Citation: | Shang Y C,Shi B P. 2020. Statistical analysis of the February 2018 Hualien,Taiwan,China,earthquake sequence:The features of its foreshocks,mainshocks,and aftershocks. Acta Seismologica Sinica,42(1):1−11. doi:10.11939/jass.20190058. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20190058 |
As we know, the statistical properties of an earthquake sequence are associated with three important empirical laws in seismology: Gutenberg-Richter law for the frequency-magnitude distribution, Båth law for the magnitude of the largest aftershock, and the modified Omori’s law for the temporal decay of aftershocks. In this paper these three laws are combined to study the February 2018 Hualien, Taiwan, China, earthquake sequence. In addition, a physics-based model proposed by Dieterich is used to describe the foreshock activities. The Hualien aftershock sequence is divided as three major sequences compounding with the ML5.5 foreshock sequence, the ML5.5 aftershock sequence and the ML6.0 sequence. The results indicate that the b values associated with Gutenberg-Richter law for the ML5.5 aftershock sequence and the ML6.0 aftershock sequence are approximately 1, respectively. And b value of the ML5.5 foreshock sequence are approximately 0.5. The p values with associated modified Omori’s law for the ML5.5 and ML6.0 aftershock sequences are both approximately 0.9, respectively. The estimated maximum aftershock magnitudes based on the modified form of Båth law are about ML5.0 and ML5.5, respectively, for ML5.5 and ML6.0 aftershock sequences, and the magnitude error is within
毛春长. 1989. 利用B值截距法估计强余震震级[J]. 山西地震,(3):41–42.
|
Mao C C. 1989. Estimating strong aftershock magnitude by B-value intercept method[J]. Earthquake Research in Shanxi,(3):41–42 (in Chinese).
|
台湾气象局. 2018. 地震测报中心[EB/OL]. [2018−04−03]. http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V7/index.htm.
|
Taiwan Weather Bureau. 2018. Earthquake monitoring and reporting center[EB/OL]. [2018−04−03]. http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V7/index.htm.
|
吴开统,焦远碧,王志东. 1984. 华北地区的晚期强余震特征[J]. 西北地震学报,6(2):35–43.
|
Wu K T,Jiao Y B,Wang Z D. 1984. Certain characteristics of late strong aftershocks of North China[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal,6(2):35–43 (in Chinese).
|
解孟雨,孟令媛,申文豪,史保平. 2017. 基于Gutenberg-Richter定律快速估算最大余震震级:以2017年九寨沟MS7.0地震为例[J]. 中国地震,33(4):493–502. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2017.04.005
|
Xie M Y,Meng L Y,Shen W H,Shi B P. 2017. Fast estimating of the largest aftershock’s magnitude based on the Gutenberg-Richter law:A case study of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou MS7.0 earthquake sequence[J]. Earthquake Research in China,33(4):493–502 (in Chinese).
|
张智,吴开统,焦远碧,张天润. 1989. 用b值横截距预报强余震震级的方法探讨[J]. 中国地震,5(4):59–69.
|
Zhang Z,Wu K T,Jiao Y B,Zhang T R. 1989. Discussion on the prediction method for magnitude of strong aftershock with the crosscut way of b-value[J]. Earthquake Research in China,5(4):59–69 (in Chinese).
|
Chan C H,Ma K F,Lee Y T,Wang Y J. 2019. Rethinking seismic source model of probabilistic hazard assessment in Taiwan after the 2018 Hualien,Taiwan,earthquake sequence[J]. Seismol Res Lett,90(1):88–96. doi: 10.1785/0220180225
|
Dieterich J H,Linker M F. 1992. Fault stability under conditions of variable normal stress[J]. Geophys Res Lett,19(16):1691–1694. doi: 10.1029/92GL01821
|
Dieterich J H. 1994. A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering[J]. J Geophys Res,99(B2):2601–2618. doi: 10.1029/93JB02581
|
Dieterich J H,Kilgore B. 1996. Implications of fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,93(9):3787–3794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3787
|
Dieterich J H. 2007. Applications of rate- and state-dependent friction to models of fault slip and earthquake occurrence[G]//Treatise on Geophysics. Boston: Elsevier: 107−129.
