Applicability of the new one-dimensional velocity model in Fujian and Taiwan strait region
-
摘要: 通过福建及台湾海峡地区的新一维速度模型与现有华南速度模型的对比，讨论了新一维速度模型在福建地震观测台网的适用性。理论走时分析结果表明，尽管两个速度模型差异明显，但震中距在0—100 km范围内的震相理论走时相差较小，一定程度上说明两速度模型所给出的本区域地壳平均速度差异较小。对利用18次人工定点爆破记录的地震定位结果的分析表明：当震源深度不受约束时，应用华南速度模型的定位结果精度稍优于新一维速度模型；将震源深度固定为0 km后，应用新一维速度模型的定位结果精度则明显优于华南模型。对19个仙游震群序列事件进行定位的结果显示，由于华南地区速度结构的横向变化较小，应用两模型的地震定位精度结果基本相当，但新一维速度模型定位的发震时刻较华南速度模型普遍早0.61 s左右，因此使得事件定位残差显著增大。Abstract: Based on the new one-dimensional velocity model in Fujian and Taiwan strait region, we analyzed the applicability of this model used for Fujian seismic monitoring network by compared with the existing South China velocity model. Theoretical travel time comparison shows that small difference appeared within 100 km of the epicentral distance although the two velocity models seem obviously different. To some extent, this reflects the mean velocity of this region given by these two models are consistent. By choosing 18 man-made explosion events, we test the location results based on these two models. If without constrain on focal depth, location results by using the South China velocity model are slightly better than the new one-dimensional velocity model, but when we set focal depth as 0 km, precision of location results are much better for one-dimensional velocity new model. As for 19 natural earthquake events of Xianyou earthquake sequence, as a result of small velocity variation in horizontal dimension for South China region, earthquake location precision by using both models are quite close. The origin times of the events estimated by the new one-dimensional velocity model are usually 0.61 s ahead, which also result in the residuals of location error significantly higher than those by using the South China velocity model.
-
-
![]()
图 1 华南速度模型（a）与新一维速度模型（b）
Figure 1. South China velocity model （a） and new 1D velocity model （b）
![]()
图 2 震源深度分别为10 km （a），20 km （b）和30 km （c）时两模型中4组震相的理论走时差
Figure 2. Theoretical travel time error of two 1D velocity models for four seismic phases with focal depths 10 km （a），20 km （b），30 km （c）
![]()
图 3 PCNP台测得的2013年9月4日福建仙游ML4.8地震的4组震相应用于两速度模型的理论到时与人工编目拾取到时对比
Figure 3. Comparison of theoretical phase arrival times calculated based on the two velocity models with catalog phase arrival times of four phases from the station PCNP in ML4.8 Xianyou，Fujian，earthquake on September 4，2013
![]()
图 4 基于两速度模型的人工爆破事件定位震中及发震时刻偏差
（a） 不约束震源深度；（b） 震源深度固定为0 km
Figure 4. Epicenter location error and event origin time error by using two velocity models
（a） No focal depth constrain is applied；（b） Focal depth is set as 0 km
![]()
图 6 新一维速度模型下震源位于地表的初至震相射线路径
Figure 6. Ray path of the first arrival phase when the source is set to surface for the new 1D velocity model
![]()
图 8 华南速度模型与新一维速度模型的定位残差
Figure 8. Location residuals by using the South China velocity model and the new 1D velocity model
![]()
图 9 华南速度模型与新一维速度模型的发震时刻偏差
Figure 9. Event origin time biases between South China velocity model and new 1D model
表 1 华南速度模型与新一维速度模型参数对比
Table 1 Comparison between south China velocity model and new 1D velocity model
