1936年4月1日广西灵山县东北<i>M</i>6 ¾地震震源参数测定

郭培兰; 李保昆; 周斌; 冯向东; 万永革; 邹立晔; 杜广宝

doi:10.11939/jass.2017.06.005

1936年4月1日广西灵山县东北M6 ¾地震震源参数测定

1.
中国南宁 530022 广西壮族自治区地震局
2.
中国北京 100045 中国地震台网中心
3.
中国石家庄 050021 河北省地震局
4.
中国河北三河 065201 防灾科技学院

基金项目:

广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目桂科攻14251008

中国地震局

中国地震局和广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(桂科攻14251008)资助

详细信息

作者简介:
郭培兰广西壮族自治区地震局高级工程师. 1996年华东地质学院地球物理学专业毕业，获理学学士学位.目前主要从事地震监测预报和数字地震学等方面的研究工作.广西地震学会会员

通讯作者:
李保昆, e-mail: libk@seis.ac.cn

中图分类号: P315.63
计量
- 文章访问数: 1330
- HTML全文浏览量: 384
- PDF下载量: 31
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-10-25
- 修回日期: 2016-12-20
- 发布日期: 2017-10-31

Determination of the source parameters of the northeast Lingshan, Guangxi, M6 ¾ earthquake on April 1, 1936

1.
Earthquake Administration of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530022, China
2.
China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing 100045, China
3.
Earthquake Administration of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
4.
Institute of Disaster Prevention, Hebei Sanhe 065201, China

摘要

摘要: 本文收集了1936年4月1日2时至3时(UTC)全球168个台站的仪器记录, 根据1936年4月1日广西灵山县东北部M6 ¾地震的宏观震中(22.5°N，109.4°E)和计算所得各台站初至P波的到时残差，将168个台站的数据与灵山主震进行关联或相关性分析.最终有13个台站的数据与灵山主震关联成功，其中7—8个台站的到时数据参与了定位计算.分别利用我国国家测震台网的常规定位方法和技术以及ISC的定位方法和技术对灵山主震进行重新定位，两种重定位方法得到的灵山主震震中相距47.6 km，经过比较，我国国家测震台网的定位方法和技术更适合灵山主震的数据特点.
- 灵山主震 /
- 震源参数测定 /
- 到时数据关联
Abstract: The records of 168 global seismographic stations from 2 to 3 o′clock (UTC) on April 1, 1936 have been collected in order to locate the strong earthquake M6 ¾ occurred in northeast Lingshan of Guangxi. The station readings were grouped and associated based on the macro-epicenter of Lingshan mainshock (22.5°N, 109.4°E) and the initial P wave residuals of the seismic stations. Finally records of thirteen stations were successfully associated to Lingshan mainshock, and phase arrivals of 7--8 stations contributed to the event relocation. The routine location method and model of China National Seismic Network Center and ISCloc have been used to relocate the Lingshan mainshock, and the relocation results show that the distance between the two relocated epicenters is about 47.6 km. By comparison, the routine location method and model of China National Seismic Network Center are more suitable for the data with the poor observational conditions of Lingshan mainshock.
- Lingshan mainshock /
- source parameters determination /
- phase arrivals association

HTML全文

感谢两位审稿专家提出的宝贵意见.河北省地震局刁桂苓研究员、中国地震局地球物理研究所陈培善研究员和金严研究员对本文的研究工作提出了建议；匈牙利科学院István Bondár博士和ISC Domenico Di Giacomo博士帮助调试软件和收集数据；中国地震局地球物理研究所赵荣国高工和李学勤副研究馆员、上海市地震局时军高工、寿海涛高工和蔡旭荣高工帮助查阅文献和分析地震图, 作者在此一并表示感谢.

