Citation: | Guo Y X,Zhang X X,Zhang Q,Gao X W,Li Y. 2025. Magnetic field distribution in geomagnetic observation bin based on equivalent magnetic charge method. Acta Seismologica Sinica,47(1):136−144. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20230086 |
Geomagnetic field observation constitutes a vital part of geophysical data acquisition. In recent years, the employment of smaller and more compact bins for geomagnetic observations has emerged as a novel trend. A geomagnetic observation bin typically takes the form of a cylindrical structure with a bottom. By utilizing the equivalent magnetic charge (EMC) method, a system of equations is initially solved at the boundaries between the object and the surrounding air. This facilitates the determination of the surface magnetic charge density on N discrete elements, which is subsequently employed to compute the magnetic field at any point in space. When applying this method to a cylindrical bottomed bin with non-axial magnetization, we obtain the distribution of surface magnetic charge density and the magnetic field within the bin, followed by the calculation of the magnetic field gradient inside.
In the calculations, the magnetic susceptibility of typical concrete was referred to, and the background magnetic field characteristics were acquired using the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF). The results reveal that, due to the small geomagnetic declination angle D, the magnetic field intensity inside the observation bin exhibits approximate axial symmetry in the east-west direction, and near-central symmetry in the north-south direction. Near the bottom of the bin, the magnetic field intensity mainly increases, with a maximum increment of approximately 1.2 nT compared to the background field. Near the top of the bin, the magnetic field intensity predominantly decreases, with a maximum decrease of around 1.5 nT. The largest magnetic field gradients are concentrated at the edges of the top and bottom of the bin.
Finite element simulations along three measuring lines were compared with actual measurement data. These measuring lines include: ① a vertical line inside the bin, ② a north-south line one meter above the bin’s bottom, and ③ an east-west line one meter below the bin’s top, with a measurement interval of 0.1 meters. The results demonstrate that the magnetic field calculated using the EMC method deviates from the measured results by less than 0.1 nT, with a relative error of less than
The effects of the bin’s bottom thickness, the ratio of its height to diameter, and the magnetic susceptibility of the material on the internal magnetic field gradient were also explored. The results indicate that as the bottom thickness of the bin decreases, the effective horizontal space inside the bin enlarges. When the bin is bottomless, it offers the maximum horizontal effective space. However, a bottomless structure does not augment the vertical effective space inside the bin. When the external and internal heights of the bin are kept constant, an increase in the inner diameter leads to more effective vertical space inside the bin, without significant alteration in the horizontal direction. When the inner and outer diameters of the bin are fixed, increasing the internal height results in more effective horizontal space inside the bin, with no pronounced impact on the vertical direction. The highest magnetic field gradients inside the bin are concentrated near the edges of the top and bottom. As the bin’s dimensions expand, the proportion of effective space inside the bin also rises. Moreover, when the bin size remains unchanged, the influence of varying magnetic susceptibilities on the magnetic field gradient inside the bin was analyzed. The results suggest that for magnetic susceptibilities ≤800×10−6, increasing the susceptibility does not trigger significant changes in the effective space inside the bin.
郭友钊,李祥新,董杰,李磊. 2001. 河北省沉积岩磁化率特征及古温度意义的初探[J]. 物探与化探,25(5):368–371.
|
Guo Y Z,Li X X,Dong J,Li L. 2001. A preliminary study on features and paleotemperature implications of sedimentary magnetic susceptibility in Hebei Province[J]. Geophysical &Geochemical Exploration,25(5):368–371 (in Chinese).
|
单红丹,卢升高. 2005. 火电厂粉煤灰的矿物磁性及其环境意义[J]. 矿物学报,25(2):141–146. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4734.2005.02.009
|
Shan H D,Lu S G. 2005. Mineral magnetism of power-plant fly ash and its environmental implication[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica,25(2):141–146 (in Chinese).
|
王树萱,贾义侠. 1990. 磁场计算中的等效磁荷法[J]. 太原重型机械学院学报,11(3):84–91.
|
Wang S X,Jia Y X. 1990. Equivalent magnetic monopoles model for calculation of magnetic field[J]. Journal of Taiyuan Heavy Machinery Institute,11(3):84–91 (in Chinese).
|
吴攀,郭智勇,徐伟,陈文辉. 2020. 磁偶极子构造法球形磁性矿体磁异常正演[J]. 地球物理学进展,35(3):893–900. doi: 10.6038/pg2020DD0189
|
Wu P,Guo Z Y,Xu W,Chen W H. 2020. Magnetic dipole reconstruction method for forward modeling of magnetic anomaly of spherical magnetic body[J]. Progress in Geophysics,35(3):893–900 (in Chinese).
|
夏志成,马晓进,毕亚军,周健南,吴鹏. 2004. 硅酸盐类水泥的磁性试验研究[J]. 水泥工程,(4):17–20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0389.2004.04.004
|
Xia Z C,Ma X J,Bi Y J,Zhou J N,Wu P. 2004. Trial study on magnetism of Portland cement[J]. Cement Engineering,(4):17–20 (in Chinese).