|
Hamdache M,Peláez J A,Kijko A,Smit A. 2017. Energetic and spatial characterization of seismicity in the Algeria-Morocco region[J]. Nat Hazards,86(S2):273–293. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2514-7
|
Helmstetter A,Sornette D,Grasso J R. 2003. Mainshocks are aftershocks of conditional foreshocks:How do foreshock statisti-cal properties emerge from aftershock laws[J]. J Geophys Res,108(B1):2046.
|
Jian P R,Hung S H,Meng L S. 2018. Rupture behavior and interaction of the 2018 Hualien earthquake sequence and its tectonic implication[J]. Seismol Res Lett,90(1):68–77.
|
Jones L M. 1985. Foreshocks and time-dependent earthquake hazard assessment in southern California[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,75(6):1667–1679.
|
Kisslinger C,Jones L M. 1991. Properties of aftershock sequences in southern California[J]. J Geophys Res,96(B7):11947–11958. doi: 10.1029/91JB01200
|
Kuo Y T,Wang Y,Hollingsworth J,Huang S Y,Chuang R Y,Lu C H,Hsu Y C,Tung H,Yen J Y,Chang C P. 2018. Shallow fault rupture of the milun fault in the 2018 MW6.4 Hualien earthquake:A high-resolution approach from optical correlation of Pléiades satellite imagery[J]. Seismol Res Lett,90(1):97–107.
|
Lin C M,Kuo C H,Huang J Y,Chao S H,Hsu T Y,Wen K L. 2018. Strong ground motion and pulse-like velocity observations in the near-fault region of the 2018 MW6.4 Hualien,Taiwan,earthquake[J]. Seismol Res Lett,90(1):40–50.
|
Ma K F,Wu Y M. 2018. Preface to the focus section on the 6 February 2018 MW6.4 Hualien,Taiwan,earthquake[J]. Seismol Res Lett,90(1):15–18.
|
Marzocchi W,Sandri L. 2003. A review and new insights on the estimation of the b-value and its uncertainty[J]. Ann Geophys,46(6):1271–1282.
|
Pollitz F F,Johnston M J S. 2006. Direct test of static stress versus dynamic stress triggering of aftershocks[J]. Geophys Res Lett,33(15):L15318. doi: 10.1029/2006GL026764
|
Popov V L. 2009. Contact Mechanics and Friction[M]. Berlin: Springer: 323−342.
|
Sandri L,Marzocchi W. 2007. A technical note on the bias in the estimation of the b-value and its uncertainty through the least squares technique[J]. Ann Geophys,50(3):329–339.
|
Scholz C H. 2002. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press: 358−380.
|
Shcherbakov R,Turcotte D L. 2004. A modified form of Ba °th’s law[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,94(5):1968–1975. doi: 10.1785/012003162
|
USGS. 2018. Earthquake hazards program[EB/OL]. [2018−04−03]. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/.
|
Utsu T. 1961. A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks[J]. Geophys Mag,30:521–605.
|
Utsu T,Ogata Y,Ritsuko S,Matsu′ ura. 1995. The centenary of the Omori formula for a decay law of aftershock activity[J]. J Phys Earth,43(1):1–33. doi: 10.4294/jpe1952.43.1
|
Wiemer S,Wyss M. 2000. Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs:Examples from Alaska,the western United States,and Japan[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,90(4):859–869. doi: 10.1785/0119990114
|
Zúñiga F R,Wyss M. 1995. Inadvertent changes in magnitude reported in earthquake catalogs:Their evaluation through b-value estimates[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,85(6):1858–1866.
|
1. |
许鑫,万永革,何金. 2010年青海玉树Ms7.1级地震中心震源机制解及震源区构造应力场研究. 高原地震. 2021(03): 1-10 .
![]() | |
2. |
祝爱玉,王永哲,李永华,张东宁. 基于InSAR地表形变约束的玛多M_S7.4地震孕育发生机理数值模拟研究. 地球物理学报. 2021(12): 4548-4561 .