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 本文采用的18次人工定点爆破事件
Table 2 18 artificial explosion events used in this paper
事件
序号爆破时间 爆破位置 年−月−日 时：分：秒 北纬/° 东经/° 1 2010−09−01 01:00:13.111 25.3967 119.7143 2 2010−09−01 01:10:14.752 25.6214 119.1688 3 2010−09−11 01:00:13.284 25.0636 118.5620 4 2010−09−11 01:10:14.472 25.4707 118.0392 5 2011−08−23 01:00:16.382 25.9200 117.6387 6 2011−08−23 01:10:14.631 26.5765 118.9839 7 2011−08−28 01:00:16.746 26.8172 118.5279 8 2011−08−28 01:10:15.000 27.2877 117.6942 9 2011−08−28 04:10:14.514 25.0417 117.3357 10 2012−07−18 01:00:20.181 25.2452 117.3357 11 2012−07−18 01:10:16.253 25.7110 116.8243 12 2012−07−23 01:00:21.079 26.1632 117.6419 13 2012−07−23 01:10:17.263 26.1632 116.2853 14 2012−07−23 01:20:15.423 26.3954 115.9158 15 2012−07−29 01:00:15.499 24.0390 116.8733 16 2012−07−29 01:20:15.866 24.9327 119.7143 17 2012−07−29 04:20:15.875 25.1793 119.1688 18 2012−08−08 01:00:21.000 24.6020 118.5620
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 两个模型对19次天然地震事件的定位结果
Table 3 List of location results for 19 earthquakes by using two velocity models
序号 MS 发震日期 华南速度模型结果 新一维速度模型结果 发震时刻 震中位置 震源
深度
/km残差 发震时刻 震中位置 震源
深度
/km残差 年−月−日 时:分:秒 东经/° 北纬/° 时:分:秒 东经/° 北纬/° 1 3.8 2012−11−25 07:48:49.5 118.75 25.63 10.4 0.132 07:48:48.7 118.74 25.64 9.0 0.586 2 3.4 2012−11−25 17:42:39.1 118.75 25.63 18.3 0.065 17:42:38.2 118.75 25.64 19.4 0.941 3 3.3 2012−11−30 14:59:13.7 118.75 25.63 11.4 0.090 14:59:13.0 118.74 25.64 6.9 0.319 4 4.2 2013−08−03 02:43:56.5 118.75 25.63 8.1 0.088 02:43:55.5 118.74 25.63 12.8 0.240 5 3.1 2013−08−09 13:37:07.5 118.75 25.62 13.5 0.105 13:37:07.0 118.75 25.64 9.9 0.305 6 3.5 2013−08−09 13:38:41.0 118.75 25.63 6.9 0.064 13:38:40.0 118.75 25.63 12.7 0.250 7 3.8 2013−08−19 17:36:20.0 118.75 25.63 6.3 0.086 17:36:18.9 118.74 25.63 11.0 0.321 8 4.5 2013−08−23 05:02:01.3 118.75 25.63 8.0 0.076 05:02:00.3 118.71 25.65 6.6 0.300 9 3.1 2013−08−24 00:49:57.4 118.75 25.63 7.0 0.083 00:49:56.3 118.74 25.64 10.8 0.304 10 5.0 2013−09−04 06:23:26.7 118.75 25.63 12.9 0.071 06:23:26.2 118.75 25.63 9.0 0.309 11 3.4 2013−09−14 02:59:50.8 118.76 25.62 6.6 0.093 02:59:49.8 118.75 25.62 10.9 0.291 12 3.3 2013−10−18 14:05:23.5 118.75 25.63 7.2 0.091 14:05:22.4 118.72 25.64 10.7 0.281 13 4.5 2013−10−30 01:50:12.3 118.75 25.62 9.4 0.097 01:50:11.4 118.73 25.63 7.9 0.229 14 3.2 2013−11−19 03:03:59.0 118.76 25.62 6.3 0.080 03:03:58.2 118.76 25.64 9.8 0.301 15 3.1 2013−12−16 19:01:36.0 118.75 25.64 5.6 0.071 19:01:35.2 118.74 25.65 10.7 0.347 16 3.1 2014−01−27 13:50:18.8 118.74 25.64 6.4 0.093 13:50:17.9 118.73 25.65 10.7 0.278 17 3.8 2014−03−14 19:53:36.1 118.75 25.63 7.0 0.153 19:53:35.0 118.74 25.64 10.4 0.230 18 3.0 2014−05−12 18:24:00.0 118.74 25.64 7.6 0.088 18:24:18.5 118.73 25.64 11.0 0.333 19 3.3 2014−07−19 01:50:16.0 118.74 25.64 5.8 0.111 01:50:15.1 118.73 25.65 8.7 0.312
下载: 导出CSV
-
蔡辉腾. 2015. 福建地区地壳上地幔三维P波速度结构研究[D]. 福州: 福州大学: 53−78. Cai H T. 2015. Three-Dimensional P-Wave Velocity Structure of the Curst and Upper Mantle in Fujian Region[D]. Fuzhou: Fuzhou University: 53−78 （in Chinese）.
