Li J,Chen B. 2025. The secular variation prediction method of geomagnetic field in Chinese mainland based on long short-term memory neural network. Acta Seismologica Sinica47(3):390−409. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20240013
Citation: Li J,Chen B. 2025. The secular variation prediction method of geomagnetic field in Chinese mainland based on long short-term memory neural network. Acta Seismologica Sinica47(3):390−409. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20240013

The secular variation prediction method of geomagnetic field in Chinese mainland based on long short-term memory neural network

More Information
  • Received Date: January 22, 2024
  • Revised Date: July 30, 2024
  • Available Online: December 11, 2024
  • The geomagnetic field is the result of the superposition of different magnetic substances and their dynamic processes within the Earth, as well as the magnetic field generated by the current systems both inside and outside the Earth. Study on the geomagnetic field is not only crucial for revealing the Earth’s spatial electromagnetic environment, exploring the Earth’s internal structure, and understanding the geodynamo of the Earth’s core, but also plays an extremely important role in monitoring earthquake and volcanic activity, exploring mineral and energy resources, as well as positioning and navigating carrier. The magnetic field of the Earth’s core, also known as the main magnetic field, is widely believed to be generated by the geodynamo of the Earth’s core, accounting for over 95% of the total magnetic field. The wavelength of the main magnetic field is relatively long, and its spatial distribution is predominantly characterized by dipole fields. In terms of temporal variation, it exhibits long-term changes on a scale ranging from hundreds to thousands of years and polarity reversal on a scale of millions of years. The main magnetic field and its secular variation have long been important research topics in geomagnetism.

    Machine learning can extract features from large amounts of data, and can also perform learning and iterative operations to discover the data patterns and features that meet our requirements. As an important branch of machine learning, deep learning undertakes learning and mining of data features through deep neural networks. Deep learning can handle non-linear data without relying on the spectral characteristics of temporal data, and has good performance. Long short-term memory (LSTM) incorporates a gate mechanism into the traditional recurrent neural network (RNN) structure, which can effectively solve the problems of gradient explosion and vanishing during RNN training. Therefore, LSTM has more complex temporal information memory units and is widely used in temporal data analysis and modeling.

    Thus, we apply deep neural network, specifically LSTM, to the research on predicting secular variation of geomagnetic field. We select the time averaged data of the horizontal component H, magnetic declination D, and vertical component Z of the geomagnetic field from 32 geomagnetic stations in Chinese mainland and its neighboring regions. By leveraging local time conditions and geomagnetic index conditions, we select and compute the daily means of the time-averaged data. Subsequently, based on the geomagnetic quiet days released by the World Geomagnetic Data Center we conduct further data filtering. Linear fitting is then applied to the filtered data to eliminate outliers and calculate the monthly means. And we further obtain the secular variation time-series of the main magnetic field through the annual difference of the monthly means. Finally, the secular variation time-series of the main magnetic field is input into the LSTM model for training, and the predicted results of the model are compared and analyzed with those obtained by conventional methods.

    The prediction results show that for the D element the average RMSE and NRMSE from LSTM model are 1.139′ and 0.040, for the H element the average RMSE and NRMSE from LSTM model are 11.85 nT and 0.086, for the Z element the average RMSE and NRMSE from LSTM model are 15.10 nT and 0.026, suggesting the LSTM model has the highest prediction accuracy for Z element, followed by D element, while the accuracy is the lowest for H element. There are two main reasons accounting for the poor accuracy of the model in predicting H elements. Firstly, during the geomagnetic quiet period, the distribution of Sq current system and equatorial current directly affects the recording of H elements at ground stations, especially in low latitude areas where H elements undergo significant changes. Secondly, the training set contains limited sample data and lacks comprehensive secular variation information. As a consequence, the model can fit well on the training set but exhibits poor prediction accuracy on the testing set. Expanding the sample size of the training set as much as possible can improve this situation.

    We calculate the annual rate error for various elements of the station derived from LSTM model, linear extrapolation, and quadratic extrapolation. For the D element, the average RMSE of the LSTM prediction results is 0.361′ /a, which is 54% higher than that of linear extrapolation and 59% higher than that of quadratic extrapolation. For the H element, the average RMSE of the LSTM prediction results is 3.921 nT/a, which is 58% higher than that of linear extrapolation and 76% higher than that of quadratic extrapolation. For the Z element, the average RMSE of the LSTM prediction results is 4.339 nT/a, which is 47% higher than the value obtained from linear extrapolation and 57% higher than that from quadratic extrapolation.

