首都圈地区土壤气Rn, Hg, CO2地球化学特征及其成因

王喜龙, 李营, 杜建国, 陈志, 周晓成, 李新艳, 崔月菊, 王海燕, 张志宏

王喜龙, 李营, 杜建国, 陈志, 周晓成, 李新艳, 崔月菊, 王海燕, 张志宏. 2017: 首都圈地区土壤气Rn, Hg, CO2地球化学特征及其成因. 地震学报, 39(1): 85-101. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2017.01.008
引用本文: 王喜龙, 李营, 杜建国, 陈志, 周晓成, 李新艳, 崔月菊, 王海燕, 张志宏. 2017: 首都圈地区土壤气Rn, Hg, CO2地球化学特征及其成因. 地震学报, 39(1): 85-101. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2017.01.008
Wang Xilong, Li Ying, Du Jianguo, Chen Zhi, Zhou Xiaocheng, Li Xinyan, Cui Yueju, Wang Haiyan, Zhang Zhihong. 2017: Geochemical characteristics of soil gases Rn, Hg and CO2 and their genesis in the capital area of China. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 39(1): 85-101. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2017.01.008
Citation: Wang Xilong, Li Ying, Du Jianguo, Chen Zhi, Zhou Xiaocheng, Li Xinyan, Cui Yueju, Wang Haiyan, Zhang Zhihong. 2017: Geochemical characteristics of soil gases Rn, Hg and CO2 and their genesis in the capital area of China. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 39(1): 85-101. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2017.01.008

首都圈地区土壤气Rn, Hg, CO2地球化学特征及其成因

基金项目: 

中国地震局地震监测预报专项项目 20160114

中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务专项 2016IES0303

国家自然科学基金(41573121)、 中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务专项(2016IES0303)和中国震局地震监测预报专项项目(20160114)共同资助

国家自然科学基金 41573121

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    李营: e-mail: subduction6@hotmail.com

  • 中图分类号: P315.72+4

Geochemical characteristics of soil gases Rn, Hg and CO2 and their genesis in the capital area of China

  • 摘要: 对首都圈地区跨18条活动断裂的35条剖面进行了土壤气浓度和通量测量, 结果显示: 各测量剖面土壤气Rn, Hg和CO2的浓度平均值分别为3.2—45.0 kBq/m3, 3.9—24.9 ng/m3和0.154%—2.175%; 其通量平均值分别为3.8—152.1 mBq/(m2·s), 0.1-42.6 ng/(m2·h)和8.5—89.4 g/(m2·d). 研究区土壤气Rn, Hg和CO2的浓度和通量均呈东高西低的变化趋势, 与首都圈地区由西至东应力水平增高、 地壳厚度逐渐减薄、 沉积层厚度增大、 地震活动逐渐增强等趋势相对应, 这表明首都圈地区土壤气的区域地球化学特征主要受控于上地壳物质结构、 深部气体补给和地震活动, 同时也受到自然环境及土壤类型的影响.
    Abstract: The concentration and flux of soil gases were measured at 35 profiles across 18 faults in the capital area of China from June to July of 2015, and the geochemical characteristics and sources of soil gases Rn, Hg and CO2 in the area were also investigated. The results showed that the average concentrations of Rn, Hg and CO2 varied from 3.2 to 45.0 kBq/m3, 3.9 to 24.9 ng/m3 and 0.154% to 2.175%, respectively. The average flux values of Rn, Hg and CO2 ranged from 3.8 to 152.1 mBq/(m2·s), 0.1 to 42.6 ng/(m2·h) and 8.5 to 89.4 g/(m2·d), respectively. There is an obvious spatial distribution feature of soil gases that both the concentration and flux values in the eastern region were higher than those in the western region within the studied area, which could be attributed to the increased tectonic stress, the decreased crustal thickness, the increased thickness of sediments and earthquake activity from west to east. These spatial geochemical characteristics in the studied area might be mainly controlled by the upper crustal material structure, deep gas supply and seismic activity, and also additionally affected to some degree by the natural environment and soil types.
  • 图  1   首都圈地区构造和历史中强震分布(公元前780年—2015年1月1日)

    F1: 口泉断裂; F2: 六棱山断裂; F3: 大同火山断裂; F4: 阳高—天镇断裂; F5: 蔚县—广灵断裂; F6: 阳原盆地断裂;F7: 怀安盆地北缘断裂; F8: 张家口断裂; F9: 沙城断裂; F10: 怀来—涿鹿断裂; F11: 延庆—矾山断裂; F12: 夏垫断裂; F13: 蓟县山前断裂; F14: 宝坻断裂; F15: 天津北断裂; F16: 沧东断裂; F17: 海河断裂; F18: 唐山断裂,下同

    Figure  1.   Sketch map showing tectonic settings and historical moderate-strong earthquakes of the capital area of China from 780 BC to January 1,2015

    The inverse triangles denote the measuring sites of soil gas,and the black lines denote fault,the same below. F1: Kouquan fault; F2: Liulengshan fault; F3: Datong volcanic fault; F4: Yanggao-Tianzhen fault;F5: Yuxian-Guangling fault; F6: Yangyuan basin fault ; F7: Northern marginal fault of Huaian basin; F8: Zhangjiakou fault; F9: Shacheng fault; F10: Huailai-Zhuolu fault; F11: Yanqing-Fanshan fault; F12: Xiadian fault; F13: Jixian piedmont fault; F14: Baodi fault; F15: Nor-thern Tianjin fault; F16: Cangdong fault; F17: Haihe fault; F18: Tangshan fault

    图  2   首都圈地区土壤气浓度和通量布点示意图

    Figure  2.   Measuring sites for the concentration (dots)and flux(inverse triangles)of soil gases in the capital area of China

    图  3   首都圈地区土壤气浓度C及通量F平均值分布

    Figure  3.   Distribution of average concentration C(squares)and flux F(dots)for soil gases Rn,CO2 and Hg in the capital area of China

    图  4   首都圈地区土壤气测点布设及浓度平均值示意图

    Figure  4.   Arrangement of measuring sites and the average concentration of soil gases in the capital area of China

    图  5   首都圈地区土壤气通量平均值示意图

    Figure  5.   Average flux of soil gases in the capital area of China

    图  6   2014年5月1日—2015年5月1日首都圈地区小震活动空间分布图

    Figure  6.   Distribution of small earthquakes in the capital area of China from May 1,2014 to May 1,2015

    表  1   首都圈地区土壤气Rn,Hg和CO2 的组分浓度C和通量F

    Table  1   Flux F and constituent concentration C for soil gases Rn,Hg and CO2 in the capital area of China

