Citation: | Wang W,Qi Y K,Xiong W,Wang H Y,Li J Y,Zhang X Q. 2024. Polarization effect on the ground motion of mountain topography under earthquake action. Acta Seismologica Sinica,46(4):695−708. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20230166 |
A large number of earthquake site investigation and theoretical studies have shown that local site conditions have a significant effect on seismic damage and ground motion characteristics, which is usually manifested as amplification or reduction of ground motion. The mountain topographic effect of strong ground motion plays a great role in the antiseismic defense of major projects in mountainous areas. Currently, there are three main ways to study the topographic effect: topographic effect observation array, analytical analysis and numerical simulation calculation. The strong motion observation data from the array can directly reflect the characteristics caused by the complex terrain, and analysis results are more intuitive, real and reliable.
Based on the nine aftershock records after the 2008 Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake, the baseline-correction and filtration were carried out, and the Fourier spectral ratios and particle motion displacement trajectory diagrams were achieved.
The average spectral ratio curve of the two horizontal records of 9 aftershocks has good consistency with the spectral ratio curve of a single aftershock. The natural frequency of the mountain is not unique, and the maximum spectral ratio will appear in different frequency bands, indicating a clear multi-order nature of the mountain vibration. 1.0−4.0 Hz is the lower-order vibration mode of the mountain, and 9.0−15.0 Hz is the higher-order vibration mode. There are significant differences in the source, magnitude, epicenter distance, and propagation path of each aftershock, but the spectral ratio curves of each aftershock have good consistency, indicating that the natural frequency of the mountain is related to factors such as the geometric shape of the mountain itself.
The particle motion displacement trajectory diagrams show that under different earthquake input, the maximum displacement amplitude of the mountain vibration can appear in the transverse or longitudinal direction of the mountain.
There exists the obvious polarization effect in the mountain vibration. The EW and NS acceleration records of the nine aftershocks were decomposed in 10° increments to obtain 324 new time histories. The amplification coefficients of the peak ground acceleration and the Fourier spectral ratio were analyzed for each decomposition angle. The orientation of the maximum peak acceleration amplification coefficient is basically the same as that of the maximum displacement amplitude of the mountain vibration, and the peak acceleration amplification coefficients of each decomposition angle have obvious polarization effects. The frequency bands of the nine aftershocks with the largest Fourier spectral ratios at different decomposition angles are relatively close to each other, and all of them are distributed in the frequency bands of 0.8−2.8 Hz, 7.8−10.2 Hz, and 11.5−16.0 Hz.
However, the angular range in which the extreme values of the Fourier spectral ratios are located varies from one aftershock to another, with aftershocks 1, 3, 4, and 9. For the Fourier spectral ratio in the low frequency band of 0.8−2.8 Hz, the maximum amplitude appears in the range of 110°−160° i.e. transverse direction of the mountain; in the middle and high frequency bands of 7.8−10.2 Hz, the maximum amplitude appears in the range of 30°−60° i.e. longitudinal direction of the mountain.
The seismic energy of the aftershocks 2, 5, 6, 7, and 8 is mainly concentrated in the mid- and high-frequency bands, and the maximum value of the spectral ratio is concentrated in the range of 30°−60° i.e. longitudinal direction of the mountain, which is more easily to stimulate of higher-order vibration modes of the mountain in this angular range, and the phenomenon is also roughly similar to that of the particle motion displacement trajectory diagrams and the orientation of polarization of the peak ground acceleration.
Considering the Fourier spectrum analysis of the nine aftershock records at the foot of the slope, we can obtain that the frequency content is different. The low frequency band is easy to stimulate the lower-order vibration mode of the mountain that leads to polarization in the transverse direction; the high-order vibration mode is easily stimulated by the high-frequency band that leads to polarization in the longitudinal direction of the mountain; the mountain can produce both low-order and high-order polarization effects when the low and high frequency exist at the same time. The maximum displacement amplitude of the mountain under the action of different earthquakes will appear in the transverse and longitudinal direction of the mountain, which is closely related to the spectral characteristics of the input earthquake. In the seismic design of large-scale structures such as bridges, tunnels and hydropower stations across mountain areas, the polarization effect of the mountain topography should be given priority consideration.
