyssal hill characterization at the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge[J]. Geochem,Geophys,Geosyst,13(2):Q0AE06.

    Stein C A,Stein S. 1992. A model for the global variation in oceanic depth and heat flow with lithospheric age[J]. Nature,359(6391):123–129. doi: 10.1038/359123a0

    Storey M,Mahoney J J,Saunders A D,Duncan R A,Kelley S P,Coffin M F. 1995. Timing of hot spot-related volcanism and the breakup of Madagascar and India[J]. Science,267(5199):852–855. doi: 10.1126/science.267.5199.852

    Tao C H,Lin J,Guo S Q,Chen Y J,Wu G H,Han X Q,German C R,Yoerger D R,Zhou N,Li H M,Su X,Zhu J,the DY115-19 (Legs 1–2) and DY115-20 (Legs 4–7) Science Parties. 2012. First active hydrothermal vents on an ultraslow-spreading center:Southwest Indian Ridge[J]. Geology,40(1):47–50. doi: 10.1130/G32389.1

    Tapponnier P,Francheteau J. 1978. Necking of the lithosphere and the mechanics of slowly accreting plate boundaries[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,83(B8):3955–3970. doi: 10.1029/JB083iB08p03955

    Turcotte D L,Oxburgh E R. 1969. Convection in a mantle with variable physical properties[J]. J Geophys Res,74(6):1458–1474. doi: 10.1029/JB074i006p01458

    Vogt P R,Johnson G L. 1975. Transform faults and longitudinal flow below the Midoceanic Ridge[J]. J Geophys Res,80(11):1399–1428. doi: 10.1029/JB080i011p01399

    Wessel P, Smith W H F. 1995. New version of the generic mapping tools[J]. Eos, Trans Am Geophys Union, 76(33): 329.

    White R S,McKenzie D,O’Nions R K. 1992. Oceanic crustal thickness from seismic measurements and rare earth element inversions[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,97(B13):19683–19715. doi: 10.1029/92JB01749

    Whittaker J M,Goncharov A,Williams S E,Müller R D,Leitchenkov G. 2013. Global sediment thickness data set updated for the Australian-Antarctic Southern Ocean[J]. Geochem,Geophys,Geosyst,14(8):3297–3305.

    Yale M M,Morgan J P. 1998. Asthenosphere flow model of hotspot-ridge interactions:A comparison of Iceland and Kerguelen[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett,161(1/2/3/4):45–56.

    Yang A Y,Zhao T P,Zhou M F,Deng X G. 2017. Isotopically enriched N-MORB:A new geochemical signature of off-axis plume-ridge interaction:A case study at 50°28′E,Southwest Indian Ridge[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,122(1):191–213.

    Zhang T,Lin J,Gao J Y. 2011. Interactions between hotspots and the Southwest Indian Ridge during the last 90 Ma:Implications on the formation of oceanic plateaus and intra-plate seamounts[J]. Science China Earth Sciences,54(8):1177–1188. doi: 10.1007/s11430-011-4219-9

    Zhang T,Lin J,Gao J Y. 2013. Magmatism and tectonic processes in Area A hydrothermal vent on the Southwest Indian Ridge[J]. Science China Earthquake Science,56(12):2186–2197. doi: 10.1007/s11430-013-4630-5

    Zhao M H,Qiu X L,Li J B,Sauter D,Ruan A G,Chen J,Cannat M,Singh S,Zhang J Z,Wu Z L,Niu X W. 2013. Three-dimensional seismic structure of the Dragon Flag oceanic core complex at the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (49°39′E)[J]. Geochem,Geophys,Geosyst,14(10):4544–4563.

图(13)  /  表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  331
  • HTML全文浏览量:  130
  • PDF下载量:  111
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-09-29
  • 修回日期:  2022-12-14
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-04-03
  • 发布日期:  2023-05-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回