Zhang Weichen, Zhu Kaiguang, Chi Chengquan, Yu Zining, Qiu Zehua. 2019: Time-frequency analyses for borehole strain anomaly at Guzan station before 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake based on wavelet transform. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(2): 230-238. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20170193
Citation: Zhang Weichen, Zhu Kaiguang, Chi Chengquan, Yu Zining, Qiu Zehua. 2019: Time-frequency analyses for borehole strain anomaly at Guzan station before 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake based on wavelet transform. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(2): 230-238. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20170193

Time-frequency analyses for borehole strain anomaly at Guzan station before 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake based on wavelet transform

More Information
  • Received Date: December 21, 2017
  • Revised Date: May 17, 2018
  • Available Online: April 07, 2019
  • Published Date: February 28, 2019
  • Before the 20 April 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake, a significant high frequency strain distortion signal has been recorded by the four-component YRY-4 borehole strainmeter at Guzan station in Sichuan Province. In order to avoid the frequency aliasing phenomenon of the high frequency part of the distortion signal in time-frequency evolution process in the same spectrum, and for the purpose of discussing the correlation between the weak strain anomaly period recorded earlier and the significant strain anomaly period in the same studied frequency band before the earthquake, this paper carried out time-frequency analysis on the borehole strain data of Guzan station during the period from 1 January 2012 to 20 April 2013 by using the continuous wavelet transform method. The results show that there are two peak frequencies in the studied frequency band, the correlation coefficient between the weak strain period and signifi-cant strain anomalous period near the peak frequency reach 0.85, and the correlation coefficient between aseismic period and significant strain anomalous period is only −0.007. Therefore, the peak frequencies is highly reliable as the anomalous frequency, and the evolution of two kinds of deformed strain signals recorded by four-component borehole strain gauge may be related to Lushan MS7.0 earthquake.
  • 池顺良,刘琦,池毅,邓涛,廖成旺,阳光,张贵萍,陈洁. 2013. 2013年芦山MS7.0地震的震前及临震应变异常[J]. 地震学报,35(3):296–303. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.03.002
    Chi S L,Liu Q,Chi Y,Deng T,Liao C W,Yang G,Zhang G P,Chen J. 2013. Borehole strain anomalies before the 20 April 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,35(3):296–303 (in Chinese).
    池顺良,张晶,池毅. 2014. 汶川、鲁甸、康定地震前应变数据由自洽到失洽的转变与地震成核[J]. 国际地震动态,(12):3–13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0235-4975.2014.12.003
    Chi S L,Zhang J,Chi Y. 2014. Failure of self-consistent strain data before Wenchuan,Ludian and Kangding earthquakes and its relation with earthquake nucleation[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology,(12):3–13 (in Chinese).
    崔锦泰. 1995. 小波分析导论[M]. 西安: 西安交通大学出版社: 129–148.
    Cui C K. 1995. An Introduction to Wavelet Analysis[M]. Xi’an: Xi’an Jiaotong University Press: 129–148 (in Chinese).
    廖盈春. 2007. 小波变换在固体潮观测资料处理中的应用[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学: 16–25.
    Liao Y C. 2007. The Tidal Signal Processing Based on Wavelet Analysis[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology: 16–25 (in Chinese).
    刘琦,张晶. 2011. S变换在汶川地震前后应变变化分析中的应用[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,31(4):6–9.
    Liu Q,Zhang J. 2011. Application of S transform in analysis of strain changes before and after Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,31(4):6–9 (in Chinese).
    刘琦,张晶,池顺良,闫伟. 2014. 2013年芦山MS7.0地震前后姑咱台四分量钻孔应变时频特征分析[J]. 地震学报,36(5):770–779.
    Liu Q,Zhang J,Chi S L,Yan W. 2014. Time-frequency characteristics of four-component borehole strain at Guzan station before and after 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,36(5):770–779 (in Chinese).
    牛安福,张凌空,闫伟,吉平. 2011. 中国钻孔应变观测能力及在地震预报中的应用[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,31(2):48–52.
    Niu A F,Zhang L K,Yan W,Ji P. 2011. Borehole strain measurement and application to earthquake prediction in China[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,31(2):48–52 (in Chinese).
    钱世锷. 2005. 时频变换与小波变换导论[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社: 68–82.
    Qian S E. 2005. The Time-Frequency Transform and Wavelet Transforms[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press: 68–82 (in Chinese).
    邱泽华. 2004. 钻孔应变观测点到地面载荷干扰源最小" 安静”距离的理论分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,23(23):4063–4067. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.23.026
    Qiu Z H. 2004. Theoretic studies on the shortest ‘quiet’ distance between borehole strain observatory site and surficial mecha-nical disturbance sources[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,23(23):4063–4067 (in Chinese).
    邱泽华,周龙寿,池顺良. 2009. 用超限率分析法研究汶川地震的前兆应变变化[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,29(4):1–4.
    Qiu Z H,Zhou L S,Chi S L. 2009. Study on precursory strain changes of Wenchuan earthquake with ORA method[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,29(4):1–4 (in Chinese).
    邱泽华,杨光,唐磊,郭燕萍,张宝红. 2015. 芦山MS7.0地震前姑咱台钻孔应变观测异常[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,35(1):158–161.
    Qiu Z H,Yang G,Tang L,Guo Y P,Zhang B H. 2015. Abnormal strain changes prior to the M7.0 Lushan earthquake observed by a borehole strainmeter at Guzan[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,35(1):158–161 (in Chinese).
    徐伟民,陈石,卢红艳. 2015. 台站连续重力信号的差分方法原理及理论验证[J]. 国际地震动态,(9):89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4975.2015.09.089
    Xu W M,Chen S,Lu H Y. 2015. The principle and theoretical verification of the differential method of continuous gravity signal in station[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology,(9):89 (in Chinese).
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 李军红,崔宁. 基于拉普拉斯变换的常微分方程课程思政探究. 内江科技. 2025(01): 131-133 .
    2. 吴文波,杨耀宁,禹谢华. 多层卷积神经网络在图像目标标注中的应用. 计算机仿真. 2025(02): 243-247 .
    3. 王锋. 港口桥式起重机械负载防摇控制方法研究. 自动化与仪表. 2024(01): 61-65 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (2389) PDF downloads (74) Cited by(3)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return