Lian W P,Li Y M,Liu P X,Zhu L. 2022. Research on the results of national public survey on the status of earthquake disaster mitigation services and the demand for earthquake early warning in 2020. Acta Seismologica Sinica44(4):700−710. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210101
Citation: Lian W P,Li Y M,Liu P X,Zhu L. 2022. Research on the results of national public survey on the status of earthquake disaster mitigation services and the demand for earthquake early warning in 2020. Acta Seismologica Sinica44(4):700−710. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210101

Research on the results of national public survey on the status of earthquake disaster mitigation services and the demand for earthquake early warning in 2020

More Information
  • Received Date: June 06, 2021
  • Revised Date: August 05, 2021
  • Available Online: June 28, 2022
  • Published Date: August 15, 2022
  • Earthquake information services require in-depth research on the public reach and feedback. Research on the public earthquake early warning needs and the acceptance of false alarms has recently become sincerely necessary for the earthquake early warning system is about to provide services to the public on a large scale due to the advancement of the national earthquake early warning project. This paper designs a survey index system including public reach rate and public satisfaction to quantitatively measure the public reach and satisfaction of earthquake disaster mitigation services and has achieved good results. The results of the nationwide public survey show that 80.7%, 56.2%, 29.5% and 26.7% of the public have contacted the four services including earthquake quick report service, earthquake knowledge popularization, earthquake resistance consulting service for self-built houses, and information portals of earthquake departments at all levels. The public contact of the services has obvious regional characteristics and group characteristics. The public satisfaction is generally high, but the timeliness satisfaction evaluation score of the earthquake quick report service is relatively low. The public lacks an intuitive experience of its timeliness improvement in recent years. Research on the public demand of earthquake early warning shows that 88.3% of the public believe that it is necessary, 56.8% of the public have a strong demand for it, and the public acceptance of false alarms has remained at a high level in the past ten years. In large cities and the earthquake-prone areas, the public demand for earthquake early warning and the acceptance of false alarms are visibly higher than the overall nationwide level.
  • 安树伟. 2018. 改革开放40年以来我国区域经济发展演变与格局重塑[J]. 人文杂志,(6):1–10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0447-662X.2018.06.001
    An S W. 2018. The evolution and structural reshaping of Chinese regional economic development since China’s reform and opening up for 40 years[J]. The Journal of Humanities,(6):1–10 (in Chinese).
    陈琳,张力文. 2016. 公众应对地震预警的行为过程及其影响因素研究[J]. 理论月刊,4(5):153–157.
    Chen L,Zhang L W. 2016. Research on the behavior process and influencing factors of the public in response to earthquake early warning[J]. Theory Monthly,4(5):153–157 (in Chinese).
    程浩,管磊. 2002. 对公共产品理论的认识[J]. 河北经贸大学学报,23(6):10–17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2101.2002.06.003
    Cheng H,Guan L. 2002. Understanding of public goods theory[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Trade,23(6):10–17 (in Chinese).
    董丽娜,连尉平,陈为涛,马海建. 2020. 防震减灾公共服务现状与需求全国公众调查结果分析[J]. 地震地质,42(3):762–771. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2020.03.015
    Dong L N,Lian W P,Chen W T,Ma H J. 2020. Investigation of status and demand on public service of earthquake disaster mitigation in China[J]. Seismology and Geology,42(3):762–771 (in Chinese).
    国家统计局. 2019. 中国统计年鉴: 2019[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社: 37.
    National Bureau of Statistics. 2019. China Statistical Yearbook: 2019[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press: 37 (in Chinese).
    国家统计局, 国务院第七次全国人口普查领导小组办公室. 2021a. 第七次全国人口普查公报(第七号): 城乡人口和流动人口情况[EB/OL]. [2021-05-11]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/202106/t20210628_1818826.html.
    National Bureau of statistics of the People’s Republic of China, Office of the Leading Group for the Seventh National Census, 2021a. Bulletin of the seventh national census (No.7): Urban and rural population and floating population[EB/OL]. [2021-05-11]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/202106/t20210628_1818826.html (in Chinese).
