Gu H D,Jiang J Z,Li J,Chang Y Q,Yang Y W,Wang G M,Zhang S,Yao Y. 2024. Focal depth determination of the MS5.0 earthquake in Mangshi,Yunnan,2023,and discussion on its seismogenic mechanism. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(0):1−20. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20240026
Citation: Gu H D,Jiang J Z,Li J,Chang Y Q,Yang Y W,Wang G M,Zhang S,Yao Y. 2024. Focal depth determination of the MS5.0 earthquake in Mangshi,Yunnan,2023,and discussion on its seismogenic mechanism. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(0):1−20. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20240026

Focal depth determination of the MS5.0 earthquake in Mangshi,Yunnan,2023,and discussion on its seismogenic mechanism

More Information
  • Received Date: February 24, 2024
  • Revised Date: June 09, 2024
  • Accepted Date: June 10, 2024
  • Available Online: April 09, 2025
  • Focal depth is an important parameter for the study of regional seismicity and seismic hazard. Accurate focal depths can provide valuable references for seismic hazard assessment and seismogenic mechanism research. However, it is a challenge to determine an accurate focal depth for earthquakes that occur in regions with sparse seismic networks. Traditional methods relying on seismic wave (e.g. the P and S phases) arrival times are severely limited by network density, resulting in low measurement accuracy. Nonetheless, utilizing information such as seismic wave amplitudes, spectra, and depth phases, even in sparse seismic networks, can facilitate the accurate determination of focal depths.

    In recent years, the sPL depth phase method has been widely utilized for determining the focal depths of local small and moderate earthquakes. The travel time of the sPL depth phase is primarily related to the focal depth and almost independent of the epicentral distance. Therefore, utilizing the sPL depth phase method not only avoids the compromise between the origin time and focal depth of earthquakes but also effectively reduces measurement errors induced by velocity models. Moreover, the CAP (cut-and-paste) method is a full waveform inversion method with significant advantages in determining focal depths for moderate earthquakes.

    On 2 December, 2023, at 01:36:33 Beijing time, an earthquake of MS5.0 (local magnitude is ML5.3) occurred in Mangshi, Yunnan Province, followed by four ML≥3.5 aftershocks. Different institutions have reported significant disparities in the determined focal depth of the Mangshi MS5.0 mainshock. Hence, it is necessary to reassess the focal depth of the MS5.0 mainshock by using more regional seismic waveforms and different methods. Based on the broadband waveform data from the Yunnan Seismic Network and two regional velocity models, this study employed the CAP method to invert the focal mechanisms and focal depths of the mainshock (MS5.0) and four aftershocks (ML≥3.5) in the Mangshi earthquake sequence. Additionally, we employed the sPL depth phase to further determine the focal depths. Our research results indicate that: the Mangshi MS5.0 mainshock is characterized by a strike-slip fault with a significant normal component. The optimal double-couple focal mechanism solution is as follows: fault plane I: strike 89°, dip 78°, rake −20°; fault plane Ⅱ: strike 183°, dip 70°, rake −167°. The four ML≥3.5 aftershocks exhibit strike-slip with thrust or pure thrust mechanisms, the optimal double-couple focal mechanism solutions for these aftershocks all feature fault planes trending northeast (NE), and the strike, dip, and rake angles of the average plane for the four ML≥3.5 aftershocks are approximately 247°, 65°, 26°, respectively. This orientation of the average plane is consistent with the distribution of the double-difference relocated aftershocks and the orientation of the maximum seismic intensity axis of the Mangshi earthquake sequence. Furthermore, the focal mechanisms of both the mainshock and the four aftershocks of ML≥3.5 have complex orientations of the P and T axes, indicating the presence of a complex stress regime within the source region. It is plausible to speculate that the rupture of the MS5.0 mainshock may have triggered nearby faults (with different fault planes) due to regional stress adjustments, resulting in significant differences in the focal mechanism types between the MS5.0 mainshock and the subsequent four ML≥3.5 aftershocks. Additionally, by using the CAP method, the optimal focal depth of the MS5.0 mainshock in Mangshi is determined to be 7 km, while the focal depths of the four ML≥3.5 aftershocks range from 5 to 7 km. On the other hand, the focal depth of the MS5.0 mainshock in Mangshi is estimated to be 7 km, and the focal depths of the four aftershocks are all approximately 5 km by utilizing the sPL depth phase method. The consistency between the focal depths determined by both two methods (with a difference of less than 2 km) indicates that the Mangshi earthquake sequence mainly occurred in the shallow part of the upper crust.

