Sun L N,Qi Y Y,Chen T,Wang X S. 2021. Research on application of focal mechanism and site conditions in judgment of Hebei earthquake influence field. Acta Seismologica Sinica43(4):508−520. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20200133
Citation: Sun L N,Qi Y Y,Chen T,Wang X S. 2021. Research on application of focal mechanism and site conditions in judgment of Hebei earthquake influence field. Acta Seismologica Sinica43(4):508−520. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20200133

Research on application of focal mechanism and site conditions in judgment of Hebei earthquake influence field

More Information
  • Received Date: August 03, 2020
  • Revised Date: March 24, 2021
  • Available Online: August 15, 2021
  • Published Date: July 14, 2021
  • The determination of seismic influence field in post-earthquake work, a quickly gived reasonable map of seismic intensity distribution, was an important basis for emergency rescue after the earthquake and was important for the government to understand the disaster situation, deploy work and estimate the disaster loss. In this paper, the isoseismal maps of moderate strong earthquakes in Hebei Province were collected and sorted out, it was compared with the theoretical isotherm map generated by the regional earthquake intensity attenuation relationship based on the focal mechanism solution. The results show that, with the increase of magnitude, the similarity was higher between the theoretical isoseismal map and the actual isoseismal map in the high intensity area (≥Ⅶ), the theoretical isoseismal map was calculated by the attenuation relationship of seismic intensity with focal mechanism solution. In addition, according to the spatial variation of aftershock frequency within 24 hours after the earthquake, the theoretical isoseismal line in the polar region is modified, which is more consistent with the actual isoseismal line. That is to say, the theoretical calculated intensity is closer to the actual investigation intensity value. Finally, the grid of Hebei area was divided, and the bedrock PGA of the earthquake case on each grid center point was calculated according to the attenuation relationship of ground motion. Then, the site category attributes were extracted, considered site amplification factor, and the conversion of bedrock PGA to surface PGA was completed. The surface PGA was converted into intensity and compared with the actual earthquake isoseismal map. The results show that the similarity between the seismic influence field calculated by considering the site amplification effect and the actual isoseismal line was very high in the high intensity area, and the similarity is higher than the intensity attenuation relation method based on the focal mechanism solution.
  • 白仙富,戴雨芡,赵恒. 2014. 地震影响场应急评估方法研究[J]. 自然灾害学报,23(4):91–102.
    Bai X F,Dai Y Q,Zhao H. 2014. Study on the emergency evaluation of earthquake influence field[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,23(4):91–102 (in Chinese).
    陈鲲,俞言祥,高孟潭. 2010. 考虑场地效应的ShakeMap系统研究[J]. 中国地震,26(1):92–102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2010.01.009
    Chen K,Yu Y X,Gao M T. 2010. Research on ShakeMap system in terms of the site effect[J]. Earthquake Research in China,26(1):92–102 (in Chinese).
    国家地震局震害防御司. 1995. 中国历史强震目录[M]. 北京: 地震出版社: 158–414.
    Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, State Seismological Administration. 1995. Catalogue of Historical Strong Earthquakes in China[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 158–414 (in Chinese).
    郝敏,谢礼立. 2006. 集集地震等震线和PGA、PGV等值线关系的研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,26(1):18–21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2006.01.003
    Hao M,Xie L L. 2006. Study on the relationship between isoseismal and isolines of PGA and PGV for Chi-Chi earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,26(1):18–21 (in Chinese).
    胡聿贤,张敏政. 1984. 缺乏强震观测资料地区地震动参数的估算方法[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,4(1):1–11.
    Hu Y X,Zhang M Z. 1984. A method of predicting,ground motion parameters for regions with poor ground motion data[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,4(1):1–11 (in Chinese).
    李志强,袁一凡,李晓丽,何萍. 2008. 对汶川地震宏观震中和极震区的认识[J]. 地震地质,30(3):768–777. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2008.03.015
    Li Z Q,Yuan Y F,Li X L,He P. 2008. Some insights into the macro-epicenter and meizo seismal region of Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Seismology and Geology,30(3):768–777 (in Chinese).
    龙锋,闻学泽,徐锡伟. 2006. 华北地区地震活断层的震级-破裂长度、破裂面积的经验关系[J]. 地震地质,28(4):511–535. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2006.04.001
    Long F,Wen X Z,Xu X W. 2006. Empirical relationships between magnitude and rupture length,and rupture area,for seismogenic active faults in North China[J]. Seismology and Geology,28(4):511–535 (in Chinese).
    吕红山,赵凤新. 2007. 适用于中国场地分类的地震动反应谱放大系数[J]. 地震学报,29(1):67–76. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2007.01.008
    Lü H S, Zhao F X. 2007. Site coefficients suitable to China site category. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 29(1): 67–76 (in Chinese).
    沈正康,万永革,甘卫军,李铁明,曾跃华. 2004. 华北地区700年来地壳应力场演化与地震的关系研究[J]. 中国地震,20(3):211–228. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2004.03.001
    Shen Z K,Wan Y G,Gan W J,Li T M,Zeng Y H. 2004. Crustal stress evolution of the last 700 years in North China and earthquake occurrence[J]. Earthquake Research in China,20(3):211–228 (in Chinese).
