Research on the eleventh generation IGRF
-
摘要: 详细阐述了国际地磁参考场模型IGRF11的建模原理、 数据来源、 球谐系数及误差来源等. 以NOAA/NGDC候选地磁场模型为例, 分析了数据的选取原则和校正方法. 在MATLAB环境下, 研制了该模型的可视化软件, 为制备地磁仿真基准图提供了最有可能和最为便捷的途径, 能有效使用国际公开数据, 减少外场地磁实测工作量和成本, 对地磁导航工程化具有重要的价值. 对模型检验值和实测值与模型计算值进行比较, 结果表明, 软件计算结果是正确的、 可靠的; 对IGRF11与WMM2010模型的异同点进行比较, 结果表明, WMM2010的模型精度要高于IGRF11, 具有更为广阔的适用范围. 最后, 从模型长期变化估算角度入手, 分析了引起IGRF11模型计算精度低的原因.Abstract: This paper expounds in detail the modeling principle, data sources, spherical harmonic coefficients and error sources of the 11th generation international geomagnetic reference field model (IGRF11). Taking the NOAA/NGDC candidate geomagnetic model as an example, an analysis is made on the data selection principle and calibration method. Under MATLAB environment, a visual software of the model was developed, providing the most possible and convenient way for making a geomagnetic reference map. This enables the effective use of international open data, and reduces the workload and cost of geomagnetic measurements, therefore, it is valuable for geomagnetic navigation. Comparing the test and measured values with the calculated value shows that the calculation results of the software are correct and reliable; and comparing IGRF11 with WMM2010 for their similarities and differences reveals that WMM2010 has higher accuracy and a wider scope of application than IGRF11. Finally, by estimating long-time variation, the reason for low calculation accuracy of IGRF11 is analyzed.
-
Keywords:
- magnetic model /
- IGRF11 /
- WMM2010 /
- spherical harmonic coefficient
-
-
表 1 数据的选择标准
Table 1 Data selection criteria
表 2 实测数据修正
Table 2 Correction of experimental data
表 3 单点位置磁场要素值
Table 3 Magnetic elements of a single spot
表 4 误差分析
Table 4 Error analysis
表 5 球谐系数的比较
Table 5 The spherical harmonic coefficients
-
安振昌. 1992. 地磁场模型和球冠谐模型分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 7(3): 73-80. 李忠亮, 边少锋. 2011. 世界地磁场模型WMM2010及其应用[J]. 舰船电子工程, 31(2): 58-61. 王丹, 彭丰林, 马麦宁, 袁晓茹, 白春华, 孙立江. 2009. IGRF国际地磁参考场可视化研究[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 30(4): 7-11. 王亶文. 2005. IGRF在地磁研究中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 20(2): 558-561. 王仕成, 苏德伦, 张金生. 2007. 基于WMM2005的地磁计算[C]//刘代志(主编). 第三届国家安全与军事地球物理学术研讨会. 西安: 西安地图出版社: 116-119. 徐文耀. 2000. 地磁学[M]. 北京: 地震出版社: 123-133. Ackson A, Jonkers A R T, Walker M R. 2000. Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records[J]. Philos T Roy Soc A, 358(1768): 957-990.
Facius R, Reitz G. 2007. Space weather impacts on space radiation protection[M]//Bothmer V, Daglis L A eds. Space Weather, Physics and Effects. Berlin: Springer Verlag: 289-352.
Finlay C C, Maus S, Beggan C D. 2010. International geomagnetic reference field: the eleventh generation[J]. Geophys J Int, 183(3): 1216-1230.
Heirtzler J R. 2002. The future of the south Atlantic anomaly and implications for radiation damage in space[J]. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phy, 64(16): 1701-1708.
Kuvshinov A, Olsen N. 2004. 3-D modelling of the magnetic fields due to ocean tidal flow[M]//Reigber C, Lühr H, Schwintzer P, Wickert J eds. Earth Observation with CHAMP: Results from Three Years in Orbit. Berlin: Springer Verlag: 359-365.
Lowes F J. 2000. An estimate of the errors of IGRF/DGRF field 1945-2000[J]. Earth Planets Space, 52: 1207-1211.
Macmillan S, Turbitt C, Thomson A. 2009. Ascension and prot stanley geomagnetic observatories and monitoring the south Atlantic anomaly[J]. Ann Geophys-Italy, 52(1): 83-96.
Macmillan S, Finlay C C. 2011. The International Geomagnetic Reference Field[M]//Mandea M, Korte M eds. IAGA Special Sopron Book Series, 5: Geomagnetic Observations and Models: 265-276.
Maus S, Mclean S, Hamilton B, Thomson A, Nair M. 2010. The US/UK world magnetic model for 2010-2015[R/OL]. NOAA Technical Report NESDIS/NGDC. 1-11[2012-03-15]. http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/18737.
Newitt L R, Chulliar A, Orgeval J J. 2009. Location of the north magnetic pole in April 2007[J]. Earth Planets Space, 61: 703-710.