CHEN JIAGENG, GAO LONGSHENG. 1989: IN-SITU STRESS, IN-SITU STRENGTH OF ROCKS AND THE CHINA MAINLAND STRESS FIELD. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 11(2): 142-152.
Citation: CHEN JIAGENG, GAO LONGSHENG. 1989: IN-SITU STRESS, IN-SITU STRENGTH OF ROCKS AND THE CHINA MAINLAND STRESS FIELD. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 11(2): 142-152.

IN-SITU STRESS, IN-SITU STRENGTH OF ROCKS AND THE CHINA MAINLAND STRESS FIELD

More Information
  • Published Date: September 01, 2011
  • Based on the data of hydrofracturing from 150 segments in 8 oil fields in China, in this paper, we studied the variation in horizontal stress with depth in some areas, and found that the ratios of average horizontal stress to vertical stress are about 0.8-1.2 at the depth of 4000 m, the high values corresponding to reverse faults, and low ones to normal faults. The results of in situ measurements coinside with the features of fault activity in every area. We find that the more distant from the boundary between the Eurasian and Indian plates the less the maximum horizontal stress becomes; the values are normalized to the depth of 4000 m with respect to the sea level after making the elevation correction of well sites. This result and the hypothesis of Force Source Center hinted by the radiant distribution of the direction of the principal stress in the China mainland from focal mechanisms solutions support each other. We also got the in-situ tensile strength of rocks by use of the hydrofracturing curve tests. The actual result shows a certain degree of regularity: the strength increases with the depth of rocks, also varies linearly with the logarithm of the age of rocks. These field strength data coinside roughly with experimental results.
  • [1] Haimson, B. C., 1976. The hydrofracturing stress measuring technique method and recent field results in the‘.S. Proc. International Society of Rock Mechanics Symposium on Investigation of Stress in Rock Advances in Stress Measurement. Sydney.

    [2] Fletcher, J. B., 1984. A comparison between thr tectonic stress measured in'situ and stress parametera from induced seismicity at Monticello Reservior, South California. J. Geophys. Res. 87,

    [3] 6931——6944.

    [4] 陈家庚、曹新玲、李自强,1982.水压致裂法测定华北地下深部应力.地震学报,4,350——362.

    [5] Li Ziqiang, Cao Xinling, Chen Jiageng, Liu Jianzhong and Zhang Zhi, 1985. Some considerations on the recent tectonic stress field of China.丁ertonophysies, 117, 161——176.

    [6] 丁健民、梁国平,1985.唐山、天津和沧州地区的油井水力压裂应力测量.地震学报,7,363——373,

    [7] 李方全、刘光勋,1986.我国现今地应力状态及有关问题.地震学报,8,156——171.

    [8] 邸家全、时振粱、环文林、汪素云,1979.中国及邻区现代构造应力场的区域特证.地震学报,1,10—— 24,

    [9] 顾功叙、林庭煌、时振梁等,1983.中国地震目录,科学出版社.

    [1] Haimson, B. C., 1976. The hydrofracturing stress measuring technique method and recent field results in the‘.S. Proc. International Society of Rock Mechanics Symposium on Investigation of Stress in Rock Advances in Stress Measurement. Sydney.

    [2] Fletcher, J. B., 1984. A comparison between thr tectonic stress measured in'situ and stress parametera from induced seismicity at Monticello Reservior, South California. J. Geophys. Res. 87,

    [3] 6931——6944.

    [4] 陈家庚、曹新玲、李自强,1982.水压致裂法测定华北地下深部应力.地震学报,4,350——362.

    [5] Li Ziqiang, Cao Xinling, Chen Jiageng, Liu Jianzhong and Zhang Zhi, 1985. Some considerations on the recent tectonic stress field of China.丁ertonophysies, 117, 161——176.

    [6] 丁健民、梁国平,1985.唐山、天津和沧州地区的油井水力压裂应力测量.地震学报,7,363——373,

    [7] 李方全、刘光勋,1986.我国现今地应力状态及有关问题.地震学报,8,156——171.

