利用主-被动源面波联合探测郯庐断裂带内安丘—莒县断裂的浅部构造特征

Utilizing joint active-passive surface source wave exploration to study the shallow tectonic characteristics of the Anqiu-Juxian fault in the Tanlu fault zone

  • 摘要: 郯庐断裂带安丘—莒县断裂(编号F5)为全新世活动断裂,本文通过主-被动源面波联合勘探技术,以同排列方式采集主、被动源面波信号,利用叠加频散能量谱拓宽面波观测频带,结合遗传算法反演获取探测区域内的二维 S 波速度结构,进而探究该断裂的浅部构造特征。结果表明:探测区地壳介质横向非均匀性显著,S 波速度结构呈现明显分段特征,在测线110,160和640 m处分别识别出断点F5-1-1F5-1F5-2。其中F5-1F5-2F5 断裂的两条边界断裂,呈相向倾斜的断陷构造形态,破碎带宽度达 330 m。此外,反演结果还显示F5断裂的西边界并非独立断裂,而是由断点F5-1和次级断裂F5-1-1共同构成的断裂带;该断裂带破碎带内 S 波速度整体以低速为主,局部发育多处高速异常体,推测这些高速异常体可能记录了F5 断裂活动迹象。

     

    Abstract:
    The Tanlu fault zone is the most active fault zone in eastern China, exhibiting multi-phase, complex, and segmented activity characteristics. Based on its geometric structure and activity, the Tanlu fault zone can be divided into four sections from south to north: the Jiashan-Guangji, Weifang-Jiashan, Xialiaohe-Laizhouwan, and Hegang-Tieling sections. Among these, the Weifang-Jiashan section displays the strongest tectonic activity, within which the F5 fault (Anqiu-Juxian fault) is identified as the most recent Holocene active fault. Studying its shallow tectonic characteristics is critical for understanding fault evolution and assessing seismic hazards.
    Domestic and international scholars have reached a consensus on the developmental scale, strike, and activity characteristics of the F5 fault. However, rapid and effective methods for detecting fault zone width and internal medium structure remain lacking. While core drilling offers high precision, its high cost and lengthy duration limit widespread application. Reflection wave exploration can locate fault points by analyzing co-phase axis deformation and diffracted wave development, but it fails to resolve detailed internal medium structures. Advances in observation technology and data processing now make high-resolution surface wave exploration a promising solution.
    Rayleigh wave exploration, an emerging geophysical method, enables rapid and cost-effective shear wave velocity measurements, making it a research hotspot. Rayleigh wave methods are categorized into active-source and passive-source techniques based on seismic excitation modes. The active-source method yields high-frequency signals but has limited depth resolution, whereas the passive-source method provides low-frequency signals for deeper exploration. Combining both approaches enhances effective exploration depth while maintaining shallow-structure accuracy.
    This study employs a joint detection method for active and passive surface waves, acquiring data using identical array configurations for both sources. Dispersion spectra are superimposed to improve dispersion curve quality and expand the observable frequency range. A genetic algorithm inverts the 2D S-wave velocity structure.
    Results reveal significant lateral heterogeneity in the crustal medium, with a segmented S-wave velocity structure. Fault points are identified at distances 110 m (F5-1-1), 160 m (F5-1), and 640 m (F5-2). The F5-1 and F5-2 faults form opposing boundary faults (dip angles 70° and 65°, respectively), creating a graben structure with a 330 m-wide fracture zone. The western boundary is not a single fault but a composite zone comprising F5-1 and its secondary fault F5-1-1. The fracture zone exhibits overall low S-wave velocities but contains localized high-velocity anomalies, likely reflecting F5 fault activity.
    Comparisons with shallow seismic exploration and borehole profiles confirm that the joint method accurately locates main fault surfaces, while also providing clearer delineation of fracture zone width and internal material structure. This approach is particularly effective for shallow faults or high-interference environments like urban areas.

     

/

返回文章
返回