Yang Q Y,Wu Q J,Cao Y J,Wei Y J,Cai Z C,Yang Z Q,Sheng Y R. 2024. Teleseismic P-wave data reconstruction based on compressive sensing theory. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(3):413−424. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220197
Citation: Yang Q Y,Wu Q J,Cao Y J,Wei Y J,Cai Z C,Yang Z Q,Sheng Y R. 2024. Teleseismic P-wave data reconstruction based on compressive sensing theory. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(3):413−424. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220197

Teleseismic P-wave data reconstruction based on compressive sensing theory

More Information
  • Received Date: October 20, 2022
  • Revised Date: February 21, 2023
  • Available Online: October 26, 2023
  • The non-uniformity and incompleteness of seismic data in space have long been one of the significant challenges affecting seismic imaging. The factors that cause the non-uniform spatial distribution of seismic data are primarily twofold: Firstly, the non-uniform distribution of earthquakes, which are the sources of seismic waves; Secondly, the non-uniform distribution of seismic stations used to record these waves. In areas where stations are difficult to built, such as mountainous regions and offshore locations, uniform array deployment becomes impractical. These factors lead to the acquisition of non-uniform and incomplete data, thereby reducing the resolution and accuracy of the imaging results.

    The core principle of compressed sensing theory is to exploit the sparse nature of the signal and then employ a non-linear reconstruction algorithm to recover the original signal. Since seismic wavefields exhibit continuity, then missing or irregularly sampled seismic data can potentially be recovered through compressed sensing techniques. In the time domain, seismic observation data usually contain rich frequency information. However, due to the filtering effects of subsurface layers, the bandwidth of the actual recorded seismic data is limited, and the data exhibit sparsity in the frequency domain. Based on this characteristic, under limited acquisition conditions, the reconstruction of missing seismic data utilizing compressed sensing theory can, to some extent, mitigate the problem of insufficient seismic data coverage.

    In oil and gas seismic exploration, data reconstruction methods based on compressed sensing theory have been widely applied to address the issue of insufficient sampling. However, relevant discussions are not yet common in the acquisition and processing of natural earthquake data. In fact, due to environmental and site constraints, the acquisition of natural earthquake data also suffers missing and irregular sampling issues. Moreover, owing to the irregular distribution of acquisition stations, the reconstruction of natural earthquake data encounters greater challenges. Natural earthquake waveforms are more complex, and proposing a reliable scheme for reconstructing natural earthquake data under the condition of irregularly distributed acquisition stations is a relatively difficult problem.

    For artificial seismic exploration data reconstruction, the trace spacing is small, and the waveforms of adjacent traces exhibit good consistency. In Chinese continental natural earthquake observation stations, the minimum station spacing is less than 30 km, and the teleseismic waveforms recorded at different stations also exhibit certain similarities. This study commences with natural teleseismic observation data, draws upon the experience of artificial seismic data reconstruction, and attempts to conduct research on the reconstruction of teleseismic data. Relevant experimental verifications have been carried out.

    To verify the reconstruction effect of the algorithm, we first use the reflectivity method to calculate the theoretical seismogram, simulating the teleseismic P-wave data recorded by the Inner Mongolia movable array. Thirty-six seismic stations receive the data, with a sampling interval of 2 ms and 5501 sampling points. The simulated seismic data are obtained through calculation of seismic travel time, and the missing teleseismic P-wave data are recovered, verifying the effectiveness of the method. Compared with the original record, the reconstructed seismic record signals can restore the waveform relatively well; the reconstructed result is generally consistent with the original record. In terms of amplitude, the reconstructed result is significantly smaller, and the frequency is also higher, which shows that the reconstruction method has the effect of suppressing random noise. Simultaneously, there are certain differences in the waveforms across different stations, and the analysis suggests that the number of iterations for certain station data is insufficient, or there are discrepancies in parameter adjustments.

    We applied the seismic data reconstruction method that based on compressed sensing to process P-wave arrival times of teleseismic events. Firstly, the curvelet transform is utilized as a sparse transform, and a regularized inversion model based on the L1 norm is established. The iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm (ISTA) is employed to solve this model. Subsequently, the compressed sensing theory is applied to the reconstruction of teleseismic data observed by the portable seismic array in the Inner Mongolia region. On this basis, data reconstruction is performed on the acquired real earthquake data, and the reconstructed P-wave arrival time data are picked to verify the effectiveness of the method through teleseismic tomography.

