Citation: | Zhang K Z,Wan Y G. 2024. Inversion of rupture process of the Japan MW7.6 earthquake on January 1,2024. Acta Seismologica Sinica,46(0):1−18. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20240055 |
To obtain a detailed understanding of the rupture process of the MW7.6 earthquake that occurred in Japan on January 1, 2024, this study integrates seismic data from multiple agencies and researchers. By analyzing the focal mechanism solutions provided by these institutions, we derived two nodal planes of the centroid moment tensor (CMT) solution for this event. Through an in-depth analysis of the depth distribution of aftershocks within 24 hours following the mainshock, we concluded that the southeast-dipping nodal plane in the CMT solution is more appropriate to be identified as the causative fault plane for this earthquake. This determination is based on the spatial alignment of aftershock depths and their correlation with the inferred fault geometry.
To further refine the rupture characteristics, we employed broadband P-wave waveform data from 35 seismic stations within the Global Seismographic Network (GSN), located at distances between 30° and 90° from the epicenter. Using the waveform inversion method for earthquake rupture processes, we iteratively tested and optimized the parameters to reconstruct the rupture behavior of this earthquake. This methodology allowed us to achieve a reliable solution that delineates the spatiotemporal evolution of the rupture.
The results of the inversion reveal several key characteristics of the earthquake’s rupture process:
1) Rupture duration and sub-events: The total rupture duration of this earthquake was approximately 40 seconds. The source time function shows three distinct sub-events, each corresponding to different stages of the rupture. The largest sub-event occurred around 30 seconds after the initial rupture, releasing a significant portion of the earthquake’s total seismic moment. This pattern suggests a complex rupture process involving multiple fault segments or asperities.
2) Rupture zone and slip distribution: The primary area of concentrated slip is located southwest of the epicenter. This region experienced the most significant fault slip during the rupture process. The maximum slip on the fault plane reached 4.28 meters, while the maximum slip velocity was measured at 1.01 meters per second. The spatial distribution of slip indicates that the rupture propagated predominantly in a unilateral direction, with a notable concentration of energy release in the southwest quadrant of the fault plane.
3) Seismic moment and faulting mechanism: The moment magnitude of this earthquake was determined to be approximately MW7.54, consistent with previous estimates from global seismic networks. The rupture mechanism is characterized as a thrust faulting event, typical of subduction zone earthquakes. The fault geometry and slip distribution suggest that this earthquake was associated with a reverse fault, dipping to the southeast, in alignment with regional tectonic stress orientations.
This earthquake is noteworthy for its complex rupture dynamics and its ability to generate large-scale fault slip over a relatively short time span. The rupture process involved multiple stages, with significant energy release concentrated in a few key sub-events. The identification of the southeast-dipping fault plane as the causative structure for this earthquake provides valuable insight into the tectonic behavior of the region. Additionally, the analysis of aftershock depth distributions supports the conclusion that this plane is the primary fault responsible for the mainshock.
The implications of this study extend to the broader understanding of seismic hazard in Japan, particularly in regions prone to thrust faulting events. The detailed characterization of the rupture process and fault slip behavior contributes to the growing body of knowledge on earthquake mechanics in subduction zones. Furthermore, the findings underscore the importance of integrating diverse data sources, such as focal mechanism solutions, aftershock distributions, and seismic waveform inversions, to achieve a comprehensive understanding of earthquake rupture processes.
The results of this study may also have broader applications in seismic hazard assessments and earthquake forecasting efforts, as the detailed reconstruction of rupture processes can help inform models of future seismic activity in the region. By identifying key areas of concentrated slip and energy release, future studies can focus on the potential for aftershock activity or further seismic events along the same fault structure.
In summary, the 2024 MW7.6 earthquake in Japan exhibits a complex rupture process with multiple sub-events and a concentrated area of slip southwest of the epicenter. The southeast-dipping fault plane is identified as the most likely causative fault, based on aftershock distribution and focal mechanism analysis. This earthquake represents a significant seismic event in the region, and the detailed study of its rupture process provides important insights into the nature of earthquake mechanics in subduction zones.
