吴庆鹏1, 于淑筠1, 周家庆2. 1980: 上海台重力固体潮观测结果(1978年4月—8月)的调和分析. 地震学报, 2(4): 413-424.
引用本文: 吴庆鹏1, 于淑筠1, 周家庆2. 1980: 上海台重力固体潮观测结果(1978年4月—8月)的调和分析. 地震学报, 2(4): 413-424.
WU QING-PENGup, YU SHU-JUNup, ZHOU JIA-QINGup2. 1980: HARMONIC ANALYSIS OF THE GRAVITY TIDAL DATA OBSERVED AT THE SHANGHAI STATION FROM APRIL TO AUGUST, 1978. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2(4): 413-424.
Citation: WU QING-PENGup, YU SHU-JUNup, ZHOU JIA-QINGup2. 1980: HARMONIC ANALYSIS OF THE GRAVITY TIDAL DATA OBSERVED AT THE SHANGHAI STATION FROM APRIL TO AUGUST, 1978. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2(4): 413-424.

上海台重力固体潮观测结果(1978年4月—8月)的调和分析

HARMONIC ANALYSIS OF THE GRAVITY TIDAL DATA OBSERVED AT THE SHANGHAI STATION FROM APRIL TO AUGUST, 1978

  • 摘要: 上海重力固体潮台站位于j=31.1°, =121.2°, 利用安装在山洞内的 GS-15 NO.227重力仪进行观测.山洞内年平均温度为18.8°C, 年温差为0.3℃.重力仪的记录格值为2.99微伽/毫米.利用勒卡拉兹方法和维涅第科夫方法对1978年4月—8月共142日的连续观测结果进行了调和分析.勒卡拉兹调和分析方法所得结果是: δ(M2)=1.142,  δ(K1)=1.164,  δ(O1)=1.192, δ(O1)—δ(K1)=0.028. 维涅第科夫调和分析方法所得结果是: δ(M2)=1.142, δ(K1)=1.166, δ(O1)=1.189, δ(O1)—δ(K1)=0.023. 此外, 在北京大学 DJS-18电子计算机上对勒卡拉兹调和分析方法和维涅第科夫调和分析方法进行了精度检验.检验结果是: 1)勒卡拉兹方法对M2S2N2K1O1五个主要波群来说, 确定的精度约为1%, 确定相位差的精度约为1. 2)维涅第科夫方法的精度与资料长度有关.一般说来, 资料越长, 精度越高.当资料长度取为90天时, 对M2S2K1O1, 五个波群来说, 确定δ的精度约为1%, 确定位相差的精度为0.5°.

     

    Abstract: The shanghai gravity tidal station is located at =31.1°N, =112.2°E, using a gravimeter type GS-15 No. 227 installed in a tunnel. The annual mean temperature in the tunnel is 18.8℃, the annual deviation of which is 0.3℃. The scale value of the gravimeter is 2.99 gal/mm. The data continuously observed from April to August in 1978 (142 days) were analysed by both the methods of Lecolazet and Venedikov. The results of analysis by the method of Lecolazet are as follows: δ(M2)= 1.142, δ(K1)= 1.164, δ(O1)= 1.192, δ(O1)-(K1)= 0.028, while that by the method of Venedikav are:  δ(M2)=1.142, δ(K1)=1.166, δ(O1)=1.189, δ(O1)-δ(K1)=0.023. Besides, the accuracy of methods of Lecolazet and Venedikov were tested on the electronic computer DJS-18 of the Peking university. The test results are as follows:(1) For method of Lecolazet, the accuracy of determination of gravimetric factor δ of the main waves M2, S2, N2, K1, O1, is about 1%, while the accuracy of determination of the phase difference of the same main wave is about 1.(2) For method of Venedikov, the accuracy of analysis depends on the length of the observational data, in general the longer the data, the more accurate the result. When the length of the data is 90 days, the accuracy of determination of the gravimetric factor δ  of the main waves M2, S2, N2, K1, O1 is about 1% the accuracy of determination of phase difference of the same main wave is about 0.5°.

     

/

返回文章
返回