    国家统计局, 国务院第七次全国人口普查领导小组办公室. 2021b. 第七次全国人口普查公报(第四号): 人口性别构成情况[EB/OL]. [2021-05-11]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/202106/t20210628_1818823.html.
    National Bureau of statistics of the People’s Republic of China, Office of the Leading Group for the Seventh National Census, 2021b. Bulletin of the seventh national census (No.4): Gender composition of population[EB/OL]. [2021-05-11]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/202106/t20210628_1818823.html (in Chinese).
    郭凯,温瑞智,卢大伟. 2012. 地震预警系统应用的社会影响调查与分析[J]. 自然灾害学报,21(4):108–115.
    Guo K,Wen R Z,Lu D W. 2012. Survey and analysis of social effects of earthquake early warning system’s application[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,21(4):108–115 (in Chinese).
    国务院发展研究中心“中国民生调查”课题组. 2019. 中国民生满意度继续保持在较高水平:中国民生调查2019综合研究报告[J]. 管理世界,35(10):1–10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2019.10.002
    “China’s People’s Livelihood Survey” Research Group of the Development Research Center of the State Council. 2019. China livelihood satisfaction remains at a high level:China livelihood survey 2019 general report[J]. Management World,35(10):1–10 (in Chinese).
    郭媛,陈修吾,吴嘉贤. 2019. 广东省防震减灾公共服务供给研究[J]. 华南地震,39(增刊):22–29.
    Guo Y,Chen X W,Wu J X. 2019. Research on public service supply of earthquake prevention and disaster mitigation in Guangdong Province[J]. South China Journal of Seismology,39(S1):22–29 (in Chinese).
    连尉平,李玉梅,刘培玄,朱林. 2021a. 2020年全国公众防震减灾素养水平及主要特点研究[J]. 灾害学,36(2):171–175. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2021.02.030
    Lian W P,Li Y M,Liu P X,Zhu L. 2021a. Research on Chinese residents’ literacy level of earthquake disaster mitigation in 2020 and its main characteristics[J]. Journal of Catastrophology,36(2):171–175 (in Chinese).
    连尉平,李玉梅,刘培玄,董青,朱林. 2021b. 防震减灾科普需求和满意度调查指标设计及结果分析[J]. 震灾防御技术,16(4):763–770.
    Lian W P,Li Y M,Liu P X,Dong Q,Zhu L. 2021b. Index design and result analysis of the earthquake knowledge demand and popularization satisfaction survey[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,16(4):763–770 (in Chinese).
    刘杰,侯建民. 2020. 我国地震监测应急服务产品现状[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,41(5):226–229. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2020.05.029
    Liu J,Hou J M. 2020. Introduction to the emergency service products of seismic monitoring network in China[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,41(5):226–229 (in Chinese).
    刘武. 2009. 公共服务接受者满意度指数模型研究[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学: 3–6.
    Liu W. 2009. Research on the Public Services Cumtomer Satisfaction Index Models[D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University: 3–6 (in Chinese).
    杨格格,杨艳昭,游珍,张小咏. 2011. 中国陆域地震灾害的时空分布格局[J]. 地球科学进展,26(5):548–555.
    Yang G G,Yang Y Z,You Z,Zhang X Y. 2011. The temporal and spatial distribution pattern of earthquake disaster in Chinese mainland[J]. Advances in Earth Science,26(5):548–555 (in Chinese).
    姚秀萍,张晓美,吕明辉. 2014. 公众气象服务满意度评价指标体系的构建方法[J]. 气象与环境科学,37(4):102–108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7148.2014.04.014
    Yao X P,Zhang X M,Lü M H. 2014. Construction method of evaluation index system of the public meteorological service satisfaction[J]. Meteorological and Environmental Sciences,37(4):102–108 (in Chinese).
    袁洁,石文兵,潘章容,张卫东. 2019. 地震预警的社会影响及应对策略研究[J]. 甘肃科技,35(21):45–47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0952.2019.21.018
    Yuan J,Shi W B,Pan Z R,Zhang W D. 2019. Study on social impact and coping strategies of earthquake early warning[J]. Gansu Science and Technology,35(21):45–47 (in Chinese).