陈光齐,武艳强,夏明垚,李志远. 2024. 2024年1月1日日本能登半岛7.6级地震:震源特征、 灾害概况与应急响应[J]. 地震,44(1):141–152.
|
Chen G Q,Wu Y Q,Xia M Y,Li Z Y . 2024. The Japan Noto Peninsula M7.6 earthquake on January 1,2024:Focal characteristics,disaster situation and emergency response[J]. Earthquake. 44(1):141-152 (in Chinese) . 邓文泽,孙丽. 2021. 2021年美国阿拉斯加半岛 MW8.2地震震源特征分析[J]. 中国地震,37(3):737-744.
|
Deng W Z,Su L. 2021. The source characteristics of the 2021 Alaska MW8.2 earthquake[J]. Earthquake Research in China. 37(3):737-744 (in Chinese) .
|
万永革. 2019. 同一地震多个震源机制中心解的确定[J]. 地球物理学报,62(12):4718–4728. doi: 10.6038/cjg2019M0553
|
Wan Y G. 2019. Determination of center of several focal mechanisms of the same earthquake [J]. Chinese J. Geophysics. 62(12):4718−4728 (in Chinese) .
|
万永革. 2022. 断裂带震源机制节面聚类确定断裂带产状方法及在2021年漾濞地震序列中的应用[J]. 地球物理学报,65(02):637–648. doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0531
|
Wan Y G. 2022. Method of active fault geometry determination by clustering nodal planes of focal mechanisms occurred on the fault belt and its application to the 2021 Yangbi earthquake sequence[J]. Chinese J. Geophysics. 65(2):637−648 (in Chinese).
|
万永革,黄少华,王福昌,许英才,余海琳. 2023. 2022年门源地震序列揭示的断层几何形状及滑动特性[J]. 地球物理学报,66(7):2796–2810. doi: 10.6038/cjg2022Q0345
|
Wan Y G,Huang S H,Wang F C,Xu Y C,Yu H L. 2023. Fault geometry and slip characteristics revealed by the 2022 Menyuan earthquake sequence[J]. Chinese J. Geophysics. 66(7):2796−2810 (in Chinese).
|
万永革,沈正康,王敏,张祖胜,甘卫军,王庆良,盛书中. 2008. 根据GPS和InSAR数据反演2001年昆仑山口西地震同震破裂分布[J]. 地球物理学报,51(4):1074–1084. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2008.04.016
|
Wan Y G,Shen Z K,Wang M,Zhang Z S,Gan W J,Wang Q L,Sheng S Z. 2008. Coseismic slip distribution of the 2001 Kunlun mountain pass west earthquake constrained using GPS and InSAR data[J]. Chinese J. Geophysics. 51(4):1074−1084 (in Chinese).
|
万永革,盛书中,李祥,崔华伟,高熹微. 2015. 2015年尼泊尔强震序列对中国大陆的应力影响[J]. 地球物理学报,58(11):4277–4286
|
Wan Y G,Sheng S Z,Li X,Cui H W,Gao X W. 2015. Stress influence of the 2015 Nepal earthquake sequence on Chinese mainland[J]. Chinese J. Geophysics. 58(11):4277-4286 (in Chinese).
|
王谦身,郝天珧,江为为. 1999. 日本海重力场与深部构造研究[J]. 地球物理学进展,14(3):9–16.
|
Wang Q S,Hao T Y,Jiang W W. 1999. Gravity field and deep structure in japan sea[J]. Progress in Geophysics,14(3):9–16 (in Chinese).
|
张旭. 2016. 基于视震源时间函数的震源过程复杂性分析新方法研究[D]. 北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所:40−45.
|
Zhang X. 2016. Study on new methods for analysis of the complexity of source rupture process based on apparent source time functions[D]. Beijing:Institute of Geophysics,China Earthquake Administration:40−45 (in Chinese).
|
张勇. 2008. 震源破裂过程反演方法研究[D]. 北京:北京大学:1−158.
|
Zhang Y. 2008. Study on the inversion methods of source rupture process[D]. Bijing:Peking University:1−158 (in Chinese).
|
张勇,许力生,陈运泰. 2015. 2015年尼泊尔7.9地震破裂过程:快速反演与初步联合反演[J]. 地球物理学报,58(05):1804–1811.
|
Zhang Y,Xu L S,Chen Y T. 2015. Rupture process of the 2015 Nepal 7.9 earthquake:Fast inversion and preliminary joint inversion[J]. Chinese J. Geophysics,58(05):1804-1811 (in Chinese).
|
张勇,徐晨雨. 2024 . 2024/01/01日本能登半岛地震初步破裂模型[EB/OL]. https://pku-geophysics-source.group/htmls/20240101071010Japan.html.2024-01-01.
|
Zhang Y,Xu C Y. 2024. 2024/01/01 Preliminary rupture models of the 1st Jan. 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake in Japan[EB/OL]. https://pku-geophysics-source.group/htmls/20240101071010Japan.html.2024-01-01.
|
周云好. 2002. 用远场体波反演震源破裂过程研究[D]. 北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所.
|
Zhou Y H. 2002. Study on source process inversion with far field body waves[D]. Beijing:Institute of Geophysics,China Earthquake Administration:48−49 (in Chinese).
