Advanced Search
Xue F Z，Wang H C，Zhu H F，Xu X. 2022. Modeling and applications on amplitude-magnitude-distance-depth of some teleseism and ultra-teleseism phases. Acta Seismologica Sinica，44（3）：413−426. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210023
Citation: Xue F Z，Wang H C，Zhu H F，Xu X. 2022. Modeling and applications on amplitude-magnitude-distance-depth of some teleseism and ultra-teleseism phases. Acta Seismologica Sinica，44（3）：413−426. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210023
shu

Modeling and applications on amplitude-magnitude-distance-depth of some teleseism and ultra-teleseism phases

  • Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology，Xi’an 710024，China

More Information
  • Received Date: January 31, 2021
  • Revised Date: May 23, 2021
  • Available Online: May 11, 2022
  • Published Date: June 26, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The consistency analysis of the signal feature is an important method to estimate the relationship between the event and the signal in the detection of seismic event. The consistency of amplitude can be used for determination of association through the comparison of amplitude residuals with numerous signal features on time and frequency domain. Different phases comply with the different propagation and attenuation law of amplitude-distance-depth. In this paper, the distribution of sample size varying with the distance of teleseism and ultra-teleseism phases such as P, PcP, PKP, PKPab and PKPbc based on the IDC is made. The model of amplitude-magnitude- distance-depth is constructed by iterative regression based on the residual statistics. The model is estimated through the standard deviation and mean of residual of magnitude. The range of standard deviation of residual of magnitude is 0.30−0.36. It could satisfy the requirements of phase consistency. Besides the mean of residual of magnitude of PKPbc phase is greater than 0.03, the rest phases is about 0.01. It demonstrates that the system deviation of the model is so tiny that it could be neglected. The application research of model is carried out by three different cases such as comparison of predicted amplitude, detection of magnitude consistency and magnitude calculation of ultra-teleseism events. The application research demonstrates that these models could be applied to routine seismic monitoring.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (18)
  • 陈培善,秦嘉政. 1983. 量规函数、台站方位、台基及不同测量方法对近震震级ML的影响[J]. 地震学报,5(1):87–98.
    Chen P S,Qin J Z. 1983. The effects of the calibration function,azimuths and sites of the stations and different methods of approach on the magnitude determination of near earthquakes,ML[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,5(1):87–98 (in Chinese).
    康清清,顾勤平,于悦颖,钱婷,黄群,霍祝青. 2019. 江苏及邻区地方性震级量规函数的研究[J]. 中国地震,35(3):521–530. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2019.03.010
    Kang Q Q,Gu Q P,Yu Y Y,Qian T,Huang Q,Huo Z Q. 2019. Study on calibration function of local earthquakes in Jiangsu and its adjacent areas[J]. Earthquake Research in China,35(3):521–530 (in Chinese).
    库尔哈奈克. 1992. 地震图解析[M]. 刘启元, 吴宁远, 修济刚译. 北京: 地震出版社: 10–33.
    Ota K. 1992. Anatomy of Seismograms[M]. Liu Q Y, Wu N Y, Xiu J G trans. Beijing: Seismological Press: 10–33 （in Chinese）.
    刘芳,张帆,张晖,赵铁锁,娜热,魏建民. 2016. 内蒙古地区地方性震级的量规函数研究[J]. 中国地震,32(3):485–493. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2016.03.005
    Liu F,Zhang F,Zhang H,Zhao T S,Na R,Wei J M. 2016. Study on calibration function of near earthquakes in the Inner Mongolia region[J]. Earthquake Research in China,32(3):485–493 (in Chinese).
    严尊国,薛军蓉. 1987. 中国近震震级ML综述[J]. 中国地震,3(4):44–51.
    Yan Z G,Xue J R. 1987. On local magnitude ML for earthquakes in China[J]. Earthquake Research in China,3(4):44–51 (in Chinese).
    严尊国,李普丽,薛军蓉. 1992. 中国近震震级量规函数研究[J]. 中国地震,8(4):76–91.
    Yan Z G,Li P L,Xue J R. 1992. Study on calibration function of local magnitude ML in China[J]. Earthquake Research in China,8(4):76–91 (in Chinese).
    张媛媛,王平,惠少兴,古云鹤. 2017. 陕西地区近震震级的量规函数研究[J]. 内陆地震,31(4):368–375.
    Zhang Y Y,Wang P,Hui S X,Gu Y H. 2017. Study on calibration function of local earthquakes in Shaanxi region[J]. Inland Earthquake,31(4):368–375 (in Chinese).