![]() | |
3. |
岳汉,张勇,盖增喜,王腾,赵里. 大地震震源破裂模型:从快速响应到联合反演的技术进展及展望. 中国科学:地球科学. 2020(04): 515-537 .
![]() | |
4. |
Han YUE,Yong ZHANG,Zengxi GE,Teng WANG,Li ZHAO. Resolving rupture processes of great earthquakes: Reviews and perspective from fast response to joint inversion. Science China(Earth Sciences). 2020(04): 492-511 .
![]() |
|
5. |
马云漪,卢建旗,李山有,何沛阳. 基于线源模型的中国仪器地震烈度衰减规律. 内陆地震. 2020(04): 330-339 .
![]() | |
6. |
董培育,程惠红,石耀霖,柳畅,乔学军. 基于Monte Carlo方法数值反演区域初始构造应力场——以巴颜喀拉块体为例. 地球物理学报. 2019(08): 2858-2870 .
![]() | |
7. |
郑绪君,张勇,马强,汪荣江. 基于强震动资料的破裂过程快速反演及其自动化的可行性. 地球物理学报. 2018(10): 4021-4036 .
![]() | |
8. |
郑韵,姜立新,王辉山,王洪栋. 基于余震粒子群算法的极震区快速判定方法研究. 地震. 2018(04): 120-131 .
![]() | |
9. |
李津津,张合,吕国军,李皓,刘志辉. 廊坊市活断层探测数据管理系统. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2017(04): 212-217 .
![]() | |
10. |
黄学猛,田坤,杜义,何仲太,雷惊昊,马保起,谢富仁. 玉树巴塘断裂晚第四纪滑动速率及其构造意义. 北京大学学报(自然科学版). 2015(01): 65-78 .
![]() | |
11. |
李煜航,王庆良,崔笃信,郝明,王文萍,秦姗兰. 利用GPS数据反演阿尔金断裂现今滑动速率. 地震地质. 2015(03): 869-879 .
![]() | |
12. |
郑韵,姜立新,杨天青,刘杰. 利用余震能量场进行宏观震中快速判定的研究. 中国地震. 2015(04): 698-709 .
![]() | |
13. |
耿冠世,俞言祥. 中国西部地区震源破裂尺度与震级的经验关系. 震灾防御技术. 2015(01): 68-76 .
![]() | |
14. |
杨博,朱爽,杨国华,周伟,冯胜涛,陈欣. 岷县漳县M_S6.6地震前区域形变场的特征. 地震. 2014(02): 115-123 .
![]() | |
15. |
盛书中,万永革,王未来,郑爽,石砚斌,李迎秋. 2010年玉树M_S 7.1地震发震断层面参数的确定. 地球物理学进展. 2014(04): 1555-1562 .
![]() | |
16. |
孙刚,刘晶晶,谢霄峰,张小咏. 玉树地震基层应急响应综述. 防灾科技学院学报. 2014(01): 57-61 .
![]() | |
17. |
吴中海,周春景,冯卉,张克旗,李家存,叶培盛,李跃华,田婷婷. 青海玉树地区活动断裂与地震. 地质通报. 2014(04): 419-469 .
![]() | |
18. |
周春景,吴中海,尼玛次仁,李家存,蒋瑶,刘艳辉. 青海玉树Ms7.1级地震同震地表破裂构造. 地质通报. 2014(04): 551-566 .
![]() | |
19. |
玄松柏,申重阳,谈洪波,汪健,杨光亮. 类乌齐-玉树-玛多剖面地壳结构与玉树7.1级地震. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2013(06): 36-40 .
![]() | |
20. |
沈旭章. 2010年玉树7.1级地震震源区P和S波接收函数成像. 地球物理学报. 2013(02): 495-503 .
![]() | |
21. |
王长在,吴建平,房立华,王未来. 玉树地震震源区速度结构与余震分布的关系. 地球物理学报. 2013(12): 4072-4083 .
![]() | |
22. |
马玉虎,陈玉华,王培玲,刘文邦. 2010年玉树7.1级地震序列时空演化特征及早期趋势判断. 地震. 2012(03): 109-116 .
