A finite element analysis method for the numerical simulation of characteristic earthquakes: Case study based on the Longmenshan fault zone
-
摘要: 本文构建一种应用有限元开展特征地震数值模拟的新方法, 并以龙门山断裂带中段的浅层构造和动力学机制为背景, 研究了平行逆冲断层分布格局对区域地震活动性的影响. 结果表明, 从断层活动相互影响的角度看, 包含3条平行逆断层的断裂带的整体地震活动性并不适用严格周期的特征地震模型, 当断层间距在20 km以下时, 随着断层间距的缩短, 对单条断层应用特征地震模型的适用性会逐渐降低. 龙门山断裂带中段的模拟计算结果显示, 后山断裂的地震活动相对独立, 区域活动性和中央断裂的断层活动很可能不适用严格周期的特征地震模型.Abstract: This paper constructs a finite element analysis (FEA) method for the numerical simulation of characteristic earthquakes, based on the wide-accepted knowledge of the shallow crustal structure and dynamic boundary conditions at the middle part of the Longmenshan fault zone. The influence of parallel thrust faults on regional seismic activity is focused on and simulated with this FEA model. The results show that the characteristic earthquake model with strict recurrence interval is not suitable for the entire fault zone which contains three parallel faults. When the distance between the faults is less than 20 km, the applicability of the characteristic earthquake model to each single fault is attenuated with the distance between the faults decreasing. The results based on the distribution pattern of the profile in the middle of the Longmenshan fault zone reveal that seismic activity of the back range fault is relatively independent, and the characteristic earthquake model with strict recurrence interval is not suitable for the entire fault zone and the central fault.
-
-
图 2 龙门山断裂带中段深部构造剖面有限元几何模型 D1,D2分别为后山断裂与中央断裂、 中央断裂与前山断裂之间的距离; ∠a为前山断裂的近地表倾角. 模型为龙门山断裂带中段垂直剖面,模型长度为120 km,自地表至底部40 km.模型南东侧固定水平自由度,40 km深度下边界固定垂直自由度
Figure 2. Geometry of the profile in the middle of the Longmenshan fault zone used for the finite element model D1 is the distance between back range fault and central fault,D2 is that between central fault and range front fault,∠a is the dip of the front fault at the crustal surface. The model is for a vertical profile cross Longmenshan fault zone with 120 km long and 40 km depth. The SE end is fixed in horizontal direction and the depth end is fixed in vertical direction
-
陈颙, 黄庭芳, 刘恩儒. 2009. 岩石物理学[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社: 343-374. Chen Y, Huang T F, Liu E R. 2009. Rock Physics[M]. Hefei: Press of University of Science and Technology of China: 343-374 (in Chinese).
唐荣昌, 韩渭宾. 1993. 四川活动断裂与地震[M]. 北京: 地震出版社: 34-63. Tang R C, Han W B. 1993. Active Faults and Earthquakes in Sichuan Province[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 34-63 (in Chinese).
王芝银, 李云鹏. 2008. 岩体流变理论及其数值模拟[M]. 北京: 科学出版社: 30-70. Wang Z Y, Li Y P. 2008. Theory of Rock Rheology and Its Numerical Simulation[M]. Beijing: Science Press: 30-70 (in Chinese).
Wriggers P. 2006. Computational Contact Mechanics[M]. New York: Springer: 356-412.
-
期刊类型引用(10)
1. 商咏梅,周永胜,马玺. 松辽盆地南部岩石圈地幔变形特征及各向异性分析——来自橄榄岩包体的约束. 岩石学报. 2024(04): 1285-1298 . 百度学术
2. 武玮洁,黄金莉,李选涛,刘志坤,祝淮南. 大三江盆地及邻区地壳结构研究. 地震学报. 2022(02): 286-301 . 本站查看
3. 黄臣宇,常利军,丁志峰. 喜马拉雅东构造结及周边地区地壳各向异性特征. 地球物理学报. 2021(11): 3970-3982 . 百度学术
4. 张凯文,陈棋福,陈赟. 接收函数揭示的兴蒙造山带西南部的地壳结构特征. 地球物理学报. 2020(04): 1484-1504 . 百度学术
5. 王建民,杨宝俊,李占林,于春玲,江才君,李鹏,曹来圣,陈智. 松辽盆地东缘域地壳结构及其地质意义:深反射地震. 地球物理学报. 2020(09): 3478-3490 . 百度学术
6. 强正阳,吴庆举. 中国东北诺敏河火山岩石圈变形:来自剪切波分裂的证据. 地球物理学报. 2019(01): 104-114 . 百度学术
7. 鲁明文,雷建设,张贵宾. 中国东北地区SKS分裂的上地幔各向异性结构与动力学. 地球物理学报. 2019(09): 3365-3384 . 百度学术
8. 李秀丽,朱叶琳,高业欣,燕云,赵龙梅. 利用接收函数反演东北地区地壳结构. 防灾减灾学报. 2019(03): 15-21 . 百度学术
9. 李锦轶,刘建峰,曲军峰,郑荣国,赵硕,张进,孙立新,李永飞,杨晓平,王励嘉,张晓卫. 中国东北地区主要地质特征和地壳构造格架. 岩石学报. 2019(10): 2989-3016 . 百度学术
10. 强正阳,吴庆举. 中国东北地区北部上地幔各向异性及其动力学意义. 地球物理学报. 2015(10): 3540-3552 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(13)