图 1 1936年4月1日灵山M6 ¾地震的等震线图

(引自中国地震局震害防御司，1999)

Figure 1. The isoseismal map of Lingshan M6 ¾ earthquake on April 1, 1936

(after Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, China Earthquake Administration, 1999)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 灵山主震宏观震中和可收集到1936年4月1日2时至3时数据的全球168个台站的分布

Figure 2. The distrubution of the macro-epicenter of Lingshan mainshock and 168 global stations which could record the information during 02:00--03:00 on April 1, 1936

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 灵山主震震中和相应的全球台站分布

Figure 3. Location of the epicenter of Lingshan mainshock and distribution of the corresponding global stations used for location

Green triangles stand for 13 global stations associated to Lingshan mainshock successfully, and blue triangles for seven global stations used for the relocation with the routine location method and model of China National Seismic Network Center, and red triangles for eight global stations used for the relocation with ISCloc

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 灵山主震宏观震中及CENC和ISCloc重新定位后的灵山主震震中

Figure 4. The macro-epicenter of Lingshan mainshock (green dot), and the epicenters of Lingshan mainshock relocated by CENC (orange dot) and ISCloc (blue dot)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 1936年4月1日徐家汇台的记录图纸

Figure 5. The seismograph map of Zikawei on April 1, 1936

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 CENC和ISCloc的主要差别

Table 1 The main differences of location methods of CENC and ISCloc

方法	走时模型	定位所用数据类型	走时误差
CENC	J-B	初至P波震相	不相关(各自独立)
ISCloc	AK135	多种震相	相近的传播路径上相关
注：CENC表示我国国家测震台网常规的定位方法和技术，ISCloc表示ISC的定位方法和技术，下同.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 两种方法和技术对灵山主震参数测定的结果

Table 2 The parameters of Lingshan mainshock determinated by two different methods and techniques

方法	发震时刻时：分：秒	发震时刻误差/s	走时均方差/s	震中		震中误差椭圆			震源深度 /km	深度误差 /km	台站数	Gap /°	最小震中距 /°	最大震中距 /°	M_S
方法	发震时刻时：分：秒	发震时刻误差/s	走时均方差/s	北纬/°	东经/°	长半轴 /km	短半轴 /km	长轴走向/°	震源深度 /km	深度误差 /km	台站数	Gap /°	最小震中距 /°	最大震中距 /°	M_S
CENC	02:12:20.10	3.64	3.49	22.61	109.34	45.1	32.9	0	9	27.4	7	185	12.60	120.40	7.0
ISCloc	02:12:17.88	1.88	3.64	22.37	109.70	47.6	22.0	162	10.0f	-	8	185	13.66	120.54	-
注：深度数据中的“f”表示默认(缺省)值，Gap为台站最大空隙角.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(30)

陈国达. 1939.广东灵山地震志[J].两广地质调查所特刊, (17): 1-112. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/LocalChronicleItem_3056990.aspx

Chen G D. 1939. The Lingshan earthquake of April 1, 1936[J].Special Publication, Geological Survey of Kwantung and Kwangsi, (17): 1-112 (in Chinese). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/LocalChronicleItem_3056990.aspx

陈培善, 李强. 1989.地震报告的数据处理[J].地震地磁观测与研究, 10(3): 1-9. http://doc.xuehai.net/b32557f854a63ca1e65a0a333.html

Chen P S, Li Q. 1989. The data processing of seismological report[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 10(3): 1-9 (in Chinese). http://doc.xuehai.net/b32557f854a63ca1e65a0a333.html

陈培善, 李强, 白彤霞, 金闻虎. 1993.中国地震报告数据处理系统[J].地震地磁观测与研究, 14(3): 19-24.

Chen P S, Li Q, Bai T X, Jin W H. 1993. The data processing system (DPS) for the bulletin of seismological observation of China[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 14(3): 19-24 (in Chinese).

顾功叙. 1983.中国地震目录:公元前1831年—公元1969年[M].北京:科学出版社: 296.

Gu G X. 1983. The Catalogue of China Earthquakes: BC 1831-AD 1969[M]. Beijing: Science Press: 296 (in Chinese).

广西地震局历史地震小组. 1982.广西地震志[M].南宁:广西人民出版社: 1-288.