    地点测点
    代号
    CRn/(kBq·m-3)CHg/(ng·m-3)CCO2FRn/(mBq·m-2·s-1)FHg/(ng·m-2·h-1)FCO2/(g·m-2·d-1)
    最大值最小值平均值最大值最小值平均值最大值最小值平均值最大值最小值平均值最大值最小值平均值最大值最小值平均值
    石井村SJC18.45.48.329612.80.515%0.082%0.203%27.440.227.420.68.113.438.68.027.1
    上皇庄SHZ11.01.07.460824.91.242%0.087%0.182%31.548.431.546.64.823.413.64.28.5
    大同火山DTHS13.75.27.91236.60.442%0.179%0.243%35.244.035.23.61.02.137.60.117.9
    东后子口DHZC5.91.13.230312.20.369%0.146%0.204%13.024.213.014.21.56.828.911.321.3
    阎家窑YJY9.52.84.82049.20.216%0.107%0.154%26.449.926.415.47.710.034.58.323.3
    宜兴庄YXZ11.82.05.71669.00.479%0.070%0.173%8.514.18.520.95.112.038.38.924.4
    北口村BKC11.32.95.6936.11.116%0.373%0.570%4.98.74.94.71.73.115.68.212.4
    榆林口YLK9.32.54.71247.10.482%0.208%0.346%13.317.513.34.04.04.040.427.934.1
    张仲口ZZK10.53.97.23449.70.302%0.108%0.193%25.840.525.88.30.12.931.522.527.3
    南口村NKC7.52.25.91357.80.870%0.124%0.491%7.114.17.69.54.26.369.922.040.7
    羊窑沟YJG7.43.65.520510.60.276%0.152%0.201%25.636.425.60.10.10.131.115.723.8
    张家窑ZJY6.92.14.3633.90.864%0.349%0.597%14.422.414.40.40.20.353.08.526.3
    万全县WQX14.06.810.61847.40.295%0.220%0.258%18.024.718.01.501.116.59.114.0
    青边口QBK11.84.28.01045.60.503%0.317%0.393%31.548.431.510.71.33.846.518.928.9
    郝家坡HJP16.74.38.91235.71.340%0.174%0.604%8.913.28.920.14.27.733.510.024.8
    西洪站XHZ12.83.26.2924.90.561%0.243%0.404%12.820.612.816.12.38.846.612.231.8
    东园子DYZC14.80.76.230410.46.004%0.058%2.175%10.318.110.315.61.67.557.81.432.1
    良田屯LTT10.83.07.427612.81.282%0.196%0.501%20.124.720.14.22.13.037.728.532.9
    八营村BYC7.53.96.31157.90.292%0.175%0.257%23.036.623.03.60.62.413.204.3
    蚕房营CFY21.34.410.81215.02.118%0.195%0.648%23.545.723.58.94.36.141.022.334.3
    玉皇庙YHM15.95.511.41124.30.477%0.303%0.399%24.748.724.721.80.37.451.023.036.0
    大东关DDG40.220.95.61846.10.783%0.406%0.570%5.91.73.81.00.60.85.12.53.8
    潘各庄PGZ63.434.245.02046.91.516%0.091%0.904%148.129.471.117.17.412.0154.653.689.4
    齐心庄QXZ44.410.425.91638.22.160%0.646%1.394%25.48.017.54.01.02.167.416.841.6
    王家口WJK71.50.66.295713.81.393%0.054%0.333%76.515.748.343.68.429.068.349.961.3
    八户村BHC40.06.416.030611.43.790%0.333%1.103%50.724.040.09.42.45.9113.066.184.5
    陈家庵CJA56.81.029.927713.82.438%0.073%0.851%97.648.074.526.113.121.043.135.276.9
    北怀淀BHD28.50.36.326613.30.544%0.058%0.206%159.078.7110.734.219.929.469.239.750.5
    何家洼HJW30.40.56.1135619.90.889%0.075%0.326%73.441.456.045.139.142.686.436.964.0
    邓善沽DSG40.60.420.724612.43.347%0.072%1.386%294.93.2152.110.84.87.8136.128.681.8
    朱头淀ZTD82.80.39.920611.33.908%0.056%0.364%50.54.324.141.725.434.057.530.942.3
    南营村NYC53.53.419.524411.21.548%0.059%0.828%33.59.521.522.613.518.765.453.459.4
    吴家庄WJZ37.01.213.986721.52.049%0.148%0.826%94.749.064.33.20.61.952.623.142.0
    丰南FN31.13.715.834815.97.212%0.398%1.851%38.916.524.224.89.216.343.533.337.2
    巍峰山WFS28.20.59.2221013.70.791%0.080%0.301%35.022.327.618.22.29.064.027.242.8
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   山西地震带北段和张渤地震带陆地段的地震活动性参数与活动习性(武敏捷等,2013)

    Table  2   The seismic activity parameters and characteristics in north section of Shanxi seismic belt and the land area of Zhangjiakou-Bohai seismic belt(after Wu et al,2013)

    地震带段落名称b断裂活动习性
    山西地震带北段 赤城—张家口0.87相对闭锁
    张家口—大同0.84中等频度中小地震
    张渤地震带陆地段尚义—张家口0.57中等频度中小地震
    涿鹿—延庆 0.72小震活动
    延庆—怀柔 0.72相对闭锁
    三河—玉田 0.89频繁小震活动
    玉田—唐山 0.81中等频度中小地震
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   张渤地震带部分台站h-k扫描结果(张莹莹等,2015)

    Table  3   h-k searching results for some stations in Zhangjiakou-Bohai seismic belt(after Zhang et al,2015)

    序号台站h/km波速比k
    1CHC40±1.281.74±0.044
    2LBP37±0.071.84±0.022
    3MIY34±1.171.85±0.039
    4XIL34±0.921.79±0.035
    5XLD33±1.061.79±0.038
    6QIX30±0.921.86±0.045
    7CLI32±1.431.76±0.062
    注: 台站按张渤地震带自西向东排序,h为莫霍面深度.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 车用太, 刘成龙, 鱼金子, 官致君, 李军. 2008. 汶川MS8.0地震的地下流体与宏观异常及地震预测问题的思考[J]. 地震地质, 30(4): 828-838. http://www.baidu.com/link?url=ectduOFZ2B1TijMLS2IwRGCcEccMszNmrHEdvYYpaCaNo_Xdpq9LoM8zcgJRvmqPAoGN02UgUbtLfLpddAwmvjCxQ29rLU9qiRnO2lOguDX9DfdrVS-D55iNiEcyGtIBDfeotN_LFMmgVmt3TNipNgSuih-zJmr1gp-P_W-EF4io4SIQ4lczxY1tndlCku2OaBo8cIFcpn-n5UgZ5sIWMMqzokMsZA3Fg8jCKF-n1NpaqWPTD_teFF3GyNHHRySJO8im8HRPYKMxoxLrf4KXMMCbu9XjSap4HhtdOURQDZB8NKLPKglTCA4A-25sJiI6gsnrIjBLhEns99idVsgYsyfP0AwmIBBBQ7htm4w7OjbEbLCLsstTsVbL8tui4aoPZ4lWRfad4CIiSkCzGRgYmW2lGKayFUopzUYKHiOWMBUzacIRCJkaVRssleIDh0cTL5QpUCUA9E0lFCMiFUKcb90vpRNgTuxyETVvWGEJ7KDcz_5eRbWZfHv1rYLE8V2iXRMyEYjEHY07v3BrwekCYSDYAiqfa71i-N4p1WRpcjC&wd=&eqid=d741e2a900023039000000055880856c

    Che Y T, Liu C L, Yu J Z, Guan Z J, Li J. 2008. Underground fluid anomaly and macro anomaly of MS8.0 Wenchuan earthquake and opinions about earthquake prediction[J]. Seismology and Geology, 30(4): 828-838 (in Chinese).