    Considering that the epicenter of the Mangshi earthquake is located within the Longjiang Reservoir area, we statistically analyze the relationship between the ML≥1.0 seismic events and water level changes in the Longjiang Reservoir area from 2010 to 2024 to depict the characteristics of seismic activities in the reservoir area after the reservoir impoundment. Our study results indicate that seismic events with ML≥3.0 in the Longjiang Reservoir area are closely related to reservoir water levels, except for one ML3.1 earthquake, which occurred during a period of low annual water level on June 8, 2013, all other ML≥3.0 earthquakes in the reservoir area occurred during periods of high annual water levels. Among them, the largest earthquake, with a magnitude of ML4.2, occurred on September 24, 2011, during a period of high water levels after the impoundment of the Longjiang Reservoir.

    The seismic activities in the Longjiang Reservoir area can be divided into four stages: the first stage is from January 2010 to February 2016, during which seismic activities of ML≥1.0 earthquakes were relatively calm (monthly frequency less than 10 times), with a calm period of about six years; the second stage is from January 2016 to December 2017, during which the water level of the reservoir changed drastically, and the seismic activities were relatively active, with monthly frequencies of ML≥1.0 seismic activity ranging from a dozen to several dozen times; the third stage is from January 2018 to September 2023, during which the seismicity with magnitude above ML1.0 was relatively calm (monthly frequency less than 10 times) by a period of about six years; the fourth stage is from October 2023 to December 2023, during which the reservoir was at a high water level and its water level changed drastically followed the Mangshi MS5.0 earthquake on December 2, suggesting that there may be a certain correlation between the water level changes in the Longjiang Reservoir and the occurrence of this MS5.0 earthquake.

    Given that this earthquake occurred within the Longjiang Reservoir area, as well as factors such as high water levels, shallow hypocentral distribution, and conspicuous discrepancies in the focal mechanism solutions of the main and aftershocks, this study tentatively hypothesizes that the infiltration of fluids into pre-existing fault fractures with potential for generating moderate to strong earthquakes within the reservoir area may have facilitated the occurrence of this MS5.0 mainshock. Additionally, the rupture of the mainshock was likely to induce adjustments of the local stress field, triggering slip along nearby NE-trending faults, and resulting in the predominant NE-oriented distribution of aftershocks in this seismic source area.