|
张喆,房立华,许力生. 2023. 2022年四川泸定 Ms6.8地震震源基本特征[J]. 地球物理学报,66(4):1397–1408. doi: 10.6038/cjg2022Q0757
|
Zhang Z,Fang L H,Xu L S. 2023. Primary source characteristics of the 2022 Sichuan Luding Ms6.8 Earthquake[J]. Chinese J. Geophysics. 66(4):1397-1408 (in Chinese).
|
Aki,K. ,Richard,P. 1979. Quantitative Seismology Theory[M]. W. H. Freeman,San Francisco.
|
Chen,Y. T. ,Xu,L. S. (2000). A time‐domain inversion technique for the tempo‐spatial distribution of slip on a finite fault plane with applications to recent large earthquakes in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Geophysical Journal International,143(2):407-416.
|
Hurukawa,N. ,Harada,T. 2013. Fault plane of the 1964 Niigata earthquake,Japan,derived from relocation of the mainshock and aftershocks by using the modified joint hypocenter determination and grid search methods[J]. Earth,Planets and Space,65(12):1441-1447.
|
Kennett,B. L. N.,Engdahl,E. R.,Buland,R. 1995. Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from travel times[J]. Geophysical Journal International,122(1):108–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb03540.x
|
Kim,A. ,Dreger,D. S. 2008. Rupture process of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake from near‐fault seismic waveform and geodetic records[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research ,113(B7).
|
Mulia,I. E. ,Ishibe,T. ,Satake,K. ,Gusman,A. R. ,Murotani,S. 2020. Regional probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment associated with active faults along the eastern margin of the Sea of Japan[J]. Earth,Planets and Space,72(1):123.
|
Nishimura,T.,Hiramatsu,Y.,Ohta,Y. 2023. Episodic transient deformation revealed by the analysis of multiple GNSS networks in the Noto Peninsula,central Japan[J]. Scientific Reports,13(1):8381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35459-z
|
Nakajima,J. 2022. Crustal structure beneath earthquake swarm in the Noto peninsula,Japan. [J]. Earth,Planets and Space,74(160):1-11.
|
Tamaki,K.,Honza,E. 1985. Incipient subduction and deduction along the eastern margin of the Japan Sea[J]. Tectonophysics,119(1):381–406.
|
Wan Y G,Shen Z K,Bürgmann R,Sun J,Wang M. 2017. Fault geometry and slip distribution of the 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan,China earthquake,inferred from GPS and InSAR measurements[J]. Geophys J. Int.,208(2):748–766. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggw421
|
Wang,R. 1999. A simple orthonormalization method for stable and efficient computation of Green's functions[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,89(3):733–741. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0890030733
|
Ward,S. N.,and Barrientos,S. E. 1986. An inversion for slip distribution and fault shape from geodetic observations of the 1983,Borah Peak,Idaho,earthquake[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,91(B5):4909–4919. doi: 10.1029/JB091iB05p04909
|
Xu,L. S.,Chen,Y. T.,Teng,T. L.,Patau,G. 2002. Temporal-Spatial Rupture Process of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake from IRIS and GEOSCOPE Long-Period Waveform Data Using Aftershocks as Empirical Green's Functions[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,92(8):3210–3228. doi: 10.1785/0120010173
|
Yagi,Y.,Mikumo,T.,Pacheco,J.,Reyes,G. 2004. Source rupture process of the Tecomán,Colima,Mexico earthquake of 22 January 2003,determined by joint inversion of teleseismic body-wave and near-source data[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,94(5):1795–1807. doi: 10.1785/012003095
|
Yoshida,K.,Uno,M.,Matsuzawa,T.,Yukutake,Y.,Mukuhira,Y.,Sato,H. P.,Yoshida,T. 2023. Upward earthquake swarm migration in the Northeastern Noto Peninsula,Japan,initiated from a deep ring‐shaped cluster:possibility of fluid leakage from a hidden magma system[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,128(6):2169–9313.
|
Zhang,Y.,Feng,W.,Chen,Y.,Xu,L.,Li,Z.,Forrest,D. 2012. The 2009 L'Aquila 6.3 earthquake:a new technique to locate the hypocentre in the joint inversion of earthquake rupture process[J]. Geophysical Journal International,191(3):1417–1426.
|
1. |
顾春生,许书刚,杨鹏,唐鑫,张其琪,李浩民. 基于LASSO-BP神经网络模型的滆湖组黏性土抗剪强度预测. 世界地质. 2023(03): 577-587 .
![]() | |
2. |
陈帅,苗则朗,吴立新. 顾及坡体赋存环境的概率地震滑坡危险性制图. 测绘学报. 2023(09): 1548-1561 .
![]() | |
3. |
陈帅,苗则朗,吴立新. 基于修正岩土体强度参数的简化纽马克位移法地震滑坡危险性快速评估技术. 地震学报. 2022(03): 512-527 .
![]() |