Discrimination between explosions,mine collapsesand earthquakes in capital region of China
-
摘要: 选取首都圈地区2008年8月——2009年9月ML在2.0——2.2范围内的爆破、矿塌和天然地震数据资料,从时间域和频率域进行分析对比,总结出识别爆破、矿塌和天然地震的依据.在时域方面,爆破的初动方向向上,矿塌向下,天然地震的初动方向依赖于台站的分布情况;爆破和矿塌的面波比较发育;天然地震的S波与P波最大振幅比(AS/AP)大于爆破和矿塌,同时,爆破和矿塌的能量衰减比天然地震快.在频域方面,高频成分的能量衰减快于低频;天然地震的拐角频率较高,爆破次之,矿塌的最小;在震中距200 km范围内,爆破的顶峰频率主要分布在5——7 Hz,矿塌分布在2——4 Hz,天然地震的顶峰频率较大,在10——18 Hz范围内.另外,天然地震的频率域较宽,其次为爆破、矿塌.
-
关键词:
- 爆破 矿塌 天然地震 时间域 频率域
Abstract: Choosing seismic data of explosions,collapses and earthquakes with ML in the range of 2.0mdash;2.2 during August 2008 to September 2009 in capital region,and analyzing and comparing the data in time and frequency domain,this paper studies how to identify the explosion,mine collapse and earthquake. In time domain,vertical component first motion of explosion seismic records is upward,and that of mine collapses is downward,while that of earthquakes depends on station distribution. The surface wave of explosion and mine collapse develops well. The S to P wave amplitude ratio (AS/AP) of earthquakes are larger than that of explosions and collapses. Moreover,energy attenuation of explosions and collapses is faster than that of earthquakes. In frequency domain the energy attenuation of high frequency wave is faster than that of low frequency one. For the events with similar magnitude,the corner frequencies of amplitude spectrum for earthquakes are the highest,and that for explosions are secondary high,while the corner frequencies for mine collapses are the lowest. When epicenter distance is smaller than 200 km,the peak frequencies of explosion amplitude spectrum are mainly 5mdash;7 Hz,and that of collapses are 2mdash;4 Hz,while the peak frequencies of earthquakes are high in the range of 10mdash;18 Hz. The wave frequency range of earthquakes is the widest,and that of explosions and collapses are next-wide. -
-
-
期刊类型引用(6)
1. 李蒙亚,曾宪伟,姚华建,李新艳,张志,杨硕. 2022年9月5日四川泸定6.8级地震及其余震前后b值变化. 地震工程学报. 2024(05): 1214-1222 . 百度学术
2. 索朗南杰,桑杰卓玛,索朗多吉,次仁多吉,益西拉姆,高锦瑞. 2008年以来西藏地区强震前固体潮调制比特征分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2023(01): 14-22 . 百度学术
3. 高锦瑞,王晓山,益西拉姆,王行舟. 西藏米林6.9级地震孕震机理研究. 四川地震. 2022(01): 1-6+47 . 百度学术
4. 曾宪伟,赵小艳,李蒙亚,李文君,唐浩,袁媛. 2021年5月21日漾濞4次M_S≥5.0地震前后b值变化. 地震学报. 2022(03): 401-412 . 本站查看
5. 王耀临,刘伟,柴宁娇,张帆,张建中,段昊. 蒙宁交界区b值时空变化特征. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2021(03): 55-63 . 百度学术
6. 徐志国,梁姗姗,盛书中,张广伟,邹立晔,周元泽. 2019年四川长宁M_S6.0地震序列重定位和震源特征分析. 地震学报. 2020(04): 377-391+509 . 本站查看
其他类型引用(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1919
- HTML全文浏览量: 1830
- PDF下载量: 229
- 被引次数: 9