  • 包丰,倪四道,赵建和,谢军,陈伟文,曾祥方. 2013. 时钟不准情形地震精确定位研究:以2011年1月19日安庆地震序列为例[J]. 地震学报,35(2):160–172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.02.003
    Bao F,Ni S D,Zhao J H,Xie J,Chen W Y,Zeng X F. 2013. Accurate earthquake location with instrumental clock error:A case study for the 19 January 2011 Anqing earthquake sequence[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,35(2):160–172 (in Chinese).
    崇加军,倪四道,曾祥方. 2010. sPL,一个近距离确定震源深度的震相[J]. 地球物理学报,53(11):2620–2630.
    Chong J J,Ni S D,Zeng X F. 2010. sPL,an Effective Seismic Phase for Determining Focal Depth at near Distance[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,53(11):2620–2630 (in Chinese).
    刁桂苓,王曰风,冯向东,王晓山,冯志仁,张洪智,程万正,李悦,王利兵. 2014. 溪洛渡库首区蓄水后震源机制分析[J]. 地震地质,36(3):644–657. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2014.03.008
    Diao G L,Wang Y F,Feng X D,Wang X S,Feng Z R,Zhang H Z,Cheng W Z,Li Y,Wang L B. 2014. Analysis of characteristics of focal mechanism in reservoir head region of Xiluodu Reservoir after impoundment[J]. Seismology and Geology,36(3):644–657 (in Chinese).
    董彦君,王秋良,申学林,魏贵春. 2018. sPL震相在巴东 M4.3 地震序列震源深度测定中的应用[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,38(3):221–224.
    Dong Y J,Wang Q L,Shen X L,Wei G C. 2018. Application of sPL Phase in focal depth determination of the Badong M4.3 earthquake sequence[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,38(3):221–224 (in Chinese).
    杜苛,李红谊,李炎臻,黄雅芬. 2023. 紫坪铺水库及邻区的微震检测与定位[J]. 地震学报,45(6):970–984. doi: 10.11939/jass.20230008
    Du K,Li H Y,Li Y Z,Huang Y F. 2023. Microseismic detection and location around the Zipingpu reservoir and its adjacent areas[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,45(6):970–984 (in Chinese).
    段刚. 2019. 利用 sPL 震相测定福建仙游 M4.6 地震震源深度[J]. 地球物理学进展,34(2):0417–0422.
    Duan G. 2019. Determination of foal depth of the Xianyou M4.6 earthquake in Fujian application of sPL phase[J]. Progress in Ceophysics,34(2):0417–0422 ( in Chinese).
    房立华,吴建平,张天中,黄静,王长在,杨婷. 2011. 2011 年云南盈江MS5.8地震及其余震序列重定位[J]. 地震学报,33(2):262–267. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2011.02.013
    Fang L H,Wu J P,Zhang T Z,Huang J,Wang C Z,Yang T. 201l. Relocation of mainshock and aftershocks of the 2011 Yingjiang MS5.8 earthquake in Yunnan[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 33 (2):262−267 (in Chinese).
    郭伟,赵翠萍,左可桢,赵策. 2022. 金沙江下游白鹤滩水库蓄水前后地震活动特征[J]. 地球物理学报,65(12):4659–4671. doi: 10.6038/cjg2022Q0119
    Guo W,Zhao C P,Zuo K Z,Zhao C. 2022. Characteristics of seismicity before and after impoundment of Baihetan dam in the lower reaches of Jinsha River[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,65(12):4659–4671 (in Chinese).
    胡锦涛,谢军,危自根,金超. 2023. 三峡库区秭归段浅层速度结构及孕震环境[J]. 地震学报,45(2):223–233. doi: 10.11939/jass.20210194
    Hu J T,Xie J,Wei Z G,Jin C. 2023. Shallow velocity structure and seismologenic environment in the Zigui section of the Three Gorges Reservior region of China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,45(2):223–233 (in Chinese).
    姜金钟,付虹,陈棋福. 2016. 位于构造活跃区的小湾水库地震活动特征-基于地震精定位的分析[J]. 地球物理学报,59(7):2468–2485. doi: 10.6038/cjg20160713
    Jiang J Z,Fu H,Chen Q F. 2016. Characteristics of seismicity of the Xiaowan reservoir in an area of active tectonics from double-difference relocation analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,59(7):2468–2485 (in Chinese).
    姜金钟,付虹,李涛. 2021. 2021年云南漾濞MS6.4地震序列重定位及发震构造探讨[J]. 地震研究,44(3):320–329.
    Jiang J Z,Fu H,Li T. 2021. Relocation of the 2021 Yangbi,Yunnan MS6.4 earthquake sequence and discussion of its seismogenic fault[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,44(3):320–329 (in Chinese).
    李姣,姜金钟,王光明,付虹. 2021. 2018年云南通海2次MS5.0地震震源机制解及深度测定[J]. 地震研究,44(2):133–144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2021.02.001
    Li J,Jiang J Z,Wang G M,Fu H. 2021. Focal mechanism and focal depth determination of the two Tonghai,Yunnan,MS5.0 earthquakes in 2018[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,44(2):133–144 (in Chinese).
    李志伟,黄志斌,王晓欣,韩立波,陈伟文,包丰. 2015. USGS 地震目录中4~5级震源深度异常地震可靠性初步研究:以南北地震带若干地震为例[J]. 地球物理学报,58(4):1236–1250. doi: 10.6038/cjg20150412
    Li Z W,Huang Z B,Wang X X,Han L B,Chen W W,Bao F. 2015. A study on the reliability of M4~5 earthquakes with anomalous focal depth in the USGS earthquake catalog:Several earthquakes in the North-South Seismic Belt[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,58(4):1236–1250 (in Chinese).
