REN XIXIAN, QI GUIZHONG, ZHAN ZHIJIAcom sh advance. 1984: THE CHANGE OF GEOMAGNETIC TOTAL FIELD IN BEIJING AREA BEFORE AND AFTER THE 1976 TANGSHAN EARTHQUAKE. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 6(3): 271-286.
Citation: REN XIXIAN, QI GUIZHONG, ZHAN ZHIJIAcom sh advance. 1984: THE CHANGE OF GEOMAGNETIC TOTAL FIELD IN BEIJING AREA BEFORE AND AFTER THE 1976 TANGSHAN EARTHQUAKE. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 6(3): 271-286.

THE CHANGE OF GEOMAGNETIC TOTAL FIELD IN BEIJING AREA BEFORE AND AFTER THE 1976 TANGSHAN EARTHQUAKE

More Information
  • Published Date: August 31, 2011
  • In order to study the seismomagnetic effects of the 1976 Tangshan earthquake, the observed data of the geomagnetic total field during the recent six years (1975-1981) have been used in this paper. We have analysed both the local differences of geomagnetic secular variations and the features of changes in geomagnetic statistical parameters in Beijing area during normal period, and the influences of local differences of secular variations on the statistical parameters.Comparison between changes of the parameters in the period before and after the Tangshan earthquake and that in normal period shows that the influence of the Tangshan earthquake on geomagnetic statistical parameters is obvious.In order to determine the portion of the survey network, where the information induced by the Tangshan earthquake was strongest, the space distribution of the statistical parameters before and after the earthquake has been calculated for different kinds of combinations of the points and profiles of observation.The statistical features of seismomagnetic information in the Beijing area caused by the Tangshan earthquake are as follows:1. The anomalous information is not fluctuations in short period but long time changes lasted for one year at least;2. The anomalies in the S region which is closer to the epicenter, were larger, because of the fact that the changes in the geomagnetic statistical parameters Smmj bsn and Fk2 in this region are more obvious, especially, the difference in space distributions of the local statistical information and secular variations, the former trends chiefly east-west while the latter north-south.3. The changes with time in the mean space difference of the tendency of the anomalies is not so clear in the entire surveyed area but becomes quite clear in the region from March to June of 1976, just before the Tangshan earthquake.
  • [1] 范国华等,唐山地震对北京地区地磁场总强度的影响,地震学报,1, 1, 39——48,1973,

    [2] Stacey, F. D., The Seismomagnetic Effect, Pure Appl. Geophys., 58, 5——22, 1964.

    [3] Johnston, M. J. S., Tectonomangetic Effect, Proceedings of The T. Nagata Conference, 283——303,1975.

    [4] Rikitake, T., et al., Geomagnetic and Geoelectric Studies of the Matsushiro Earthquake Swarm (4),Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 44, 1735——1758, 1966.

    [5] Nagata, T., Tectonomagnetism, IAGA Bulletin, 27, 12——43, 1969.

    [6] Smith, B. E., et al., A Tectonomagnetic Effect Observed Before a Magnitude 5.2 Earthquake Near Hollister, California, J. G. R., 81, 3556——3603, 1976.

    [7] Rikitake, T., et al., Changes in the Geomagnetic Field Associated with Earthquakes in the Izu Penin——sula, Japan, J. G. G., 32, 721——737, 1980.

    [8] 祁贵仲等,地磁场的空间相关性及其在地震预报中的应用,地球物理学报,20, 1, 169—— 184, 1977.

    [9] Shapiro, V., et al., Anomalous Variations of the Geomagnetic Field in East Faragana——Magnetic Precursor of the Alay Earthquake with M=7.0, G. J. R. Astr. Soc., 68, 1——5, 1982

    [10] Shapiro, V., et al., Some Results of the Investigation of Geomagnetic Field Variation in the Urals and Carpathians, G. J. R. Astr. Soc. 66, 1, 71——81, 1981.

    [11] Johnston, M., Tectonomagnetic Effects, Earthquake Information Bulletin, 10, 3,82——87,1978.