巴振宁,吴孟桃,梁建文. 2019. 坡体几何参数与弹性模量对岩质斜坡地震动力响应的影响:IBEM求解[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,38(8):1578–1592.
|
Ba Z N,Wu M T,Liang J W. 2019. Influence of geometric parameters and elastic modulus on seismic dynamic response of rock slopes by IBEM[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,38(8):1578–1592 (in Chinese).
|
薄景山,李琪,齐文浩,王玉婷,赵鑫龙,张毅毅. 2021. 场地条件对地震动和震害影响的研究进展与建议[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),51(5):1295–1305.
|
Bo J S,Li Q,Qi W H,Wang Y T,Zhao X L,Zhang Y Y. 2021. Research progress and discussion of site condition effect on ground motion and earthquake damage[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),51(5):1295–1305 (in Chinese).
|
胡聿贤,孙平善,章在墉,田启文. 1980. 场地条件对震害和地震动的影响[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,试刊(1):34–41.
|
Hu Y X,Sun P S,Zhang Z Y,Tian Q W. 1980. Effects of site conditions on earthquake damage and ground motion[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,T(1):34–41 (in Chinese).
|
李小军,廖振鹏,关慧敏. 1995. 粘弹性场地地形对地震动影响分析的显式有限元-有限差分方法[J]. 地震学报,17(3):362–369.
|
Li X J,Liao Z P,Guan H M. 1995. An explicit finite element-finite difference method for the analysis of viscoelastic field topography on ground motion[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 17 (3):362−369 (in Chinese).
|
梁建文,张彦帅,Lee V W. 2006. 平面SV波入射下半圆凸起地形地表运动解析解[J]. 地震学报,28(3):238–249. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2006.03.003
|
Liang J W,Zhang Y S,Lee V W. 2006. Surface motion of a semi-cylindrical hill for incident plane SV waves:Analytical solution[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,28(3):238–249 (in Chinese).
|
刘晶波. 1996. 局部不规则地形对地震地面运动的影响[J]. 地震学报,18(2):239–245.
|
Liu J B. 1996. The influence of local irregular terrain on seismic ground motion[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,18(2):239–245 (in Chinese).
|
荣棉水,李小军,吕悦军,尤红兵. 2009. 粘弹性浅圆弧形山谷地形对地震动谱特性的影响[J]. 地震研究,32(1):40–45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2009.01.008
|
Rong M S,Li X J,Lü Y J,You H B. 2009. Effect of viscoelastic local canyon on the spectrum property of ground motion[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,32(1):40–45 (in Chinese).
|
孙崇绍,闵祥仪,周民都. 2011. 陇南山区局部地形对地震动强度的影响[J]. 西北地震学报,33(4):331–335.
|
Sun C S,Min X Y,Zhou M D. 2011. Influence of local topography on ground motion in mountain region of southern Gansu Province[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal,33(4):331–335 (in Chinese).
|
唐晖,李小军,李亚琦. 2012. 自贡西山公园山脊地形场地效应分析[J]. 振动与冲击,31(8):74–79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2012.08.015
|
Tang H,Li X J,Li Y Q. 2012. Site effect of topograghy on ground motions of Xishan park of Zigong city[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,31(8):74–79 (in Chinese).
|
王海云,谢礼立. 2010. 自贡市西山公园地形对地震动的影响[J]. 地球物理学报,53(7):1631–1638. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2010.07.014
|
Wang H Y,Xie L L. 2010. Effects of topography on ground motion in the Xishan park,Zigong city[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,53(7):1631–1638 (in Chinese).
|
王铭锋,郑傲,章文波. 2017. 局部山体地形对强地面运动的影响研究[J]. 地球物理学报,60(12):4655–4670. doi: 10.6038/cjg20171210
|
Wang M F,Zheng A,Zhang W B. 2017. Effect of local mountain topography on strong ground motion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,60(12):4655–4670 (in Chinese).
|
王伟. 2011. 地震动的山体地形效应[D]. 哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所:105−110.
|
Wang W. 2011. Effect of Hill Topography on Ground Motion[D]. Harbin:Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration:105−110 (in Chinese).