    杜建国, 刘连柱, 康春丽. 1997. 地震活动中地壳深部流体的作用研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 12(5): 416-421. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ705.002.htm

    Du J G, Liu L Z, Kang C L. 1997. The role of deep-crust fluids in earthquake activity[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 12(5): 416-421 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=Y4xXMKxoaNMnnBr72KRiAxfn1FwFs3zZJgkGyhGbuY9cxLBQNN2nNQ5ATWnPBSKNpkoOpH7ZXuimoxp51Ufok010GKoqCsCIEENuOO0Ky5u2CfJaXshsx6ESCb-0pQIWW4m0AbXQZ7HQmqCH5fbU7uWLxq1-TiwizdRF82obs3gP9fVOv2xX2ri_s7qQk5OMoAB2-szC5SNYoxWOAQeIJoStWfP01IyB_9XuA2H79K6C5rJHVYhOlkShjTjSExrB0lf79GrSHh_hac0KJX5-1L5iA9wuwOwrYz02RBPyewoweP_GT7ls80BL0pZ0oLOs&wd=&eqid=e15541c3000283d30000000558808593

    杜建国, 康春丽. 2000. 强地震前兆异常特征与深部流体作用探讨[J]. 地震, 20(3): 95-101. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN200003014.htm

    Du J G, Kang C L. 2000. Characteristics of earthquake precursors and its geological significance[J]. Earthquake, 20(3): 95-101 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=QazkjRMXiyDhxYjsHGx8-ckzlwx7MHp2Z1-n_ZAoXVyf3WEdTwJxLCsSReFh08cpBxQSSKoYmvQOe9rs1mGr3AAdrOI0GNZj797HUMQDpyqw1ih3OowAuho7dvJdnBB9NioGXko220gef-VWdET7mgsQtX4xYVgXSQF2yyD1gti6xlK77YZOdGABcD6EyJL7covOsBV8eWzRE-87xzqTsvaGFTFa0_ucGQVlfghDie-491DGq1t2xQQpB9l0QgI6Li8vkEOAyeEbMk4dlrDrtn8FERiEPiS9eutrYOV5RNjyzkBwWjEUVqy9tIfeozRd8Qsm1kse5ivfb7dgtnw3Ga&wd=&eqid=d7b5aea70002502000000005588085a7

    杜乐天. 2005. 地球排气作用的重大意义及研究进展[J]. 地质论评, 51(2): 174-180. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200502012.htm

    Du L T. 2005. Significance of earth degassing and its research progress[J]. Geological Review, 51(2): 174-180 (in Chinese). http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=5de9f889ed5e3217e0ca742ef931e2b4&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    宫猛, 李信富, 张素欣, 罗艳, 曾祥芳, 刘丽. 2015. 利用接收函数研究河北及邻区地壳厚度与泊松比分布特征[J]. 地震, 35(2): 34-42. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN201502004.htm

    Gong M, Li X F, Zhang S X, Luo Y, Zeng X F, Liu L. 2015. Crustal thickness and Poisson’s ratio of Hebei and adjacent areas from teleseisimic receiver functions[J]. Earthquake, 35(2): 34-42 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=d0P7hkX5fXneEuLRkTK-w6-ThdX9qSDjGXMonvG-DodnBg7xve8qismT5ADj2y6LYN7PnKaiT31maUx3eDTHNaY10wg2BfgvD_FEZEEiJ6l8I0tDhT8tjjC9cBOzVxJfHl0vk20s3o0NgAr3vwpbETsaQO4yMkmt2DDIUsIwDGmOnGmU2q3an2pY3mIJbs-KFW7TiLFsptWrBVMJT8GO4M1g9mmVtdD7ybpDrJzD0UfmhiG8Dda0l-vp63oJVVxlafMZCxQqzj4MAsCKmB_Zv7NsWlJnmG-Tg5sbBBjFdJEbg5d3SaDKVxdjjOR3fzREeUfvE8e5knzpBHbXY8EVawjuQfqmlwmQE2OdaJen5AteK0vZrzQXOYyPAbRbgkBu&wd=&eqid=d2afa4d500021e1c00000005588085d4

    韩晓昆, 李营, 杜建国, 周晓成, 李小强. 2013. 夏垫断裂中南段土壤气体地球化学特征[J]. 物探与化探, 37(6): 976-982. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WTYH201306003.htm

    Han X K, Li Y, Du J G, Zhou X C, Li X Q. 2013. Geochemical characteristics of soil gas in the central south segment of Xiadian fault[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 37(6): 976-982 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=8jA0d3oaJKrS371WkOQlN8r6lMZ9OgmM7iDv_ADQl4FsbUQ7jnjSvory8DDcJuO3PAaX1f6SoN4OpMH34Rwf4ZvY3svj9_42ev5NqmUgInn1XlhQiMEwTjLZGQHcH2GgyHvYB8A8Kjfxl4BlWnf4Ybn-F98hsv6KEV0SfLuku1p75oETIuSVERjGEwJk2am2isFRHrf5VxDSCxbslRmvOXMCHRjl4Pyy2p8yoN-lo7i8qetLkXeIG9HuatA-2x7PjKGXIL_m0GxeWvPovpeQDKV9RhnCPleuQBiz14zbsyH749txKEBd8uBtYiaUJacdJoKb5DOGTNkeiBmRaDxhq-hHa5bDqSMxxlvQefmojYW&wd=&eqid=da2be4f90002d0ea00000005588085ea

    韩晓昆. 2014. 首都圈地震重点监测区土壤气体地球化学[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地震预测研究所: 10-45.

    Han X K. 2014. Soil Gas Geochemistry Across the Active Fault Zones in the Capital Area of China[D]. Beijing: Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration: 10-45 (in Chinese).