    中国气象局. 2022. 92.8分, 2021年全国公众气象服务满意度创新高[EB/OL]. [2021-01-14]. http://www.cma.gov.cn/2011xwzx/2011xqxxw/2011xqxyw/202201/t20220114_590458.html.
    China Meterological Administration. 2022. 92.8 points, the national public meteorological service satisfaction reached a new high in 2021[EB/OL]. [2021-01-14]. http://www.cma.gov.cn/2011xwzx/2011xqxxw/2011xqxyw/202201/t20220114_590458.html (in Chinese).
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(15)

    1. 夏新宇,高原. 青藏高原东北缘构造特征与分层各向异性. 地震学报. 2025(01): 1-20 . 本站查看
    2. 姚生海,盖海龙,殷翔,李鑫,刘炜. 青海门源M6.9级地震地表破裂特征及区域地震活动趋势分析. 地质通报. 2024(Z1): 340-349 .
    3. 蒲颂文,闻鑫,周志伟,汪汉胜,江利明,李晨程. 基于Sentinel-1的门源Ms 6.9三维同震形变提取与分析. 地理空间信息. 2024(06): 109-112+117 .
    4. 徐伟,程理,李光涛,陈文龙. 马雅雪山断裂金强河段晚第四纪断错地貌及滑动速率确定. 震灾防御技术. 2024(03): 457-467 .
    5. 曾锐,蒋亚楠,燕翱翔,程燕,罗袆沅. InSAR约束的青海门源M_w6.7级地震同震断层滑动反演与三维形变场模拟. 地质科技通报. 2024(06): 212-225 .
    6. 程燕,蒋亚楠,侯中健,曾锐,罗袆沅. 2016年和2022年青海门源强震活动的InSAR形变观测与区域强震危险性分析. 地质力学学报. 2024(06): 965-977 .
    7. 袁道阳,谢虹,苏瑞欢,李智敏,文亚猛,司国军,薛善余,陈干,刘炳旭,梁淑敏,彭慧,段磊,魏拾其. 2022年1月8日青海门源M_S6.9地震地表破裂带特征与发震机制. 地球物理学报. 2023(01): 229-244 .
    8. 朱俊文,蔡艺萌,张波,姚赟胜. 昌马M_S7.6地震三维同震形变场数值模拟及库仑应力触发研究. 地震工程学报. 2023(03): 598-605 .
    9. 龚炜程,孙云强,邱鑫鹏,王甘娇,李敏娟,阮云凯. 青藏高原东北缘主要断裂带的库仑应力演化及其强震危险性. 地震工程学报. 2023(03): 585-597 .
    10. 汤大委,葛伟鹏,袁道阳,郑文俊,胡才博. 青藏高原北部历史强震对2022年门源M_S6.9地震及后续地震库仑应力触发作用. 地球物理学报. 2023(07): 2772-2795 .
    11. Sixin Zhang,Peng Jia,Bowen Hou,Ming Hao. Vertical deformation before and after the 2022 Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake and analysis of earthquake precursors. Geodesy and Geodynamics. 2023(06): 582-588 .
    12. 李媛,杨周胜,庞亚瑾,梁洪宝,刘峡. 2022年门源M_S6.9地震前断层活动及应力状态的数值模拟. 地震地质. 2023(06): 1286-1308 .
    13. 韩立波. 2022年青海门源M_S6.9地震震源机制解. 地震科学进展. 2022(02): 49-54 .
    14. 刘璐,刘兴旺,张波,何文贵,朱俊文,蔡艺萌. 利用高分影像识别门源M_S6.9地震地表破裂带. 地震工程学报. 2022(02): 440-449 .
    15. 苑争一,赵静,牛安福. 2022年1月8日青海门源M_S6.9地震震前变形特征分析. 中国地震. 2022(03): 389-398 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (538) PDF downloads (84) Cited by(21)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return