长短极距比值干扰源定位方法及其在地电场观测中的实际应用

谭洁玉, 李蓝萍, 孙君嵩

谭洁玉,李蓝萍,孙君嵩. 2023. 长短极距比值干扰源定位方法及其在地电场观测中的实际应用. 地震学报,45(4):685−694. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220047
引用本文: 谭洁玉,李蓝萍,孙君嵩. 2023. 长短极距比值干扰源定位方法及其在地电场观测中的实际应用. 地震学报,45(4):685−694. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220047
Tan J Y,Li L P,Sun J S. 2023. A method for locating interference source by long-and-short polar distance ratio and its practical application in geoelectric field observation. Acta Seismologica Sinica45(4):685−694. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220047
Citation: Tan J Y,Li L P,Sun J S. 2023. A method for locating interference source by long-and-short polar distance ratio and its practical application in geoelectric field observation. Acta Seismologica Sinica45(4):685−694. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220047

长短极距比值干扰源定位方法及其在地电场观测中的实际应用

基金项目: 地震科技星火计划项目(XH22001YC)和江苏省地震局局长基金项目(202201)联合资助
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    谭洁玉,硕士,助理工程师,主要从事地震地磁研究,e-mail:tanjieyu1994@163.com

  • 中图分类号: P319.3

A method for locating interference source by long-and-short polar distance ratio and its practical application in geoelectric field observation

  • 摘要: 提出长短极距比值干扰源定位方法用来定位地电观测中出现的地表干扰源。该方法基于均匀半空间模型且地表干扰为点电源,利用地表不同位置的干扰源所引起的同测向长短极距的电场变化差异,联合多测向比值来定位干扰源位置,并应用到徐庄子台漏电干扰一例和高邮台偶极源试验中。结果表明:利用长短极距比值法,能有效定位干扰点源,且能定位偶极干扰源的其中一个电极。
    Abstract: The long and short pole distance ratio method in geoelectric observation is employed here to locate the near-surface disturbance sources, on the assumption of a uniform half-space model and that the near-surface disturbance is a point source. The disturbance sources of different locations can cause different increments in the long-pole-distance and short-pole-distance geoelectric field at the same direction, which is the key mind of this method. By combining multi-directional long-and-short pole distance ratios in geoelectric field, we successfully applied this method into locating the disturbance sources of the leakage at Xuzhuangzi station and the dipole source test at Gaoyou station. The results show that the point source producing the interference in geoelectric field at Xuzhuangzi station can be effectively located, and one electrode of the dipole source can be discovered in the Gaoyou station test as well.
  • 图  1   我国地电场观测布极方式示意图

    (a) 十字形布设;(b) L形布设

    Figure  1.   Schematic diagram of the electrode arrangement for our geoelectric field observation

    (a) Cruciform layout;(b) L-shaped layout

    图  2   不同的电极布设坐标示意图(左)、地电场长短极距比值分布图(中)和比值确定时的等值线图(右)

    (a) 十字形东西向;(b) L形东西向;(c) L形北东向

    Figure  2.   Schematic diagram of different electrode layout coordinates (left),distribution of the long and short pole distance ratio for geoelectric field (middle),and contour map when the ratio is determined (right)

    (a) Cross-shaped east-west direction;(b) L-shaped east-west direction; (c) L-shaped north-east direction

    图  3   长短极距比定位漏电干扰源示意图

    Figure  3.   Schematic diagram of locating leakage interference source by long-and-short polar distance ratio

    图  4   徐庄子地震台地电场观测系统电极布置方式示意图 (单位:m)

    Figure  4.   The sketch map of layout patterns for electrodes in geoelectric field observatory systems at Xuzhuangzi seismic station (unit:m)

    图  5   徐庄子台2010年11月16日地电场分钟数据对比曲线

    Figure  5.   Comparison curves of minute data of geoelectric field at Xuzhuangzi station on November 16,2010

    图  6   徐庄子台干扰源定位结果示意图

    Figure  6.   Schematic diagram of the location result of the interference source at Xuzhuangzi station

    图  7   高邮地震台地电场及地电阻率同场观测电极布极图(单位:m)

    Figure  7.   The sketch map of layout patterns for electrodes in geoelectric field and earth resistivity observatory systems at Gaoyou seismic station (unit:m)

    图  8   偶极干扰源试验定位结果示意图

    Figure  8.   Schematic diagram of the location results of the dipole interference source test

    表  1   徐庄子台干扰电场长短极距比

    Table  1   Long-and-short polar distance ratio of interference electric field at Xuzhuangzi station

    11月干扰事件
    (日-时-分)
    EW向NS向
    长极距短极距长短极距比长极距短极距长短极距比
    14-19-522.612.810.9292.252.710.830
    16-17-192.252.620.8592.463.290.748
    17-17-162.202.490.8842.553.110.820
    20-22-251.942.360.8222.022.690.751
    21-07-400.961.060.9061.021.220.836
    平均值0.8800.797
    注:表1中干扰电场的单位为mV/km,数据来源于陈志刚等(2012
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   偶极源试验中干扰电场长短极距比

    Table  2   Long-and-short polar distance ratio of interference electric field in dipole source test

    试验时间EW向NS向NE向
    长极距短极距长短极距比 长极距短极距长短极距比 长极距短极距长短极距比
    6日18时3.2506.1480.52932.17336.7480.8763.372−11.767−0.287
    7日00时3.3086.2120.53332.11036.6720.8763.384−11.788−0.287
    7日09时5.96811.2160.53258.30566.4840.8776.118−21.316−0.287
    平均值0.5310.876−0.287
    注:表2中干扰电场的单位为mV/km,数据来源于张宇等(2017
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 陈志刚,田山,徐学恭,马朝晖,陈嵩. 2012. 地电场观测漏电干扰的排查一例[J]. 华北地震科学,30(4):44–48.