    黄辅琼, 邓志辉, 顾瑾平, 王慧敏, 吕培苓. 2002. 张北地震地下流体异常场的研究[J]. 地震, 22(4): 114-122. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN200204017.htm

    Huang F Q, Deng Z H, Gu J P, Wang H M, Lü P L. 2002. Research of the field of subsurface fluid anomalies before the Zhangbei earthquake[J]. Earthquake, 22(4): 114-122 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=OJZo5Sa2x4f2BmC2cirptycwvr2fesNuwp2AnEGPJKNTXemVw6lPNnyYbapIIBh8zAwVna2yKs5wc94FgTc-yEn3PTyt0cgC8Nj-HExFnHMNQLQ_gY5B-YMcgb4d5noO94absOYTOmqLYWxWj7Z6qexAQRdCRvjpjXOhw0PADhlSxxD5p-fJPNe_Rb_4LJNO136BbKjhb9bSBu_XteGE8YL2NnFwubeB72bGGhJ0IJUx7XKg7R3BrzjsX2T1c1K1vH9bZUeF2RknvfHJxzENkOkFOYtFWhWulZEeJuwY8yEAqE2Qzc5_cR6cuNzeHs2vsCB4k8518lnrJvgqYQtLXvqyWiO4GXH1tARC_3hZ7JS&wd=&eqid=d69adc4f000282920000000558808605

    黄金莉, 赵大鹏. 2005. 首都圈地区地壳三维P波速度细结构与强震孕育的深部构造环境[J]. 科学通报, 50(4): 348-355. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB200504008.htm

    Huang J L, Zhao D P. 2005. Fine three-dimensional P-wave velocity structure beneath the capital region and deep environment for the nucleation of strong earthquakes[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 50(4): 348-355 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=N6UnoD7-BxAAtFG9Th5MicN_9wZ2TxQLk5kwRzUaYeuwWNYBjnrDHSmEapKptEcPbaQm8wz5fMSTnWrw0qKkzidbDKa1vHd3OQyUQVx4M-fHN58CjxIMWM8Hr5CRC7AgdQ09soCD18x6xrHNhgVCt8743gPazmLVVFFnlKm3i3mP3pRN0dzsrw_1aRXzxgccp0BbrOQeEEGY-qxk_TNKvXpU5Cgg9EMucpevuKot95zZXwwrRX_nuBfXGESpL9x3s8P5G3LqAibTwJpoQilUS3xdlDafewoereMnkBXyVJIG9da-P87ZPTH6qB3xXddmD5lyX1JVQirfchTxrAbiPm_a6dh8O0YnEGJfQ4OvVRKQh_4boP5gDMTxsRK31t3qG9MYBGpC0pWeE77c2OZrgJjxT-XdqHBoWb10s5s3apK&wd=&eqid=d7b5aea700025b9b0000000558808618

    嘉世旭, 齐诚, 王夫运, 陈棋福, 张先康, 陈颙. 2005. 首都圈地壳网格化三维结构[J]. 地球物理学报, 48(6): 1316-1324. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200506013.htm

    Jia S X, Qi C, Wang F Y, Chen Q F, Zhang X K, Chen Y. 2005. Three-dimensional crustal gridded structure of the capital area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 48(6): 1316-1324 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1002/cjg2.779

    李营, 杜建国, 王富宽, 周晓成, 盘晓东, 魏汝庆. 2009. 延怀盆地土壤气体地球化学特征[J]. 地震学报, 31(1): 82-91. http://www.dzxb.org/Magazine/Show?id=27173

    Li Y, Du J G, Wang F K, Zhou X C, Pan X D, Wei R Q. 2009. Geochemical characteristics of soil gas in Yanqing-Huailai basin, North China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 31(1): 82-91 (in Chinese).

    刘耀炜, 陈华静, 车用太. 2006. 我国地震地下流体观测研究40年发展与展望[J]. 国际地震动态, (7): 3-12. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJZT200607002.htm

    Liu Y W, Chen H J, Che Y T. 2006. Retrospect and prospect of observation and study on seismic underground fluid in China[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology, (7): 3-12 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=C34vBtOYNvUi-HrlDfw5qkDJCzbL59L8rrTznGjuKDaPdMjlS0jVeonJCYoNp7C3YSLlbM6cXYYnL1u5feK54v1LAJqS28uiLlz4LJuuIe5zZKX5W72YQNEMl6_5wQthOUBMEKifA91588mrnO_oMLlPcWK1IinhVtMWU-8NiCM9_AqXTriCW5sGwmOHKclfRN3XaTvRx7rcP3H_LkGd3wJ18i3vTlMTy7TJSohQdiB98NQyTB9C1747cf4nudMrJCuIhdUqwZ9OOG5kCmoK6bZNVLJ7ME89YHfwXtIP0z8pMWKt25kne-4wl4K3uOaLUj211YO0nPqBGbPuvOJjg0NqPVznhGpE1pC-0d3MNY_&wd=&eqid=c94a14cd000264050000000558808698

    刘耀炜, 任宏微. 2009. 汶川8.0级地震氡观测值震后效应特征初步分析[J]. 地震, 29(1): 121-131. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN200901016.htm

    Liu Y W, Ren H W. 2009. Preliminary analysis of the characteristics of post-seismic effect of radon after the Wenchuan 8.0 earthquake[J]. Earthquake, 29(1): 121-131 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=Hh54xIx_gh-VyDvHt49qppcOd0cor6AW2_phcy-Al0qf1W-Xfzgb_AvoQTVReKOcO3wEWC9-JYVO1zAqLYURLgKk0IbhidsWBpuhKNqXNW6g1c4pfVl9vBnokxADUaD4ttg5uZydL7nnUvZcH4cIuJP73RfeMx3wv4Y51E_zWbawesSWTGx4MoLoEN0qLYFM3XQxvaiTkiXFr4xatnw_5nz-KyJXmZei4_ibXql9wB9j147knWYq1SLPUfvUg9Yeoa2ybmWvZFwKOr77sEpBne5P2FzpaRxcmf2kS2CQe_JBuBybTKAUThNo8M-1i_sKnXIF2eqtnrD1f5MuXosaTZ72QTb0pq_zAucRPKT-vyDm8ILAFSMYRT10dnyhsvxkwT2kZxvnI1iHyXS2vguCmq&wd=&eqid=d18a945700029b4a00000005588086ad

    罗艳, 崇加军, 倪四道, 陈棋福, 陈颙. 2008. 首都圈地区莫霍面起伏及沉积层厚度[J]. 地球物理学报, 51(4): 1135-1145. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200804024.htm

    Luo Y, Chong J J, Ni S D, Chen Q F, Chen Y. 2008. Moho depth and sedimentary thickness in capital region[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 51(4): 1135-1145 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=IuHD81nUIx-el7IXFZIMd3Idb24x-8FlYSOSan3Tla7vZKg14UPBlX9DIIm1x9Ki49aWF1XCobabLg0-a-ry3jsbrC-PsOVpC5xPlmdS-g1iOteteJzd3HsJAGDJfkqAqdQJX3Z7i91VCYkSjb4hMUo2_HDoG6IT6Qp0uiR2cD8vCrIzZZMCkLskC6pxuikcIQu_F07joc_gPRNkY5w0w9T521TTqRnnOdSr82rWJKV06D1YfiOfEGIk3K6JE3PBpEDzZxKB3FsQmZqY2nYDUSjvdYgdRk6K-7hCSDPJiYXoDfnR08BUQNS0DSDbZRB6RRSz8Yf0w1uoSccUYk7KHBVRGU5BNIw7tjx4uAYW20Gaxi9rXZ9vHXifTZEYIzwcFvss5EtKOKLG0zdBwUQw0kP3FxK9lFJvPoFcPRiNaivPXdhZALEBloG6CjVC5YVswWKOAqmr88nMxX50bdmy4jN1aFrBORwfb176iviGUwcUfQONytY-kCHCUX3UN8yw&wd=&eqid=d18a945700029e2800000005588086c1

    孙进, 石玉涛, 赵博, 高原. 2013. 张家口—渤海地震活动带中东段地壳剪切波分裂研究[J]. 地震, 33(3): 24-32. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN201303002.htm

    Sun J, Shi Y T, Zhao B, Gao Y. 2013. On shear wave splitting in the Zhangjiakou-Bohai seismic belt[J]. Earthquake, 33(3): 24-32 (in Chinese).