Group of Historical Earthquake, Earthquake Administration of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. 1982. Annals of Earthquakes in Guangxi[M]. Nanning: Guangxi People's Publishing House: 1-288 (in Chinese).

何军, 刘怀庆, 黎清华, 朱章显. 2012.广西防城—灵山断裂带北东支灵山段活动性初探[J].华南地质与矿产, 28(5): 71-78. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4892508

He J, Liu H Q, Li Q H, Zhu Z X. 2012. Activity of the northeasten branch of Fangcheng-Lingshan fault zone in Ling-shan, Guangxi, China[J]. Geology and Mineral Resources of South China, 28(5): 71-78 (in Chinese). http://www.oalib.com/paper/4892508

黄河生, 任镇寰, 杨廉法. 1990.广西灵山地区断裂活动性与土壤中汞气含量变化[J].华南地震, 10(1): 42-49.

Huang H S, Ren Z H, Yang L F. 1990. The activity of the faults and the concentration of gas Hg variation among soil in Lingshan area[J]. South China Seismological Journal, 10(1): 42-49 (in Chinese).

李保昆, 陈培善, 刘瑞丰. 2004. 《中国数字地震台网观测报告》震级的确定[J].地震地磁观测与研究, 25(4): 8-13. http://www.cqvip.com/qk/96509X/200404/10408879.html

Li B K, Chen P S, Liu R F. 2004. The determination of magnitude in the reports of China National Digital Seismic Network[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 25(4): 8-13 (in Chinese). http://www.cqvip.com/qk/96509X/200404/10408879.html

李保昆, 刁桂苓, 邹立晔, 徐锡伟, 冯向东. 2014. 1947年西藏朗县东南M7.7大地震震源参数复核[J].地震地磁观测与研究, 35(1/2): 85-91.

Li B K, Diao G L, Zou L Y, Xu X W, Feng X D. 2014. The redetermination of the source parameters of the big earthquake M7.7 in the southeast of Lang county in Tibet in 1947[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 35(1/2): 85-91 (in Chinese).

李保昆, 刁桂苓, 徐锡伟, 万永革, 冯向东, 邹立晔, 苗春兰. 2015. 1950年西藏察隅M8.6强震序列震源参数复核[J].地球物理学报, 58(11): 4254-4265.

Li B K, Diao G L, Xu X W, Wan Y G, Feng X D, Zou L Y, Miao C L. 2015. Redetermination of the source parameters of the Zayü, Tibet M8.6 earthquake sequence in 1950[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 58(11): 4254-4265 (in Chinese).

李善邦. 1960.中国地震目录第一集[M].北京:科学出版社: 1-399.

Li S B. 1960. The Catalogue of China Earthquakes, Volume 1[M]. Beijing: Science Press: 1-399 (in Chinese).

李伟琦. 1992. 1936年灵山6

级地震极震区烈度分布及发震构造[J].华南地震, 12(3): 46-51.

Li W Q. 1992. Intensity distribution of Lingshan M6 earthquake in meizoseismic area and its seismogenic structure[J]. South China Journal of Seismology, 12(3): 46-51 (in Chinese).

任镇寰, 李健梅, 乔计花, 宫会玲. 2012.广西灵山地区深部断裂系统的重力资料解释[J].华南地震, 32(2): 1-8. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95728X/201001/33581095.html

Ren Z H, Li J M, Qiao J H, Gong H L. 2012. Interpretation of gravity data of deep fault system in Lingshan region of Guangxi[J]. South China Journal of Seismology, 32(2): 1-8 (in Chinese). http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95728X/201001/33581095.html

宋志平, 张国民, 刘杰, 尹继尧, 薛艳, 宋先月. 2011.全球地震灾害信息目录[M].北京:地震出版社: 250.

Song Z P, Zhang G M, Liu J, Yin J Y, Xue Y, Song X Y. 2011. Disaster Information Catalog of Global Earthquakes[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 250 (in Chinese).