|
王伟,刘必灯,刘欣,杨明亮,周正华. 2015. 基于汶川MS8.0地震强震动记录的山体地形效应分析[J]. 地震学报,37(3):452–462. doi: 10.11939/j.issn:0253-3782.2015.03.008
|
Wang W,Liu B D,Liu X,Yang M L,Zhou Z H. 2015. Analysis on the hill topography effect based on the strong ground motion records of Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,37(3):452–462 (in Chinese).
|
王伟,刘必灯,刘培玄,王振宇,刘欣. 2016. 基于台阵记录的局部场地条件地震动效应分析[J]. 地震学报,38(2):307–317. doi: 10.11939/jass.2016.02.014
|
Wang W,Liu B D,Liu P X,Wang Z Y,Liu X. 2016. Analyses on the effect of the local site conditions on the strong motion based on the array records[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,38(2):307–317 (in Chinese).
|
姚凯,卢大伟,刘旭宙,周民都,闵祥仪. 2009. 利用汶川余震流动观测资料探讨地形对峰值加速度的影响[J]. 西北地震学报,31(1):46–50.
|
Yao K,Lu D W,Liu X Z,Zhou M D,Min X Y. 2009. Using observational data from the aftershocks of Wenchuan great earthquake to study the influence of geography on peak ground acceleration[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal,31(1):46–50 (in Chinese).
|
袁晓铭,廖振鹏. 1996. 任意圆弧形凸起地形对平面SH波的散射[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,16(2):1–13.
|
Yuan X M,Liao Z P. 1996. Scattering of plane SH waves by a cylindrical hill of circular-arc cross-section[J]. Earthquake Engi neering and Engineering Vibration,16(2):1–13 (in Chinese).
|
章文波,谢礼立,郭明珠. 2001. 利用强震记录分析场地的地震反应[J]. 地震学报,23(6):604–614. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2001.06.006
|
Zhang W B,Xie L L,Guo M Z. 2001. Estimation on site-amplification from different methods using strong motion data obtained in Tangshan,China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,23(6):604–614 (in Chinese).
|
章小龙,李小军,周正华,陈国兴,彭小波. 2017. 三维复杂山谷地形SV波垂直输入地震反应分析[J]. 地球物理学报,60(7):2779–2790. doi: 10.6038/cjg20170723
|
Zhang X L,Li X J,Zhou Z H,Chen G X,Peng X B. 2017. The seismic response analysis of three-dimensional canyon complex topography under incident SV seismic waves[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,60(7):2779–2790 (in Chinese).
|
周港圣,周游,周正华,魏来,魏鑫,沈欣茹,陈珍. 2022. 山脊地形效应的强震动观测研究[J]. 地震工程学报,44(5):1110–1116.
|
Zhou G S,Zhou Y,Zhou Z H,Wei L,Wei X,Shen X R,Chen Z. 2022. Topographic effect of ridge terrains based on strong motion observation data[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal,44(5):1110–1116 (in Chinese).
|
周红,高孟潭,俞言祥. 2010. SH波地形效应特征的研究[J]. 地球物理学进展,25(3):775–782. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2010.03.005
|
Zhou H,Gao M T,Yu Y X. 2010. A study of topographical effect on SH waves[J]. Progress in Geophysics,25(3):775–782 (in Chinese).
|
周正华,王玉石,王伟,王宇欢,刘泉,杨程. 2009. 汶川MS8.0地震中的山脊地形效应:自贡西山公园典型事例[C]//纪念汶川地震一周年地震工程与减轻地震灾害研讨会论文集. 成都:中国建筑学会,中国地震学会:58−64.
|
Zhou Z H,Wang Y S,Wang W,Wang Y H,Liu Q,Yang C. 2009. Ridge topography effect in Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake:Typical examples of Xishan park in Zigong[C]//Collection of Seminar on Earthquake Engineering and Earthquake Disaster Reduction to Commemorate the First Anniversary of Wenchuan Earthquake. Chengdu:Architectural Society of China,China Earthquake Society:58−64 (in Chinese).
|
Bard P Y,Tucker B E. 1985. Underground and ridge site effects:A comparison of observation and theory[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,75(4):905–922. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0750040905
|
Bonamassa O,Vidale J E. 1991. Directional site resonances observed from aftershocks of the 18 October 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,81(5):1945–1957.
