Zhang M,Pan H. 2022. A new method for expressing seismic hazards. Acta Seismologica Sinica44(6):1099−1110. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210106
Citation: Zhang M,Pan H. 2022. A new method for expressing seismic hazards. Acta Seismologica Sinica44(6):1099−1110. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210106

A new method for expressing seismic hazards

More Information
  • Received Date: June 08, 2021
  • Revised Date: September 26, 2021
  • Available Online: October 17, 2022
  • Published Date: December 12, 2022
  • The aim is to find a way to express seismic hazards with high accuracy, a wide range of exceedance probabilities and convenient application. We reviewed several commonly used methods for seismic hazards expression, and the "characteristic coefficient method" based on a new function to fit the seismic hazard curve is proposed, and the effect of this function was also verified by using the base data of the Seismic Parameter Zoning Map of China (GB 18306−2015). The results show that the new function could effectively fit the seismic hazard curve, with a significant improvement compared to the extreme value function, and can adequatelyexpress the seismic hazards of a site. In addition, it is found that the parameter k (referred to as the characteristic coefficient in the paper), which characterizes the shape of the curve in this function, is related to the seismic environment faced by the site, that is, the hazard contribution for sites with low values of k essentially came from the near field, while the contribution for sites with high values of k from long distances could not be ignored.
  • 高孟潭,卢寿德. 2006. 关于下一代地震区划图编制原则与关键技术的初步探讨[J]. 震灾防御技术,1(1):1–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2006.01.001
    Gao M T,Lu S D. 2006. The discussion on principles of seismic zonation of the next generation[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,1(1):1–6 (in Chinese).
    高孟潭. 2015. GB 18306—2015《中国地震动参数区划图》宣贯教材[M]. 北京: 中国质检出版社: 206–210.
    Gao M T. 2015. Propagation Materials of GB 183062015 "Earthquake Parameter Zoning Map of China"[M]. Beijing: China Quality Supervision and Inspection Press: 206–210 (in Chinese).
    胡聿贤. 2006. 地震工程学[M]. 北京: 地震出版社: 354.
    Hu Y X. 2006. Earthquake Engineering[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 354 (in Chinese).
    潘华,高孟潭,谢富仁. 2013. 新版地震区划图地震活动性模型与参数确定[J]. 震灾防御技术,8(1):11–23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2013.01.002
    Pan H,Gao M T,Xie F R. 2013. The earthquake activity model and seismicity parameters in the new seismic hazard map of China[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,8(1):11–23 (in Chinese).
    俞言祥,李山有,肖亮. 2013. 为新区划图编制所建立的地震动衰减关系[J]. 震灾防御技术,8(1):24–33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2013.01.003
    Yu Y X,Li S Y,Xiao L. 2013. Development of ground motion attenuation relations for the new seismic hazard map of China[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,8(1):24–33 (in Chinese).
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 2016. GB 18306—2015 中国地震动参数区划图[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社: 4.
    General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China. 2016. GB 18306—2015 Seismic Ground Motion Parameters Zonation Map of China[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China: 4 (in Chinese).
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 2010. GB 50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社: 33.
    Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. 2010. GB 50011—2010 Code for Seismic Design of Buildings[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press: 33 (in Chinese).
    周本刚,陈国星,高战武,周庆,李姜一. 2013. 新地震区划图潜在震源区划分的主要技术特色[J]. 震灾防御技术,8(2):113–124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2013.02.001
    Zhou B G,Chen G X,Gao Z W,Zhou Q,Li J Y. 2013. The technical highlights in identifying the potential seismic sources for the update of national seismic zoning map of China[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,8(2):113–124 (in Chinese).
    ASCE. 2010. ASCE 7-10 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures[S]. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers: 207–211.
    Bommer J J,Pinho R. 2006. Adapting earthquake actions in Eurocode 8 for performance-based seismic design[J]. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn,35(1):39–55. doi: 10.1002/eqe.530
    European Committee for Standardization. 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures For Earthquake Resistance[S]. London: Commission of the European Communities: 40–43
    Cornell C A. 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,58(5):1583–1606. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0580051583
    Crowley H,Colombi M,Borzi B,Faravelli M,Onida M,Lopez M,Polli D,Meroni F,Pinho R. 2009. A comparison of seismic risk maps for Italy[J]. Bull Earthq Eng,7(1):149–180. doi: 10.1007/s10518-008-9100-7
    FEMA. 2009. Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures: NEHRP P-750[R]. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency: 5–8.
    Giardini D, Wössner J, Danciu L. 2014. Mapping Europe’s seismic hazard[J]. Eos, Trans AGU, 95(29): 261–262.
    Grant D N,Bommer J J,Pinho R,Calvi G M,Goretti A,Meroni F. 2007. A prioritization scheme for seismic intervention in school buildings in Italy[J]. Earthq Spectra,23(2):291–314. doi: 10.1193/1.2722784
    James E. 2002. A review of seismic hazard description in US design code and procedures[J]. Prog Struct Eng Mat,4(1):46–63.
    Kennedy R C, Short S A. 1994. Basis for Seismic Provisions of DOE-STD-1020[R]. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Energy: 21–26.
    McGuire R K. 1976. Fortran Computer Program for Seismic Risk Analysis[R]. Washington, D C: U. S. Geological Survey: 67–76.
    Petersen M D, Moschetti M P, Powers P M, Mueller C S, Haller K M, Frankel A D, Zeng Y H, Rezaeian S, Harmsen S C, Boyd O S, Field N, Chen R, Rukstales K S, Luco N, Wheeler R L, Williams R A, Olsen A H. 2014. Documentation for the 2014 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps[R]. Washington, DC: U. S. Geological Survey: 7–10.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(22)