    The practice of natural earthquake data reconstruction demonstrates that natural earthquake data exhibit a sparse representation in the curvelet transform domain. Based on the seismic data itself, when seismic data are missing or the natural earthquake observation data are incomplete, the compressed sensing theory can be employed to reconstruct the seismic data. Concurrently, this method can be utilized to reconstruct data with poor signal-to-noise ratio and obtain high signal-to-noise ratio seismic data. In this study, the fast marching teleseismic tomography (FMTT) method is used to invert the velocity structure from the original data, sampled data, and reconstructed seismic data, respectively. The results indicate that when data are missing, the calculated tomographic velocity structure deviates significantly from that calculated with complete data. The relative error between the tomographic result obtained from the reconstructed data and that from the complete data is within 0.02%. The vertical cross-section shows that the tomographic results obtained from the original data and reconstructed data exhibit highly similar travel time residuals, and the spatial positions and shapes of the main high and low velocity anomaly zones are highly consistent. This signifies that the compressed sensing based theory reconstruction method can recover the imaging results from the sampled data. The practice of three-dimensional P-wave imaging proves that the data reconstruction technique based on compressed sensing theory can improve the resolution of seismic tomography. The results also demonstrate the potential application value of compressed sensing acquisition technology in natural earthquake data, which can provide and broaden the research ideas for exploring new array observation methods and data acquisition strategies for natural earthquakes.

  • 白兰淑,刘伊克,卢回忆,王一博,常旭. 2014. 基于压缩感知的Curvelet域联合迭代地震数据重建[J]. 地球物理学报,57(9):2937–2945. doi: 10.6038/cjg20140919
    Bai L S,Liu Y K,Lu H Y,Wang Y B,Chang X. 2014. Curvelet-domain joint iterative seismic data reconstruction based on compressed sensing[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,57(9):2937–2945 (in Chinese).
    白兰淑,吴庆举,张瑞青. 2022. 压缩感知高分辨率接收函数叠加成像及其应用[J]. 地球物理学报,65(11):4354–4368. doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0419
    Bai L S,Wu Q J,Zhang R Q. 2022. High-resolution receiver function imaging based on compressive sensing and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,65(11):4354–4368 (in Chinese).
    曹静杰,王彦飞,杨长春. 2012. 地震数据压缩重构的正则化与零范数稀疏最优化方法[J]. 地球物理学报,55(2):596–607. doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.02.022
    Cao J J,Wang Y F,Yang C C. 2012. Seismic data restoration based on compressive sensing using the regularization and zero-norm sparse optimization[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,55(2):596–607 (in Chinese).
    曹静杰,王尚旭,李文斌. 2017. 基于一种三维低冗余曲波变换和压缩感知理论的地震数据重建[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),41(5):61–68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2017.05.007
    Cao J J,Wang S X,Li W B. 2017. Seismic reconstruction with 3D low-redundancy curvelet transform and compressed sensing theory[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science),41(5):61–68 (in Chinese).
    曹静杰,杨志权,杨歧焱. 2020. 一种基于压缩感知的地震数据重建方法及其在城市活断层地震勘探中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展,35(4):1545–1551. doi: 10.6038/pg2020DD0267
    Cao J J,Yang Z Q,Yang Q Y. 2020. Compressive sensing based seismic reconstruction method and its application to seismic exploration of urban active faults[J]. Progress in Geophysics,35(4):1545–1551 (in Chinese).
    付明柏. 2013. 基于异质矩阵完全的缺失数据恢复混合集成算法[J]. 云南师范大学学报(自然科学版),33(6):67–72.
    Fu M B. 2013. Mixed ensemble heterogeneous matrix completion for missing value estimation[J]. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition),33(6):67–72 (in Chinese).
    孔德辉. 2017. 基于压缩感知的地震数据重建及若干问题研究[D]. 成都:电子科技大学:1–11.
    Kong D H. 2017. Research on Some Issues of Seismic Data Reconstruction Based on Compressed Sensing[D]. Chengdu:University of Electronic Science and Technology of China:1–11 (in Chinese).
    赵杨. 2018. 地震体波走时与重力联合反演研究及在南北地震带南段的应用[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京):1–9.
    Zhao Y. 2018. Joint Inversion of Seismic Traveltime and Gravity Data and Its Application in Imaging Crustal Structure Around Southern Section of North-South Earthquake Belt[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing):1–9 (in Chinese).
    郑雪辰. 2019. 基于压缩感知理论和SPGL1算法的地震数据重建[D]. 西安:长安大学:1–9.
    Zheng X C. 2019. Seismic Data Reconstruction Based on Compressive Sensing and SPGL1 Algorithm[D]. Xi’an:Chang’an University:1–9 (in Chinese).
    Bai L S,Lu H Y,Liu Y K. 2020. High-efficiency observations:Compressive sensing and recovery of seismic waveform data[J]. Pure Appl Geophys,177(1):469–485. doi: 10.1007/s00024-018-2070-z
    Candès E,Demanet L,Donoho D,Ying L X. 2006a. Fast discrete curvelet transforms[J]. Multiscale Model Simul,5(3):861–899. doi: 10.1137/05064182X
    Candès E J,Romberg J,Tao T. 2006b. Robust uncertainty principles:Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information[J]. IEEE Trans Inform Theory,52(2):489–509. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2005.862083
    Cao J J,Wang Y F,Wang B F. 2015. Accelerating seismic interpolation with a gradient projection method based on tight frame property of curvelet[J]. Explor Geophys,46(3):253–260. doi: 10.1071/EG14016
    Daubechies I,Defrise M,De Mol C. 2004. An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint[J]. Commun Pure Appl Math,57(11):1413–1457. doi: 10.1002/cpa.20042
    Donoho D L. 2006. Compressed sensing[J]. IEEE Trans Inform Theory,52(4):1289–1306. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
    Herrmann F J,Hennenfent G. 2008. Non-parametric seismic data recovery with curvelet frames[J]. Geophys J Int,173(1):233–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03698.x
    Ismael V R,Mauricio S,Yu J G. 2012. A compressive sensing framework for seismic source parameter estimation[J]. Geophys J Int,191(3):1226–1236
    Rawlinson N,Pozgay S,Fishwick S. 2010. Seismic tomography:A window into deep Earth[J]. Phys Earth Planet Inter,178(3/4):101–135.
    Wang B,Chen X,Li J,Cao J. 2016. An improved weighted projection onto convex sets methods for seismic data interpolation and denoising[J]. IEEE J STARS,9:228–235.
    Wang R J. 1999. A simple orthonormalization method for stable and efficient computation of Green’s functions[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,89(3):733–741. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0890030733
    Zhang H L,Song S,Liu T Y. 2007. The ridgelet transform with non-linear threshold for seismic noise attenuation in marine carbonates[J]. Appl Geophys,4(4):271–275. doi: 10.1007/s11770-007-0027-6
    Zhou Q B,Gao J H,Wang Z G. 2015. Sparse spike deconvolution of seismic data using trust-region based SQP algorithm[J]. J Comput Acoust,23(4):1540002. doi: 10.1142/S0218396X15400020
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(17)

