Yu W H,Wang S C,Zhou Y Y,Zhou S W,Li S L. 2024. Fast estimation of fault rupture length and direction based on FinDer method. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(5):865−876. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20230168
Citation: Yu W H,Wang S C,Zhou Y Y,Zhou S W,Li S L. 2024. Fast estimation of fault rupture length and direction based on FinDer method. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(5):865−876. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20230168

Fast estimation of fault rupture length and direction based on FinDer method

More Information
  • Received Date: December 26, 2023
  • Revised Date: March 25, 2024
  • Available Online: August 04, 2024
  • The distribution direction and rupture length of large earthquake faults will affect the prediction of the city intensity in the earthquake early warning system and the subsequent outputs in the intensity rapid reporting system, such as the intensity of cities and towns, spatial distribution maps of intensity, etc. For large earthquake catastrophes, the accurate fault location will effectively improve the comprehensive processing ability of the earthquake early warning system and the intensity rapid reporting system for major earthquakes. In 2012, Bose proposed the finite fault identification rupture detector (short for FinDer), which used image recognition and template matching techniques to calculate the rupture length and direction of large earthquakes (MW>6.0) in real time. In 2015, the FinDer method was used in the ShakeAlert system in California, USA. In 2018, Bose expanded the warning range of fault parameters and proposed the second-generation algorithm, namely FinDer 2. For earthquakes with M>2.0, the peak ground acceleration (PGA) threshold was set based on the earthquake magnitudes in FinDer 2.

    When a station data records exceed the set PGA threshold, the station is determined as a near-source station. By identifying the distribution range of near-source stations, the near-field area with strong ground motion is obtained, which is then matched with a pre-made template with fault direction and length. Here, the length and direction of the fault are calculated using the template with the highest matching degree.

    The FinDer method has been running online in California for nearly ten years, and hence it provides a good demonstration for the discrimination of major earthquake faults in the earthquake early warning system, and provides a foundation for the construction of the large earthquake early warning system in the National Seismic Intensity Rapid Reporting and Early Warning project. What is more, through the construction of the national project, the current monitoring station network provides a favorable data support for the implementation of the FinDer method. In order to adapt to local site conditions and improve the calculation efficiency of the direction and length of fault rupture of major earthquakes, this study optimized the two steps: station property discrimination and template matching, and the details are as follows:

    1) Select earthquakes with magnitude M4.0 or above that occurred in China from January 2022 to July 2023, as well as the 1999 ML7.3 Chi-Chi and 2008 MS8.0 Wenchuan earthquakes, and recount the initial thresholds corresponding to different magnitudes.

    2) Perform an interpolation calculation on the distribution range of the near-source stations to determine the boundary of the surface rupture area of the fault: ① calculate the PGA value of each interpolation point every second; ② compare PGA of the interpolation points with the initial triggering threshold and determine the classification of the interpolation points; ③ determine the edge of rupture projection on the surface through the envelope of the near-source stations and the near-source interpolation points.

    3) Select the minimum enclosing rectangle of the fault surface rupture edge as the optimal template and select the length and direction of the long side of the rectangle as the length and direction of the surface projection of the fault rupture so as to quickly obtain the length and direction of the fault rupture.

    Taking the Chi-Chi ML7.3 earthquake in Taiwan region in 1999 as an example, the real-time calculation process by FinDer method is introduced in detail. Then, the improved FinDer method is verified by six earthquakes of M4.5−8.0 in Chinese mainland. The verification results show that:

    1) By selecting an appropriate PGA threshold, the calculated length of the fault will be around a reasonable theoretical value. For earthquakes with larger magnitude, especially those with M>7.0, the calculation results are consistent with the field investigation results. For earthquakes with 4.5<M<5.5, the length and direction of rupture is calculated in an extremely short time, with a relatively short rupture length. Although the FinDer method can calculate direction, its accuracy is not high.

    2) The calculation of fault direction and length is related to the distribution of the station network. When there are near-source stations around the fault, there are better constraints on the calculation of fault length. When the near-source stations around the fault are densely distributed, the accuracy of fault direction will be improved.

    3) Based on the existing network conditions, the fault rupture calculations are generally completed within one minute after the first station is triggered, meeting the timeliness requirements of the earthquake early warning system. However, when a single earthquake causes multiple faults to rupture simultaneously, the FinDer method can only calculate the comprehensive rupture length and direction of multiple faults, but cannot calculate the rupture length and direction of multiple faults.

