基于改进长短时窗比值及优化变分模态分解的微震初至拾取算法

孟娟, 吴燕雄, 李亚南

孟娟,吴燕雄,李亚南. 2022. 基于改进长短时窗比值及优化变分模态分解的微震初至拾取算法. 地震学报,44(3):388−400. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20200199
引用本文: 孟娟,吴燕雄,李亚南. 2022. 基于改进长短时窗比值及优化变分模态分解的微震初至拾取算法. 地震学报,44(3):388−400. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20200199
Meng J,Wu Y X,Li Y N. 2022. First arrival time picking algorithm of micro-seismic based on improved STA/LTA and adaptive VMD. Acta Seismologica Sinica44(3):388−400. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20200199
Citation: Meng J,Wu Y X,Li Y N. 2022. First arrival time picking algorithm of micro-seismic based on improved STA/LTA and adaptive VMD. Acta Seismologica Sinica44(3):388−400. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20200199

基于改进长短时窗比值及优化变分模态分解的微震初至拾取算法

基金项目: 河北省教育厅高等学校科学研究计划项目(QN2020527)和中央高校基本科研业务费项目(QN2020527)联合资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    孟娟,硕士,讲师,主要从事地震资料信号处理和地震仪表设计领域的教学与科研工作,e-mail:mengjuan@cidp.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: P315.3+1

First arrival time picking algorithm of micro-seismic based on improved STA/LTA and adaptive VMD

  • 摘要: 针对低信噪比条件下微震初至拾取准确度低的问题,基于信号幅度变化引入权重因子,对传统长短时窗比值(STA/LTA)算法进行改进,提高初次拾取精度。为了进一步降低拾取误差,对变分模态分解(VMD)算法进行优化,基于互相关系数和排列熵准则自适应确定VMD分解层数,对初次拾取结果前后2—3 s的记录进行优化VMD,并计算分解后各本征模函数(IMF)的峰度赤池信息准则值,得到各IMF的到时,以各IMF的拾取结果及能量比综合加权得到二次拾取到时。仿真实验表明:改进后的STA/LTA在较低信噪比下可降低初次拾取误差约0.01 s以上;相比经验模态分解(EMD)和小波包分解,自适应VMD分解后能再次降低误差,最终与人工拾取结果平均误差在0.023 s以内。实际微震信号初至拾取结果表明,本算法能快速有效地识别初至P波,与人工拾取结果相比误差小,准确率高。
    Abstract: Accurate and reliable picking of the first arrival time is one of the critical steps in micro-seismic monitoring. Aiming at the problem of low accuracy of first arrival picking for micro-seisms under low signal-to-noise ratio, the traditional short term averaging/long term averaging algorithm is improved by introducing weight factor according to the change of signal amplitude to improve the accuracy of initial pickup. In order to further reduce the pickup error, variational mode decomposition (VMD) is optimized based on cross-correlation coefficient and permutation entropy criterion, and decomposition layers are determined adaptively. Then, the signals of 2−3 s before and after the initial pickup are decomposed by VMD, and the Kurtosis-Akaike information criterion (AIC) values of the decomposed intrinsic mode functions (IMF) are calculated to get the arrival time of each IMF, and the secondary arrival time is obtained by comprehensively weighting the picking results and energy ratios of each IMF. Simulation results show that the improved STA/LTA can reduce the initial picking error by more than 0.01 s at low SNR; compared with empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and wavelet packet decomposition, the adaptive VMD decomposition can reduce the picking error again, and the finalaverage picking error is less than 0.023 s. The first arrival time picking results of real micro-seismic signals show that the proposed algorithm can identify the first break of P-wave quickly and effectively, and the error is smaller than that of manual picking, which shows that the algorithm is effective and the picking accuracy is high.
  • 图  1   基于改进STA/LTA及优化VMD的微震初至拾取算法流程图

    Figure  1.   The flow chart of the first break picking of micro-seismic based on imp-roved STA/LTA and adaptive VMD

    图  2   基于雷克子波和卷积模型的理论和模拟地震记录

    Figure  2.   Theoretical and simulated seismogram based on Ricker wavelet and convolution model

    图  3   三种STA/LTA算法拾取结果

    Figure  3.   Picking up results of three kinds of STA/LTA algorithms

    图  4   不同SNR下三种STA/LTA算法拾取误差曲线

    Figure  4.   Picking up error curves of three STA/LTA algorithms under different SNRs