    Carpenter E W,Marshall P D,Douglas A. 1967. The amplitude-distance curve for short period teleseismic P-waves[J]. Geophys J Int,13(1/2/3):61–70.
    Le Bras R, Wuster J. IDC Processing of Seismic, Hydroacoustic and Infrasonic Data. Revision 1. IDC Documentation User Guides.[M]. Vienna: Science Applications International Corporation: 74–96.
    Murphy J R,Barker B W. 2003. Revised distance and depth corrections for use in the estimation of short-period P-wave magnitudes[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,93(4):1746–1764. doi: 10.1785/0120020084
    Veith K F,Clawson G E. 1972. Magnitude from short-period P-wave data[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,62(2):435–452. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0620020435
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    Wei Yonggang, Yang Qianli, Wang Tingting, Jiang Changsheng, Bian Yinju. 2019: Earthquake and explosion identification based on Deep Learning residual network model. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(5): 646-657. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20190030
    Zhang Ayao, Fan Guangchao, Wang Minchao, Shen Xufeng, Zhang Chengliu, Lu Na, Cui Jiajia. 2018: Amplitude characteristic analysis of noise and signal from the stations deployed at different depths. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 40(4): 440-447. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20170150
    Geng Guanshi, Yu Yanxiang. 2015: Influence of magnitude and hypocentral distance on H/V spectral ratio of seismic signal. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(3): 420-428. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.03.005
    Qin Manzhong, Li Shuncheng, Liu Xuyu, Zhang Shuzhen, Zhang Yuansheng. 2015: A discussion on the largest recorded epicentral distance for seismic phase Pdiff diffracted on core-mantle boundary. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(2): 249-256. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.02.005
    Wang Bo　Jiang Haikun　Song Jincom iasic personality. 2012: A statistical study on the prediction of maximum magnitude of reservoir-induced earthquakes. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 34(5): 689-697.
    Ren Xuemeiup, Gao Mengtan Yu Yanxiang. 2012: Modification of magnitude-frequency relation and magnitude limit determination based on MGR model for moderate-strong earthquakes in Chinese mainland. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 34(3): 331-338.
    ShenJianwenupup， LiuZhengShi Shuzhongupaunch a career. 2010: Modify equivalent linear method of finding soil seismic response with magnitude and distance parameters. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 32(4): 466-475.
    1982: A COMMENT ON THE EPSTEIN'S MODEL FOR THE MAGNITUDE OF EARTHQUAKES. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 4(4): 426-433.
    HU YUXIAN, ZOU XILIN, ZHANG JIDONG, QI XINcom sh adva. 1982: FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS OF BEDROCK MOTION PARAMETERS WITH EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE AND DISTANCE. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 4(2): 199-207.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 杨晨艺，石富强，季灵运，杨宜海，苏利娜，杨敏，郑怡. 2013年岷县漳县M_S6.6地震和2017年九寨沟M_S7.0地震震前地球物理观测异常空间分布机理分析. 地震学报. 2024(02): 307-326 . 本站查看
    2. 李琼，付虹，胡小静，杜家云，杨黎. 云南地区氡异常与地震的统计特征分析. 地震学报. 2024(02): 340-352 . 本站查看
    3. 杨鹏，张寿川，郭本力，杨崇敬，冯启原，吕有成，解露茜. 山东日照地区不同类型含水层地下水位多年动态变化特征及其影响因素. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2024(03): 967-979 .
    4. 贾东辉，余怀忠，陈界宏，晏锐，刘杰，赵彬彬，李泽平，马玉川，苑争一，杨文，李桂荣，李越帅. 利用加卸载响应比探查强震成核过程——以2020年新疆伽师6.4级地震为例. 地球物理学报. 2024(06): 2132-2147 .
    5. 任宏微，姚玉霞，陈其峰. 测氡仪标准仪器校准法的可行性研究. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2023(01): 100-105 .
    6. 李营，陈志，胡乐，苏淑娟，郑辰禾，刘兆飞，路畅，赵影，刘洁，何鸿毅，孙凤霞，徐超文，周晓成，杜建国，徐胜，郑国东. 流体地球化学进展及其在地震预测研究中的应用. 科学通报. 2022(13): 1404-1420 .
    7. 钟骏，冯晓博，王博，周志华，晏锐. 2022年青海门源M_S6.9地震前地下流体异常特征分析. 地震研究. 2022(02): 308-317 .
    8. 李宏伟，闫伟. 时间序列的趋势转折点提取算法及应用研究. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2020(12): 1242-1247 .
    9. 余丹，刘春国，王晓，韩雪君，黄兴辉. 集合经验模态分解(EEMD)在地下水位数据处理中的应用初探. 中国地震. 2019(02): 337-346 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (637) PDF downloads (55) Cited by(11)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return