    [12] Nagata, T., Main Characteristics of Recent Geomagnetic Secular Variation,J.G.G., 17, 263——276,1965

    [13] 林云芳等,中国华北地区地磁长期变化的分析,地震学报,4, 1, 74——83,1982.

    [1] 范国华等,唐山地震对北京地区地磁场总强度的影响,地震学报,1, 1, 39——48,1973,

    [2] Stacey, F. D., The Seismomagnetic Effect, Pure Appl. Geophys., 58, 5——22, 1964.

    [3] Johnston, M. J. S., Tectonomangetic Effect, Proceedings of The T. Nagata Conference, 283——303,1975.

    [4] Rikitake, T., et al., Geomagnetic and Geoelectric Studies of the Matsushiro Earthquake Swarm (4),Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 44, 1735——1758, 1966.

    [5] Nagata, T., Tectonomagnetism, IAGA Bulletin, 27, 12——43, 1969.

    [6] Smith, B. E., et al., A Tectonomagnetic Effect Observed Before a Magnitude 5.2 Earthquake Near Hollister, California, J. G. R., 81, 3556——3603, 1976.

    [7] Rikitake, T., et al., Changes in the Geomagnetic Field Associated with Earthquakes in the Izu Penin——sula, Japan, J. G. G., 32, 721——737, 1980.

    [8] 祁贵仲等,地磁场的空间相关性及其在地震预报中的应用,地球物理学报,20, 1, 169—— 184, 1977.

    [9] Shapiro, V., et al., Anomalous Variations of the Geomagnetic Field in East Faragana——Magnetic Precursor of the Alay Earthquake with M=7.0, G. J. R. Astr. Soc., 68, 1——5, 1982

    [10] Shapiro, V., et al., Some Results of the Investigation of Geomagnetic Field Variation in the Urals and Carpathians, G. J. R. Astr. Soc. 66, 1, 71——81, 1981.

    [11] Johnston, M., Tectonomagnetic Effects, Earthquake Information Bulletin, 10, 3,82——87,1978.

    [12] Nagata, T., Main Characteristics of Recent Geomagnetic Secular Variation,J.G.G., 17, 263——276,1965

    [13] 林云芳等,中国华北地区地磁长期变化的分析,地震学报,4, 1, 74——83,1982.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 田优平,沈平,万永革,唐红亮,康承旭,姚海东,佘旭明,叶世山. 湖南地区应力场定量结果及置信区间分析. 地震研究. 2023(04): 483-490 .
    2. Xiaobin Li,Mingpei Jin,Ya Huang,Wenjian Cha,Jun Wang,Sihai Li. Temporal evolution of the focal mechanism consistency of the 2021 Yangbi M_S6.4 earthquake sequence in Yunnan. Earthquake Research Advances. 2022(02): 11-20 .
    3. 田优平,唐红亮,康承旭,万永革,黄骥超,姚海东,佘旭明. 综合震源机制解法反演湖南地区构造应力场的初步结果. 地球物理学报. 2020(11): 4080-4096 .
    4. 何永锋,李锴,曾乐贵,姚国政,赵克常,张献兵,刘炳灿. 利用全元素矩张量反演方法识别地下核爆炸. 爆炸与冲击. 2018(05): 985-992 .
    5. 何永锋,李锴,刘炳灿,姚国政,赵克常,张献兵,曾乐贵. 基于面波数据的地下核爆炸的全元素矩张量反演方法. 爆炸与冲击. 2017(05): 945-950 .
    6. 王志铄,王明亮,赵显刚,万娜,马兴全,于浩雨. 太康隆起南缘新郑-太康断裂的新生代活动形迹与地震活动. 地震地质. 2017(01): 117-129 .
    7. 孙杰,胡凤英,杨龙翔,阎楷,李源. 2010年10月24日周口太康M_s4.6地震的震源机制解. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2014(Z2): 8-14 .
    8. 郑建常,王鹏,林眉,穆娟,徐长朋,李冬梅. 区域全波形反演美国三次中强地震的震源矩张量. 地球物理学进展. 2013(06): 2825-2837 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (1576) PDF downloads (151) Cited by(9)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return