NIU ZHIREN, CHEN DANGMIN, LI BINGQIANcom sh advance. 1990: EFFECTS OF BARRIERS AND ASPERITIES ON SEISMIC MOMENT. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 12(1): 43-53.
Citation: NIU ZHIREN, CHEN DANGMIN, LI BINGQIANcom sh advance. 1990: EFFECTS OF BARRIERS AND ASPERITIES ON SEISMIC MOMENT. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 12(1): 43-53.

EFFECTS OF BARRIERS AND ASPERITIES ON SEISMIC MOMENT

More Information
  • Published Date: September 01, 2011
  • In this paper,the effects of barriers and asperities on the determination of seismic moment have been quantitatively examined by using the solution for a penny-shaped crack with non-uniform traction. It has been found that the moment of a fault with a barrier is about 40 percent of the moment on the fault with uniform stress drop and the same area,if the radius of the barrier is not very small,nor approximates to that of the fault. Therefore,it follows that,in this case,the apparent stress drop is about 40 percent of △Af=SA-f where SA is the far-field stress and f is the uniform residual frictional stress. Furthermore,a pre-existing slip zone can substantially amplify the seismic moment due to the failure of an asperity. Especially,the amplification is very large when the radius of the asperity is small. For example,the moment on the asperity is over 7 times and 30 times of the moment at the failure of a uniform shear fault with radius C,respectively,when the radius of the asperity is 20 percent and 10 percent of the radius C of the fault.The difference between three-dimensional and two-dimensional effects is compared in this paper. It is founl that Mx0/M0c is not sensitive to the change of asperity radius for three-di-mensionad faults,this differs very mith from the result with two-dimensional fault,where Mx0 is the moment due to the failure of the fault with an asperity and M0c is the moment of a uniform fault. Therefore,two-dimensional analsis is not suitable to a three-dimensional fault with asperity. However,when examining the effect of pre-existing slip zones on the moment due to failure of asperity,the difference between the results of plane strain and three-dimensional case is not apparent.
  • [1] Aki, K,1966. Generation and propagation of G}waves from the Niigata earthquake of June 16, 1964,2, Estimation of earthquake moment, released energy, and stress——strain drop from G——waves spectrum.Bulh Earthg, Rcs. Irur, Tokyo Uniu., 44, 7 3——88.

    [2] Kanamori, H, and Stcwart, G. S,1978. Seismological aspects of the Guatemala earthquake of February, 4, 1976. J. Ccophys.Res., 83, 3427——3434.

    [3] Das, S. and Aki, K., 1977. Fault plane with barriers:A versatile earthquake model. J. GcopJzys, Res.,82, 5658——5670.

    [4] Madariaga, R,1979. On the relation between moment and stress drop in the presence of stress and strength heterogeneity. J. Geophys. Res., 84, 2243——2250.

    [5] Rice, J., 1980. The mechanics of earthquake rupture. Proc. Int. Sch. Phys. Enrico Fermi. 78, 555——649.

    [6] Aki, K., 1981. Characterization of barriers on an earthquake fault. J. Geophys. Res., 86, 1785——1793.

    [7] Rudnicki, J. W, and Kanamori, H., 1981. Effects of fault inter: coon on moment, stress drop, and strain energy release. J. Geoplzys. Rcs., 86, 1785——1793.

    [8] Rudnicki, J. W., Hiroshima, K. and Achenbach, J. D,1984. Amplification of moment and strain energy release due to interation between different size fault slip zone. J. Geophys. Res., 89, 5828——5834.

    [9] Niu Zhireu, 1988. Stress and displacement field due to a penny——shaped shear crack with non——uniform traction. Geophys.J. R, Astr. Soc,94, 219——235.

    [10] Keilis——Borok, V. I,1959. On the estimation of the displacement in an earthquake source and of source dimensions. Ann. Geofis., 12, 205——214.

    [11] Rundle, J. B., Kanamori, H, and McNally, K. C., 1984.An inhomogeneous fault model for gaps, aspcrities, barriers, and seismicity migration. J, Geophys. Res,89, 10019——10231.