蔡辉腾,金星,王善雄. 2015. 基于人工地震测深数据建立地壳一维速度结构[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,35(2):267–272. Cai H T,Jin X,Wang S X. 2015. Establishment of crust 1D velocity structure based on artificial earthquake sounding data[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,35(2):267–272 (in Chinese).
陈祥熊,林树,李祖宁,鲍挺,周峥嵘. 2005. 福建—台湾地区一维地壳速度结构的初始模型[J]. 地震,25(2):61–68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3274.2005.02.009 Chen X X,Lin S,Li Z N,Bao T,Zhou Z R. 2005. Preliminary 1-D model of crust velocity structure in Fujian-Taiwan region[J]. Earthquake,25(2):61–68 (in Chinese).
邓阳凡,李守林,范蔚茗,刘佳. 2011. 深地震测深揭示的华南地区地壳结构及其动力学意义[J]. 地球物理学报,54(10):2560–2574. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.10.013 Deng Y F,Li S L,Fan W M,Liu J. 2011. Crustal structure beneath South China revealed by deep seismic soundings and its dynamics implications[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,54(10):2560–2574 (in Chinese).
段刚. 2016. CAP方法反演福建仙游ML5.0、ML4.5级地震震源机制解[J]. 地球物理学进展,31(4):1432–1437. doi: 10.6038/pg20160403 Duan G. 2016. Inversion of the focal mechanisms of the ML5.0 and ML4.5 earthquake in Xianyou,Fujian using the CAP methods[J]. Progress in Geophysics,31(4):1432–1437 (in Chinese).
范玉兰,林纪曾,胡瑞贺,罗振暖. 1990. 华南地区近震走时表的研制[J]. 华南地震,10(2):1–16. Fan Y L,Lin J Z,Hu R H,Luo Z N. 1990. The development of travel timetable for near earthquakes in South China[J]. South China Journal of Seismology,10(2):1–16 (in Chinese).
黄晖,米宁,徐鸣洁,王良书,李华,于大勇. 2010. 福建地区地壳上地幔S波速度结构与泊松比[J]. 高校地质学报,16(4):465–474. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2010.04.006 Huang H,Mi N,Xu M J,Wang L S,Li H,Yu D Y. 2010. S-wave velocity structures of the crust and uppermost mantle,and Possion’s ratios in Fujian Province[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities,16(4):465–474 (in Chinese).
黄金莉, 李祖宁, 林树, 蔡晋安, 陈祥熊, 鲍挺. 2007. 福建及台湾地区三维P波地壳速度结构[C]//中国地球物理学会第二十三届年会论文集. 青岛: 中国海洋大学出版社: 393. Huang J L, Li Z N, Lin S, Cai J A, Chen X X, Bao T. 2007. 3D P-wave crustal velocity structure in Fujian and Taiwan[C]//The 23rdAnnual Meeting of the Chinese Geophysical Society. Qingdao: China Ocean University Press: 393 （in Chinese）.
金震. 2018. 福建及台湾海峡中南部三维地壳结构研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所: 41−69. Jin Z. 2018. Study on Three-Dimensional Crustal Structure in the Central and Southern Fujian Strait and Taiwan Strait[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration: 41−69 （in Chinese）.
