Advanced Search
Dong R，Jing L P，Shan Z D，Li Y D. 2022. Numerical simulation of coupling failure between subway station and cross bridge. Acta Seismologica Sinica，44（1）：50−59. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210078
Citation: Dong R，Jing L P，Shan Z D，Li Y D. 2022. Numerical simulation of coupling failure between subway station and cross bridge. Acta Seismologica Sinica，44（1）：50−59. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210078
shu

Numerical simulation of coupling failure between subway station and cross bridge

  • 1.

    Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration，Institute of Engineering Mechanics，China Earthquake Administration，Harbin 150080，China

  • 2.

    Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation，Ministry of Emergency Management，Harbin 150080，China

  • 3.

    Institute of Disaster Prevention，Hebei Langfang 065201，China

  • 4.

    Earthquake Engineering Research & Testing Center，Guangzhou University，Guangzhou 510405，China

More Information
  • Received Date: May 21, 2021
  • Revised Date: July 12, 2021
  • Available Online: January 17, 2022
  • Published Date: March 17, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In this paper, a typical two-story and three-span subway station is taken as the research object. The nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis method is adopted to conduct numerical simulation analysis on the model of the subway station and the upper bridge on soft site. A potential coupling failure mode of subway station and bridge is presented. The seismic interaction between the subway station and the upper bridge is studied. Numerical simulation results show that: the bridge has a little effect on the seismic response of the station, and the damage of the station mainly depends on the earthquake action and structure strength; the destruction of the subway station will cause a large horizontal and vertical deformation of the soil in adjacent areas, resulting in the bridge beam fall; after the destruction of the station, the bridge foundation makes the soil move towards the station, which aggravates the earthquake damage of subway station.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (25)
  • 董瑞. 2020. 地铁车站-桥梁耦联地震破坏机理及数值模拟[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所: 1–104.
    Dong R. 2020. Coupled Failure Mechanism of Subway Station-Bridge and Seismic Response Numerical Simulation[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration: 1–104 （in Chinese）.
    杜修力,马超,路德春,许成顺,许紫刚. 2017. 大开地铁车站地震破坏模拟与机理分析[J]. 土木工程学报,50(1):53–62.
    Du X L,Ma C,Lu D C,Xu C S,Xu Z G. 2017. Collapse simulation and failure mechanism analysis of the Daikai subway station under seismic loads[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,50(1):53–62 (in Chinese).
    杜修力,李洋,许成顺,路德春,许紫刚,金浏. 2018. 1995年日本阪神地震大开地铁车站震害原因及成灾机理分析研究进展[J]. 岩土工程学报,40(2):223–236. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201802002
    Du X L,Li Y,Xu C S,Lu D C,Xu Z G,Jin L. 2018. Review on damage causes and disaster mechanism of Daikai subway station during 1995 Osaka-Kobe earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,40(2):223–236 (in Chinese).
    傅玉勇,闫澍旺,胡子学. 2009. 层状场地中地铁隧道对邻近建筑物地震反应的影响[J]. 建筑结构,39(11):46–49.
    Fu Y Y,Yan S W,Hu Z X. 2009. Effect of tunnels on earthquake response of ground and buildings along the subway in layered site[J]. Building Structure,39(11):46–49 (in Chinese).
    郭靖. 2013. 地下结构动力变形分析及其对地表建筑地震响应的影响研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学: 1−155.
    Guo J. 2013. The Dynamic Deformation Analysis of Underground Structures and its Influence on Seismic Response of Adjacent Surface Buildings[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology: 1−155 （in Chinese）.
    郭靖,陈健云. 2013. 均质地基地铁车站对临近建筑层间位移角的影响[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版),40(8):40–45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2974.2013.08.008
    Guo J,Chen J Y. 2013. Influence of subway station buried in homogeneous foundations on the inter-story drift ratio of adjacent structures[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences),40(8):40–45 (in Chinese).
    郭靖,陈健云,余流. 2017. 隧道对地表临近既有建筑物层间位移影响分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,13(3):765–772.
    Guo J,Chen J Y,Yu L. 2017. Influence of tunnel on inter-story drift of adjacent structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,13(3):765–772 (in Chinese).
    何伟,陈健云. 2012. 地表建筑对地下车站结构地震响应的影响[J]. 振动与冲击,31(9):53–58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2012.09.011
    He W,Chen J Y. 2012. Influence of ground surface building on seismic response of underground station structure[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,31(9):53–58 (in Chinese).
    廖振鹏. 2002. 工程波动理论导论[M]. 第2版. 北京: 科学出版社: 213−231.
    Liao Z P. 2002. Introduction to Wave Motion Theories in Engineering[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Science Press: 213−231 （in Chinese）.
    杨书燕,姜忻良,李新国. 2007. 隧道对临近建筑物的地震反应影响分析[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版),39(3):41–46.
    Yang S Y,Jiang X L,Li X G. 2007. Analysis on seismic response effect of tunnel to nearby structure[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition),39(3):41–46 (in Chinese).
    Dong R,Jing L P,Li Y Q,Yin Z Y,Wang G,Xu K P. 2020. Seismic deformation mode transformation of rectangular underground structure caused by component failure[J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol,98:103298. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103298
    Doltsinis I S.1989. Advances in computational nonlinear mechanics[G]//Earthquake Input Definition and The Trasmitting Boundary Conditions.Vienna: Springer: 109–133.
    Montáns F J. 2000. Bounding surface plasticity model with extended masing behavior[J]. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng,182(1/2):135–162.
    Wang H F,Lou M L,Chen X,Zhai Y M. 2013. Structure-soil-structure interaction between underground structure and ground structure[J]. Soil Dyn Earth Eng,54:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.015
    Xu C S,Zhang Z H,Li Y,Du X L. 2020. Validation of a numerical model based on dynamic centrifuge tests and studies on the earthquake damage mechanism of underground frame structures[J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol,104:103538. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103538
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    Xu Changzhi, Liu Shaolin, Yang Dinghui, Li Mengyang, Song Hanjie, Shen Wenhao, Yang Shuxin. 2025: Spectral element-finite difference hybrid methods for seismic wave simulation. Acta Seismologica Sinica: 1-17. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20240009
    Wang Jingxiong, Li Hongjing, Xing Haojie. 2022: The Lumped mass Chebyshev spectral element method for seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil sites. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 44(1): 76-86. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210091
    Song Xing, Lan Jingyan. 2020: Two dimensional seismic responses of free field in typical seafloor site based on dynamic finite difference method. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 42(6): 769-780. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20190191
    Jing Shuaijun, Shuai Xianghua, Zhen Meng. 2019: Fine information extraction of 3D building seismic damage based on unmanned aerial vehicle oblique images. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(3): 366-376. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20180114
    Peng Chaoyong, Yang Jiansi. 2019: Real-time estimation of potentially damaged zone for earthquake early warning based on thresholds of P-wave parameters. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(3): 354-365. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20190140
    Wu Guochen, Li Qingyang, Wu Jianlu, Liang Zhanyuan. 2018: High-order finite-difference seismic forward modeling method for fluid-solid boundary coupling media. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 40(1): 32-44. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20170010
    Huang Shusong, Dou Aixia, Wang Xiaoqing, Yuan Xiaoxiang. 2016: Building damage feature analyses based on post-earthquake airborne LiDAR data. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38(3): 467-476. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2016.03.014.
    Yin Xingyao, Zhou Jianke, Wu Guochen, Liang Kai. 2014: Dispersion analysis for the finite element algorithm in acoustic wave equation numerical simulation. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 36(5): 944-1898. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.05.017
    Xu Chao, Chen Bo, Li Xiaojun, Chen Xueliang, Lü Hongshan, Geng Fei, Wen Zengping. 2013: Seismic performance characteristics and damage of buildings in Lushan MS7.0 earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(5): 749-758. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.05.013

