Huang Shusong, Dou Aixia, Wang Xiaoqing, Yuan Xiaoxiang. 2016: Building damage feature analyses based on post-earthquake airborne LiDAR data. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38(3): 467-476. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2016.03.014.
Citation: Huang Shusong, Dou Aixia, Wang Xiaoqing, Yuan Xiaoxiang. 2016: Building damage feature analyses based on post-earthquake airborne LiDAR data. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38(3): 467-476. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2016.03.014.

Building damage feature analyses based on post-earthquake airborne LiDAR data

More Information
  • Received Date: October 13, 2015
  • Revised Date: January 21, 2016
  • Published Date: April 30, 2016
  • Building damage detection can be more accuracy because that the airborne LiDAR system can acquire height of buildings and other high resolution information, therefore airborne LiDAR data will be an important data source in post-earthquake disaster evaluation in the future. This paper chooses the typical building point cloud data on different damage condition from the airborne LiDAR point cloud data acquired after the MW7.0 earthquake in Haiti in 2010, and compares the distribution of the features such as height, slope and normal vector of damaged and non-damaged buildings. And then we establish the building damage determination factors, such as mean height deviation, slope value of building roof, and the intersection angle between normal vector and zenith direction. The results show that all factors can be used to recognize building damage in different condition, that is to say, mean height deviation can be used to detect the damage of single building, the slope value can be used to detect the damage part border of building, the intersection angle is a better factor that can be used to detect building damage in large areas.
  • Hoppe H, DeRose T, Duchamp T, McDonald J, Stuetzle W. 1992. Surface reconstruction from unorganized points[C]// Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. New York, USA: ACM: 71-78.
    Khoshelham K, Elberink S O. 2012. Role of dimensionality reduction in segment-based classification of damaged building roofs in airborne laser scanning data[C]//Proceedings of the 4th GEOBIA. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: 372-377.
    OpenTopography. 2010. Post-January 2010 Haiti earthquake LiDAR data now available via OpenTopography[EB/OL]. [2015-08-17]. http://opentopography.org/news/post-january-2010-haiti-earthquake-lidar-data-now-available-opentopography.
    Schweier C, Markus M. 2004. Assessment of the search and rescue diand for individual buildings[C]//Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, Canada: Mira Digital Publishing: 3092.
    Vu T T, Matsuoka M, Yamazaki F. 2004. LIDAR-based change detection of buildings in dense urban areas[C]//Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Riote Sensing Symposium. Anchorage, AK: IEEE: 3413-3416.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 杜志强,周天畅,甘巧燕. 震害任务驱动的遥感信息服务链动态演化方法. 时空信息学报. 2024(05): 666-679 .
    2. 崔驿宁,窦爱霞,杨慎宁. 3D点云震害建筑物深度学习样本增强方法. 遥感学报. 2023(08): 1876-1887 .
    3. 赵全斌,师煜,邹秋元,王成. 基于BIM的建筑地震受损程度评估模型设计. 地震工程学报. 2019(01): 227-232 .
    4. 眭海刚,刘超贤,黄立洪,华丽. 遥感技术在震后建筑物损毁检测中的应用. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2019(07): 1008-1019 .
    5. 梁显丽,杨海波. 基于人工蜂群优化算法的激光传感云数据挖掘系统设计. 激光杂志. 2019(08): 94-97 .
    6. 曾彬,王以荣. 激光点云数据库多值域信息自反馈存储方法. 激光杂志. 2019(11): 131-134 .
    7. 成桂兰. 基于大数据的地震多发区域破坏程度估计模型设计. 地震工程学报. 2018(03): 604-611 .
    8. 王金霞,窦爱霞,王晓青,黄树松,张雪华. 地震后机载LiDAR点云的地物区分方法研究. 震灾防御技术. 2017(03): 677-689 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (677) PDF downloads (21) Cited by(14)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return