    王峻, 刘启元, 陈九辉, 李顺成, 郭飚, 李昱. 2009. 根据接收函数反演得到的首都圈地壳上地幔三维S波速度结构[J]. 地球物理学报, 52(10): 2472-2482. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200910008.htm

    Wang J, Liu Q Y, Chen J H, Li S C, Guo B, Li Y. 2009. Three-dimensional S-wave velocity structure of the crust and upper mantle beneath the capital circle region from receiver function inversion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 52(10): 2472-2482 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=RRKED6ek_DFzZsOLQSoABar9JEmj7VG8DxKYn47WP7DkRXY4ONR8P2-yk8NsskrR2qZS2bj6GQLur_0Fh5oZ9aqkJQAJcVDgtlnbxWkF_SyKUnvS41o7oV_s0-U4aJZY7pS0197OBdAtCd97thapiRpB_VcyCC9ek9gu0Vw99A6crQRkCSohw_H-SyekllhqCuv7vv35QMQU2lSI4yQEESlLsc05UE1Ncr0RWiJpmoQgHIp_ZPxorOo98vlKLTUOqP_pqkZBzfkgQK_JeqdRxYhZQK-IOUanheIVh5Nu52uxHGrZUtb2DL6rzHoVhOZsz6cJ0ty7C_MgaPZCL9_BxpTuPRm5QM6B_X-p0aAg2peAWbpRllFw138Hyy_vpPeDTbvx_EqiCZAilqbWnWBOeQOTT9__Lh_htqDw18LfPVW&wd=&eqid=ccb5b8170002529f00000005588086ea

    王乃樑. 1996. 山西地堑系新生代沉积与构造地貌[M]. 北京: 科学出版社: 15-212.

    Wang N L. 1996. Cenozoic Depositions and Tectonic Geomorphology in the Shanxi Graben[M]. Beijing: Science Press: 15-212 (in Chinese).

    王未来, 吴建平, 房立华. 2009. 唐海—商都地震台阵剖面下方的地壳上地幔S波速度结构研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 52(1): 81-89. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200901011.htm

    Wang W L, Wu J P, Fang L H. 2009. Crust and upper mantle S-wave velocity structure beneath Tanghai-Shangdu seismic array profile[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 52(1): 81-89 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=_HNouICuSN9OQ4RA-4qkU7WlsrSL7XkORZBnauEVeZK5heNGPxCbg2KVXmZzHUdl5iyb3yRgXp8MfYfs3qLo2bMG3sIMEXZU2-YqRVGaThhtZ0c-I1WVWjijVrWfW391enZzNv3p97hrfuVNQOyjyk2bcrKs--wMMcn4Nt7GwyuGtbY8aW7w0K6cKZcMpU7glA-nrk4JlqBfZSMQZ3wOoPafmyX1MiJlkxQJWQCQSl_Y2rwihnrEd7PfbdgSGg0BEF71qw_k9y45vaBzb5N3ko_915u_0r2UpwmPvOuB4AneyzyZyOrRTBJjTuDIxumJx_GVXI2Gx_lec2nlBIg5EtvhRjzhhapNIioYuxNAUWK0ztRpr5sQgGGoOzgaE73lqx19_SzFhdv0i-jwkPobDqKRGsLOLs0Nb6LKk_QuMFakxLVkvEHpbdcEDloLmUWt12lW_XCI58vzGm2goLpM8mptxr-edMqYO8J94vydcF_d7o0KFFXYPImOLbdE3uHO2fjuNNHdZQw48bvU_wkLD_Ekf5BKwGPQyPY0K0M2fd5a874VcfXdMpvd-IP55DRu_Iv7W4DsEYQ1P9KNrsfwSJNTvOqGfnVsCTFJTXzehNM6Q7UEiwkb4JP-0P-ithVv5fUMgn0prJ3XECF9IoudVTXsLq4NXyst7A5k5BA5rly&wd=&eqid=d0f162f900028a7a000000055880870b

    汪一鹏, 邓起东, 朱世龙. 1989. 中国岩石圈动力学图集[M]. 北京: 中国地图出版社: 59.

    Wang Y P, Deng Q D, Zhu S L. 1989. Lithospheric Dynamics Atlas of China[M]. Beijing: China Cartographic Publishing House: 59 (in Chinese).

    吴晶, 高原, 陈运泰, 黄金莉. 2007. 首都圈西北部地区地壳介质地震各向异性特征初步研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 50(1): 209-220. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200701026.htm

    Wu J, Gao Y, Chen Y T, Huang J L. 2007. Seismic anisotropy in the crust in northwestern capital area of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 50(1): 209-220 (in Chinese). http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=68fa1995eb0d92ebb15cb16e36be7167&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    吴晶, 高原, 陈运泰. 2008. 首都圈东南部地区地壳介质各向异性[J]. 地震学报, 30(1): 1-11. http://www.dzxb.org/Magazine/Show?id=26342

    Wu J, Gao Y, Chen Y T. 2008. Crustal seismic anisotropy in southeastern capital area, China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 30(1): 1-11 (in Chinese). http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=7af05f207ebf115b7f428d04daba45b5&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    武敏捷, 朱红彬, 岳晓媛, 林向东, 李红. 2013. 基于多地震活动参数的首都圈地区地震危险性分析[J].华北地震科学, 31(1): 25-30. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDKD201301007.htm

    Wu M J, Zhu H B, Yue X Y, Lin X D, Li H. 2013. Analysis on potential earthquake risk of capital zone based on multiple seismicity parameters[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 31(1): 25-30 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=0lv5nS1Fv6RFqvV5ptIyZgjB16Bn3rrRACEYnJ9-ma_hdZYT-oGTeO1DrefW_Tp0xC7y0qKoRBK0C7-4gxEt5NsBi6dKEGyD46JpH0I7wARiw-U-JT0r4ag2Xya1NsHYFUqimt1oI39eFK05mYYL8_B3OQRnGhhDis4Qy28zviAcNv-ghY-X6Q_QuE0hlraAv5SlDmsLnLGbGMGxDRsxxDRWIxuLheaGoAwjrVXIsvCmubE_agvt9ryYsQdHPZFL09BmMOtkGcdYLNzvoxczMc36sYcAOV4OCQS2vyjLZdn8qMYCV9unrVlJOtstrHeKTxISh4tUhGJIW4Iun7GEiRjMeHZSSi6thh2svMTquoC0Ph0COGMvVnic2RwrsnJF&wd=&eqid=b169901c0002cbe6000000055880874e