|
张秀霞,刘高川,蒋延林,郭宇鑫,赵卫红,张骞,潘颖,高熹微,李玉. 2022. 地埋式地磁观测装置的设计与实现[J]. 中国地震,38(1):131–141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2022.01.013
|
Zhang X X,Liu G C,Jiang Y L,Guo Y X,Zhao W H,Zhang Q,Pan Y,Gao X W,Li Y. 2022. Design and test of a buried geomagnetic observation device[J]. Earthquake Research in China,38(1):131–141 (in Chinese).
|
张朝阳,肖昌汉,高俊吉,周国华. 2010. 磁性物体磁偶极子模型适用性的试验研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报,18(5):862–868. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0930.2010.05.016
|
Zhang Z Y,Xiao C H,Gao J J,Zhou G H. 2010. Experiment research of magnetic dipole model applicability for a magnetic object[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering,18(5):862–868 (in Chinese).
|
中国地震局. 2004. DB/T 9—2004 地震台站建设规范:地磁台站[S]. 北京:中国地震局:2−4.
|
China Earthquake Administration. 2004. DB/T 9−2004 Specification for the Construction of Seismic Station:Geomagnetic Station[S]. Beijing:China Earthquake Administration:2−4 (in Chinese).
|
周耀忠,张国友. 2004. 舰船磁场分析计算[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社:135−136.
|
Zhou Y Z,Zhang G Y. 2004. Ship Magnetic Field Analysis and Calculation[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press:135−136 (in Chinese).
|
Guo Z Y,Liu D J,Chen Z,Meng H. 2012. Modeling on ground magnetic anomaly detection of underground ferromagnetic metal pipeline[C]//ICPTT 2012:Better Pipeline Infrastructure for a Better Life. Wuhan:American Society of Civil Engineers:1011−1024.
|
Guo Z Y,Liu D J,Pan Q,Zhang Y Y. 2015. Forward modeling of total magnetic anomaly over a pseudo-2D underground ferromagnetic pipeline[J]. J Appl Geophys,113:14–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.12.011
|
Huang X J,Chen S L,Guo S X,Zhao W,Jin S J. 2013. Magnetic charge and magnetic field distributions in ferromagnetic pipe[J]. ACES J,28(8):737–746.
|
Soda N,Kobayashi M,Rowlands G. 2004. Charge densities and inclination angles of magnetization on various surfaces of rotational symmetry[J]. IEEE Trans Magn,40(4):1763–1768. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2004.828160
|
Yao Xiuyi, Teng Yuntian, Yang Dongmei, Yao Yuan, Chen Jun. 2016: On reconstruction technique of geomagnetic observation data. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38(6): 878-888. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2016.06.007 | |
Xu Ji ren, Zhao Zhi xin, Zeng Xiang zhi, Pi Ji yun. 2016: Instrument installation and observation research for borehole geophysical long-term observation in Donghai, Jiangsu. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38(2): 321-325. DOI: 10.11939/jass.201 | |
Zhang Shizhong, Shi Hang, Wang Lanwei, Hu Zhe, Liu Dapeng, Wei Liansheng, Ju Yong. 2013: An inspection equipment for electro-magnetic disturbance observation based on DDS technique. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(1): 108-116. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.01.011 | |
Xi Jilou, Song Yanru, Hu Mingzhao, Liu Chao, Xu Xuegong, Shang Xianqi. 2013: Research on the observation methods and techniques of omni-directional spontaneous electric field. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(1): 94-107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.01.010 | |
Xie Fanupup Teng Yuntianupup Xu Xuegongup2up Xing Xichunup3up Hu Xingxingupup. 2011: Magnetic perturbation to geomagnetic observationcaused by Tianjin railway transit. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 33(2): 252-261. | |
DONG SHUHUAup, LIU YUANZHUANGup2com mult. 1986: GEOSOUND OBSERVATION AND RESEARCH. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 8(4): 439-443. | |
ZHOU JUNCHENG, ZHOU XUN, CHENG ANLONG, AN YUXIU, HAN KELI, ZHENG SHAYING. 1986: MODEL DCM-1 DIGITAL OBSERVATION SYSTEM FOR GEOMAGNETIC PULSATIONS. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 8(3): 317-329. | |
CHENG DELI, ZHANG YUZHONG . 1985: OBSERVATION OF CODA AND DISTRIBUTION OF Q. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 7(4): 398-407. | |
1980: ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE MEASUREMENT OF GEOMAGNETIC TOTAL FIELD IN MONITORING THE SEISMO-MAGNETIC PHENOMENA. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2(3): 268-280. |
1. |
冀国强,雷建设,赵大鹏. 利用多震相走时成像研究胶东地区三维地壳速度结构与震群孕震环境. 地球物理学报. 2025(01): 123-138 .
![]() |