    图  5   优化VMD峰度AIC为3.07 s时的初至拾取结果

    Figure  5.   First arrival picking based on improved VMD when Kurtosis-AIC is 3.07 s

    图  6   基于EMD-AIC算法的初至拾取

    Figure  6.   First arrival picking based on EMD-AIC

    图  7   基于小波包峰度AIC的初至拾取

    Figure  7.   First arrival picking based on wavelet packet Kurtosis-AIC

    图  8   初次与二次P波拾取的误差对比

    Figure  8.   Comparison of initial and second P-wave picking errors

    图  9   3种不同算法的拾取误差对比

    Figure  9.   Picking errors of three different algorithms

    图  10   广西平果2013年7月4日ML1.3爆破的一条实际微震记录

    Figure  10.   Real micro-seismic record of some coal mine with ML1.3 at Pingguo,Guangxi on July 4th 2013

    图  11   本文改进STA/LTA初次拾取结果

    Figure  11.   First picking results of improved STA/LTA in this paper

    图  12   本文改进STA/LTA及优化VMD峰度AIC拾取结果

    Figure  12.   First arrival picking by improved STA/LTA and adaptive VMD Kurtosis-AIC

    图  13   EMD-AIC拾取结果

    Figure  13.   Picking results of EMD-AIC

    图  14   小波包峰度AIC的拾取结果

    Figure  14.   Picking results of wavelet packet Kurtosis-AIC

    表  1   实际微震记录初至拾取结果

    Table  1   First arrival picking of real micro-seismics

    拾取方法误差 30 ms误差 20 ms误差 10 ms
    记录条数占比记录条数占比记录条数占比
    本文 1 117 98.2% 1 090 95.9% 1 031 90.7%
    EMD-AIC 1 090 95.9% 1 052 92.5% 980 86.2%
    小波包峰度AIC 1 075 94.5% 1 037 91.2% 968 85.1%
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 贾瑞生,谭云亮,孙红梅,洪永发. 2015. 低信噪比微震P波震相初至自动拾取方法[J]. 煤炭学报,40(8):1845–1852.

    Jia R S,Tan Y L,Sun H M,Hong Y F. 2015. Method of automatic detection on micro-seismic P-arrival time under low signal-to-noise ratio[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,40(8):1845–1852 (in Chinese).

    李伟,江晓林,陈海波,金珠鹏,刘志军,李兴伟,林井祥. 2018. 基于EEMD_Hankel_SVD的矿山微震信号降噪方法[J]. 煤炭学报,43(7):1910–1917.

    Li W,Jiang X L,Chen H B,Jin Z P,Liu Z J,Li X W,Lin J X. 2018. Denosing method of mine microseismic signal based on EEMD_Hankel_SVD[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,43(7):1910–1917 (in Chinese).

    刘晗,张建中. 2014. 微震信号自动检测的STA/LTA算法及其改进分析[J]. 地球物理学进展,29(4):1708–1714. doi: 10.6038/pg20140429

    Liu H,Zhang J Z. 2014. STA/LTA algorithm analysis and improvement of microseismic signal automatic detection[J]. Progress in Geophysics,29(4):1708–1714 (in Chinese).

    刘晓明,赵君杰,王运敏,彭平安. 2017. 基于改进的STA/LTA方法的微地震P波自动拾取技术[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版),38(5):740–745.

    Liu X M,Zhao J J,Wang Y M,Peng P A. 2017. Automatic picking of microseismic events P-wave arrivals based on improved method of STA/LTA[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science),38(5):740–745 (in Chinese).

    唐贵基,王晓龙. 2015. 参数优化变分模态分解方法在滚动轴承早期故障诊断中的应用[J]. 西安交通大学学报,49(5):73–81. doi: 10.7652/xjtuxb201505012

    Tang G J,Wang X L. 2015. Parameter optimized variational mode decomposition method with application to incipient fault diagnosis of rolling bearing[J]. Journal of Xian Jiaotong University,49(5):73–81 (in Chinese).

    田优平,赵爱华. 2016. 基于小波包和峰度赤池信息量准则的P波震相自动识别方法[J]. 地震学报,38(1):71–85. doi: 10.11939/jass.2016.01.007

    Tian Y P,Zhao A H. 2016. Automatic identification of P-phase based on wavelet packet and kurtosis-AIC method[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,38(1):71–85 (in Chinese).

