Su Kaiwei, Yang Qingsong, Liang Jiguan. 2019: Damping correction factor for horizontal acceleration response spectrum of shallow crustal and upper-mantle earthquakes. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(6): 778-794. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20190052
Citation: Su Kaiwei, Yang Qingsong, Liang Jiguan. 2019: Damping correction factor for horizontal acceleration response spectrum of shallow crustal and upper-mantle earthquakes. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(6): 778-794. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20190052

Damping correction factor for horizontal acceleration response spectrum of shallow crustal and upper-mantle earthquakes

More Information
  • Received Date: March 14, 2019
  • Revised Date: August 07, 2019
  • Available Online: February 20, 2020
  • Published Date: October 31, 2019
  • In this paper, 6 466 strong-motion records from 76 shallow crustal and 47 upper-mantle earthquakes in Japan were compiled to develop a damping correction factor (DCF) model. This study is aimed to provide a DCF that can be used to scale a design spectrum without known source and path parameters, therefore the models presented in this study did not include any terms for earthquake magnitude or source distance. Site effect on DCF was found to be significant, and a separate DCF model was constructed for the records from each of the four site classes. The total residuals were approximately separated into within- and between-event residuals, and the within-event residuals were further separated into within- and between-site components using a random effect model. Then the corresponding standard deviations were calculated to illustrate the variabilities associated with the source, path and site effects for the DCF model presented in this study. The results showed that the random errors tend to increase with spectral periods and damping ratios increasing, and the random errors associated with source effect are smaller than those associated with path and site effect at spectral periods less than 2.0 s. At most spectral periods, the random errors associated with site effect were smaller than those associated with path and other effects not explicitly modelled in this study. The between-event residuals are significantly correlated with magnitude and focal depth, while the within-site residuals were significantly correlated with source distance. Therefore, source and path parameters should be included for a model that can be used to scale a design spectrum from an earthquake with a known magnitude and source distance.
  • 蒋建,吕西林,周颖,蒋欢军. 2009. 考虑场地类别的阻尼比修正系数研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,29(1):153–161.
    Jiang J,Lü X L,Zhou Y,Jiang H J. 2009. Research on modification factors of damping ratios considering site conditions[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,29(1):153–161 (in Chinese).
    卢皓. 2017. 高阻尼设计反应谱阻尼修正系数的评估[J]. 振动与冲击,36(8):209–217.
    Lu H. 2017. Evaluation of damping modification factor for high-damping design response spectra[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,36(8):209–217 (in Chinese).
    罗开海,王亚勇. 2011. 关于不同阻尼比反应谱的研究[J]. 建筑结构,41(11):16–21.
    Luo K H,Wang Y Y. 2011. Researches about the response spectra with different damping ratio[J]. Building Structure,41(11):16–21 (in Chinese).
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 2010. GB 50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社: 34−35.
    Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Construction of the People’s Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. 2010. GB 50011−2010 Code for Seismic Design of Buildings[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press: 34−35 (in Chinese).
    Abrahamson N A,Youngs R R. 1992. A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,82(1):505–510.
    Atkinson G M,Pierre J R. 2004. Ground-motion response spectra in eastern North America for different critical damping values[J]. Seismol Res Lett,75(4):541–545. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.75.4.541
    Bommer J J, Elnashai A S, Weir A G. 2000. Compatible acceleration and displacement spectra for seismic design codes[C]//Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 8. Auckland: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering: 207.
    Building Seismic Safety Council. 2000. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures[R]. Washington: Federal Emergency Management Agency: 88−358.
    Castillo T,Ruiz S E. 2014. Reduction factors for seismic design spectra for structures with viscous energy dampers[J]. J Earthq Eng,18(3):323–349. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2013.860932
    European Committee for Standardization. 2005. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings[S]. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization: 6−20.
    Hatzigeorgiou G D. 2010. Damping modification factors for SDOF systems subjected to near-fault,far-fault and artificial earthquakes[J]. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn,39(11):1239–1258. doi: 10.1002/eqe.991
    Hayes G P,Wald D J,Johnson R L. 2012. Slab1.0:A three-dimensional model of global subduction zone geometries[J]. J Geophys Res,117:B01302.
    International Conference of Building Officials. 1997. Uniform BUILDING Code 1997[S]. Whittier, California: International Code Council: 1−75.
    Lin Y Y,Chang K C. 2003. Study on damping reduction factor for buildings under earthquake ground motions[J]. J Struct Eng,129(2):206–214. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(206)
    Lin Y Y,Chang K C. 2004. Effects of site classes on damping reduction factors[J]. J Struct Eng,130(11):1667–1675. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1667)
    Naeim F, Kelly J M. 1999. Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice[M]. New York: John Wiley: 741−742.
    Newmark N M, Hall W J. 1982. Earthquake Spectra and Design[M]. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute: 13−99.
    Stafford P J,Mendis R,Bommer J J. 2008. Dependence of damping correction factors for response spectra on duration and numbers of cycles[J]. J Struct Eng,134(8):1364–1373. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:8(1364)
    Zhao J X. 2004. Response of seismically isolated buildings with buffers subjected to near-source ground motions and possible alternative isolation systems[J]. Bull New Zealand Soc Earthq Eng,37(3):111–113.
    Zhao J X,Irikura K,Zhang J,Fukushima Y,Somerville P G,Asano A,Ohno Y,Oouchi T,Takahashi T,Ogawa H. 2006. An empirical site-classification method for strong-motion stations in Japan using H/V response spectral ratio[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,96(3):914–925. doi: 10.1785/0120050124
    Zhao J X,Zhang J. 2007. Inelastic demand spectra for bi-linear seismic isolation systems based on nonlinear time history analyses and the response of lead-rubber bearing isolation systems subjected to near-source ground motions[J]. Bull New Zealand Soc Earthq Eng,40(1):7–17.
    Zhao J X. 2010. Geometric spreading functions and modeling of volcanic zones for strong-motion attenuation models derived from records in Japan[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,100(2):712–732. doi: 10.1785/0120090070
    Zhao J X,Zhou S L,Gao P J,Long T,Zhang Y B,Thio H K,Lu M,Rhoades D A. 2015. An earthquake classification scheme adapted for Japan determined by the goodness of fit for ground-motion prediction equations[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,105(5):2750–2763. doi: 10.1785/0120150013
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Article views (1614) PDF downloads (18) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return