Zhao Yulin, Qian Fuye, Xu Tongchuncom sh advance. 1990: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESISTIVITY VARIATION AND STRAIN IN A LOAD-BEARING ROCK-SOIL LAYER. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 12(1): 87-93.
Citation: Zhao Yulin, Qian Fuye, Xu Tongchuncom sh advance. 1990: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESISTIVITY VARIATION AND STRAIN IN A LOAD-BEARING ROCK-SOIL LAYER. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 12(1): 87-93.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESISTIVITY VARIATION AND STRAIN IN A LOAD-BEARING ROCK-SOIL LAYER

More Information
  • Published Date: September 01, 2011
  • It is obtained from a comparison of the data from base line measurement and resistivity strain gauge that first,the ratio of resistivity to strain,i.e.,the (hagni-fication) factor K=(△/) △ for small strain in some naturally unsaturated rock-soil layer is relatively high with a maximum of 103,and second,the smaller the strain is,the higher the magnification factor k will be. The relationship between resistivity p and strain has been found from an analysis of the second fact as -(E+F0.4),where is the porosity,E,F are constants. This shows that the structural coefficient ?is no longer a constant as thought previously. It is in fact a function of strain,i.e.n= E+F. Therefore,the high magnification factor is thought as a generally accepted law concerning the unsaturated rock-soil layer under small strain rather than a particular feature of rocks. It is pointed out that an observation location with a magnification factor of no less than 10 could be chosen for resistivity measurements so that an anomaly of 5% will hopefully be observed near the epicentre before an earthquake.
  • [1] 赵玉林、钱复业、杨休成、刘建毅,1983.原地电阻率变化的实验.地震学报,5,217——225,

    [2] 藤森义彦,岩石の歪と电气伍导度变化.《Conductivity anomaly》研究会1982年论文集,199——207,

    [3] Motro w, C, and Brace, W.F., 1981. Electrical resistivity changes in tuff tue to stress, J. Geophys. Res., 86,2929——2934.

    [4] Brace, W.F., 1975. Ditatancy——related electrical resistivity C hanges in rocks. Pageoph, 113 Nos 1/2,207——217.

    [5] E. M.克维雅特柯夫斯基,1959.电法勘探,上册,地质出版社.

    [6] Rikitake. T., 1976. Earthquake brediction, Flsevier Amsterdam

    [1] 赵玉林、钱复业、杨休成、刘建毅,1983.原地电阻率变化的实验.地震学报,5,217——225,

    [2] 藤森义彦,岩石の歪と电气伍导度变化.《Conductivity anomaly》研究会1982年论文集,199——207,

    [3] Motro w, C, and Brace, W.F., 1981. Electrical resistivity changes in tuff tue to stress, J. Geophys. Res., 86,2929——2934.

    [4] Brace, W.F., 1975. Ditatancy——related electrical resistivity C hanges in rocks. Pageoph, 113 Nos 1/2,207——217.

    [5] E. M.克维雅特柯夫斯基,1959.电法勘探,上册,地质出版社.

    [6] Rikitake. T., 1976. Earthquake brediction, Flsevier Amsterdam
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 杨磊,陈双贵,闫万生,张瑜,雷光,杨龙. 南北地震带北段及周边地区岩石圈磁场时空变化特征对地震活动的指示意义. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2024(03): 304-309 .
    2. 宋成科,张鹏涛,陈斌. 基于地磁场重复观测资料分析玛多M_W7.3地震前地磁场变化. 防灾科技学院学报. 2024(01): 38-46 .
    3. 陈政宇,倪喆,周思远,金云华,杨薪俊. 岩石圈磁场与地质构造和地震活动性之间的关系——以漾濞地震为例. 地震地质. 2024(02): 449-461 .
    4. 王朝景,李博,苏树朋. 基于多期累积岩石圈磁场变化分析唐山M_S5.1地震震磁异常. 地震研究. 2024(04): 517-527 .
    5. 李晨阳,池成全. 机器学习在地震观测异常数据提取中的应用. 海南师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(03): 348-356 .
    6. 张瑜,陈双贵,闫万生,雷光,杨磊,杨龙,马辉源,肖世堂,董兴洲,岳敏. 甘肃青海部分地区流动地磁场时空分布特征. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2023(01): 65-70 .
    7. 张瑜,陈双贵,马辉源,杨磊,雷光,肖世堂,闫万生,杨龙. 2019—2021年门源M_S6.9地震岩石圈磁场异常回溯分析. 华南地震. 2023(01): 46-54 .
    8. 张瑜,陈双贵,马辉源,闫万生,杨磊,雷光,杨龙,杜建清. 2021年5月22日玛多M_S 7.4地震周边地区岩石圈磁场变化及地震前后异常特征分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2023(03): 64-72 .
    9. 张海洋,苏树朋,赵慧琴. 2022年青海门源6.9级地震前岩石圈磁场异常变化分析. 地震工程学报. 2022(03): 735-743 .
    10. 蔡苏苏,陈斌. 中国大陆岩石圈震磁异常年变统计分析. 地震研究. 2022(04): 592-598 .
    11. 马永,张海江,高磊,陈志刚. 2021年玛多Ms7.4地震三维地壳速度结构与活动特征(英文). Applied Geophysics. 2022(04): 590-602+605 .
    12. 文丽敏,康国发,白春华,高国明. 南北地震带南段地壳磁异常与强震活动关系研究(英文). Applied Geophysics. 2021(03): 408-419+434 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (1555) PDF downloads (113) Cited by(13)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return