Xu T,Zhou B F,Wang X M,Ren Y F,Zhang Y J. 2025. Preliminary analysis of strong motion characteristics of the Maerkang earthquake swarm in Sichuan on June 10,2022. Acta Seismologica Sinica47(1):122−135. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20230072
Citation: Xu T,Zhou B F,Wang X M,Ren Y F,Zhang Y J. 2025. Preliminary analysis of strong motion characteristics of the Maerkang earthquake swarm in Sichuan on June 10,2022. Acta Seismologica Sinica47(1):122−135. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20230072

Preliminary analysis of strong motion characteristics of the Maerkang earthquake swarm in Sichuan on June 10,2022

More Information
  • Received Date: June 25, 2023
  • Revised Date: November 14, 2023
  • Accepted Date: November 26, 2023
  • Available Online: November 26, 2023
  • On June 10, 2022, an earthquake swarm consisting of MS5.8, MS4.1, MS4.4, MS6.0, and MS5.2 earthquakes occurred in Maerkang, Sichuan, China. This study filtered and analyzed the strong-motion records, conducted time-frequency analysis on acceleration data, and compared energy distributions among these earthquakes. By referencing the Fifth Generation Seismic Zoning Map, the attenuation relationships of peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), and spectral acceleration (SA) were analyzed. The acceleration and velocity response spectra, as well as Fourier amplitude spectra, were calculated and compared. Results indicate similar energy distribution patterns, with the attenuation model in the Fifth Generation Seismic Zoning Map predicting PGA, PGV, and SA (0.2) well of MS>5.0 earthquakes but overestimating SA (0.5) and SA (1.0). Response spectrum shapes and peak periods were identical at the same station, with values not exceeding local seismic design specifications. Normalized response spectra highly coincided for T<0.2 s in MS>5.0 earthquakes. Horizontal Fourier spectra were similar, with main frequencies in the 10−20 Hz range. Strong correlations were observed among acceleration and Fourier spectra in the same direction at the same station for all five earthquakes.