  • 常宜峰. 2015. 卫星磁测数据处理与地磁场模型反演理论与方法研究[D]. 郑州:中国人民解放军信息工程大学:106−110.
    Chang Y F. 2015. Research on Satellite Geomagnetic Data Process and Geomagnetic Model Recovery Theory and Method[D]. Zhengzhou:PLA Information Engineering University:106−110 (in Chinese).
    陈斌,顾左文,高金田,袁洁浩,狄传芝. 2010. 中国地区地磁长期变化研究[J]. 地球物理学报,53(9):2144–2154.
    Chen B,Gu Z W,Gao J T,Yuan J H,Di C Z. 2010. Study of geomagnetic secular variation in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,53(9):2144–2154 (in Chinese).
    杜奕. 2023. 基于多源遥感数据的大气PM2.5产品缺失数据重构方法研究[D]. 上海:上海师范大学:12−23.
    Du Y. 2023. Research on the Reconstruction Method of Missing Data for Atmospheric PM2.5 Products Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data[D]. Shanghai:Shanghai Normal University:12−23 (in Chinese).
    葛轶洲,许翔,杨锁荣,周青,申富饶. 2021. 序列数据的数据增强方法综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索,15(7):1207–1219. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2012062
    Ge Y Z,Xu X,Yang S R,Zhou Q,Shen F R. 2021. Survey on sequence data augmentation[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology,15(7):1207–1219 (in Chinese).
    顾左文,陈斌,高金田,辛长江,袁洁浩,狄传芝. 2009. 应用NOC方法研究中国地区地磁时空变化[J]. 地球物理学报,52(10):2602–2612. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.10.020
    Gu Z W,Chen B,Gao J T,Xin C J,Yuan J H,Di C Z. 2009. Research of geomagnetic spatial-temporal variations in China by the NOC method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,52(10):2602–2612 (in Chinese).
    康国发,高国明,白春华,狄传芝. 2009. CHAMP卫星主磁场长期变化和长期加速度的分布特征[J]. 地球物理学报,52(8):1976–1984. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.08.004
    Kang G F,Gao G M,Bai C H,Di C Z. 2009. Characteristics of the secular variation and secular acceleration distributions of the main geomagnetic field for the CHAMP satellite[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,52(8):1976–1984 (in Chinese).
    卢兆兴,吕志峰,李婷,张金生,姚垚. 2021. 基于BP神经网络的地磁变化场预测研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,41(3):229–233.
    Lu Z X,Lü Z F,Li T,Zhang J S,Yao Y. 2021. Forecasting of the variable geomagnetic field based on BP neural network[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,41(3):229–233 (in Chinese).
    毛宁,陈石,杨永友,吴旭,李永波. 2023. 地磁长期变化信号提取和模型预测精度评估[J]. 地球物理学报,66(8):3302–3315. doi: 10.6038/cjg2022Q0499
    Mao N,Chen S,Yang Y Y,Wu X,Li Y B. 2023. Extraction of secular variation signals of geomagnetic field and evaluation of prediction accuracy of geomagnetic field models[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,66(8):3302–3315 (in Chinese).
    邱耀东. 2017. 联合CHAMP和Swarm卫星磁测数据反演中国大陆区域岩石圈磁场[D]. 武汉:武汉大学:1−2.
    Qiu Y D. 2017. Invert the Lithospheric Magnetic Field in China Mainland by Combining CHAMP and Swarm Satellite Data[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University:1−2 (in Chinese).
    汪凯翔,黄清华,吴思弘. 2020. 长短时记忆神经网络在地电场数据处理中的应用[J]. 地球物理学报,63(8):3015–3024. doi: 10.6038/cjg2020O0119
    Wang K X,Huang Q H,Wu S H. 2020. Application of long short-term memory neural network in geoelectric field data processing[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,63(8):3015–3024 (in Chinese).
    王月华. 2002. 1985—1997年中国地磁场长期变化的正交模型[J]. 地球物理学报,45(5):624–630. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2002.05.004
    Wang Y H. 2002. Regional orthogonal model of secular variation of the geomagnetic field in China during 1985−1997[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,45(5):624–630 (in Chinese).
    王振东,王粲,袁洁浩,毛丰龙. 2019. 中国及邻近地区地磁长期变化分析[J]. 地震研究,42(1):102–111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2019.01.014
    Wang Z D,Wang C,Yuan J H,Mao F L. 2019. Analysis of geomagnetic secular variation in China and its neighboring regions[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,42(1):102–111 (in Chinese).
    熊波,李肖霖,王宇晴,张瀚铭,刘子君,丁锋,赵必强. 2022. 基于长短时记忆神经网络的中国地区电离层TEC预测[J]. 地球物理学报,65(7):2365–2377. doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0557
    Xiong B,Li X L,Wang Y Q,Zhang H M,Liu Z J,Ding F,Zhao B Q. 2022. Prediction of ionospheric TEC over China based on long and short-term memory neural network[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,65(7):2365–2377 (in Chinese).
    徐文耀. 2009. 地球电磁现象物理学[M]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社:19−29.
    Xu W Y. 2009. Physics of Electromagnetic Phenomena of the Earth[M]. Hefei:Science and Technology of China Press:19−29 (in Chinese).
    张素琴,陈传华,王建军,赵旭东,何宇飞,李琪,杨冬梅,胡秀娟. 2021. 1985—1990年地磁基准台时均值数据集[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,42(4):173–182.