    龙锋,张永久,闻学泽,倪四道,张致伟. 2010. 2008年8月30日攀枝花—会理6.1级地震序列ML≥4.0事件的震源机制解[J]. 地球物理学报,53(12):2852–2860. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2010.12.008
    Long F,Zhang Y J,Wen X Z,Ni S D,Zhang Z W. 2010. Focal mechanism solutions of ML≥4.0 events in the MS6.1 Panzhihua-Huili earthguake sequence of Aug 30,2008[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,53(12):2852–2860 (in Chinese).
    罗艳,曾祥方,倪四道. 2013. 震源深度测定方法研究进展[J]. 地球物理学进展,28(5):2309–2321. doi: 10.6038/pg20130513
    Luo Y,Zeng X F,Ni S D. 2013. Progress on the determination of focal depth[J]. Progress in Geophysics,28(5):2309–2321 (in Chinese).
    罗艳,赵里,田建慧. 2020. 2008年8月30日攀枝花MS6.1地震序列深度及震源区应力特征[J]. 中国科学:地球科学,50(3):404–417.
    Luo Y,Zhao L,Tian J H. 2020. The focal depths of the 2008 Panzhihua earthquake sequence and the stress field in the source region[J]. Science China:Earth Sciences,50(3):404–417 (in Chinese).
    潘睿,姜金钟,付虹,李姣. 2019. 2017年云南漾濞MS5.1及MS4.8地震震源机制解和震源深度测定[J]. 地震研究,42(3):338–348. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2019.03.005
    Pan R,Jiang J Z,Fu H,Li J. 2019. Focal mechanism and Focal determination of Yunnan Yangbi MS5.1 and MS4.8 earthquakes in 2017[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,42(3):338–348 (in Chinese).
    Seismology小组. 2023. 2023 年12月02日云南芒市5.0级地震的震源机制中心解及在周边产生变形场[EB/OL]. [2023−12−05]. https://ses-kled.cidp.edu.cn/info/1084/1486.html.
    Seismology Group. 2023. The central focal mechanism solution of the M5.0 earthquake in Mangshi,Yunnan Province on December 02,2023 and the deformation field in the surrounding area [EB/OL]. [2023−12−05]. https://ses-kled.cidp.edu.cn/info/1084/1486.html (in Chinese).
    王妙月,杨懋源,胡毓良,李自强,陈运泰,金严,冯锐. 1976. 新丰江水库地震的震源机制及其成因初步探讨[J]. 地球物理学报,19(1):1–17.
    Wang M Y,Yang M Y,Hu Y L,Li Z Q,Chen Y T,Jin Y,Feng R. 1976. Mechanism of the reservoir impounding earthquakes at Xingfengjiang and a preliminary endeavour to discuss their cause[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,19(1):1–17 (in Chinese).
    叶庆东,余大新,王凯明,毛远凤,阎春恒. 2023. 龙滩水库库区地震活动与水位的互相关分析及孔隙压力扩散系数估算[J]. 地震学报,45(6):1068–1078. doi: 10.11939/jass.20220083
    Ye Q D,Yu D X,Wang K M,Mao Y F,Yan C H. 2023. Analysis of the cross-correlation between seismicity and water level and estimation of the hydraulic diffusivity in the Longtan reservoir area[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,45(6):1068–1078 (in Chinese).
    张国民,汪素云,李丽,张晓东,马宏生. 2002. 中国大陆地震震源深度及其构造含义[J]. 科学通报,47(9):663–668. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2002.09.004
    Zhang G M,Wang S Y,Li L,Zhang X D,Ma H S. 2002. Focal depth research of earthquakes in mainland China and implication for tectonics[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin,47(9):663–668 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1360/csb2002-47-9-663
    张瑞青,吴庆举. 2008. 四川攀枝花2008年8月31日MS5.6地震震源深度的确定[J]. 国际地震动态,12:1–5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4975.2008.06.001
    Zhang R Q,Wu Q J. 2008. Focal depth for an earthquake(MS5.6) on August 31,2008 in Panzhihua of Sichuan Province[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology,12:1–5 (in Chinese).
    赵韬,储日升,倪四道,王莹,周勇,曾祥方. 2019. 广西苍梧MS5.4地震震源深度[J]. 地震地质,41(3):619–632. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2019.03.006
    Zhao T,Chu R S,Ni S D,Wang Y,Zhou Y,Zeng X F. 2019. Study on focal depth of the MS5.4 Cangwu earthquake in Guangxi[J]. Seismology and Geology,41(3):619–632 (in Chinese).
    中国地震局地球物理研究所. 2023. 2023年12月2日云南德宏州芒市5.0级地震科技支撑简报 [EB/OL]. [2023-12-04]. https://www.cea-igp.ac.cn/kydt/280396.html.
    Institute of Geophysics,China Earthquake Administration. 2023. Science and technology support for the M5.0 earthquake in Mangshi,Dehong Prefecture,Yunnan Province on December 2,2023[EB/OL]. [2023-12-04]. https://www.cea-igp.ac.cn/kydt/280396.html(in Chinese).
    中国地震台网中心. 2023. 云南德宏州芒市5.0级地震[EB/OL]. [2023−12−02]. https://news.ceic.ac.cn/CC20231202013633.html.
    China Earthquake Networks Center. 2023. M5.0 earthquake in Mangshi,Dehong Prefecture,Yunnan Province[EB/OL]. [2023−12−02]. https://news.ceic.ac.cn/CC20231202013633.html (in Chinese).
    Chen W W,Wang D C,Wei S J. 2013. A study on the uncertainties of the centroid depth of the 2013 Lushan earthquake from teleseimic body wave data[J]. Earthquake Science,26(3-4):161–168. doi: 10.1007/s11589-013-0042-z