|
Bouchon M. 1973. Effect of topography on surface motion[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,63(2):615–632. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0630020615
|
Bouchon M,Barker J S. 1996. Seismic response of a hill:The example of Tarzana,California[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,86(1A):66–72. doi: 10.1785/BSSA08601A0066
|
Çelebi M. 1987. Topographical and geological amplifications determined from strong-motion and aftershock records of the 3 March 1985 Chile earthquake[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,77(4):1147–1167. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0770041147
|
Çelebi M. 1991. Topographical and geological amplification:Case studies and engineering implications[J]. Struct Saf,10(1/2/3):199–217.
|
Geli L,Bard P Y,Jullien B. 1988. The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion:A review and new results[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,78(1):42–63. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0780010042
|
Kurita T,Annaka T,Takahashi S,Shimada M,Suehiro T. 2005. Effect of irregular topography on strong ground motion amplification[J]. J Japan Assoc Earthq Eng,5(3):1–11.
|
Pedersen H,Le Brun B,Hatzfeld D,Campillo M,Bard P Y. 1994. Ground-motion amplitude across ridges[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,84(6):1786–1800. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0840061786
|
Tessmer E,Kosloff D. 1994. 3-D elastic modeling with surface topography by a Chebychev spectral method[J]. Geophysics,59(3):464–473. doi: 10.1190/1.1443608
|
Vidale J E,Bonamassa O,Houston H. 1991. Directional site resonances observed from the 1 October 1987 Whittier Narrows,California,earthquake and the 4 October aftershock[J]. Earthq Spectra,7(1):107–125. doi: 10.1193/1.1585616
|
Vincenzo D G. 2017. Instantaneous polarization analysis of ambient noise recordings in site response investigations[J]. Geophys J Int,210(1):443–464.
|
Wong H L,Trifunac M D. 1974. Scattering of plane SH waves by a semi-elliptical canyon[J]. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn,3(2):157–169. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290030205
|
1. |
杨晨艺,石富强,季灵运,杨宜海,苏利娜,杨敏,郑怡. 2013年岷县漳县M_S6.6地震和2017年九寨沟M_S7.0地震震前地球物理观测异常空间分布机理分析. 地震学报. 2024(02): 307-326 .
![]() | |
2. |
李琼,付虹,胡小静,杜家云,杨黎. 云南地区氡异常与地震的统计特征分析. 地震学报. 2024(02): 340-352 .
![]() | |
3. |
杨鹏,张寿川,郭本力,杨崇敬,冯启原,吕有成,解露茜. 山东日照地区不同类型含水层地下水位多年动态变化特征及其影响因素. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2024(03): 967-979 .
![]() | |
4. |
贾东辉,余怀忠,陈界宏,晏锐,刘杰,赵彬彬,李泽平,马玉川,苑争一,杨文,李桂荣,李越帅. 利用加卸载响应比探查强震成核过程——以2020年新疆伽师6.4级地震为例. 地球物理学报. 2024(06): 2132-2147 .
![]() | |
5. |
任宏微,姚玉霞,陈其峰. 测氡仪标准仪器校准法的可行性研究. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2023(01): 100-105 .
![]() | |
6. |
李营,陈志,胡乐,苏淑娟,郑辰禾,刘兆飞,路畅,赵影,刘洁,何鸿毅,孙凤霞,徐超文,周晓成,杜建国,徐胜,郑国东. 流体地球化学进展及其在地震预测研究中的应用. 科学通报. 2022(13): 1404-1420 .
![]() | |
7. |
钟骏,冯晓博,王博,周志华,晏锐. 2022年青海门源M_S6.9地震前地下流体异常特征分析. 地震研究. 2022(02): 308-317 .
![]() | |
8. |
李宏伟,闫伟. 时间序列的趋势转折点提取算法及应用研究. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2020(12): 1242-1247 .
![]() | |
9. |
余丹,刘春国,王晓,韩雪君,黄兴辉. 集合经验模态分解(EEMD)在地下水位数据处理中的应用初探. 中国地震. 2019(02): 337-346 .
![]() |