    徐杰, 宋长青, 楚全芝. 1998. 张家口—蓬莱断裂带地震构造特征的初步探讨[J]. 地震地质, 20(2): 146-154. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ802.009.htm

    Xu J, Song C Q, Chu Q Z.1998. Preliminary study on the seismotectonic characters of the Zhangjiakou-Penglai fault zone [J]. Seismology and Geology, 20(2): 146-154 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=61T4pWSyDv1H6Y-PgGhMDxRVI4iebTFxXGEvlw8XWD1RX6Mj-8j2ASGjy1ErOLTYQ-I4I4GHDnbxCDtWcNuWODeaGdFPZGjIOg8eg4thW0Vsw-9YNri9VLRBOjUKOuHQf1PWz6ZrZavLtSBRatQ5SVzzESDd-9GuOC4u1PipzgtxTFZnAs_2mKpi95BdN3YGtU9P5qUCfbzMTGE4RCPa_2TNp9OJJbGUVHBR6r1J9GzT97IRO6TZdkfPjsyUAGxrqtarc4invx5ZZ3UN6FdxIzmBDf4DhxvShlBjJaC4eL_ZhWk_xTiJM6gZsINTLErK5i6mgAgMYIVWFQWKhPzD2wVBOP-LiP8HIMQYSGkMVTC&wd=&eqid=a1f31a120002affa00000005588087a9

    徐锡伟. 2002. 首都圈地区地壳最新构造变动与地震[M]. 北京: 科学出版社: 87-365.

    Xu X W. 2002. New Crustal Structure Motion and Earthquake in Capital Area[M]. Beijing: Science Press: 87-365 (in Chinese).

    张冠亚, 周晓成, 李营, 崔月菊, 韩晓昆, 孙玉涛, 孙凤霞, 杜建国. 2015. 怀安盆地北缘断裂东段土壤气体地球化学特征[J]. 地震, 35(3): 113-122. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN201503012.htm

    Zhang G Y, Zhou X C, Li Y, Cui Y J, Han X K, Sun Y T, Sun F X, Du J G. 2015. Geochemical characteristics of soil gas in the eastern segment of the north margin fault of the Huaian basin, Hebei Province[J]. Earthquake, 35(3):113-122 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=XSr754QVkTj9UXe18pKq4E3Adq1LgJRk1wEtjKmKq1J1XiaAMWaho5tbfg9mp_ymht3p-YyYrT-T8QaQYO2RAfCgyQnKs046OpYR0KCVKOG6ijxqir3QGtzcVFnXgtSNagy2dy_HPrkh9wGBOJ1_RolZ5-9Nsc7Io7aXTxQoBoIu2A3lBgcoAk2l05Ey_jQhLGFeJQZS1DdouwJfyIWE8j0i1ptjhSH7XmKInzbo7fno1eft-lHiOXroQsodC62-tjlQJKHCK6ud6cHjYMLD663UCFwKFGeOzelV67bsjT2Fa1J5vqoVOWASM4sndUs-jZbigPnU020yVyjD8ICV2FXJhpJg4qHe6QVUpXgrjFUs8TSIHxuonN9bKciJuKDo7KnL6Jkm_O-Eh7ImfYsvhHbKSgBhrsVsfnhtzbtOpXC&wd=&eqid=9bcaf27200027fe100000005588087bd

    张广伟, 雷建设, 谢富仁, 郭永霞, 兰从欣. 2011. 华北地区小震精定位及构造意义[J]. 地震学报, 33(6): 699-714. http://www.dzxb.org/Magazine/Show?id=28711

    Zhang G W, Lei J S, Xie F R, Guo Y X, Lan C X. 2011. Precise relocation of small earthquakes ocurred in North China and its tectonic implication[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 33(6): 699-714 (in Chinese). http://www.dzxb.org/Magazine/Show?id=28711

    张国民, 马宏生, 王辉, 李丽. 2004. 中国大陆活动地块与强震活动关系[J]. 中国科学: D辑, 34(7): 591-599. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200407000.htm

    Zhang G M, Ma H S, Wang H, Li L. 2004. The relation between active blocks and strong earthquakes in China[J]. Science in China: Series D, 34(7): 591-599 (in Chinese).

    张红艳, 谢富仁, 崔效锋, 李瑞莎. 2009. 张渤带陆地段现代构造应力场的非均匀特征[J].中国地震, 25(3): 314-324. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZD200903009.htm

    Zhang H Y, Xie F R, Cui X F, Li R S. 2009. Research on heterogeneity of the present tectonic stress field at the overland part of the Zhangjiakou-Bohai fault zone[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 25(3): 314-324 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=1Q9Ci36PjXjl8WWuzq5kM4ZeJGZJFqXGZtd8dAZoFZ--A10wzXcYxjA2NTT4wpK2qnP97mMD3a1XhDwCc1Sdk7W4q-dDOzhILGrZtX2-vLotQiE1CHqGBTFSVY-fbMFoeUFUapN2H3QgGcaEgvpECh3NuOO5OXrfw4T_-F8WImY4RxplNgKYBSAvrKl6cEepilezcrb-GdPUbGyp_UxiaqXl550jlB6Gr18nHhPqzMIlhjGJ2KW3BQEOirQVTZnzV-0OpLKpEAWxa1y_1W0LoFlKsMSAluMphqhT_SCH1jgs2e6Gb2AEbPH7ahho-JqKoahD7x9pT7dAIOt4byAvQQb3R4x8LnoKo9mkpCGVwjbDHAFU3CC2mEuublVX5E_ukac_vCjMxr-xrIcB4cWh6q&wd=&eqid=cdb6827e00029b2f000000055880882a

    张莹莹, 高原, 石玉涛, Liu K. 2015. 张家口—渤海地震活动带及其邻区的地壳厚度与泊松比分布[J]. 地震学报, 34(7): 541-553. http://www.dzxb.org/Magazine/Show?id=29103

    Zhang Y Y, Gao Y, Shi Y T, Liu K. 2015. Crustal thickness and Poisson’s ratio beneath Zhangjiakou-Bohai seismic active belt and its neighboring regions[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 34(7): 541-553 (in Chinese). http://www.dzxb.org/Magazine/Show?id=29103

    赵博, 高原, 石玉涛, 金红林, 孙进. 2011. 张家口—渤海地震带与山西地震带交汇区的地壳剪切波分裂[J]. 地球物理学报, 54(6): 1517-1527. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201106012.htm