    1. 刘洁,翟宏光,张国强,朱琳,邱玉荣. 陕西凤翔井水位和区域应力场变化与地震活动性关系研究. 地震. 2024(03): 124-137 .
    2. 王秀娟,周璇. 江苏睢宁苏02、03井水位异常变化机理探讨. 四川地震. 2023(03): 31-37 .
    3. 郑家军,朱成林,熊玮,李铂,杨立涛,董敏,韩博,闫德桥,刘海林,池国民. 累计去趋势法在分析降水与形变关系中的应用. 内陆地震. 2023(04): 392-398 .
    4. 胡小静,付虹,卞跃跃,李燕玲,李琼,张翔. 云南红河地区地下流体井-含水层系统特征研究. 地震研究. 2022(02): 300-307 .
    5. 张志相,王江,张帆,张娜,宋志刚,赵建明. 唐山地区断层土壤气体CO_2连续观测台阵数据分析. 华北地震科学. 2022(04): 69-76 .
    6. 芮雪莲,杨耀,官致君,林圣杰. 四川会理川-31井水位变化与降雨量关系及异常识别. 华北地震科学. 2021(01): 78-83 .
    7. 唐杰,李楠,张素欣,盛艳蕊,丁志华. 河北丰南井水位大幅下降异常分析. 地下水. 2021(05): 58-60+73 .
    8. 王熠熙,邵永新,李悦,王博,刘双庆,李赫,王喜龙,龚永俭. 基于多种方法的宝坻新井水位异常分析. 地震. 2020(01): 172-183 .
    9. 王喜龙,杨振鹏,刘天龙. 辽宁高七井静水位破年变异常特征分析. 防灾减灾学报. 2019(04): 7-13 .
    10. 王喜龙,付聪,李梦莹,张丽,李俏. 辽宁新民井静水位转折上升变化成因分析. 防灾减灾学报. 2018(01): 6-12 .
    11. 王喜龙,贾晓东,王海燕,李彤霞,付聪,孔祥瑞,张琪,翟丽娜. 辽宁阜新井水温破年变与加速下降原因分析. 中国地震. 2018(02): 371-378 .
    12. 胡小静,付虹,李琼. 滇南地区近期水位趋势上升异常机理初探. 地震学报. 2018(05): 620-631+689 . 本站查看
    13. 胡小静,付虹,李利波,李祥. 云南江川渔村井地下水补给来源分析. 地震研究. 2018(04): 544-550 .
    14. 孙小龙,刘耀炜,晏锐. 云南姚安井2009年10月后水位下降的成因分析. 地震学报. 2013(03): 410-420+451 . 本站查看
    15. 孙小龙,刘耀炜,马玉川,晏锐. 鲁豫交界地区深井水位持续大幅度下降原因分析. 中国地震. 2013(01): 132-141 .
    16. 徐伟民,陈石,高孟潭,卢红艳,李真. 中国大陆重力场非潮汐时空变化特征的初步分析. 地球物理学进展. 2012(03): 861-871 .
    17. 丁风和,哈媛媛. 丰镇井水位变化与降雨量的关系研究. 华南地震. 2012(01): 35-40 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (235) PDF downloads (179) Cited by(21)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return