    [12] Dmowska, R. and Rice, J., 1986. Fracture thory and its seismological applications, In "Corrtitrunz Theory in Solzd Earth Physics", ed. Teisseyre, R., Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, Polish Scient. Publ.,Warsaw.

    [13] Niu Zhiren, 1984/85. Estimates of fracture parameters of earthquakes. Purc Appl. Geophys., 122, 645——661.

    [1] Aki, K,1966. Generation and propagation of G}waves from the Niigata earthquake of June 16, 1964,2, Estimation of earthquake moment, released energy, and stress——strain drop from G——waves spectrum.Bulh Earthg, Rcs. Irur, Tokyo Uniu., 44, 7 3——88.

    [2] Kanamori, H, and Stcwart, G. S,1978. Seismological aspects of the Guatemala earthquake of February, 4, 1976. J. Ccophys.Res., 83, 3427——3434.

    [3] Das, S. and Aki, K., 1977. Fault plane with barriers:A versatile earthquake model. J. GcopJzys, Res.,82, 5658——5670.

    [4] Madariaga, R,1979. On the relation between moment and stress drop in the presence of stress and strength heterogeneity. J. Geophys. Res., 84, 2243——2250.

    [5] Rice, J., 1980. The mechanics of earthquake rupture. Proc. Int. Sch. Phys. Enrico Fermi. 78, 555——649.

    [6] Aki, K., 1981. Characterization of barriers on an earthquake fault. J. Geophys. Res., 86, 1785——1793.

    [7] Rudnicki, J. W, and Kanamori, H., 1981. Effects of fault inter: coon on moment, stress drop, and strain energy release. J. Geoplzys. Rcs., 86, 1785——1793.

    [8] Rudnicki, J. W., Hiroshima, K. and Achenbach, J. D,1984. Amplification of moment and strain energy release due to interation between different size fault slip zone. J. Geophys. Res., 89, 5828——5834.

    [9] Niu Zhireu, 1988. Stress and displacement field due to a penny——shaped shear crack with non——uniform traction. Geophys.J. R, Astr. Soc,94, 219——235.

    [10] Keilis——Borok, V. I,1959. On the estimation of the displacement in an earthquake source and of source dimensions. Ann. Geofis., 12, 205——214.

    [11] Rundle, J. B., Kanamori, H, and McNally, K. C., 1984.An inhomogeneous fault model for gaps, aspcrities, barriers, and seismicity migration. J, Geophys. Res,89, 10019——10231.

    [12] Dmowska, R. and Rice, J., 1986. Fracture thory and its seismological applications, In "Corrtitrunz Theory in Solzd Earth Physics", ed. Teisseyre, R., Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, Polish Scient. Publ.,Warsaw.

    [13] Niu Zhiren, 1984/85. Estimates of fracture parameters of earthquakes. Purc Appl. Geophys., 122, 645——661.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 赵天次,赵伯明. 基于小波分析的近断层地震动最强速度脉冲识别方法与应用. 振动与冲击. 2021(08): 41-49 .
    2. 赵晓芬,温增平,陈波,刘奕君. 适用于全周期结构的速度脉冲型地震动强度表征参数研究. 地震学报. 2019(04): 536-547 . 本站查看
    3. 赵晓芬,温增平,陈波. 近断层地震动最强速度脉冲方向分量特性研究. 地震学报. 2018(05): 673-688+690 . 本站查看
    4. 陈秋旺. 近断层地震下大底盘框架结构非线性响应分析及减震控制. 福建建设科技. 2018(06): 1-5 .
    5. 李敏,黄天璨. 近断层地震动作用下超高层结构地震响应分析. 华南地震. 2018(04): 84-89 .
    6. 杜永峰,宋翔,包超,朱翔,谈志鸿. 近场地震作用下RC框架鲁棒性分析. 振动与冲击. 2016(03): 192-197 .
    7. 张常勇,钟铁毅,李徐,杨海洋. FPS隔震简支梁桥近断层地震响应研究. 世界桥梁. 2014(05): 48-53 .

    Other cited types(12)

Catalog

    Article views (1596) PDF downloads (135) Cited by(19)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return