    Chen Z G,Tian S,Xu X G,Ma Z H,Chen S. 2012. Study on electricity-leaking interference in geoelectric field observation at Xuzhuangzi seismic station[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences,30(4):44–48 (in Chinese).

    蒋延林,赵卫红,王福才,张骞,朱晔. 2015. 一种地电场观测环境干扰的分析和试验研究[J]. 中国地震,31(1):158–164.

    Jiang Y L,Zhao W H,Wang F C,Zhang Q,Zhu Y. 2015. Analysis and experimental study of the environment interference in the geo-electric field observation[J]. Earthquake Research in China,31(1):158–164 (in Chinese).

    李伟,马钦忠,王冠玥. 2014. 地电场多极距观测的异常识别和分析[J]. 中国地震,30(1):91–101.

    Li W,Ma Q Z,Wang G Y. 2014. Abnormal signal recognition by multi-dipole observation of geoelectric field[J]. Earthquake Research in China,30(1):91–101 (in Chinese).

    马钦忠,钱家栋,李伟,赵文舟,方国庆. 2016. 源自多个大电流源的华东地区地电场空间变化特征[J]. 地球物理学报,59(7):2598–2614.

    Ma Q Z,Qian J D,Li W,Zhao W Z,Fang G Q. 2016. Characteristics of the spatial variation of geoelectric field signals recorded at the stations in Huadong area in China when 4 heavy currents are injected[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,59(7):2598–2614 (in Chinese).

    谭大诚,赵家骝,刘小凤,范莹莹,刘君,陈军营. 2014. 自然电场的区域性变化特征[J]. 地球物理学报,57(5):1588–1598.

    Tan D C,Zhao J L,Liu X F,Fan Y Y,Liu J,Chen J Y. 2014. Features of regional variations of the spontaneous field[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,57(5):1588–1598 (in Chinese).

    田山,王建国,徐学恭,董洪军,崔晓峰,马骥. 2009. 大地电场观测地震前兆异常提取技术研究[J]. 地震学报,31(4):424–431.

    Tian S,Wang J G,Xu X G,Dong H J,Cui X F,Ma J. 2009. Research on the technique of extracting seismic precursory anomaly from telluric electric field observation[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,31(4):424–431 (in Chinese).

    王福才,蒋延林,张骞,赵卫红,朱晔,薛家富. 2013. 地电观测场地干扰的一种测试查找方法[J]. 西北地震学报,35(增刊):126–134.

    Wang F C,Jiang Y L,Zhang Q,Zhao W H,Zhu Y,Xue J F. 2013. A test and search method for the interferences in geoelectric observation field[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal,35(S1):126–134 (in Chinese).

    卫清,颜蕊,韩秀红,温晋. 2017. 基于牛顿迭代法的地电场观测人为漏电干扰源反演及其应用[J]. 地球物理学进展,32(4):1490–1495.

    Wei Q,Yan R,Han X H,Wen J. 2017. Inversion for artificial electricity-leaking in geo-electric field observations based on Newton iteration and its application[J]. Progress in Geophysics,32(4):1490–1495 (in Chinese).

    张宇,王兰炜,赵家骝,蒋延林,胡哲,张兴国,王福才. 2017. 地电观测中电磁干扰源定位方法研究[J]. 地震学报,39(3):367–373.

    Zhang Y,Wang L W,Zhao J L,Jiang Y L,Hu Z,Zhang X G,Wang F C. 2017. Location method of electromagnetic interference sources in geo-electric field observation[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,39(3):367–373 (in Chinese).

    中国地震学会. 2007. 中国地震科技事业的发展[J]. 国际地震动态,(8):23–37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4975.2007.08.010

    Seismological Society of China. 2007. The development of the Chinese seismological science and technology[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology,(8):23–37 (in Chinese).

    Helman D S. 2020. Seismic electric signals (SES) and earthquakes:A review of an updated VAN method and competing hypotheses for SES generation and earthquake triggering[J]. Phys Earth Planet Inter,302:106484. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2020.106484

    Miyakoshi J. 1986. Anomalous time variation of the self-potential in the fractured zone of an active fault preceding the earthquake occurrence[J]. J Geomagn Geoelectr,38(10):1015–1030. doi: 10.5636/jgg.38.1015

    Varotsos P,Alexopoulos K. 1984. Physical properties of the variations of the electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes,I[J]. Tectonophysics,110(1/2):73–98.

图(8)  /  表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  311
  • HTML全文浏览量:  93
  • PDF下载量:  63
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-04-05
  • 修回日期:  2022-08-10
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-06-29
  • 发布日期:  2023-07-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回