Advanced Search
Xu Zhong-huaiup, Liu Yu-fenup, Zhang Ying-zhenup2. 1979: ON THE CHARACTERISTIC OF DIRECTION OF THE EARTHQUAKE STRESS FIELD AROUND THE BEIJING AERA. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1(2): 121-132.
Citation: Xu Zhong-huaiup, Liu Yu-fenup, Zhang Ying-zhenup2. 1979: ON THE CHARACTERISTIC OF DIRECTION OF THE EARTHQUAKE STRESS FIELD AROUND THE BEIJING AERA. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1(2): 121-132.
shu

ON THE CHARACTERISTIC OF DIRECTION OF THE EARTHQUAKE STRESS FIELD AROUND THE BEIJING AERA

  • 1. Institute of Geophysics, State Seismological Bureau; 2. State Seismological Bureau

More Information
  • Published Date: August 31, 2011
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The composite nodal-plane solutions of the earthquakes occurred in the area around Beijing during 1960 to 1977 are obtained on the basis of P wave onset data and also the confidence curves of the results. The directions of the maximum and minimum principal stresses are given as NE 65°—75° and NW 15°—25° respectively, whereas that of intermediate stress is nearly vertical. They appear to be uniform and stable in the entire area. The fault angle of the crustal rock is estimated not less then 27°. It is inferred that the earthquakes in the area are caused probably by the action of additional horizontal tension. No significant variation of the composite nodal-plane solutions was found before the great Tangshan earthquake.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (1)
  • [1] 李钦祖等, 由单台小地震资料所得两个区域的应力场, 地球物理学报, 16, 49—61, 1973.

    [2] K. Aki(安芸敬一), Earthquake generating stress in Japan for the years 1961 to 1963 obtained by smoothing the first motion patterns, Bull. Earthq. Res, Inst., 44, 447—471, 1966.

    [3] N. Yamakawa(山川宜男), Stress Fields in Focal Regions, J. Phys. Earth, 19, 347—353, 1971.

    [4] D. P. Mekenzie, The relation between fault plane solutions for earthquakes and the direction  of the principal stress, B. S. S. A.,  59, 591—601, 1969.

    [5] B. C. Haimson, The state of stress in the earth's crust, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 13, 3, 350—352, 1975.

    [6] 李四光, 地质力学概论, 科学出版社, 1973.

    [7] E. M. Anderson, The Dynamies of Faulting, Oliver & Boyd Ltd., Edinburgh, 1951.

    [8] R. M. Stesky et al., Friction in faulted rock at high temperature, and pressure, Tectomophysics, 23, 177—203, 1974.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    Yu Mengxue, Wu Qingju, Qiang Zhengyang, Bai Lanshu. 2023: Focal mechanism solutions and stress field characteristics of small and moderate earthquakes in Weiyuan area， southern Sichuan basin. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 45(6): 1025-1039. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220057
    Feng Bing, Zhu Liangyu, Hui Hang, Wang Wenqing, Chai Xuchao, Ji Dongjiao. 2022: Joint iterative inversion of tectonic stress field and fault identification in Yingjiang area. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 44(4): 619-631. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210027
    Li Jun, Wang Qincai, Zheng Guodong, Liu Geng, Zhou Hui, Zhou Cong. 2019: Characteristics of seismogenic faults and stress fields of the Songyuan MS5.7 earthquake sequence in May 2018. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(2): 207-218. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20180101
    Fan Wenjie, Cui Xiaofeng, Hu Xingping, Chen Jiawei. 2019: Focal mechanism solutions and spatio-temporal variations of the present tectonic stress field in Capital Circle region. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(1): 33-45. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20180064
    Li Xiang, Wan Yongge, Cui Huawei, Huang Jichao, Yan Rui, Gao Xiwei. 2016: Tectonic stress field analysis on the source region of the 2015 MW8.3 Chile earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38(6): 847-853. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2016.06.004
    Li Jun, Wang Qincai. 2016: Seismogenic faults and stress field characteristics of MS6.0 Yao’an earthquake sequence in 2009. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38(2): 199-207. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2016.02.005
    Han X M , Rong D L. 2015: Consistency of seismogenic stress field of preshocks to the tectonic stress field before eight earthquakes (MW≥6.0) in southern California of United States from 1981 to 2011. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(6): 948-958. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.06.006
    Hu Xionglin, Wang Qiang, Xie Zhaodi. 2015: Spatio-temporal distribution of tectonic stress field in Longmenshan and its adjacent regions before and after Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(5): 747-761. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.05.004
    Zhang Xindong, Wang Xiaoshan, Zhang Xiaotao, Sun Qi, Sheng FangLuan, Xi GuiLing. 2013: The stress field and seismogenic structure in northern Hainan island based on current small earthquakes. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(4): 451-460. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.04.001
    2004: 华东地区地电阻率各向异性度的地震前兆异常特征初步研究. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 26(2): 223-227.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 王丽红，王同利，武敏捷，李菊珍，岳晓媛，李红. 2020年7月12日古冶M_S 5.1地震前北京地电阻率异常分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2023(03): 87-94 .
    2. 杜学彬，张元生，谭大诚，安张辉，王建军，范莹莹，刘君，陈军营. 国际地震和火山电磁方法组织2016年兰州研讨会——纪念兰州地震研究所开创地电监测预报地震半个多世纪. 地震工程学报. 2022(01): 244-250 .
    3. 郑斌，石川. 电力工程中极址区域地电阻率适宜性评价. 大众标准化. 2022(04): 84-86 .
    4. 叶青，王晓，杜学彬，解滔，范晔，周振贵，刘高川. 中国地震井下地电阻率研究进展. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2022(03): 669-683 .
    5. 王同利，崔博闻，叶青，李菊珍，王丽红，童琼. 九寨沟M_S7.0地震地电阻率变化时空演化分析. 地球物理学报. 2020(06): 2345-2356 .
    6. 高研，李飞，史红军. 2018年松原M5.7地震前地电阻率变化特征研究. 防灾减灾学报. 2019(02): 46-51 .
    7. 李红中，张修杰，马占武，刘祥兴. 花岗岩地区深埋长大隧道工程勘察关键技术研究——以粤东地区某隧道工程为例. 公路工程. 2018(05): 110-119 .
    8. 杜学彬，刘君，崔腾发，范莹莹，安张辉，闫睿，王丽. 两次近距离大震前成都台视电阻率重现性、相似性和各向异性变化. 地球物理学报. 2015(02): 576-588 .
    9. 徐锡泉，高昌志，王亮. 内蒙古宝昌台地电阻率长期观测数据研究. 地震工程学报. 2014(02): 405-412 .
    10. 高曙德，汤吉，孙维怀. 盈江5.8级和缅甸7.2级地震前电磁异常. 地球物理学报. 2013(05): 1538-1548 .
    11. 解滔，杜学彬，郑国磊，陈军营，谭大诚，安张辉，范莹莹，刘君. 水平两层均匀介质中井下电阻率观测信噪比的理论计算. 西北地震学报. 2012(01): 18-22+104 .
    12. 刘君，杜学彬，Jacques Zlotnicki，范莹莹，安张辉. 几次大震前的地面和空间电磁场变化. 地球物理学报. 2011(11): 2885-2897 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1349) PDF downloads (130) Cited by(12)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return