关于地震烈度衰减模型的系统偏差

沈建文, 华宜平

沈建文, 华宜平. 1989: 关于地震烈度衰减模型的系统偏差. 地震学报, 11(1): 38-45.
引用本文: 沈建文, 华宜平. 1989: 关于地震烈度衰减模型的系统偏差. 地震学报, 11(1): 38-45.
SHEN JIANWEN, HUA YIPING h. 1989: ON THE SYSTEMATIC DEVIATION OF SEISMIC INTENSITY ATTENUATION MODELS. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 11(1): 38-45.
Citation: SHEN JIANWEN, HUA YIPING h. 1989: ON THE SYSTEMATIC DEVIATION OF SEISMIC INTENSITY ATTENUATION MODELS. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 11(1): 38-45.

关于地震烈度衰减模型的系统偏差

ON THE SYSTEMATIC DEVIATION OF SEISMIC INTENSITY ATTENUATION MODELS

  • 摘要: 本文讨论在地震危险性分析中目前使用广泛的地震烈度衰减模型,即Cornell建立的点源模型和洪华生(A.H-S.Ang)等建立的断层-破裂模型。与实际烈度资料的比较表明,在等震线狭长的区域,点源模型有系统偏差,通常这种偏差不算严重。为了克服上述偏差,断层-破裂模型引进了破裂长度的概念,但其衰减与实际资料出入较大。与实际地震等震线的比较和计算表明,对大地震沿断层或等震线长轴方向,断层破裂模型总是高估高烈度区而低估低烈度区。此外,本文分析了断层破裂模型产生系统偏差的原因,讨论了点椭圆模型的合理性,并用地震危险性分析实例做了说明。
    Abstract: In this paper,discussions are made on the widely applied intensity attenuation models of seismic hazard analysis: the point-source model introduced by Cornell,C. A. and the fault-rupture model given by Der Kiureghian and A. H-S. Ang. Comparisons with practical intensity data show that there is systematic deviation which isn't very large in the results given by point-source model for regions where isoseismals are of elongated shapes. To reduce the above deviation,the concept of rupture length is introduced into the fault-rupture model,but the attenuation is quite different from practical dam. Comparisons with isoseismals of actual earthquakes and computation show that the results given by the fault-rupture model overestimate the attenuation in high-intensity area and underestimate it in low-intensity area along the directions of fault or the major axis of the isoseismals. The reason causing such systematic deviation in the fault-rupture model is analysed,and the rationality of the empirical ellipse model is discussed,with illustration by examples of seismic hazard analysis.
  • [1] Cornell, C. A., 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 58, 1583——1606.

    [2] Der Kiureghian, A., and Ang, A. H——S., 1977. A faultrupture model for seismic risk analysis.Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 67, 1173——1194.

    [3] 顾功叙,1983.中国地震目录〔公元1970——1979年),地震出版社.

    [4] 马宗晋、傅征祥、张黔珍、汪成民、张国民、刘德富,1980.1966——1976年中国九大地震,7——11,地震出版社.

    [5] 国家地震局全国地震烈度区划图组,1979,中国地震等烈度线图集,97——106,地震出版社.

    [6] 沈建文、华宜平,邱瑛、孔令磊,地震危险性分析的经验点椭圆模型,地震学报,待发表.

    [1] Cornell, C. A., 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 58, 1583——1606.

    [2] Der Kiureghian, A., and Ang, A. H——S., 1977. A faultrupture model for seismic risk analysis.Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 67, 1173——1194.

    [3] 顾功叙,1983.中国地震目录〔公元1970——1979年),地震出版社.

    [4] 马宗晋、傅征祥、张黔珍、汪成民、张国民、刘德富,1980.1966——1976年中国九大地震,7——11,地震出版社.

    [5] 国家地震局全国地震烈度区划图组,1979,中国地震等烈度线图集,97——106,地震出版社.

    [6] 沈建文、华宜平,邱瑛、孔令磊,地震危险性分析的经验点椭圆模型,地震学报,待发表.

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1434
  • HTML全文浏览量:  20
  • PDF下载量:  134
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2011-09-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回