蔡妍,吴建平,房立华,刘雅宁,王长在,肖雨辰. 2023. 2022年芦山MS6.1地震:发生在隐伏反冲断层上的一次中强地震. 地震学报,45(5):1−12. doi: 10.11939/jass.20220173
引用本文: 蔡妍,吴建平,房立华,刘雅宁,王长在,肖雨辰. 2023. 2022年芦山MS6.1地震:发生在隐伏反冲断层上的一次中强地震. 地震学报,45(5):1−12. doi: 10.11939/jass.20220173
Cai Y,Wu J P,Fang L H,Liu Y N,Wang C Z,Xiao Y C. 2023. The 2022 Lushan MS6.1 earthquake: A strong earthquake on a blind back thrust fault. Acta Seismologica Sinica45(5):1−12. doi: 10.11939/jass.20220173
Citation: Cai Y,Wu J P,Fang L H,Liu Y N,Wang C Z,Xiao Y C. 2023. The 2022 Lushan MS6.1 earthquake: A strong earthquake on a blind back thrust fault. Acta Seismologica Sinica45(5):1−12. doi: 10.11939/jass.20220173

2022年芦山MS6.1地震:发生在隐伏反冲断层上的一次中强地震

The 2022 Lushan MS6.1 earthquake: A strong earthquake on a blind back thrust fault

  • 摘要: 继2008年汶川MS8.0地震和2013年芦山MS7.0地震后,2022年6月1日,在龙门山断裂带南段又发生了一次MS6.1强震,距离芦山MS7.0地震震中位置仅10 km。为研究此次地震的发震断层及两次芦山地震的关系,我们对震后60天的余震序列进行重定位,获得了933个高精度定位结果,定位误差在EW,NS和UD方向分别为0.15 km,0.13 km和0.23 km。余震序列在水平分布上沿北东—南西向略长,在深度上主要分布在12—20 km,10 km以浅余震很少。余震震源深度剖面显示发震断层面(倾向南东),与芦山MS7.0地震发震断层结构中的反冲断层倾向一致,两次芦山地震的发震断层结构相交成为复式Y型断裂结构,此次芦山地震的发震断层为其中一条深度更深的反冲断层。此次地震没有产生地表破裂,推测发震断层为一条埋深较深的隐伏断层。两次芦山地震的余震震中分布区跨过了该区域一条大型逆冲型断裂带,即双石—大川断裂带。深度剖面显示芦山MS7.0地震的南东倾向余震带穿过双石—大川分支断裂,大部分集中在断裂下方,但有少量地震发生在断裂上方,由于断裂带下方上地壳存在高速异常体,推测芦山MS7.0地震的反冲断裂向上逆冲滑动时受到断裂所在的高速区的阻挡。此次芦山MS6.1地震的余震主要发生在双石—大川分支断裂下方,但在发震断层的浅部位置没有明显的高速体分布,推测双石—大川分支断裂可能对发震断层的滑动起到了控制阻挡作用,使其没有继续向浅部破裂。

     

    Abstract: Following the 2008 Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake and the 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake, another strong earthquake of MS6.1 occurred on June 1, 2022 in the southern segment of the Longmenshan fault zone, only 10 km away from the epicenter of the Lushan MS7.0 earthquake. To investigate the seismogenic fault of the earthquake and the relationship between the two Lushan earthquakes, we relocated the mainshock and the aftershock sequences that occurred within 60 days, and obtained 933 high-precision relocation results, with average location errors of 0.15 km, 0.13 km and 0.23 km in the EW, NS and UD directions, respectively. The epicenters of the aftershocks have a slightly longer spread in the NE-SW direction. The focal depth is mainly located at depths of 12−20 km, with few aftershocks occurred above 10 km. The depth profile of the aftershocks shows that the seismogenic fault plane is southeast dipping, which is consistent with the tendency of the back thrust fault in the seismogenic fault structure of the Lushan MS7.0 earthquake. The seismogenic fault structures of the two Lushan earthquakes intersect in a complex Y-shaped structure, which consists of two back thrust faults. The seismogenic fault of the Lushan MS6.1 earthquake is the deeper one of the back thrust faults. As there is no surface rupture, we presume that the seismogenic fault is a deeply buried blind fault. The depth profile shows that the southeast-trending aftershock zone of the Lushan MS7.0 earthquake crossed the Shuangshi-Dachuan branch fault, with most aftershocks concentrated below the fault. High-velocity anomalies in the upper crust beneath the fault zone are assumed to have blocked the back thrust fault of the Lushan MS7.0 earthquake as it slipped upwards. However, the aftershocks of the Lushan MS6.1 earthquake occurred mainly beneath the Shuangshi-Dachuan branch fault with no obvious high-velocity zone in the shallow direction of the seismogenic fault. We speculated that the Shuangshi-Dachuan branch fault may have played a blocking role in the slipping process of the seismogenic fault, impeding its rupture to shallow depths.

     

/

返回文章
返回