![]() | |
23. |
杨国华,杨博,占伟,陈欣,华彩虹,王利. 玉树和汶川地震前后区域水平形变的空间分布. 地震. 2012(02): 40-51 .
![]() | |
24. |
刘巧霞,沙成宁,杨卓欣,段永红. 玉树7.1级地震余震重新定位及其时空分布特征研究. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2012(04): 5-9+14 .
![]() | |
25. |
华卫,陈章立,郑斯华. 2010年4月14日青海玉树7.1级地震序列中小地震辐射能量的估计. 地球物理学进展. 2012(01): 8-17 .
![]() | |
26. |
刘巧霞,杨卓欣,莘海亮,李源,沙成宁. 玉树M_S7.1级地震部分余震重新定位及发震构造分析. 地球物理学报. 2012(01): 146-154 .
![]() | |
27. |
孙鑫喆,徐锡伟,陈立春,谭锡斌,于贵华,李智敏,苏桂武,王继,张晓清. 2010年玉树地震地表破裂带典型破裂样式及其构造意义. 地球物理学报. 2012(01): 155-170 .
![]() | |
28. |
朱艾斓,徐锡伟,于贵华,张晓清,陈桂华,任烨. 玉树地震序列重新定位及其地震构造研究. 地学前缘. 2012(04): 8-14 .
![]() | |
29. |
孟令媛,史保平. 2010年墨西哥BajaM_W7.2地震与中国玉树M_W6.9地震强地震动特征的对比研究. 地震学报. 2012(01): 1-19 .
![]() | |
30. |
杨国华,杨博,占伟,刘志广,梁洪宝. GPS资料反映大震前后青藏高原东北缘的水平形变. 地震研究. 2012(03): 295-302 .
![]() | |
31. |
汪建军,许才军,申文斌. 2010年Mw 6.9级玉树地震同震库仑应力变化研究. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2012(10): 1207-1211 .
![]() | |
32. |
付晓锋,吴美平,唐毅. 快速侦察任务响应时间分析与轨道设计. 系统工程与电子技术. 2012(03): 555-561 .
![]() | |
33. |
郭安宁,郭增建,焦姣,李鑫. 青海玉树7.1级大震的预测讨论. 西北地震学报. 2012(01): 39-43 .
![]() | |
34. |
吕坚,郑勇,马玉虎,王晓山,尚荣波,苏金蓉,肖建华,郑斌. 2010年4月14日青海玉树M_S4.7、M_S7.1、M_S6.3地震震源机制解与发震构造研究. 地球物理学进展. 2011(05): 1600-1606 .
![]() | |
35. |
徐彦,张俊伟,苏有锦. 反投影全球子台网P波记录研究2010年4月14日玉树地震破裂过程. 地球物理学报. 2011(05): 1243-1250 .
![]() | |
36. |
程佳,刘杰,甘卫军,余怀忠. 1997年以来巴颜喀拉块体周缘强震之间的黏弹性触发研究. 地球物理学报. 2011(08): 1997-2010 .
![]() | |
37. |
王莹,吴小平,赵韬. 震源参数因素对玉树地震库仑破裂应力图像及其与余震活动统计关系的影响. 地震学报. 2011(05): 595-604+699 .
![]() | |
38. |
郭华东,刘良云,范湘涛,李新武. 对地观测技术用于汶川和玉树地震灾害的研究. 高校地质学报. 2011(01): 1-12 .
![]() | |
39. |
潘家伟,李海兵,吴富峣,李宁,郭瑞强,张伟. 2010年玉树地震(Ms7.1)地表破裂特征、破裂机制与破裂过程. 岩石学报. 2011(11): 3449-3459 .
![]() | |
40. |
许力生,邸海滨,冯万鹏,李春来. 2010年青海玉树M_s 7.1地震近断层地面运动估计. 地球物理学报. 2010(06): 1366-1373 .
![]() | |
41. |
孙鑫喆,徐锡伟,陈立春,谭锡斌,苏桂武,王继,李智敏,张晓清. 青海玉树M_S7.1地震两个典型地点的地表破裂特征. 地震地质. 2010(02): 338-344 .
![]() |