滕吉文, 张中杰, 胡家富, 王光杰. 2001.中国东南大陆及陆缘地带的瑞利波频散与剪切波三维速度结构[J].地球物理学报, 44(5): 663-677. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94718X/200105/5497731.html

Teng J W, Zhang Z J, Hu J F, Wang G J. 2001. The Rayleigh wave dispersion and three dimensional velocity structure in continent and its margin of southeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 44(5): 663-677 (in Chinese). http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94718X/200105/5497731.html

谢毓寿, 蔡美彪. 1985.中国地震历史资料汇编(第四卷上)[M].北京:科学出版社: 507.

Xie Y S, Cai M B. 1985. The Compilation of Chinese Historical Earthquake Data (Vol.4)[M]. Beijing: Science Press: 507 (in Chinese).

赵荣国, 魏富胜, 曹学锋, 张炜, 李卫平, 王春珍, 冯蔚. 2012. 20世纪全球地震活动性(纲要)[M].北京:地震出版社: 189.

Zhao R G, Wei F S, Cao X F, Zhang W, Li W P, Wang C Z, Feng W. 2012. Global Seismicity in Twentieth Century (Outline)[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 189 (in Chinese).

中国地震局震害防御司. 1999.中国近代地震目录(公元1912年—1990年, M_S≥4.7)[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社: 1-637.

Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, China Earthquake Administration. 1999. Earthquake Catalogue of China in Modern Times (1912-1990, M_S≥4.7)[M]. Beijing: China Science and Technology Publishing House: 1-637 (in Chinese).

周本刚, 杨晓平, 杜龙. 2008.广西防城—灵山断裂带活动性分段与潜在震源区划分研究[J].震灾防御技术, 3(1): 8-19. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20080102

Zhou B G, Yang X P, Du L. 2008. Discussion on the segmentation of Fangcheng-Lingshan fault, Guangxi Province and determination of related potential seismic sources[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 3(1): 8-19 (in Chinese). doi: 10.11899/zzfy20080102

Bondár I, McLaughlin K L. 2009a. Seismic location bias and uncertainty in the presence of correlated and non-Gaussian travel-time errors[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 99(1): 172-193. doi: 10.1785/0120080922

Bondár I, McLaughlin K L. 2009b. A new ground truth data set for seismic studies[J]. Seis Res Lett, 80(3): 465-472. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.80.3.465

Bondár I, Storchak D. 2011. Improved location procedures at the International Seismological Centre[J]. Geophys J Int, 186(3): 1220-1244. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05107.x

Bullen K E. 1963. An Introduction to the Theory of Seismology[M]. London: Cambridge at the University Press: 153-181.

Di Giacomo D, Harris J, Villaseor A, Storchak D A, Engdahl E R, Lee W H K, Data Entry Team. 2015. ISC-GEM: Global instrumental earthquake catalogue (1900-2009), I. Data collection from early instrumental seismological bulletins[J]. Phys Earth Planet Int, 239: 14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2014.06.003.

Engdahl E R, Villaseor A. 2002. Global seismicity: 1900-1999[J]. Int Geophys, 81: 665-690. doi: 10.1016/S0074-6142(02)80244-3

Geiger L. 1912. Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicenters from the arrival time only[J]. Bull St Louis Univ, 8(1): 60-71. http://www.oalib.com/references/18983481

ISC. 2012. ISC-GEM catalogue[EB/OL]. [2016-03-01]. http://www.isc.ac.uk/iscgem.

Kennett B L N, Engdahl E R, Buland R. 1995. Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes[J]. Geophys J Int, 122(1): 108-124. doi: 10.1111/gji.1995.122.issue-1

Richmond. 1936. The International Seismological Summary[R]. Surrey, England: Kew Observatory: 137-144.

Storchak D A, Di Giacomo D, Engdahl E R, Harris J, Bondár I, Lee W H K, Bormann P, Villaseor A. 2015. The ISC-GEM global instrumental earthquake catalogue (1900-2009): Introduction[J]. Phys Earth Planet Int, 239: 48-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2014.06.009.