    [8] 邸家全、时振粱、环文林、汪素云,1979.中国及邻区现代构造应力场的区域特证.地震学报,1,10—— 24,

    [9] 顾功叙、林庭煌、时振梁等,1983.中国地震目录,科学出版社.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(20)

    1. 范莹莹,安张辉,侯泽宇,付阿龙. 2022年青海门源M_S6.9地震前地电场频谱特征研究. 地震工程学报. 2022(03): 680-690 .
    2. Guoze ZHAO,Xuemin ZHANG,Juntao CAI,Yan ZHAN,Qinzhong MA,Ji TANG,Xuebin DU,Bing HAN,Lifeng WANG,Xiaobin CHEN,Qibin XIAO,Xiangyu SUN,Zeyi DONG,Jijun WANG,Jihong ZHANG,Ye FAN,Tao YE. A review of seismo-electromagnetic research in China. Science China(Earth Sciences). 2022(07): 1229-1246 .
    3. 赵国泽,张学民,蔡军涛,詹艳,马钦忠,汤吉,杜学彬,韩冰,王立凤,陈小斌,肖骑彬,孙翔宇,董泽义,王继军,张继红,范晔,叶涛. 中国地震电磁研究现状和发展趋势. 中国科学:地球科学. 2022(08): 1499-1515 .
    4. 宁亚灵,吕海杰,王鹏伟. 晋冀蒙交界地区地电阻率变化与震兆特征研究. 山西地震. 2022(04): 1-5 .
    5. 何苗,吴立新,崔静,王威,齐源,毛文飞,苗则朗,陈必焰,申旭辉. 汶川地震前多圈层短—临遥感异常回顾及其时空关联性. 遥感学报. 2020(06): 681-700 .
    6. 李飞,史红军,高研,刘立波. 2018年松原M5.7地震前地电场变化特征研究. 华南地震. 2020(03): 92-101 .
    7. 李姜,乔子云,张国苓,贾立峰,罗娜. 华北地区地电阻率归一化速率异常分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2019(06): 62-71 .
    8. 李忠,宋奕瑶,刘海军,安建琴. 天基地基地震电磁前兆研究综述. 电波科学学报. 2018(01): 105-115 .
    9. 薛艳,刘杰,宋治平,黎明晓. 汶川地震前地震活动特征的普遍性及其机理探讨. 地球物理学报. 2018(05): 1891-1906 .
    10. 刘素珍,李自红,宁亚灵. 大同地电阻率NS测向异常分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2017(04): 105-109 .
    11. 张国苓,乔子云,贾立峰,罗娜. 华北成组地震前地电阻率小波能谱分析. 地震工程学报. 2017(S1): 46-52 .
    12. 范莹莹,解滔,安张辉,王建军,李飞,张骞. 东部沿海地区地电场半日波变化特征研究. 中国地震. 2017(03): 442-452 .
    13. 刘素珍,李自红,张淑亮,殷志刚,李宏伟,王霞. 2014年大同地电阻率NW测向异常分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2016(02): 104-110 .
    14. 宁亚灵,赵虎明,殷志刚. 高压输电系统对地电阻率干扰的测试分析. 山西建筑. 2016(36): 138-140 .
    15. 黄海莎,刘庆元. 震前电离层TEC异常探测方法的研究进展. 测绘与空间地理信息. 2015(01): 197-199+203 .
    16. 范莹莹,杜学彬,谭大诚,安张辉,刘君,王建军. 芦山M_S7.0与岷县漳县M_S6.6地震前甘肃地区部分台站地电场变化. 地震. 2015(01): 100-111 .
    17. 赵应权,沈忠民,周爱芬. Mallat小波滤波器系数的计算与地质应用. 物探化探计算技术. 2015(04): 532-537 .
    18. 张铁宝,路茜,辛华,刘放. 汶川和芦山地震前后巴颜喀拉地块中东段红外亮温分析. 中国地震. 2015(02): 344-352 .
    19. 范莹莹,解滔,安张辉,杜学彬,谭大诚,刘君,陈军营. 2008年汶川M_S8.0与2010年玉树M_S7.1地震前电磁现象研究. 地震学报. 2014(02): 275-291+340 . 本站查看
    20. 张铁宝,路茜,刘放,辛华. 甘肃岷县6.6地震前柴达木地块中东段卫星红外异常分析. 地震工程学报. 2013(04): 789-793 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Article views (1005) PDF downloads (104) Cited by(29)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return