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 王子博，刘瑞丰，李赞，孔韩东，胡岩松. 利用区域地震记录测定地震辐射能量. 地球物理学报. 2023(02): 626-637 .
    2. 罗嘉琦，帅向华，李继赓. 基于深度学习的倾斜摄影建筑物表面损毁信息提取. 中国地震. 2023(02): 271-281 .
    3. 梁姗姗，张广伟，邹立晔，刘艳琼，姬运达. 2020年新疆伽师M_S6.4地震震源区微震检测与目录完备性分析. 地震工程学报. 2023(06): 1485-1492 .
    4. 龚丽文，张怀，陈石，David A.Yuen，陈丽娟，Brennan Brunsvik，尹光耀. 基于机器学习的长宁地震三维断层面几何特征建模. 地震学报. 2023(06): 1040-1054 . 本站查看
    5. 扈桂让，张广伟，梁姗姗. 四川长宁地区地震活动空间分布特征研究. 中国地震. 2023(04): 883-892 .
    6. 刘泽民，张广伟，梁姗姗，邹立晔. 2022年青海门源M_S6.9地震余震的空间迁移特征. 地震工程学报. 2022(02): 475-487 .
    7. 李平恩，廖力，奉建州. 2019年6月17日四川长宁6.0级地震震后应力演化与余震关系. 地球科学. 2022(06): 2149-2164 .
    8. 徐志国，梁姗姗，刘敬光，翟璐媛，史健宇，周元泽. 2020年云南巧家M_S5.0地震微震检测及发震构造初步探讨. 中国地震. 2021(02): 390-399 .
    9. 梁姗姗，徐志国，张广伟，邹立晔，刘艳琼，郭铁龙. 2021年云南漾濞M_S6.4地震震源区断层系统的几何复杂性. 地震地质. 2021(04): 827-846 .
    10. 赵韬，王莹，马冀，邵若潼，徐一斐，胡景. 2021年青海玛多7.4级地震序列重定位和震源机制特征. 地震地质. 2021(04): 790-805 .
    11. 王莹，赵韬，胡景，刘春. 2021年云南漾濞6.4级地震序列重定位及震源机制解特征分析. 地震地质. 2021(04): 847-863 .
    12. 郭铁龙，梁姗姗，邹立晔. 利用微震模板匹配定位方法识别辽宁抚顺矿区微矿震事件. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2021(06): 76-81 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (422) PDF downloads (46) Cited by(16)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return