吴羿锋,唐方头,姜旭东. 2024. 麦宿断裂地震地表破裂带的发震构造分析. 地震学报,46(5):1−16. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220225
引用本文: 吴羿锋,唐方头,姜旭东. 2024. 麦宿断裂地震地表破裂带的发震构造分析. 地震学报,46(5):1−16. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220225
Wu Y F,Tang F T,Jiang X D. 2024. Seismogenic structure analysis of earthquake surface rupture zone in Maisu fault. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(5):1−16. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220225
Citation: Wu Y F,Tang F T,Jiang X D. 2024. Seismogenic structure analysis of earthquake surface rupture zone in Maisu fault. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(5):1−16. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220225

麦宿断裂地震地表破裂带的发震构造分析

Seismogenic structure analysis of earthquake surface rupture zone in Maisu fault

  • 摘要: 基于麦宿断裂地震地表破裂带周围架设的密集地震台阵2020年12月至2022年7月的连续波形数据,采用双差定位方法获得31.55°—31.85°N,98.31°—98.98°E区域内578个地震事件;利用基于P波初动的HSAH方法进行震源机制解反演,获得了37组震源机制解;并基于震源机制解的阻尼区域应力场反演方法对研究区域的应力环境进行分析。精定位结果显示:研究区内沿地震地表破裂带分布了一条长约40 km的WNW−ESE向地震密集条带,震源密集分布在3—10 km深度范围内,深度剖面向北陡倾,同时还存在一条长约30 km的NNW−SSE向地震密集条带,震源密集分布在3—11 km深度范围内,深度剖面向西陡倾。震源机制解结果显示,研究区内地震的震源机制解以走滑型为主,占总数的51.4%,同时也存在少量逆断型和正断型。震源机制解P轴的优势方位为近NW−SE向,与最大主压应力轴σ1方向323°相近。P轴、T轴、最大主压应力轴σ1以及最小主压应力轴σ3的倾角总体上较小,表明研究区内应力为近NW−SE向的水平挤压状态;应力结构类型为走滑型,与定位和震源机制解结果相同。应力形因子R=0.57,表明最大主压应力轴σ1、中间主压应力轴σ2和最小主压应力轴σ3的本征值基本呈等差数列排列,其中σ1σ3均为确定值。WNW−ESE向的地震密集条带具右旋走滑兼有正断和逆断分量,NNW−SSE向的地震密集条带具左旋走滑特征,表现为共轭断层特征。综合认为研究区曾发生过一次M>7地震;近NW−SE向的水平挤压的应力状态与北部NW−SE向的甘孜—玉树—鲜水河断裂强烈左旋走滑有关。

     

    Abstract: Based on the continuous seismic waveform data of the dense seismic array set up around the surface rupture zone of the Maishu fault earthquake from December 2020 to July 2022, 578 seismic events in the area of 31.55°−31.85°N and 98.31°−98.98°E were obtained by using the double difference location method. Using HSAH method based on P-wave initial motion, 37 sets of focal mechanism solutions are obtained. The stress environment of the study area is analyzed based on the inversion method of stress field in damped region with focal mechanism solution. The relocation results show that there is a WNW-ESE seismic dense strip about 40 km long along the seismic surface rupture zone in the study area. The focus is densely distributed in the depth range of 3−10 km, the depth profile slopes sharply to the north, and there is also a NNW-SSE seismic dense strip about 30 km long. The focus is densely distributed in the depth range of 3−11 km, and the depth profile slopes sharply to the west. The results of focal mechanism analysis show that strike-slip type is the main source mechanism of earthquakes in the study area, accounting for 51.4% of the total, and there are also a few reverse fault types and positive fault types. The dominant azimuth of the focal mechanism solution P axis is near NW-SE trending, which is similar to the direction of the maximum principal compressive stress axis σ1 323°; the P and T axes, as well as the maximum compressive stress σ1 and minimum compressive stress σ3 axes have small dip angles in genera, which indicates that the horizontal compressive stress state in the study area is nearly NW-SE trending. The type of stress structure is strike slip, which is the same with the location and focal mechanism solution. R=0.57, indicating that the maximum compressive stress axis σ1, the intermediate compressive stress axis σ2 and the minimum compressive stress axis σ3 are basically arranged in an isometric manner, in which σ1 and σ3 are clear. The WNW-ESE trending seismic dense strip has dextral strike-slip with both normal and reverse fault components, while the NNW-SSE trending seismic dense strip has sinistral strike-slip characteristics with conjugate fault characteristics. It is concluded that an earthquake of magnitude 7 or above has occurred in the study area. The stress state of the nearly NW-SE trending horizontal extrusion is related to the strong sinistral strike slip of the NW-SE trending Ganzi-Yushu-Xianshuihe fault.

     

/

返回文章
返回