Huancheng Ge, Yuewei Ni, Caizhong Huang, Yongqin Licom mult. 1991: THE REVISED mLg SCALE IN THE SIX EASTERN PROVINCES OF CHINA. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 13(2): 171-178.
Citation: Huancheng Ge, Yuewei Ni, Caizhong Huang, Yongqin Licom mult. 1991: THE REVISED mLg SCALE IN THE SIX EASTERN PROVINCES OF CHINA. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 13(2): 171-178.

THE REVISED mLg SCALE IN THE SIX EASTERN PROVINCES OF CHINA

More Information
  • Published Date: September 01, 2011
  • The influence of the four different methods of measuring Lg amplitude, and of the selection of different geometrical attenuation coefficient -values ( = 5/6 or 1) on the determined -value of Lg wave anelastic attenuation coefficient are discussed.The value = 0.0034 + 0.001km-1 for the six eastern provinces of China is re-dtermined. The revised magnitude calibration function qE()=5/6lg+0.00147+1.81 of mLg(mxh) is deduced.
  • [1] 葛焕称、黄才中、叶培元、陆振飞,1986,综合回归分析与中国东部六省地区Lg波衰减的测定.地震学报,8,.367——381.

    [2] 葛焕称、黄才中、叶培元、陆振飞,1987.中国东部六省的Lg震级(上)—侧定方法和结果.地震学报,9, 3 7——51,

    [3] Herrmann, R. B. and Nuttli, O. W., 1982. Magnitude: the relation Mt, to mb}e Bulf. Seism. Soc. Amen,72, 389——397.

    [4] Herrmann, R. B. and Kijko, A., 1983. Short——period Lg magnitudes: instrument, attenuation, and source effects. Bull. Seism. Sac. Amer, 73, 1835——1850.

    [5] Nuttli, O. W., 1973. Seismic wave attenuation and magnitude relations of eastern North America. J. Geophys. Res., 78, 876——885.

    [6] Street, R. L., 1976. Scaling northeastern United States/southeastern Canadian earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Sot.Amen, 66, 1525——1537.

    [7] Chow, R. A. C., Fairhead, J. D., Henderson N. B. and Marshall, P, D., 1980. Magnitude and Q determinadons in southern Africa using Lg wave amplitudes. Geophys. J. R. astr, Sac., 63, 735——745.

    [8] Nicolas, M., Massinon, B., Mechler, I'. and Bouchon, M、1982. Attenuation of regional phases in western Europe. Bull, Seism. Sac. Amen, 72, 2089——2106.

    [9] Ehel, J. E.1982. ML measurements for norti,esrcrn United States earthquakes. Bull. Seism——Sn,.am Cr,21367——1378.

    [10] Bakun, W. H, and Joyner, W, B., 1984. The M, scale in ccntal California. Bull. Seintrr., 74 1827——1843.

    [11] Campillo, M., Bouchon, M, and Massinon, B., 1984. Theoretical study of the excitation. spectral chartcristics and geometrical attenuation of regional seismic phases. Bull, Seism. Snc. Amer,74, 79——90.

    [12] Greenha3gh, S. A. and Singh, R., 1986. A revised magnitude scale for South Australian earthquake,. Bull,Seism. Soc. Amen, 76, 757——767.

    [13] Huttnn, L. K, and Boore, D. M., 1987. The ML scale in Southern California, Bell. Seism. Snc. .imer.77, 2074——2094.

    [14] Ghavez. D. E. and Priestley, K. F., 1985. My ohservations in the Great Basin andM。versus ML relationships for the 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California, earthquake sequence. Bull. Scisrn. Soo. Amen.75, I555——1598.

    [15] 葛焕称、黄才中、倪岳伟、李永勤,1991.中国东部六省Lg波振幅比H/Z和台站项,地震学报(待发表).

    [16] 严尊国、薛军蓉 1987.中国近震震级M}综述.中国地震,3,4,44——51

    [1] 葛焕称、黄才中、叶培元、陆振飞,1986,综合回归分析与中国东部六省地区Lg波衰减的测定.地震学报,8,.367——381.

    [2] 葛焕称、黄才中、叶培元、陆振飞,1987.中国东部六省的Lg震级(上)—侧定方法和结果.地震学报,9, 3 7——51,

    [3] Herrmann, R. B. and Nuttli, O. W., 1982. Magnitude: the relation Mt, to mb}e Bulf. Seism. Soc. Amen,72, 389——397.

    [4] Herrmann, R. B. and Kijko, A., 1983. Short——period Lg magnitudes: instrument, attenuation, and source effects. Bull. Seism. Sac. Amer, 73, 1835——1850.

    [5] Nuttli, O. W., 1973. Seismic wave attenuation and magnitude relations of eastern North America. J. Geophys. Res., 78, 876——885.

    [6] Street, R. L., 1976. Scaling northeastern United States/southeastern Canadian earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Sot.Amen, 66, 1525——1537.

    [7] Chow, R. A. C., Fairhead, J. D., Henderson N. B. and Marshall, P, D., 1980. Magnitude and Q determinadons in southern Africa using Lg wave amplitudes. Geophys. J. R. astr, Sac., 63, 735——745.

    [8] Nicolas, M., Massinon, B., Mechler, I'. and Bouchon, M、1982. Attenuation of regional phases in western Europe. Bull, Seism. Sac. Amen, 72, 2089——2106.

    [9] Ehel, J. E.1982. ML measurements for norti,esrcrn United States earthquakes. Bull. Seism——Sn,.am Cr,21367——1378.

    [10] Bakun, W. H, and Joyner, W, B., 1984. The M, scale in ccntal California. Bull. Seintrr., 74 1827——1843.

    [11] Campillo, M., Bouchon, M, and Massinon, B., 1984. Theoretical study of the excitation. spectral chartcristics and geometrical attenuation of regional seismic phases. Bull, Seism. Snc. Amer,74, 79——90.

    [12] Greenha3gh, S. A. and Singh, R., 1986. A revised magnitude scale for South Australian earthquake,. Bull,Seism. Soc. Amen, 76, 757——767.

    [13] Huttnn, L. K, and Boore, D. M., 1987. The ML scale in Southern California, Bell. Seism. Snc. .imer.77, 2074——2094.

    [14] Ghavez. D. E. and Priestley, K. F., 1985. My ohservations in the Great Basin andM。versus ML relationships for the 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California, earthquake sequence. Bull. Scisrn. Soo. Amen.75, I555——1598.

    [15] 葛焕称、黄才中、倪岳伟、李永勤,1991.中国东部六省Lg波振幅比H/Z和台站项,地震学报(待发表).

    [16] 严尊国、薛军蓉 1987.中国近震震级M}综述.中国地震,3,4,44——51
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Article views (1121) PDF downloads (93) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return