    王志坚,常雪,王俊元,杜文华,段能全,党长营. 2018. 排列熵优化改进变模态分解算法诊断齿轮箱故障[J]. 农业工程学报,34(23):59–66. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.23.007

    Wang Z J,Chang X,Wang J Y,Du W H,Duan N Q,Dang C Y. 2018. Gearbox fault diagnosis based on permutation entropy optimized variational mode decomposition[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,34(23):59–66 (in Chinese).

    赵大鹏,刘希强,刘尧兴,王志铄,赵晖,张亚琳. 2013. 高阶统计量及AIC方法在区域地震事件和直达P波初动识别中的应用[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,34(5/6):61–69.

    Zhao D P,Liu X Q,Liu Y X,Wang Z S,Zhao H,Zhang Y L. 2013. Detection of regional seismic events by high order statistics method and automatic identification of direct P-wave first motion by AIC method[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,34(5/6):61–69 (in Chinese).

    郑近德,程军圣,杨宇. 2013. 改进的EEMD算法及其应用研究[J]. 振动与冲击,32(21):21–26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.21.004

    Zheng J D,Cheng J S,Yang Y. 2013. Modified EEMD algorithm and its applications[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,32(21):21–26 (in Chinese).

    郑小霞,周国旺,任浩翰,符杨. 2017. 基于变分模态分解和排列熵的滚动轴承故障诊断[J]. 振动与冲击,36(22):22–28.

    Zheng X X,Zhou G W,Ren H H,Fu Y. 2017. A rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on variational mode decomposition and permutation entropy[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,36(22):22–28 (in Chinese).

    朱权洁,姜福兴,魏全德,王博,刘金海,刘晓辉. 2018. 煤层水力压裂微震信号P波初至的自动拾取方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,37(10):2319–2333.

    Zhu Q J,Jiang F X,Wei Q D,Wang B,Liu J H,Liu X H. 2018. An automatic method determining arrival times of microseismic P-phase in Hydraulic fracturing of coal seam[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,37(10):2319–2333 (in Chinese).

    Bandt C,Pompe B. 2002. Permutation entropy:A natural complexity measure for time series[J]. Phys Rev Lett,88(17):174102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.174102

    Charles M,Ge M C. 2018. Enhancing manual P-phase arrival detection and automatic onset time picking in a noisy microseismic data in underground mines[J]. Int J Min Sci Technol,28(4):691–699. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.05.024

    Dragomiretskiy K,Zosso D. 2014. Variational mode decomposition[J]. IEEE Trans Signal Proc,62(3):531–544. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675

    Gaci S. 2014. The use of wavelet-based denoising techniques to enhance the first-arrival picking on seismic traces[J]. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens,52(8):4558–4563. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2282422

    Kirbas I,Peker M. 2017. Signal detection based on empirical mode decomposition and Teager-Kaiser energy operator and its application to P and S wave arrival time detection in seismic signal analysis[J]. Neural Comput Appl,28(10):3035–3045. doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2333-5

    Li F Y,Zhang B,Verma S,Marfurt K J. 2018. Seismic signal denoising using thresholded variational mode decomposition[J]. Explora Geophys,49(4):450–461. doi: 10.1071/EG17004

    Li X B,Shang X Y,Wang Z W,Dong L J,Weng L. 2016. Identifying P-phase arrivals with noise:An improved Kurtosis method based on DWT and STA/LTA[J]. J Appl Geophys,133:50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.07.022

    Li X B, Shang X Y, Morales-Esteban A, Wang Z W. 2017. Identifying P phase arrival of weak events: The Akaike information criterion picking application based on the empirical mode decomposition[J] Comput Geosci, 100: 57–66.

    Liu M Z,Yang J X,Cao Y P,Fu W N,Cao Y L. 2017. A new method for arrival time determination of impact signal based on HHT and AIC[J]. Mech Syst Signal Proc,86:177–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.10.003

    Shang X Y,Li X B,Morales-Esteban A,Dong L J. 2018. Enhancing micro-seismic P-phase arrival picking:EMD-cosine function-based denoising with an application to the AIC picker[J]. J Appl Geophys,150:325–337. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.09.012

    Xue Y J,Cao J X,Wang D X,Du H K,Yao Y. 2016. Application of the variational-mode decomposition for seismic time-frequency analysis[J]. IEEE J Select Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens,9(8):3821–3831. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2529702

图(14)  /  表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  731
  • HTML全文浏览量:  326
  • PDF下载量:  125
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-12-03
  • 修回日期:  2021-05-25
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-04-07
  • 发布日期:  2022-06-26

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回