    Zhao B, Gao Y, Shi Y T, Jin H L, Sun J. 2011. Shear wave splitting in the crust in the intersection zone of the Zhangjiakou-Bohai seismic belt and Shanxi seismic belt[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 54(6): 1517-1527 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=BWxl1OCikZG8q6q4-9E72plQ8ZS5T1ESFy3SdVKwXQGMSQ2ERzFp6eoV0rwXTIB3NcNjsJifL1Vf5HjgFZSYCazzsq0GvRGaDB6rTmO48UB7zBCymcV_ycI68mnfEqjp2a7BLaUQmMw9dl2f40Rk0nhp7vP8ln_CRPiPnietRvZxWR5CxoIb7Oudnt_eKbYY7V5Zv1hBCWjDUG41vNQcj3S6ILdG_n6rWcbyrqkxq1BzZHLkDDrqIc8fhClqmxsIzQTbSmgpxN5P27UkKFFJbwbSjCi0xjMCMNFridq4S9JuRlKI2WIXtU-J6TMoQ18NzGElUWxmKgJ-EmrkdfIBQyMWLhgySetvruKRT3IedjDd94ROk4_vy6bc7c5T_sG6BGNL0FiabQ6mhW9-XWX7yK&wd=&eqid=d0fb8e690002c8de0000000558808852

    周晓成, 郭文生, 杜建国, 王传远, 刘雷. 2007. 呼和浩特地区隐伏断层土壤气氡、 汞地球化学特征[J]. 地震, 27(1): 70-76. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN200701009.htm

    Zhou X C, Guo W S, Du J G, Wang C Y, Liu L. 2007. The geochemical characteristics of radon and mercury in the soil gas of buried faults in the Hohhot district[J]. Earthquake, 27(1): 70-76 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=52gA5UESvOxOy8UR4qvitnhC_48YCFs-Q1wGKk0RryaUDAimmpEvh1LTHoY1LQdmtAVatBmgawp3WsqpItl_EkkX92KSLMdXYxKQnJLRMIlVB8FIK5hnH_4jkQ7E0X-gn1GBc7Ub8MPvn70LZ1RItxaN3Umg1MGBlRoO7a6dxEkZm_MxFr9p8uLwJpQqFXJjnD-WK6wNXrQWeZ_Ck8mYQJOsZi-RFoZ7gAiNn-W83vjpHHG1pVuRfWLmQ_wtcpOfIKHobhx2JukclZ02dIRmmSMtD2XMqX69hhOEUdiQ16ytNsQxfMrxTaxDeORTIdc9QZDM-HHxRm1fAOEyL2a60NXeM65Xa08cWVEDk8ry_jQTYRba9y8oyWaT04bBoirc&wd=&eqid=d0fb8e690002cb3d0000000558808866

    周晓成. 2011. 汶川MS8.0地震后川西地区的气体地球化学[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学地球和空间科学学院: 10-78.

    Zhou X C. 2011. Gas Geochemistry in Western Sichuan Related to 12 May 2008 Wenchuan MS8.0 Earthquake[D]. Hefei: School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China: 10-78 (in Chinese).

    周晓成, 王传远, 柴炽章, 司学芸, 雷启云, 李营, 谢超, 刘胜昌. 2011. 海原断裂带东南段土壤气体地球化学特征[J]. 地震地质, 33(1): 123-132. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ201101014.htm

    Zhou X C, Wang C Y, Chai C Z, Si X Y, Lei Q Y, Li Y, Xie C, Liu S C. 2011. The geochemical characteristics of soil gas in the southeastern part of Haiyuan fault[J]. Seismology and Geology, 33(1): 123-132 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=AB0fzhs6o4g0ocush-NxiQW7LRsIlsk8hOQnGvC1qtS4iK2cX8ke-6tvYOZNg3zmhfHywMKQWJctj6aNEp-hzAx0HcIKmm4rLql89QzjdrH2DTobuZo1PJj6IZPXquHYwxJpiuagFRKvZ0TGRjhy-RG-KiDYPmJr9gkcXu4R6b6ULGsALrSSu319coZrNogiTtSFfBck4ydg-sHh5fmVEC2XrygO7We8IQzcy6b8E01lhOvpzyQw6MYHZHfgSaXoWRqC-CxBEwiYSYHDUAcsfjlkIbmjRwj2rxvFPEmSj3C-gd37EY4V8HGS0TU9-uPt_GxoI_hBg3V3AoifDiXl1KRhmpc0iQsq3_ZLYYxbLuG&wd=&eqid=ce83b5c20002969e0000000558808879

    周晓成, 杜建国, 陈志, 崔月菊, 刘雷. 2012. 地震地球化学研究进展[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 31(4): 340-346. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201204004.htm

    Zhou X C, Du J G, Chen Z, Cui Y J, Liu L. 2012. Advance review of seismic geochemistry[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 31(4): 340-346 (in Chinese). http://www.baidu.com/link?url=F7QvIdAhLRWo5VxAMP8284puBcP6s35vlPvGiG-L8m-7wjCCfFhNf4QEWiokeI1s5QTAnXOGGYL--dAZp4KJ5uxfdDh_Vpb9sbwf8e66Wywux1ajTqEjyd3AaSgQudtNUWllLPTjM_fX9-KzL7eIvxhqzMUexl_xcBW9eh3DmIG8XQjonilef4jjQSdb_sReCtFTGfgE5zGA6uQcL4UgYExHCYKoKM43rQUGdZug-joETOIhq7VQKS1LyVIsnRgi5XOR1KTOjcxbqleeIJo4PszV7vAANSs--6R0L1bRUma&wd=&eqid=cdb6827e0002a2fa000000055880888f

    Bagnato E, Barra M, Cardellini C, Chiodini G, Parello F, Sprovieri M. 2014. First combined flux chamber survey of mercury and CO2 emissions from soil diffuse degassing at Solfatara of Pozzuoli crater, Campi Flegrei (Italy): Mapping and quantification of gas release[J]. J Volcanol Geotherm Res, 289: 26-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.10.017

    Baubron J C, Rigo A, Toutain J P. 2002. Soil gas profiles as a tool to characterise active tectonic areas: The Jaut Pass example (Pyrenees, France)[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 196(1/2): 69-81. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=af8eeda90e8ebf219aec3d5dc9ebbff4&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    Bernard P. 2001. From the search of ‘precursors’ to the research on ‘crustal transients’[J]. Tectonophysics, 338(3/4): 225-232. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=71070ab09f3136f719e43dac4f385df9&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    Ciotoli G, Lombardi S, Annunziatellis A. 2007. Geostatistical analysis of soil gas data in a high seismic intermontane basin: Fucino Plain, central Italy[J]. J Geophys Res, 112(B5): B05407. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=39ad367b36c6bc859fe3491154929f92&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    Cui Y J, Du J G, Zhang D, Sun Y. 2013. Anomalies of total column CO and O3 associated with great earthquakes in recent years[J]. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 13(10): 2513-2519. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-2513-2013

    Etiope G, Lombardi S. 1995. Evidence for radon transport by carrier gas through faulted clays in Italy[J]. J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 193(2): 291-300. doi: 10.1007/BF02039886

    Etiope G, Martinelli G. 2002. Migration of carrier and trace gases in the geosphere: An overview[J]. Phys Earth Planet Inter, 129(3/4): 185-204. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=f40c5eb109c7bea4d16f5447cee67813&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    Evans W C, Sorey M L, Kennedy B M, Stonestrom D A, Rogie J D, Shuster D L. 2001. High CO2 emissions through porous media: Transport mechanisms and implications for flux measurement and fractionation[J]. Chem Geol, 177(1/2): 15-29.