金震,李山有,蔡辉腾,李培,李海艳,徐嘉隽. 2018. 福建及台湾海峡西侧地壳一维速度结构研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,38(3):81–93. Jin Z,Li S Y,Cai H T,Li P,Li H Y,Xu J J. 2018. Inversion for the 1D velocity model of onshore-offshore in Fujian area[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,38(3):81–93 (in Chinese).
李军,金星,鲍挺,林树,韦永祥,张红才. 2011. 利用噪声记录估计福建地区中上地壳体波速度结构[J]. 中国地震,27(3):226–234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2011.03.002 Li J,Jin X,Bao T,Lin S,Wei Y X,Zhang H C. 2011. The wave velocity structure of upper shell in Fujian estimated by the noise records[J]. Earthquake Research in China,27(3):226–234 (in Chinese).
李强,李军,袁丽文,邱毅,李锋,秦双龙,曹轶. 2015. 福建仙游震群序列ML≥4.0事件震源机制与序列活动特征[J]. 地震,35(4):147–156. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3274.2015.04.016 Li Q,Li J,Yuan L W,Qiu Y,Li F,Qin S L,Cao Y. 2015. Focal mechanisms and activity of ML≥4.0 events in the 2013 Xianyou earthquake swarm sequence in Fujian Province[J]. Earthquake,35(4):147–156 (in Chinese).
吕作勇,叶春明,房立华. 2016. 不同一维速度模型的地震定位效果比较:以小江断裂带为例[J]. 华南地震,36(3):43–50. Lü Z Y,Ye C M,Fang L H. 2016. Comparison of earthquake location effect of different 1D velocity model:Application to Xiaojiang fault zone[J]. South China Journal of Seismology,36(3):43–50 (in Chinese).
秦双龙,李强,邱毅,廖丽霞,陈莹. 2015. 福建仙游震群重定位及序列特征分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,36(3):67–71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2015.03.013 Qin S L,Li Q,Qiu Y,Liao L X,Chen Y. 2015. Relocation and sequence analysis for Xianyou earthquake swarm in Fujian Province[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,36(3):67–71 (in Chinese).
邱毅,金星,蔡辉腾,康兰池,陈惠芳. 2014. 利用人工地震研究福建地壳一维速度结构[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,34(增刊1):1071–1076. Qiu Y,Jin X,Cai H T,Kang L C,Chen H F. 2014. 1-D crust velocity structure in Fujian region using artificial earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,34(S1):1071–1076 (in Chinese).
袁丽文,郑斯华. 2009. 用远震接收函数反演福建地区宽频带台站下方莫霍界面深度[J]. 华南地震,29(3):85–97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8662.2009.03.011 Yuan L W,Zheng S H. 2009. Moho depths beneath broad-band stations in Fujian area inversed by teleseismic receiver function[J]. South China Journal of Seismology,29(3):85–97 (in Chinese).
朱金芳,徐锡伟,张先康,黄宗林,陈祥熊,方盛明,刘保金,郑荣章. 2005. 福州盆地及邻区地壳精细结构的深地震反射与高分辨率折射及宽角反射折射联合探测研究[J]. 中国科学:D辑,35(8):738–749. Zhu J F,Xu X W,Zhang X K,Huang Z L,Chen X X,Fang S M,Liu B J,Zheng R Z. 2005. Joint exploration of crustal structure in Fuzhou basin and its vicinities by deep seismic reflection and high-resolution refraction as well as wide-angle reflection/refraction[J]. Science in China:Series D,48(7):925–938. doi: 10.1360/04yd0321
Schweitzer J. 2001. HYPOSAT:An enhanced routine to locate seismic events[J]. Pure Appl Geophys,158(1):277–289. doi: 10.1007/PL00001160
计量
- 文章访问数: 700
- HTML全文浏览量: 377
- PDF下载量: 50
