Advanced Search
Luo Guichun, Li Xiaojun, Wang Yushi, Lu Tao. 2014: Discussion on validity of structural response by Nakamura’s technique. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 36(3): 491-499. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.03.014.
Citation: Luo Guichun, Li Xiaojun, Wang Yushi, Lu Tao. 2014: Discussion on validity of structural response by Nakamura’s technique. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 36(3): 491-499. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.03.014.
shu

Discussion on validity of structural response by Nakamura’s technique

  • 1.

    Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China;

  • 2.

    Earthquake Administration of Beijing Municipality, Beijing 100080, China;

  • 3.

    Department of Disaster Prevention Engineering, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Hebei Sanhe 065201, China

More Information
  • Received Date: April 14, 2013
  • Accepted Date: September 08, 2013
  • Published Date: April 30, 2014
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • A method called Nakamura’s technique, which uses a horizontal-to-vertical Fourier spectrum ratio (H/V ratio) of microtremor to estimate the dynamic characteristics of a site, was introduced by a Japanese scholar Nakamura in 1989. This technique is widely used, and fruitful achievements in scientific research are presented by this technique. Nowadays, this technique is also used to estimate the structural response characteristics by home and abroad researchers. However, the validity of Nakamura’s technique is still in dispute. The ambient seismic noise measurement was conducted inside a reinforced concrete (RC) building in urban area of Beijing. The calculative analysis on velocity data by Nakamura’s technique is done. The analyses indicate that the natural frequency can be obtained validly by the Nakamura’s technique, but the magnification is not accurate. We must use this technique to estimate structural response characteristics carefully, and we suggest other methods should be used simultaneously to compare.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (12)
  • 陈棋福, 刘澜波, 王伟军, Rohrbach E. 2008. 利用地脉动探测北京城区的地震动场地响应[J]. 科学通报, 53(18): 2229-2235.

    Chen Q F, Liu L B, Wang W J, Rohrbach E. 2009. Site effects on earthquake ground motion based on microtremor measurements for metropolitan Beijing[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 54(2): 280-287.
    蒋俊杰, 陈春雷. 2008. 高层建筑结构扭转效应控制参数讨论[J]. 广东土木与建筑, (9): 6-8.

    Jiang J J, Chen C L. 2008. Discussion on torsional parameters for high-rise building[J]. Guangdong Architecture Civil Engineering, (9): 6-8 (in Chinese).
    李洪涛, 舒大强, 卢文波, 朱传云. 2010. 建筑物对爆破振动中不同频率能量成分的响应特征[J]. 振动与冲击, 29(2): 154-158.

    Li H T, Shu D Q, Lu W B, Zhu C Y. 2010. Building response characteristic to different frequencies of explosive[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 29(2): 154-158 (in Chinese).
    梁远森, 许红, 王云昌. 2005. 高层建筑结构的自振周期的计算与实测[J]. 河南科学, 23(5): 699-703.

    Liang Y S, Xu H, Wang Y C. 2005. Calculation & actual measurement method on natural vibration period of tall buildings[J]. Henan Science, 23(5): 699-703 (in Chinese).
    卢滔, 周正华, 周雍年, 仲维照. 2006. 关于Nakamura方法有效性的讨论[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 26(1): 43-48.

    Lu T, Zhou Z H, Zhou Y N, Zhong W Z. 2006. Discussion on validation of Nakamura's technique[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 26(1): 43-48 (in Chinese).
    罗桂纯, 刘澜波, 齐诚, 陈棋福, 陈永平. 2011. 基于地脉动和地铁振动的钢筋混凝土建筑结构响应分析[J].地球物理学报, 54(10): 2708-2715.

    Luo G C, Liu L B, Qi C, Chen Q F, Chen Y P. 2011. Structural response analysis of a reinforced concrete building based on excitation of microtremors and passing subway trains[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 54(10): 2708-2715 (in Chinese).
    马升东, 周德源, 孙良宏. 2005. 平面L形高层建筑的扭转效应分析及对策[J]. 结构工程师, 21(1): 10-17.

    Ma S D, Zhou D Y, Sun L H. 2005. Torsional analysis and countermeasures for high-rise building with L shape plan[J]. Structural Engineers, 21(1): 10-17 (in Chinese).
    沈晓锋, 季征宇, 储诒. 2002. 阶梯形高层建筑的扭转效应分析及对策[J]. 结构工程师, 18(3): 1-7.

    Shen X F, Ji Z Y, Chu Y. 2002. Torsional analysis for ladderlike high-rise building[J]. Structural Engineers, 18(3): 1-7 (in Chinese).
    Borcherdt R D. 1970. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay[J].Bull Seismol Soc Am, 60(1): 29-61.
    Facke A, Stefano P, Sandra R, Lothar S. 2006. Assessing the vibrational frequencies of the Cathedral of Cologne (Germany) by means of ambient seismic noise analysis[J]. Natural Hazard, 38(1/2): 229-236.
    Gallipoli M R, Mucciarelli M, Castro R R, Monachesi G, Contri P. 2004. Structure, soil-structure response and effects of damage based on observations of horizontal-vertical spectral ratios of microtremors[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 24(6): 487-495.
    Nakamura Y. 1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface[J]. Q Rep Railway Tech Res Inst, 30(1): 25-33.
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 李小军，钱玉，荣棉水，孔小山. 基于地震动反应谱与傅里叶谱确定场地卓越频率的差异性. 震灾防御技术. 2024(03): 421-435 .
    2. 李红光，侯铮. 基于谐振原理的地震勘探方法在资源勘查中的应用. 世界有色金属. 2020(09): 159-160 .
    3. 刘铁华，刘铁，程光华，师学明，化希瑞，张邦. 复杂城市环境下地球物理勘探技术研究进展. 工程地球物理学报. 2020(06): 711-720 .
    4. 罗桂纯，李小军，傅磊，王玉石. 基于HVSR谱比法研究场地反应非线性特征. 地震研究. 2019(04): 546-554+650 .
    5. 张晓敏，孙勇，陈树建，陈建琪. 基于动力测试的竖向不规则大跨度空间钢结构抗震性能研究. 钢结构. 2018(03): 6-10 .
    6. 尹建华，冀昆，崔建文，温瑞智，任叶飞. 基于中远场小震结构台阵观测数据的地震响应分析. 震灾防御技术. 2018(04): 911-920 .
    7. 陈建琪，孙勇，李慧敏. 木丝水泥板样板房动力特性脉动法测试研究. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版). 2017(05): 784-787 .
    8. 罗桂纯，李小军，王治国. 北京地区不同超越概率水准下基岩峰值加速度分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2014(Z3): 1-7 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (626) PDF downloads (19) Cited by(13)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return