    1. 李金良,黄永林. 1624年“扬州地震”震中的新认识. 中国地震. 2023(02): 385-394 .
    2. 张向格,张绪教,刘超,王鹤,刘心兰,王璐琳. 五大连池世界地质公园老黑山景区火山地震遗迹的发现及其意义. 地球学报. 2022(01): 111-122 .
    3. 赵怀群,陈文凯,张灿,康燈杰. 历史大震烈度推算新方法研究. 灾害学. 2022(02): 212-217 .
    4. 张新毅,范小露. 淮河流域中游顺治年间地震灾害考证研究. 阜阳师范大学学报(社会科学版). 2021(02): 15-20 .
    5. 秦立科,陈国栋,甄刚,周萍,贾甲,张刚,张安兴. 地震作用下馆藏石碑稳定性分析. 文博. 2021(06): 90-97 .
    6. 刁守中,刁颋,李霞,山长仑,李红. 历史强余震史料考证原则及目录校订方案探索——以1668年郯城8?级地震强余震为例. 地震科学进展. 2020(05): 22-34 .
    7. 孙柏涛,闫佳琦,李山有. 宏观地震烈度发展与其用途的演变. 地震工程与工程振动. 2019(02): 1-8 .
    8. 刁守中,刁颋,李霞,山长仑. 中国陷落地震历史资料整理与研究. 国际地震动态. 2019(06): 3-13 .
    9. 席境忆. 东汉时期的地震记录及其时空分布. 防灾科技学院学报. 2019(03): 90-95 .
    10. 郭春杉,李文巧,田勤俭,徐岳仁,杜朋,刘双. 中条山北麓断裂解州段晚更新世滑动速率研究. 地震. 2019(04): 13-26 .
    11. 闫小兵,周永胜,李自红,郭瑾. 1695年临汾73/4级地震发震构造研究. 地震地质. 2018(04): 883-902 .
    12. 王师迪,师亚芹,任凤文. 公元600年秦陇地震发震构造分析及考证研究. 地质力学学报. 2018(02): 157-168 .
    13. Li Yuche,Shi Zhenliang,Cao Xuefeng. The Large Earthquake Offshore West of Seoul, Korea, in the Southern Yellow Sea on June 22, 1518. Earthquake Research in China. 2017(04): 601-608 .
    14. 周耀,韩阳. 地震应急疏散通道的坠落物控制策略探究——以郑州二七广场德化街组团为例. 中外建筑. 2017(01): 137-140 .
    15. 张志中. 中国古建筑的防震措施探讨. 震灾防御技术. 2017(01): 194-202 .
    16. 李裕澈,时振梁,曹学锋. 1518年6月22日韩国首尔以西海域——南黄海大震. 震灾防御技术. 2017(02): 363-368 .
    17. 韩晓飞,董斌,史双双,张龙飞. 1815年平陆6(3/4)级地震两种地震烈度对比研究以及震源地现今地震环境浅析. 工程地球物理学报. 2016(02): 241-244 .
    18. 金鑫,唐艳芳,叶正伟,何燕萍,王昆婷,杨松. 近2000年来江苏地震的时空分布特征. 淮阴师范学院学报(自然科学版). 2016(01): 51-56 .
    19. 金勇强. 至道二年(996年)潼关以西至灵州地震考. 西夏研究. 2014(04): 64-67 .
    20. 王德才,倪四道,李俊. 地震烈度快速评估研究现状与分析. 地球物理学进展. 2013(04): 1772-1784 .
    21. 林国良,王健. 基于烈度点的中国历史地震资料数据库系统试编制. 地震学报. 2012(01): 118-124+127 . 本站查看
    22. 金勇强. 《中国历史地震图集(远古至元时期)》所收录的宋代四次历史地震的正误. 宋史研究论丛. 2012(00): 404-422 .

    Other cited types(22)

Catalog

    Article views (380) PDF downloads (148) Cited by(44)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return