Li Yingzhen Shen Jun Nie Xiaohong Long Haiyingdiv. 2011: Comprehensive analysis on present tectonic stress field in Urumqi region. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 33(1): 15-27.
Citation: Li Yingzhen Shen Jun Nie Xiaohong Long Haiyingdiv. 2011: Comprehensive analysis on present tectonic stress field in Urumqi region. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 33(1): 15-27.

Comprehensive analysis on present tectonic stress field in Urumqi region

More Information
  • Published Date: January 18, 2011
  • Urumqi city is located in central part of northern piedmont of Tianshan mountain. The mean direction of principal compressive stress in central section of northern Tianshan deduced from the focal mechanism solutions is around N10deg;E, with a clear feature of gradual change from west to east. In the region of Urumqi city, the direction derived from focal mechanism solutions of moderate-strong earthquakes is N15deg;mdash;20deg;E.The principal stress direction found from fault striation inversion is N17deg;Wmdash;N2deg;E. The stress direction deduced from the above two data sets are basically in the variation range of the principal compressive stress in the central section of northern Tianshan. However, the stress direction inferred from composite fault-plane solutions of small earthquakes within 25 km of the Urumqi seismic station is N40deg;mdash;46deg;E, which shows a deviation of 20deg;mdash;30deg;from that of regional principal compressive stress. Nevertheless, the direction of maximum horizontal compressive stress measured in the boreholes in Urumqi city is around N55deg;E, which displays a further deviation of 10deg;mdash;15deg;, and its deviation from that of regional stress field is up to 30deg;mdash;40deg;. These phenomena indicate that a tension stress in the shallow layers in front part of the compressive fault-fold region has been superposed to the regional NNE-SSW trending compressive tectonic stress and makes the direction of local principal compressive stress turn to NEE-SWW. This is one of the causes why the normal faults, such as the Jiujiawan fault groups, were developed in Urumqi city.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 刘池洋,黄雷,赵红格,王建强,杨丽华,席晓东,彭恒. 大陆横向转换构造及其地质作用. 地质学报. 2024(12): 3455-3477 .
    2. 何金,许鑫,吴彪,刘晓磊,杨东辉,路彤. 汶川地区区域构造应力场特征及汶川M_S8.0地震对周围主要断层面的影响. 地震科学进展. 2022(03): 97-115 .
    3. 杨宜海,张雪梅,花茜,苏利娜,丰成君,邱玉荣,梁春涛,苏金蓉,古云鹤,金昭娣,张媛媛,关昕. 龙门山断裂带的分段性特征——来自密集震源机制解的约束. 地球物理学报. 2021(04): 1181-1205 .
    4. 苏小芸,陈丽君,王文才,季婉婧,李通,周卫东. 甘东南地区水氡浓度的临界慢化现象研究. 地震工程学报. 2020(05): 1104-1110+1140 .
    5. 李振月,万永革,盛书中. 米亚罗断裂活动与汶川地震序列活动的关系. 地震地质. 2019(01): 72-83 .
    6. 杨帆,盛书中,万永革,王晓山,刘兆才,李瑶. 网格内不满足均匀性假设对应力场反演结果的影响——以喜马拉雅东构造结及其周边地区应力场研究为例. 地球物理学进展. 2019(02): 479-488 .
    7. 江敏,陈九辉,Yasuto Kuwahara,Reiken Matsushita. 利用小震震源机制解研究汶川地震后龙门山断裂带中段应力场时空演化. 地震地质. 2018(02): 310-322 .
    8. 丰成君,戚帮申,张鹏,孙东生,孟静,牛琳琳,王苗苗,谭成轩,陈群策. 汶川Ms8.0地震后龙门山断裂带地壳应力场及其构造意义. 地质力学学报. 2018(04): 439-451 .
    9. 钟菊芳,吴海波. 多断层破裂下单双峰地震动参数对比分析. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2018(01): 193-202 .
    10. 万永魁,刘峡,沈军,王雷,李妍. 汶川地震前龙门山及其周缘断裂形变运动与应力累积的数值模拟. 地震地质. 2017(04): 853-869 .
    11. 杨雅琼,王晓山,万永革,盛书中,陈婷. 由震源机制解推断唐山地震序列发震断层的分段特征. 地震学报. 2016(04): 632-643+658 . 本站查看
    12. 冯梅,张纪中,安美建. 2008年汶川地震前后震源区构造应力场变化. 地震地质. 2013(04): 701-720 .

    Other cited types(10)

Catalog

    Article views (1982) PDF downloads (136) Cited by(22)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return