  • 崔建文,刘琼仙,段建新,林国良,杨藜薇,徐硕,李世成,包一峰,段洪杰,高东. 2016. 2014年景谷MS6.6地震及其强余震强震动观测记录及初步分析[J]. 地震研究,39(2):308–315. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2016.02.018
    Cui J W,Liu Q X,Duan J X,Lin G L,Yang L W,Xu S,Li S C,Bao Y F,Duan H J,Gao D. 2016. Strong-motion observation recordings of Jinggu MS6.6 earthquake and its strong aftershocks in Yunnan in 2014 and their preliminary analysis[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,39(2):308–315 (in Chinese).
    戴嘉伟,冀昆,温瑞智,任叶飞. 2015. 云南景谷MS6.6地震地震动特征分析[J]. 地震工程学报,37(4):969–975. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2015.04.0969
    Dai J W,Ji K,Wen R Z,Ren Y F. 2015. Ground motion characteristics of the Jinggu MS6.6 earthquake in Yunnan[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal,37(4):969–975 (in Chinese).
    国家市场监督管理总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. 2019.GB/T 38226−2019 地震烈度图制图规范[S]. 北京:中国地震局:1−21.
    State Administration for Market Regulation,Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. 2019. GB/T 38226−2019 Specification for Seismic Intensity Mapping[S]. Beijing:China Earthquake Administration: 1−21 (in Chinese).
    韩锡勤,李恒,蔡永建. 2010. 湖北及邻区地震峰值速度衰减关系研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,30(增刊):89–90.
    Han X Q,Li H,Cai Y J. 2010. Peak velocity attenuation relations of the earthquakes in Hubei and its adjacent area[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,30(S):89–90 (in Chinese).
    胡小龙,王运生,刘健,刘宇,申通,辛聪聪. 2019. 九寨沟MS4.1级余震薛家坝场地地震动响应监测数据分析[J]. 科学技术与工程,19(21):49–55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.21.008
    Hu X L,Wang Y S,Liu J,Liu Y,Shen T,Xin C C. 2019. Analysis of ground motion response monitoring data of Xuejiaba site of MS4.1 aftershock in Jiuzhaigou[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,19(21):49–55 (in Chinese).
    霍俊荣. 1989. 近场强地面运动衰减规律的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:国家地震局工程力学研究所:1−299.
    Huo J R. 1989. Study on the Attenuation Laws of Strong Earthquake Ground Motion Near the Source[D]. Harbin:Institute of Engineering Mechanics,National Earthquake Administration:1−299 (in Chinese).
    雷建成,高孟潭,俞言祥. 2007. 四川及邻区地震动衰减关系[J]. 地震学报,29(5):500–511. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2007.05.007
    Lei J C,Gao M T,Yu Y X. 2007. Seismic motion attenuation relations in Sichuan and adjacent areas[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,29(5):500–511 (in Chinese).
    李文倩,何金刚,朱皓清. 2019. 基于H/V谱比法的场地卓越频率研究[J]. 内陆地震,33(4):314–320.
    Li W Q,He J G,Zhu H Q. 2019. Study on site predominant frequency based on H/V spectral ratio method[J]. Inland Earthquake,33(4):314–320 (in Chinese).
    林国良,崔建文,杨黎薇,刘琼仙. 2016. 景谷MS6.6、MS5.8和MS5.9地震强震动记录初步分析与场地效应研究[J]. 震灾防御技术,11(2):331–341.
    Lin G L,Cui J W,Yang L W,Liu Q X. 2016. Preliminary analysis of strong motion observation and site effect in Jinggu MS6.6,MS5.8 and MS5.9 earthquakes[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,11(2):331–341 (in Chinese).
    潘毅,陈齐,曹勇,龙立,琚诚可,周祎. 2023. 马尔康6.0级震群地震藏族民居震害调查与分析[J]. 土木工程学报,57(3):1–15.
    Pan Y,Chen Q,Cao Y,Long L,Ju C K,Zhou Y. 2024. Seismic damage investigation and analysis of Tibetan dwellings in the MS6.0 Maerkang earthquake swarm[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,57(3):1–15. (in Chinese).
    任叶飞,温瑞智,周宝峰,黄旭涛. 2014. 2013年4月20日四川芦山地震强地面运动三要素特征分析[J]. 地球物理学报,57(6):1836–1846. doi: 10.6038/cjg20140615
    Ren Y F,Wen R Z,Zhou B F,Huang X T. 2014. The characteristics of strong ground motion of Lushan earthquake on April 20,2013[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,57(6):1836–1846 (in Chinese).
    王莹,金昭娣,赵韬. 2024. 2022年四川马尔康6.0级震群序列震源机制特征分析[J]. 地震研究,47(3):379–390.
    Wang Y,Jin Z D,Zhao T. 2024. The characteristics of the focal mechanisms of the Ma’erkang MS6.0 earthquake sequence in 2022[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,47(3):379–390 (in Chinese).
    王运生,贺建先,罗永红,郝子皓,刘勇,张磊. 2015. 康定MS5.8级地震冷竹关坡体内地震动响应特征[J]. 西南交通大学学报,50(5):838–844.
    Wang Y S,He J X,Luo Y H,Hao Z H,Liu Y,Zhang L. 2015. Seismic responses of Lengzhuguan slope during Kangding MS5.8 earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,50(5):838–844 (in Chinese).
    肖亮,俞言祥. 2022. 我国大陆地区常用浅壳地震的地震动参数衰减关系[J]. 地震学报,44(5):752–764. doi: 10.11939/jass.20220142
    Xiao L,Yu Y X. 2022. Review on the commonly-used ground motion parameters attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes in Chinese mainland[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,44(5):752–764 (in Chinese).
    俞言祥,汪素云. 2006. 中国东部和西部地区水平向基岩加速度反应谱衰减关系[J]. 震灾防御技术,1(3):206–217. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20060304
    Yu Y X,Wang S Y. 2006. Attenuation relations for horizontal peak ground acceleration and response spectrum in eastern and western China[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,1(3):206–217 (in Chinese).
    俞言祥,李山有,肖亮. 2013. 为新区划图编制所建立的地震动衰减关系[J]. 震灾防御技术,8(1):24–33.
    Yu Y X,Li S Y,Xiao L. 2013. Development of ground motion attenuation relations for the new seismic hazard map of China[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,8(1):24–33 (in Chinese).
    俞言祥. 2016. 新一代地震区划图地震动参数衰减关系的建立与特点分析[J]. 城市与减灾,(3):34–38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0495.2016.03.009
    Yu Y X. 2016. Establishment and characteristic analysis of the attenuation relationship of ground motion parameters in the new generation seismic zoning map[J]. City and Disaster Reduction,(3):34–38 (in Chinese).
    中国地震局. 2022. 中国地震局发布四川马尔康6.0级震群地震烈度图[EB/OL]. [2022−06−13]. https://www.cea.gov.cn/cea/xwzx/fzjzyw/5662853/index.html.
    China Earthquake Administration. 2022. The China Earthquake Administration released the earthquake intensity map of the 6.0 magnitude earthquake group in Maerkang,Sichuan[EB/OL]. [2022−06−13]. https://www.cea.gov.cn/cea/xwzx/fzjzyw/5662853/index.html (in Chinese).
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部,中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 2010. GB 50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社:1−510.
    Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China,General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. 2010. GB 50011−2010 Code for Seismic Design of Buildings[S]. Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press:1−510 (in Chinese).
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (307) PDF downloads (167) Cited by(1)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return