    Fox B D,Selby N D,Heyburn R,Woodhouse J H. 2012. Shallow seismic source parameter determination using intermediate-period surface wave amplitude spectra[J]. Geophys J Int,191(2):601–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05612.x
    Helmberger D V,Stead R,Liu P H,Dreger D. 1992. Broadband modeling of regional seismograms:Imperial Valley to Pasadena[J]. Geophys J Int,110(1):42–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb00711.x
    Laske G,Masters G,Ma Z T,Pasyanos M. 2013. Update on CRUST1.0:A 1-degree Global Model of Earth’s Crust[C]//Proceedings of EGU General Assembly Conference. 15:EGU2013−2658.
    Lei X L. 2011. Possible roles of the Zipingpu Reservoir in triggering the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,40(4):844–854. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.05.004
    Liu Y,Yu Z Y,Zhang Z Q,Yao H J,Wang W T,Zhang H J,Fang H J,Fang L H. 2023. The high-resolution community velocity model V2.0 of southwest China,constructed by joint body and surface wave tomography of data recorded at temporary dense arrays[J]. Science China Earth Science,66(10):2368–2385. doi: 10.1007/s11430-022-1161-7
    Luo Y,Ni S D,Zeng X F,Zheng Y,Chen Q F,Chen Y. 2010. A shallow aftershock sequence in the north-eastern end of the Wenchuan earthquake aftershock zone[J]. Science China Earth Sciences,53(11):1655–1664. doi: 10.1007/s11430-010-4026-8
    Ma S T. 2010. Focal depth determination for moderate and small earthquakes by modeling regional depth phases sPg,sPmP,and sPn[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,100(3):1073–1088. doi: 10.1785/0120090103
    Rajkumar,Prajapati S K,Pal S K,Srivastava H N. 2022. Determination of focal depths of moderate earthquakes in Northeast Indian region using depth phase sPn[J]. Nat Hazards,114:427–455. doi: 10.1007/s11069-022-05396-7
    USGS. 2024. M5.0:13 km W of Zhefang,China [EB/OL]. [2024−02−06]. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000lf6x/moment-tensor.
    Waldhauser F,Ellsworth W L. 2000. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm:Method and application to the northern Hayward fault,California[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,90(6):1353–1368. doi: 10.1785/0120000006
    Wang Z J,Chong J J,Ni S D,Romanowicz B. 2011. Determination of focal depth by two waveform based methods:A case study for the 2008 Panzhihua earthquake[J]. Earthquake Science,24(4):321–328. doi: 10.1007/s11589-011-0794-2
    Wessel P,Luis J F,Uieda L,Scharroo R,Wobbe F,Smith W H F,Tian D. 2019. The Generic Mapping Tools version 6[J]. Geochemistry,Geophysics,Geosystems,20(11):5556–5564.
    Xu Y,Li D N,Gao Y,He J B. 2015. Relocations of five Yingjiang sequences(China-Myanmar border):Details of seismogenic faults[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,105(1):314–329. doi: 10.1785/0120130326
    Yao Y S,Wang Q L,Liao W L,Zhang L F. 2017. Influences of the Three Gorges Project on seismic activities in the reservoir area[J]. Science Bulletin,62(15):1089–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2017.07.014
    Zhang M,Ge S M,Yang Q,Ma X D. 2021. Impoundment-associated hydro-mechanical changes and regional seismicity near the Xiluodu reservoir,Southwestern China[J]. J Geophys Res,126(9):e2020JB021590. doi: 10.1029/2020JB021590
    Zhao L S,Helmberger D V. 1994. Source estimation from broadband regional seismograms[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,84(1):91–104.
    Zhao M,Long F,Yi G X,Liang M J,Xie J T,Wang S W. 2021. Focal mechanism and seismogenic structure of the MS5.1 Qingbaijiang earthquake on February 3,2020,Southwestern China[J]. Frontiers of Earth Science,9:644142. doi: 10.3389/feart.2021.644142
    Zhu L P,Helmberger D V. 1996. Advancement in source estimation techniques using broadband regional seismograms[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,86(5):1634–1641. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0860051634
    Zhu L P,Rivera L A. 2002. A note on the dynamic and static displacements from a point source in multilayered media[J]. Geophys J Int,148(3):619–627. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01610.x

Catalog

    Article views (46) PDF downloads (16) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return