  • 高志钰. 2022. 基于高频GNSS与合成地震的强震破裂及预警研究[D]. 北京:中国地震局地质研究所:44−55.
    Gao Z Y. 2022. Research on Rupture and Early Warning of Strong Earthquakes Based on High-Rate GNSS and Synthetic Earthquakes[D]. Beijing:Institute of Geology,China Earthquake Administration:44−55 (in Chinese).
    金星. 2021. 地震预警与烈度速报:理论与实践[M]. 北京:科学出版社:192−228.
    Jin X. 2021. Earthquake Early Warning and Intensity Rapid Report:Theory and Practice[M]. Beijing:Science Press:192−228 (in Chinese).
    卢建旗,李山有. 2021. 地震预警断层参数实时识别方法(FinDer)详解及其性能初步评价[J]. 世界地震工程,37(1):152–164.
    Lu J Q,Li S Y. 2021. Detailed analysis and preliminary performance evaluation of the FinDer:A real-time finite fault rupture detector for earthquake early warning[J]. World Earthquake Engineering,37(1):152–164 (in Chinese).
    申星,梁洪宝,宋成科. 2024. 泸定MS6.8地震震前变形特征及鲜水河断裂南东段地震活动性[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,44(1):69–74.
    Shen X,Liang H B,Song C K. 2024. Deformation characteristics before the Luding MS6.8 earthquake and seismicity of the southeast section of the Xianshuihe fault[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,44(1):69–74 (in Chinese).
    徐锡伟,闻学泽,叶建青,马保起,陈杰,周荣军,何宏林,田勤俭,何玉林,王志才,孙昭民,冯希杰,于贵华,陈立春,陈桂华,于慎鄂,冉勇康,李细光,李陈侠,安艳芬. 2008. 汶川 MS8.0 地震地表破裂带及其发震构造[J]. 地震地质,30(3):597–629. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2008.03.003
    Xu X W,Wen X Z,Ye J Q,Ma B Q,Chen J,Zhou R J,He H L,Tian Q J,He Y L,Wang Z C,Sun Z M,Feng X J,Yu G H,Chen L C,Chen G H,Yu S E,Ran Y K,Li X G,Li C X,An Y F. 2008. The MS8.0 Wenchuan earthquake surface ruptures and its seismogenic structure[J]. Seismology and Geology,30(3):597–629 (in Chinese).
    杨志高,徐泰然,梁建宏,邓文泽,张建勇,徐佳静. 2023. 中国地震台网中心大震震源机制CMT产品[EB/OL]. [2023−12−20]. https://data.earthquake.cn/datashare/report.shtml?PAGEID=earthquake_dzzyjz.
    Yang Z G,Xu T R,Liang J H,Deng W Z,Zhang J Y,Xu J J. 2023. Large earthquake mechanism (CMT) of China Earthquake Networks Center[EB/OL]. [2023−12−20]. https://data.earthquake.cn/datashare/report.shtml?PAGEID=earthquake_dzzyjz (in Chinese).
    于伟恒. 2016. 基于Fisher线性识别方法反演大震破裂尺度的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所:26−38.
    Yu W H. 2016. A Study of Inversion of Large Earthquake Rupture Based on Fisher Linear Identification Methods[D]. Harbin:Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration:26−38 (in Chinese).
    郑佳伟. 2022. 基于高频GNSS和加速度计信息的大震破裂特征快速确定研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学:42−54.
    Zheng J W. 2022. Rapid Determination of Rupture Characteristic of Large Earthquakes Based on High-Rate GNSS and Accelerometer[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University:42−54 (in Chinese).
    Allen R M,Ziv A. 2011. Application of real-time GPS to earthquake early warning[J]. Geophys Res Lett,38(16):L16310.
    Ben-Menahem A. 1961. Radiation of seismic surface-waves from finite moving sources[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,51(3):401–435. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0510030401
    Boatwright J. 2007. The persistence of directivity in small earthquakes[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,97(6):1850–1861. doi: 10.1785/0120050228
    Böse M,Heaton T H,Hauksson E. 2012. Real-time Finite Fault Rupture Detector (FinDer) for large earthquakes[J]. Geophys J Int,191(2):803–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05657.x
    Böse M,Smith D E,Felizardo C,Meier M A,Heaton T H,Clinton J F. 2018. FinDer v.2:Improved real-time ground-motion predictions for M2−M9 with seismic finite-source characterization[J]. Geophys J Int,212(1):725–742. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggx430
    Colombelli S,Allen R M,Zollo A. 2013. Application of real-time GPS to earthquake early warning in subduction and strike-slip environments[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,118(7):3448–3461. doi: 10.1002/jgrb.50242
    Convertito V,Caccavale M,De Matteis R,Emolo A,Wald D,Zollo A. 2012. Fault extent estimation for near-real-time ground-shaking map computation purposes[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,102(2):661–679. doi: 10.1785/0120100306
    Cua G B. 2005. Creating the Virtual Seismologist:Developments in Ground Motion Characterization and Seismic Early Warning[D]. Pasadena:California Institute of Technology:182−211.
    Geng J H,Bock Y,Melgar D,Crowell B W,Haase J S. 2013. A new seismogeodetic approach applied to GPS and accelerometer observations of the 2012 Brawley seismic swarm:Implications for earthquake early warning[J]. Geochem Geophys Geosyst,14(7):2124–2142. doi: 10.1002/ggge.20144
    Ji C,Helmberger D V,Alex Song T R,Ma K F,Wald D J. 2001. Slip distribution and tectonic implication of the 1999 Chi-Chi,Taiwan,earthquake[J]. Geophys Res Lett,28(23):4379–4382. doi: 10.1029/2001GL013225
    Shan X J,Li Y C,Wang Z J,Yin H,Liu X D,Liu Y H,Zhang G H,Zhang Y F,Qu C Y. 2021. GNSS for quasi-real-time earthquake source determination in eastern Tibet:A prototype system toward early warning applications[J]. Seismol Res Lett,92(5):2988–2997. doi: 10.1785/0220190244
    Yamada M,Heaton T,Beck J. 2007. Real-time estimation of fault rupture extent using near-source versus far-source classification[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,97(6):1890–1910. doi: 10.1785/0120060243
    Yamada M,Heaton T. 2008. Real-time estimation of fault rupture extent using envelopes of acceleration[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,98(2):607–619. doi: 10.1785/0120060218
    Zhang Y,Feng W P,Xu L S,Zhou C H,Chen Y T. 2009. Spatio-temporal rupture process of the 2008 great Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Science in China:Series D,52(2):145–154. doi: 10.1007/s11430-008-0148-7
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 黄长生,侯保全,易秤云,李龙,张胜男,周耘,Waseem Akram,王芳婷. 赣南地热水形成条件分析与赣县区地热水勘查靶区圈定. 华南地质. 2021(01): 64-74 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (120) PDF downloads (36) Cited by(3)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return