Wang Z B,Liu R F,Li Z,Kong H D,Yuan N R. 2021. Rapid evaluation of radiated seismic energy for great shallow earthquakes from 2014 to 2019. Acta Seismologica Sinica43(2):194−203. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20200077
Citation: Wang Z B,Liu R F,Li Z,Kong H D,Yuan N R. 2021. Rapid evaluation of radiated seismic energy for great shallow earthquakes from 2014 to 2019. Acta Seismologica Sinica43(2):194−203. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20200077

Rapid evaluation of radiated seismic energy for great shallow earthquakes from 2014 to 2019

More Information
  • Received Date: May 12, 2020
  • Revised Date: July 14, 2020
  • Available Online: June 17, 2021
  • Published Date: March 14, 2021
  • Based on seismic waves’ attenuation characteristics and the one-dimensional velocity model, we conducted a study for the rapid determination of radiated seismic energy ES and energy magnitude Me. The seismic recordings obtained from the Global Seismographic Network and China Seismological Digital Network were used to calculate the ES and Me of 115 shallow earthquakes with MW≥6.0 from 2014 to 2019, and the results were compared with MW and Me produced by other institutions. The results show the stable Me can be obtained within half an hour after obtaining the seismic data, and the Me values of IRIS were consistent with the earthquakes analyzed in this study. The earthquake damage is closely related to the size of energy magnitude Me, and the devastation that an earthquake can cause is more serious when the energy magnitude Me is far greater than the moment magnitude MW. In all types of earthquakes, the efficiency of radiated energy for earthquakes with strike-slip faults is high, with Me being significantly greater than MW. Next, by analyzing two MW6.1 earthquakes occurred in Hualien, Taiwan region on February 4, 2018 and April 18, 2019, it is concluded that two earthquakes with the same source mechanism in similar locations, although they have the same moment magnitude MW, the energy magnitude Me vary greatly, close to 0.5. MW can only obtain the source’s static characteristic, which is closely related to the static tectonic effects such as fault area and average dislocation of rupture caused by earthquakes. In contrast, Me can provide the source’s dynamic information and objectively evaluate the damage intensity of an earthquake. Therefore, the approach applied in this study can ensure the accuracy of the results and greatly improve the measurement speed of energy magnitude Me, which is very suitable for a rapid response system. Our research results can provide a reference for the future seismic network to take energy magnitude Me as daily output magnitude and provide more information for rapid assessment of disasters caused by large earthquakes.
  • 刘瑞丰,陈运泰,薛峰. 2018. 测定的震级之间不应相互换算[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,39(3):1–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2018.03.001
    Liu R F,Chen Y T,Xue F. 2018. The measured magnitude should not be converted to each other[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,39(3):1–9 (in Chinese).
    Boatwright J,Choy G L. 1986. Teleseismic estimates of the energy radiated by shallow earthquakes[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,91(B2):2095–2112. doi: 10.1029/JB091iB02p02095
    Bormann P,Saul J. 2008. The new IASPEI standard broadband magnitude Mb[J]. Seismol Res Lett,79(5):698–705. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.79.5.698
    Bormann P. 2009. New Manual of Seismological Observatory PracticeNMSOP-2)[M]. Potsdam: Deutsches GeoForschungszentrum GFZ: 124–133.
    Bormann P,Di Giacomo D. 2010. The moment magnitude MW and the energy magnitude Me:Common roots and differences[J]. J Seismol,15(2):411–427. doi: 10.1007/s10950-010-9219-2
    Choy G L,Boatwright J L. 1995. Global patterns of radiated seismic energy and apparent stress[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,100(B9):18205–18228. doi: 10.1029/95jb01969
    Convers J A,Newman A V. 2011. Global evaluation of large earthquake energy from 1997 through mid‐2010[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,116(B8):B08304. doi: 10.1029/2010JB00728
    Di Giacomo D,Grosser H,Parolai S,Bormann P,Wang R J. 2008. Rapid determination of Me for strong to great shallow earthquakes[J]. Geophys Res Lett,35(10):L10308. doi: 10.1029/2008GL033505
    Di Giacomo D,Parolai S,Bormann P,Grosser H,Saul J,Wang R J,Zschau J. 2010. Suitability of rapid energy magnitude determinations for emergency response purposes[J]. Geophys J Int,180(1):361–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04416.x
    Gutenberg B,Richter C F. 1956. Earthquake magnitude,intensity,energy,and acceleration (Second paper)[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,46(2):105–145.
    Kanamori H. 1977. The energy release in great earthquakes[J]. J Geophys Res,82(20):2981–2987. doi: 10.1029/JB082i020p02981
    Lomax A. 2005. Rapid estimation of rupture extent for large earthquakes:Application to the 2004,M9 Sumatra-Andaman mega-thrust[J]. Geophys Res Lett,32(10):L10314. doi: 10.1029/2005gl022437
    Picozzi M,Bindi D,Brondi P,Di Giacomo D,Parolai S,Zollo A. 2017. Rapid determination of P wave-based energy magnitude:Insights on source parameter scaling of the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence[J]. Geophys Res Lett,44(9):4036–4045. doi: 10.1002/2017gl073228
    Stockwell R G,Mansinha L,Lowe R P. 1996. Localization of the complex spectrum:The S transform[J]. IEEE Trans Signal Process,44(4):998–1001. doi: 10.1109/78.492555
    Venkataraman A,Kanamori H. 2004. Effect of directivity on estimates of radiated seismic energy[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,109(B4):B04301. doi: 10.1029/2003jb002548
    Wang R J. 1999. A simple orthonormalization method for stable and efficient computation of Green’s functions[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,89(3):733–741.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Article views (680) PDF downloads (57) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return