    Zhang S Q,Chen C H,Wang J J,Zhao X D,He Y F,Li Q,Yang D M,Hu X J. 2021. Hourly mean values datasets of geomagnetic stations from 1985 to 1990[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,42(4):173–182 (in Chinese).
    赵旭东,何宇飞,李琪,刘晓灿. 2022. 基于中国地磁台网数据的太阳静日期间地磁场Z分量日变化幅度分析[J]. 地球物理学报,65(10):3728–3742. doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0628
    Zhao X D,He Y F,Li Q,Liu X C. 2022. Analysis of the geomagnetic component Z daily variation amplitude based on the Geomagnetic Network of China during solar quiet days[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,65(10):3728−3742 (in Chinese).
    Alken P,Thébault E,Beggan C D,Amit H,Aubert J,Baerenzung J,Bondar T N,Brown W J,Califf S,Chambodut A,Chulliat A,Cox G A,Finlay C C,Fournier A,Gillet N,Grayver A,Hammer M D,Holschneider M,Huder L,Hulot G,Jager T,Kloss C,Korte M,Kuang W,Kuvshinov A,Langlais B,Léger J M,Lesur V,Livermore P W,Lowes F J,Macmillan S,Magnes W,Mandea M,Marsal S,Matzka J,Metman M C,Minami T,Morschhauser A,Mound J E,Nair M,Nakano S,Olsen N,Pavón-Carrasco F J,Petrov V G,Ropp G,Rother M,Sabaka T J,Sanchez S,Saturnino D,Schnepf N R,Shen X,Stolle C,Tangborn A,TØffner-Clausen L,Toh H,Torta J M,Varner J,Vervelidou F,Vigneron P,Wardinski I,Wicht J,Woods A,Yang Y,Zeren Z,Zhou B. 2021. International Geomagnetic Reference Field:The thirteenth generation[J]. Earth Planets Space,73(1):1–25. doi: 10.1186/s40623-020-01323-x
    Arkani-Hamed J,Langel R A,Purucker M. 1994. Secular magnetic anomaly maps of Earth derived from POGO and Magsat data[J]. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,99(B12):24075–24090.
    Brown W J,Mound J E,Livermore P W. 2013. Jerks abound:An analysis of geomagnetic observatory data from 1957 to 2008[J]. Physics Earth Planet Inter,223:62–76. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2013.06.001
    Finlay C C,Maus S,Beggan C D,Bondar T N,Chambodut A,Chernova T A,Chulliat A,Golovkov V P,Hamilton B,Hamoudi M,Holme R,Hulot G,Kuang W,Langlais B,Lesur V,Lowes F J,Lühr H,Macmillan S,Mandea M,McLean S,Manoj C,Menvielle M,Michaelis I,Olsen N,Rauberg J,Rother M,Sabaka T J,Tangborn A,TØffner-Clausen L,Thébault E,Thomson A W P,Wardinski I,Wei Z,Zvereva T I. 2010. International Geomagnetic Reference Field:The eleventh generation[J]. Geophys J Int,183(3):1216–1230. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04804.x
    Golovkov V P,Papitashvili N E,Tiupkin I S,Kharin E P. 1978. Separation of geomagnetic field variations on the quiet and disturbed components by the MNOC[J]. Geomagn Aeron,18(18):511–515.
    Hochreiter S,Schmidhuber J. 1997. Long short-term memory[J]. Neural Comput,9(8):1735–1780.
    Kother L,Hammer M D,Finlay C C,Olsen N. 2015. An equivalent source method for modelling the global lithospheric magnetic field[J]. Geophysi J Int,203(1):553–566.
    Maus S,Yin F,Lühr H,Manoj C,Rother M,Rauberg J,Michaelis I,Stolle C,Müller R D. 2008. Resolution of direction of oceanic magnetic lineations by the sixth-generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite magnetic measurements[J]. Geochem Geophys Geosyst,9(7):Q07021.
    Nevanlinna H. 1987. On the drifting parts in the spatial power spectrum of geomagnetic secular variation[J]. J Geomagn Geoelectr,39(6):367–376.
    Olsen N,Lühr H,Finlay C C,Sabaka T J,Michaelis I,Rauberg J,TØffner-Clausen Lr. 2014. The CHAOS-4 geomagnetic field model[J]. Geophys J Int,197(2):815–827.
    Pushkov A N,Frynberg E B,Chernova T A,Fiskina M V. 1976. Analysis of the space-time structure of the main geomagnetic field by expansion into natural orthogonal component[J]. Geomagn Aeron,16:337–343.
    Singh D,Singh B. 2020. Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance[J]. Appl Soft Comput,105524.
    Wen Q,Sun L,Yang F,Song X M,Gao J K,Wang X,Xu H. 2021. Time series data augmentation for Deep Learning:A survey[C]//Proceedings of the 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California:International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence:4653−4654.
    Xu J Y,Lin Y F. 2023. Dynamic mode decomposition of the geomagnetic field over the last two decades[J]. Earth Planet. Phys,7(1):32–38
    Zhang G P,Qi M. 2005. Neural network forecasting for seasonal and trend time series[J]. Eur J Oper Res,160(2):501–514.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Article views (214) PDF downloads (38) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return