    Fu C C, Yang T F, Du J, Walia V, Chen Y G, Liu T K, Chen C H. 2008. Variations of helium and radon concentrations in soil gases from an active fault zone in southern Taiwan[J]. Radiat Meas, 43(S1): S348-S352. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=402ae510b7c09315229d24773945c39d&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    Gerlach T M, Doukas M P, McGee K A, Kessler R. 2001. Soil efflux and total emission rates of magmatic CO2 at the Horseshoe Lake tree kill, Mammoth Mountain, California, 1995-1999[J]. Chem Geol, 177(1/2): 101-116. http://www.baidu.com/link?url=JWPV_Df7MwTqCtuzysXw2Ujl9pfEFbxisKBU8W4FclrKZ5bvYuaMfk9il6vwXv9334OQljjrqfvZAk_7A6aGUt0jPirtqySf7bfykzg15vn13ET1XZSoEjQJhnob4UHRKNQ2MJAyR5C99k3Kl7ZxqEWQ8vftbKW1C_KBVVoPe9uKzGtIDYoMk1TzlNyZjUjC-MZtTpdIdACbOK2P5EQ2q5M2gkqOUECEv7O3LFnmqGZKyy-YB6tvUDeqz6KfbUK8Ptwngs_42siFADyHFJ0W612QgKedb_IY_UAeN-M41tyxy83zHBsb2pLkIyD1q4WOmDf9BBZyQA-Ip0o8-e8IyMyxn5ZRn6hH56ReTGvVHpOTFpR_ersAInFE3IH1T7lDm5l-0h5wvg8JLq12QMf7ubkOefCYIA1eTZIbL0gLXa1uULSukvE-wPCdN6W90win&wd=&eqid=cffa593f0002b71800000005588088dd

    Han X K, Li Y, Du J, Zhou X C, Xie C, Zhang W B. 2014. Rn and CO2 geochemistry of soil gas across the active fault zones in the capital area of China[J]. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 14(10): 2803-2815. doi: 10.5194/nhess-14-2803-2014

    King C Y, Zhang W, Zhang Z C. 2006. Earthquake-induced groundwater and gas changes[J]. Pure Appl Geophys, 163(4): 633-645. doi: 10.1007/s00024-006-0049-7

    Kumar A, Singh S, Mahajan S, Bajwa B S, Kalia R, Dhar S. 2009. Earthquake precursory studies in Kangra valley of North West Himalayas, India, with special emphasis on radon emission[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 67(10): 1904-1911. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.05.016

    Lehmann B E, Ihly B, Salzmann S, Conen F, Simon E. 2004. An automatic static chamber for continuous 220Rn and 222Rn flux measurements from soil[J]. Radiat Meas, 38(1): 43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2003.08.001

    Li Y, Du J G, Wang X, Zhou X C, Xie C, Cui Y J. 2013. Spatial variations of soil gas geochemistry in the Tangshan area of northern China[J]. Terr Atmos Oceanic Sci, 24(3): 323-332. doi: 10.3319/TAO.2012.11.26.01(TT)

    Liu M, Cut X J, Liu F T. 2004. Cenozoic rifting and volcanism in eastern China: A mantle dynamic link to the Indo-Asian collision?[J]. Tectonophysics, 393(1/2/3/4): 29-42. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=da610f736717b33caa0e4b201c0450b6&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    Lombardi S, Voltattorni N. 2010. Rn, He and CO2 soil gas geochemistry for the study of active and inactive faults[J]. Appl Geochem, 25(8): 1206-1220. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.05.006

    Tan Y L, Xiao D T. 2013. Measuring radon exhalation rate in two cycles avoiding the effects of back-diffusion and chamber leakage[J]. Environ Monit Assess, 185(10): 8759-8765. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3210-7

    Toutain J P, Baubron J C. 1999. Gas geochemistry and seismotectonics: A review[J]. Tectonophysics, 304(1/2): 1-27. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=fc15bb6bb18a0d26245b51481883bd7e&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    Walia V, Lin S J, Fu C C, Yang T F, Hong W L, Wen K L, Chen C H. 2010. Soil-gas monitoring: A tool for fault delineation studies along Hsinhua fault (Tainan), southern Taiwan[J]. Appl Geochem, 25(4): 602-607. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.01.017

    Walia V, Yang T F, Lin S J, Kumar A, Fu C C, Chiu J M, Chang H H, Wen K L, Chen C H. 2013. Temporal variation of soil gas compositions for earthquake surveillance in Taiwan[J]. Radiat Meas, 50: 154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.11.007

    Wiersberg T, Erzinger J. 2008. Origin and spatial distribution of gas at seismogenic depths of the San Andreas fault from drill-mud gas analysis[J]. Appl Geochem, 23(6): 1675-1690. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.01.012

    Woodruff L G, Cannon W F, Eberl D D, Smith D B, Kilburn J E, Horton J D, Garrett R G, Klassen R A. 2009. Continental-scale patterns in soil geochemistry and mineralogy: Results from two transects across the United States and Canada[J]. Appl Geochem, 24(8): 1369-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.04.009

    Yang T F, Chou C Y, Chen C H, Chyi L L, Jiang J H. 2003. Exhalation of radon and its carrier gases in SW Taiwan[J]. Radiat Meas, 36(1/2/3/4/5/6): 425-429. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=a6993d50af079b04945b6f333c3eb22d&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    Yang T F, Walia V, Chyi L L, Fu C C, Chen C H, Liu T K, Song S R, Lee C Y, Lee M. 2005. Variations of soil radon and thoron concentrations in a fault zone and prospective earthquakes in SW Taiwan[J]. Radiat Meas, 40(2/3/4/5/6): 496-502. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=277f2d8a45a68f159da867df11d217c8&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    Zhang W B, Du J G, Zhou X C, Wang F. 2016. Mantle volatiles in spring gases in the Basin and Range Province on the west of Beijing, China: Constraints from helium and carbon isotopes[J]. J Volcanol Geotherm Res, 309: 45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.10.024

    Zhao D P. 2004. Global tomographic images of mantle plumes and subducting slabs: Insight into deep Earth dynamics[J]. Phys Earth Planet Inter, 146(1/2): 3-34. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=f70ef57ec7bcb02fc6d83aa4f8b11406&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn

    Zhou X C, Chen Z, Cui Y J. 2016. Environmental impact of CO2, Rn, Hg degassing from the rupture zones produced by Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake in western Sichuan, China[J]. Environ Geochem Health, 38(5): 1067-1082. doi: 10.1007/s10653-015-9773-1

    Zhuo W H, Furukawa M, Guo Q J, Kim Y S. 2005. Soil radon flux and outdoor radon concentrations in East Asia[J]. Int Congr Ser, 1276: 285-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ics.2004.10.002

图(6)  /  表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  857
  • HTML全文浏览量:  277
  • PDF下载量:  19
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-06-05
  • 修回日期:  2016-09-28
  • 发布日期:  2016-12-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回