    石建梁,闫庆民,葛秋莹. 2011. 用椭圆衰减关系模型计算任意场点烈度及地震动参数的数值方法[J]. 内陆地震,25(1):21–28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8956.2011.01.004
    Shi J L,Yan Q M,Ge Q Y. 2011. An algorithm for arbitrary engineering site earthquake intensity or motion parameter using ellipsoid attenuation model[J]. Inland Earthquake,25(1):21–28 (in Chinese).
    孙艳萍,陈文凯,周中红,张苏平,何少林,李少华. 2014. 甘肃地区地震烈度影响场评价及其与地形因子的关系[J]. 地震工程学报,36(3):697–704. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2014.03.0697
    Sun Y P,Chen W K,Zhuo Z H,Zhang S P,He S L,Li S H. 2014. Evaluation of seismic intensity influence field in Gansu Province and its relationship with terrain factors[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal,36(3):697–704 (in Chinese).
    田家勇,兰晓雯,谢周敏,陆鸣,时振梁. 2010. 地形对地震烈度衰减的影响[J]. 震灾防御技术,5(3):281–287. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2010.03.002
    Tian J Y,Lan X W,Xie Z M,Lu M,Shi Z L. 2010. Influence of topography on seismic intensity attenuation[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,5(3):281–287 (in Chinese).
    王想,王亚茹,宫猛,郭蕾,王晓山. 2017. 华北第5活动幕平静时段背景下平静异常综合判定[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,38(1):21–27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2017.01.004
    Wang X,Wang Y R,Gong M,Guo L,Wang X S. 2017. Comprehensive judgment of calm anomaly under the background of quiet time of the fifth activity in North China[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,38(1):21–27 (in Chinese).
    巫建伟,陈崇成,吴小竹,林剑峰,黄昭,张锦福,郑师春,张颖. 2013. 基于GeoKSCloud的地震影响场分析云服务研究—以福建省为例[J]. 地球信息科学学报,15(5):695–704.
    Wu J W,Chen C C,Wu X Z,Lin J F,Huang Z,Zhang J F,Zheng S C,Zhang Y. 2013. Cloud service for seismic influence field analysis based on GeoKSCloud:A case study in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science,15(5):695–704 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2013.00695
    许卫晓. 2011. 烈度分布快速评估方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所: 21–22.
    Xu W X. 2011. The Study of Methods for Rapid Assessment of Seismic Intensity Distribution[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration: 21–22 (in Chinese).
    张彦琪,范柱国,陈坤华,崔建文,李世成,冉华. 2013. Shakemap场地校正方法及其在云南地震动强度和烈度速报中的应用[J]. 地震研究,36(1):108–115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2013.01.017
    Zhang Y Q,Fan Z G,Chen K H,Cui J W,Li S C,Ran H. 2013. Shakemap site correction method and its application in the rapid prediction of ground motion intensity and seismic intensity in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,36(1):108–115 (in Chinese).
    张彦琪. 2014. 基于强震动台网的云南烈度速报场地影响校正研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学: 12–13.
    Zhang Y Q. 2014. The Study on Site Conditions and Amplification of Seismic Intensity Based on Ground Motion Intensity Network in Yunnan[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology: 12–13 (in Chinese).
    郑韵. 2015. 震源机制和余震序列在地震应急烈度快速判定中的应用研究[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地震预测研究所: 1–2.
    Zheng Y. 2015. The Application of Focal Mechanism and Aftershock Sequence in Fast Judgement of Earthquake Emergency Intensity[D]. Beijing: Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration: 1–2 (in Chinese).
    郑韵,姜立新,杨天青,刘杰. 2016. 基于震源机制解的分区地震烈度衰减关系研究[J]. 震灾防御技术,11(2):349–359. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20160218
    Zheng Y,Jiang L X,Yang T Q,Liu J. 2016. Study on seismic intensity attenuation relationship with regions via focal mechanism solutions[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,11(2):349–359 (in Chinese).
    中国国家标准化管理委员会, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 2008. 中国地震烈度表(GB/T17742—2008)[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社: 8.
    China standardization administration, General administration of quality supervision, inspection and quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. 2008. The Chinese Seismic Intensity ScaleGB/T 17742—2008)[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press: 8.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检疫总局. 2010. 建筑抗震设计规范(GB50011—2010)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社: 5
    Ministry of housing and urban-rural development of the People’s Republic of China, General administration of quality supervision, inspection and quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. 2010. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (GB50011—2010)[S]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press: 5.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 史哲,廖武林,姚运生,童广勤. 基于震相自动检测方法的秭归地区三维速度成像. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2024(12): 1280-1286+1311 .
    2. 胡锦涛,谢军,危自根,金超. 三峡库区秭归段浅层速度结构和孕震环境. 地震学报. 2023(02): 223-233 . 本站查看
    3. 张双喜,刘金钊,张品,陈兆辉. 联合BEMD和WMM方法实现位场多尺度边界检测. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2022(04): 533-542 .
    4. 冯锐. 趣味地震学(5):诱发地震, 远非那么简单. 国际地震动态. 2019(05): 32-40 .
    5. 李伟,储日升,王烁帆. 2017年6月16日湖北秭归M_S4.3地震成因初探. 地震. 2019(03): 28-42 .
    6. 王杰,王秋良,黄颂,吴海波,赵凌云,陈俊华. 湖北巴东地区滑脱构造与地震活动特征. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2018(03): 225-232 .
    7. 张娜,赵翠萍,周连庆. 三峡水库区上地壳三维精细速度结构成像. 地震. 2018(04): 37-48 .
    8. 罗佳宏,马文涛. 三峡库区上地壳速度结构初步研究. 地震地质. 2016(02): 329-341 .
    9. 吴海波,王杰,杜承宸,申学林,陈俊华. 三峡库区上地壳S波衰减成像研究. 地震学报. 2016(02): 188-198+328 . 本站查看
    10. 李小勇,朱培民,周强,彭松柏,刘江平,刘娇. 三峡库区上地壳横波速度结构. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报). 2014(12): 1842-1850 .

    Other cited types(11)

Catalog

    Article views (368) PDF downloads (66) Cited by(21)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return